SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 form a desktop pairing that targets a broad middle ground of computing. The CPU, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 with Arrow Lake architecture, delivers a 14-core, 14-thread configuration with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The GPU, a GeForce 40-series part built on Ada Lovelace, brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. This analysis examines the combined benchmark data to understand where this system excels, where it struggles, and who should consider building around it.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, housing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The architecture, codenamed Arrow Lake-S, features 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning there is no hyperthreading — each core handles a single thread. The base clock of 2.20 GHz is modest, but the boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz, which is competitive for single-threaded workloads.

The cache hierarchy is notable: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. This structure supports the high boost clock by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU does not support ECC memory, and PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of the CPU’s capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 26232, while the single-core score is 3703. The R20 test shows 11017 for multicore and 1555 for single-core. These scores indicate a strong balance: the multicore performance is sufficient for demanding multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, while the single-core score handles everyday applications and games that rely on fewer threads.

PassMark results add depth. The multithread score is 30918, with single-thread at 4339. Integer math scores 84244, floating-point math scores 106546, and extended instructions score 23212. Data compression hits 295100, while data encryption scores 23457. Random string sorting is 35377, and finding prime numbers scores 318. These figures suggest the CPU handles arithmetic-heavy workloads efficiently, though the prime number test indicates a relative weakness in that specific task.

The CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 86, placing it in the top tier of processors. Its average benchmark score is 38561. The nearest rivals are close: the Intel Core i5-14500 scores 38531 (a delta of 0.1%), the Intel Xeon w3-2525 scores 38392 (0.4%), the Intel Core 9 270H scores 38335 (0.6%), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H scores 38312 (0.7%). The 235T is essentially tied with these parts, meaning performance differences are negligible in most workloads. This suggests the 235T is a well-positioned mid-range desktop CPU that competes directly with older and newer models without a clear winner.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The transistor density is 118.9 million per mm². The base clock is 1830 MHz, boosting to 2460 MHz. Memory runs at 2125 MHz, effective 17 Gbps, across 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which support ray tracing and DLSS workloads. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The TDP is 115 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The card is dual-slot, uses a single 12-pin power connector, and interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a mixed profile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 2302. Geekbench OpenCL scores 95057, and Vulkan scores 48643. PassMark tests reveal: G3D score of 19545, G2D of 1037, and GPU compute of 9213. DirectX tests show 103 for DX10, 175 for DX11, 76 for DX12, and 236 for DX9. The GPU’s percentile versus all GPUs is 61, meaning it sits above the median but not in the high-end tier. Its average benchmark score is 17639.

The nearest rivals are intriguing. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (a delta of -0.2%), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3%), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7%). The RTX 4060 is essentially tied with these older or integrated parts in average score, which is surprising given its modern architecture. This suggests that the average benchmark score masks the RTX 4060’s strengths in specific areas like ray tracing and tensor operations, which are not fully captured by these legacy tests. The data shows that raw rasterization performance is comparable to older GPUs, but the feature set is much more modern.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is one of a well-rounded desktop system with a strong CPU and a mid-tier GPU. The CPU’s percentile of 86 versus all CPUs is significantly higher than the GPU’s 61, indicating the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Exact CPU scores include: Cinebench R15 multicore 2644 and single-core 373; Cinebench R20 multicore 11017 and single-core 1555; Cinebench R23 multicore 26232 and single-core 3703. PassMark multithread is 30918, single-thread 4339, integer math 84244, floating-point math 106546, extended instructions 23212, data compression 295100, data encryption 23457, random string sorting 35377, and find prime numbers 318.

GPU scores include: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2302; Geekbench OpenCL 95057 and Vulkan 48643; PassMark G3D 19545, G2D 1037, GPU compute 9213, DirectX 10 103, DirectX 11 175, DirectX 12 76, and DirectX 9 236.

The combined percentile for the system is 74, which reflects the average of the CPU’s high standing and the GPU’s more modest position. This suggests a system that is better suited for CPU-heavy tasks like content creation and productivity, while gaming performance is adequate but not class-leading. The data implies that the RTX 4060 will handle 1080p gaming well, but at higher resolutions, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus may become limiting factors.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The CPU’s 86th percentile versus 61st for the GPU means that in many workloads, the processor will be waiting on the graphics card. This is typical for a pairing where a high-end CPU is matched with a mid-range GPU.

In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (score 295100) or integer math (84244), the GPU plays no role, so the CPU’s strength is fully utilized. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or gaming at high settings, the RTX 4060 will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19545 is modest, and its DirectX 12 score of 76 is particularly low, suggesting that the GPU may struggle with the latest DirectX 12 titles at high settings.

FPS scaling, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the scores. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4339 in PassMark is strong, meaning it can feed frames quickly to the GPU. However, the GPU’s raw compute capabilities (15.11 TFLOPS FP32) are limited, so at high resolutions or with demanding settings, the GPU will bottleneck. For esports titles or older games, the CPU might be the limiting factor if the GPU can push frames faster than the CPU can process game logic. For modern AAA games with ray tracing, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, given its 61st percentile standing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3703, PassMark single-thread 4339) suggests it can handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p, where frame rates are often CPU-limited. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in most games, but at 1440p, the 128-bit bus may reduce performance. The RTX 4060’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 is modest, indicating that it will not excel at 4K gaming.

For competitive titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the high boost clock of 5.00 GHz on the CPU should allow frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, assuming the GPU can keep up. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the GPU’s 24 RT cores will enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, but users may need to enable DLSS to maintain smooth performance. At 1440p, expect lower frame rates, and at 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity or content creation, but who also want a capable GPU for gaming at 1080p or entry-level 1440p. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking makes it ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where multi-threaded performance is critical.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this system well-suited for most titles, especially if they prioritize high frame rates in less demanding games. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s 26232 Cinebench R23 multicore score, while the GPU handles GPU-accelerated effects. Students and small business workstations would also benefit, as the CPU’s single-thread performance handles office tasks and web browsing with ease, and the GPU provides acceleration for tasks like Adobe Premiere or Blender.

The system is less suited for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing workloads, where the GPU’s 61st percentile will be a limitation. Users with those needs should look at higher-tier GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T has 14 cores and 14 threads, with no hyperthreading.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14500?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561 on average, while the i5-14500 scores 38531, a delta of 0.1%, making them effectively equal.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4060 has 24 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 115 W.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, reflecting the CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 61st percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. The memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s, and PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This platform is current for the Arrow Lake generation, meaning a future upgrade would require a new motherboard if moving to a different socket.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will run at its native PCIe 4.0 speed. The suggested PSU is 300 W, which is modest for a desktop system. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 115 W, so the total system draw is low, leaving headroom for upgrades. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, such as a GeForce 50-series part, which would better match the CPU’s performance. However, the GPU’s end-of-life status means users should consider the successor generation for new builds.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, ranking in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace part with 8 GB VRAM, ranking in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile is 74, indicating a system that is above average but not high-end.

The pairing is characterized by a significant CPU advantage over the GPU. This means the system excels at CPU-intensive tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while gaming performance is solid at 1080p but limited at higher resolutions. The system’s overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU providing high-end processing power and the GPU offering entry-level to mid-range graphics performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4339 in PassMark supports high frame rates in competitive titles. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 suggests it can push well above 60 FPS in most games at 1080p, though the 8 GB VRAM may require lowering textures in some titles. Expect smooth gameplay in esports and moderate settings in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores handle encoding workloads effectively, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26232. The GPU’s tensor cores can offload encoding via NVENC, though the 96 tensor cores are modest. This system can stream 1080p gameplay while maintaining playable frame rates, but 1440p streaming may strain the GPU.

Video Editing: The CPU’s high multicore performance (PassMark multithread 30918) excels at rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates effects and color grading in software like Premiere Pro. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p or 1440p editing, but 4K projects may exceed it.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the 235T’s 26232 Cinebench R23 multicore score provides strong performance. For GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles, the RTX 4060’s 24 RT cores and 15.11 TFLOPS deliver decent results, though the 128-bit memory bus limits complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock speeds up compilation times, and the 14 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 84244 indicates robust performance for code execution and testing. The GPU is less relevant here but supports hardware acceleration for graphical applications.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3703) ensures snappy responsiveness in office suites and web browsers. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU provides basic display output, while the RTX 4060 is available for more demanding tasks. This system handles multitasking with ease, given the 14 cores and DDR5 memory support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds