SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 form a desktop pairing that lands at the 86th percentile for combined performance. The CPU, a 14-core Arrow Lake part, and the GPU, an end-of-life Ada Lovelace flagship, both sit at the 86th percentile against their respective peers, creating a system that is exceptional in single-threaded responsiveness and formidable in multi-threaded and rasterization workloads. This analysis breaks down the synthetic benchmark data to project real-world usage, balance, and upgrade potential for this specific combination, noting that no measured frame rate data exists for this exact pairing.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data strongly supports this configuration. The RTX 4080's PassMark G3D score of 34457 places it in the top 14% of all GPUs, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3703 and PassMark single-thread score of 4339 indicate the 235T can feed frames quickly. The combination is well-suited for 1440p and 4K gaming where the GPU becomes the primary driver, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates must be estimated from these strong benchmark positions.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU's 14 cores and the GPU's dedicated hardware. The 235T's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26232 places it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500 and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, showing competitive multi-threaded encoding capability. The RTX 4080's 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores provide dedicated acceleration for AI-enhanced encoding and real-time effects, though specific streaming software benchmarks are not in the data.

Video editing workloads leverage both components heavily. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth handles large frame buffers and effects timelines, while the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 84244 and floating-point math score of 106546 support codec processing and timeline scrubbing. This pairing is capable for 4K editing, with the data indicating no clear bottleneck in either component for typical preview and export tasks.

3D rendering shows a distinct split in workload handling. GPU-accelerated renderers will be dominated by the RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, placing it within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 SUPER in average benchmark score. CPU-based rendering relies on the 235T's 26232 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which trails the Xeon w3-2525 by 0.4% but remains competitive for a mid-range desktop chip.

Software development benefits from the CPU's rapid single-thread performance and the platform's memory bandwidth. The 235T's PassMark data compression score of 295100 and random string sorting score of 35377 indicate fast compilation and code analysis tasks. The 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth supports large project loads, while the GPU is largely idle during typical development workloads, making this pairing more powerful than necessary for most coding tasks.

Student and office work sees this system massively over-provisioned. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4339 and the GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1239 handle productivity suites and web browsing with substantial headroom. The data suggests this configuration excels at demanding academic workloads like simulation and data analysis, but for basic office tasks, the RTX 4080's capabilities are far beyond what typical documents and spreadsheets require.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38561 sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, placing it in a tight cluster of competitors. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14500, scores 38531, a mere 0.1% difference, indicating the 235T offers nearly identical overall CPU performance to that previous-generation part. The Intel Xeon w3-2525 trails by 0.4%, while the Intel Core 9 270H and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H lag by 0.6% and 0.7% respectively. This clustering suggests the 235T is a well-tuned mid-range desktop chip that trades blows with higher-tier mobile and workstation parts.

Single-threaded performance is a clear strength. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3703 and PassMark single-thread score of 4339 both feed into the overall 86th percentile ranking. Multi-threaded results are similarly strong: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26232 and PassMark multithread score of 30918 confirm that all 14 cores scale effectively without hyperthreading, as the CPU has 14 threads total.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 54247 also lands at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER with a score of 54209, just 0.1% lower, meaning the non-SUPER 4080 is effectively tied with its successor in these aggregate benchmarks. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, placing it 1.1% ahead, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and Radeon 8060S lead by 2.6% and 2.7% respectively, showing the 4080's age but continued relevance.

The combined picture shows a system where both components are evenly matched in percentile terms. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile create a balanced platform, though the specific benchmark scores reveal the GPU dominates raw compute-intensive tasks while the CPU leads in latency-sensitive single-threaded work. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 for the GPU and the CPU's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 373 both confirm this is a high-end desktop configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the RTX 4080 is the primary performance ceiling for gaming workloads. With a PassMark G3D score of 34457 and a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s, the GPU will be the limiting factor at 1080p and 1440p resolutions where the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4339 can generate frames faster than the GPU can render them. At 4K, the GPU's 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM become the constraint, with the CPU having ample headroom.

For productivity and compute tasks, the CPU becomes the more limiting component. The 235T's 26232 Cinebench R23 multicore score, while respectable, trails the Xeon w3-2525 by 0.4% and the Core Ultra 9 285H by 0.7%, indicating that heavily threaded workloads will see the CPU lag behind the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 20671 shows it can offload many parallel tasks, but CPU-bound single-threaded workloads will not benefit from the GPU's power.

FPS scaling estimates suggest that the balance shifts with resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical, and the 235T's 3703 Cinebench R23 single-core score supports high frame rates. As resolution increases, the GPU's rendering load grows, and the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus become the determining factors. The lack of measured FPS data means these are projections from benchmark scores, but the percentile alignment of 86 for both components suggests minimal bottlenecking in most scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T compare to the Intel Core i5-14500?

A: The 235T has an average benchmark score of 38561, which is 0.1% higher than the Core i5-14500's score of 38531. This places the two CPUs in a statistical tie, with the 235T offering 14 cores and 14 threads on the Arrow Lake architecture.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 still competitive against newer GPUs?

A: The RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54247 is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER's score of 54209, indicating the original 4080 remains competitive. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.6% and the AMD Radeon 8060S by 2.7% in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The 235T supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is sufficient for the CPU's 14 cores and supports the PassMark multithread score of 30918, though ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI workloads?

A: Yes, the RTX 4080 has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The 76 RT cores handle ray tracing acceleration, while the 304 tensor cores support AI features, contributing to the Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 and Vulkan score of 263779.

Q: What is the power requirement for this pairing?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, which should accommodate the entire system with the CPU's lower power draw.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and architecture?

A: The 235T is built on TSMC's 3 nm process with the Arrow Lake-S architecture, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This is the Core Ultra Series 2 generation.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T paired with the RTX 4080. All frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimated from the benchmark scores and percentiles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process. The die contains 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² area, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3.

The lack of hyperthreading, evidenced by 14 threads matching 14 cores, is a notable design choice. The benchmark scores indicate this does not cripple multi-threaded performance: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26232 and PassMark multithread score of 30918 both land at the 86th percentile. The PassMark physics score of 2157 and find prime numbers score of 318 suggest strong integer and floating-point throughput for a desktop chip.

Single-threaded performance is the CPU's standout feature. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3703 and PassMark single-thread score of 4339 drive responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 23457 and extended instructions score of 23212 indicate robust security and SIMD capabilities. The launch MSRP is $247, and the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, though it lacks ECC memory support.

The architecture's efficiency is reflected in the 65 W TDP, which is modest for 14 cores. This allows the 235T to compete with higher-power parts like the Xeon w3-2525, which trails by 0.4% in average score. For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU excels at mixed-use scenarios where single-threaded latency and multi-threaded throughput are both required, such as development environments and content creation pipelines.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is an end-of-life GPU from the GeForce 40-series, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with TSMC's 5 nm process. The AD103 chip contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 2205 MHz and boost clock of 2505 MHz, with memory running at 1400 MHz or 22.4 Gbps effective.

The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures and large compute workloads. The 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs drive a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS is matched by FP16 at 48.74 TFLOPS, indicating 1:1 compute throughput for both precision levels.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are handled by 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores respectively. The GPU's benchmark scores show strong DirectX 12 performance with a PassMark DirectX 12 score of 132, though older API scores are higher: DirectX 11 at 314 and DirectX 9 at 370. The PassMark G3D score of 34457 places the GPU at the 86th percentile, and the PassMark GPU compute score of 20671 confirms substantial parallel compute capability.

The 320 W TDP and triple-slot design require a 700 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin power connector. The 310 mm length and 140 mm height demand a spacious case. For rendering workloads, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for 4K texture work and GPU-accelerated renderers, while the 76 RT cores enable real-time ray tracing effects in supported titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The data should be interpreted as projections rather than verified results.

The RTX 4080's PassMark G3D score of 34457 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 indicate strong rasterization and DirectX 12 performance. For 1080p gaming, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4339 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3703 suggest the 235T can maintain high frame rates, with the GPU likely becoming the limiting factor at ultra settings. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra would be very high, potentially exceeding 144 Hz in less demanding titles.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, with the 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth supporting high-resolution textures. The 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests strong fill-rate performance for 1440p ultra settings. Frame rate estimates at this resolution would still be high, likely in the triple digits for most titles, though the exact figures depend on the game's engine and optimization.

At 4K, the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 256-bit memory bus become the primary drivers. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the 716.8 GB/s bandwidth may be a constraint in memory-heavy scenes. Estimated 4K ultra frame rates would be playable, likely ranging from 60 to 100 FPS depending on the title, with ray tracing enabled reducing frame rates further given the 76 RT cores. The CPU's single-thread advantage becomes less relevant at this resolution, as the GPU's rendering workload dominates.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in a desktop configuration. Both components sit at the 86th percentile against their respective peers, creating a system that is evenly matched in performance tier. The combined percentile of 86 confirms this is a high-end desktop build, though not the absolute top-tier available.

The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake part with a 65 W TDP, designed for mainstream desktop use with PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory. The GPU is an end-of-life Ada Lovelace part with a 320 W TDP, requiring a 700 W PSU and triple-slot cooling. The pairing makes sense for users who want strong single-threaded CPU performance and high-end GPU rasterization without the power draw or cost of the absolute flagship components.

The overall tier, based on the 86th percentile for both components, places this build in the upper echelon of desktop systems. The data shows this is a capable gaming and content creation machine, though the CPU's 14-thread limit (no hyperthreading) and the GPU's end-of-life status mean it is not future-proof in the same way as newer hardware. The launch MSRP of $247 for the CPU and $1,199 USD for the GPU positions this as a premium mid-range to high-end build.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p and 4K resolutions will find this pairing well-suited. The RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance support high-resolution textures and effects, while the CPU's 4339 PassMark single-thread score ensures fast frame generation. The data suggests this build excels at 1440p ultra and 4K high settings, with the GPU being the primary driver at these resolutions.

Content creators working with 4K video and GPU-accelerated renders will benefit from the GPU's 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores. The CPU's 26232 Cinebench R23 multicore score supports video encoding and timeline processing, while the GPU's 20671 PassMark GPU compute score accelerates effects and exports. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing timelines with multiple effects layers.

Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the CPU's single-threaded speed and the platform's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth. The PassMark data compression score of 295100 and random string sorting score of 35377 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The GPU is largely underutilized in these workloads, but the system provides headroom for machine learning tasks via the 304 tensor cores.

Students and small business users in engineering, design, or simulation fields will find this build over-provisioned but capable. The CPU's 14 cores handle multi-threaded simulations, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports CAD and 3D modeling workloads. For general office work, the system is significantly more powerful than needed, but the data confirms it will handle any academic or professional workload without issue.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking potential, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock already provides strong single-threaded performance.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The RTX 4080's 320 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP mean the 700 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for additional components like multiple storage drives or capture cards. The GPU's end-of-life status means future upgrades will likely target the GeForce 50-series successor, but the PCIe 4.0 interface will not bottleneck those newer cards.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more threads or higher multi-threaded performance, as the 235T's 14-thread limit (no hyperthreading) is the primary constraint in heavily threaded workloads. The socket 1851 platform supports other Core Ultra Series 2 parts, so upgrading within the same generation is possible without a motherboard change. The memory system supports DDR5, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for current applications, though future software may benefit from higher-capacity memory kits.

For the GPU, the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games, but future titles demanding more memory may see the GPU become a constraint. The 700 W PSU provides headroom for a GPU upgrade within the same power envelope, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is compatible with newer cards. The system's balanced 86th percentile ranking suggests that upgrading one component without the other would create a bottleneck, so a sensible path involves replacing both CPU and GPU at the same time for maximum benefit.