SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX

52,073 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh pairing is a laptop configuration that presents a unique dichotomy: a modern, high-performance CPU paired with an older, mid-range professional GPU. The benchmark data indicates a system where the processor is the clear star, capable of competing with desktop-class chips, while the graphics card anchors the system to a more modest tier of performance. This analysis uses the provided benchmark scores to define the capabilities and limitations of this mobile workstation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, which is part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It is manufactured by Intel on a 3 nm process node at TSMC, packing 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. This is a mobile part on the Intel BGA 2114 socket, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The processor has a TDP of 55 W and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 48 execution units.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are impressive, landing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 34,731 points in multi-core and 4,903 points in single-core. These scores indicate exceptional multi-threaded capability for a mobile chip. The data shows it is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scoring 0.2% higher on average. It also outperforms the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0.7% and trails the AMD EPYC 8124P by 0.1% and the Intel Core i7-14700 by 0.4%. This places the 235HX firmly in the same performance class as these high-end desktop processors, a significant feat for a laptop CPU.

In terms of real-world workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,587 and the PassMark multithread score of 40,849 suggest that the CPU can handle heavy productivity tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The single-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R20 score of 2,059 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,683, is also robust, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and strong performance in tasks that rely on single-threaded performance. The PassMark data further illustrates its capabilities: a floating-point math score of 129,819 and an integer math score of 97,177 point to strong number-crunching abilities, while the data encryption score of 32,697 and data compression score of 426,417 show its proficiency in file compression and security-related tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a professional mobile graphics card based on the older Turing architecture, using the TU104B chip. It is manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC and features 13,600 million transistors. This is an end-of-life product, originally released on 2020-06-07. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1035 MHz and a boost clock of 1530 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The TDP is 110 W, and it connects via a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

The GPU’s compute specifications include 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It has 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 384 tensor cores for AI acceleration. Its performance is rated at 9.400 TFLOPS for FP32 and 18.80 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s.

The benchmark data for this GPU is empty, and it holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0. This indicates it is a mid-range performer in the current landscape. For rendering workloads, the 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides a baseline for compute tasks, while the 48 RT cores offer ray tracing acceleration for supported applications. The 384 tensor cores are useful for AI-accelerated features in professional software. The 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset for large scenes and high-resolution textures, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to feed the GPU’s compute units. However, the lack of benchmark scores and its 50th percentile rank suggest that while it is a capable professional GPU, it is not in the top tier of performance when compared to all other GPUs.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX has an average benchmark score of 52,073, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's average score of 51,947, making them statistically equivalent performers.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and type of memory supported by the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, which provides a total memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What are the key specifications of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh's memory?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and a clock speed of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 48 execution units.

Q: What is the TDP of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has a TDP of 110 W.

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket.

Q: Which architecture is the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh based on?

A: It is based on the Turing architecture, using the TU104B chip.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimated from the benchmark scores. The data shows that the CPU is extremely powerful, scoring in the 91st percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part, scoring in the 50th percentile. This suggests that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in gaming. The CPU’s high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,903) ensures it will not limit frame rates, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 9.400 TFLOPS will determine the final output.

For modern games at 1080p ultra settings, this system should be capable of delivering playable frame rates in many titles, but it will likely struggle with the most demanding games or those with heavy ray tracing. The 16 GB of VRAM is a positive factor, as it allows for high-resolution textures without running out of memory. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile rank suggests it will not be a high-refresh-rate champion at 1440p or 4K. At 1440p, players can expect lower frame rates than at 1080p, and at 4K, the system will likely need settings to be lowered to maintain smooth gameplay. The estimated performance is that this is a competent 1080p gaming machine, but its primary focus is clearly professional workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX’s 91st percentile ranking vastly outclasses the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking. This creates a scenario where the CPU has significant headroom to perform more work, but is held back by the GPU’s processing limits in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck. The CPU can easily feed frames to the GPU, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in determining the final frame rate. The data suggests that the CPU will be waiting for the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

In non-gaming workloads, the balance is more nuanced. For tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU’s powerful multi-core performance will be the primary driver, and the system will feel well-balanced. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering or compute tasks, the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s high memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is sufficient to feed both the CPU and the GPU, so memory bandwidth is not likely to be a major bottleneck. Overall, the system is CPU-heavy, and the GPU is the component that will limit peak performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at professionals and power users who need a mobile workstation with exceptional CPU performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, with its 91st percentile ranking, is ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, and software development, where multi-core performance is paramount. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,731 and PassMark multithread score of 40,849 indicate that this system can handle complex, multi-threaded workloads efficiently. Students in engineering or computer science fields will also benefit from the CPU’s raw power for compiling code and running simulations.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, despite being a mid-range part, is a professional-grade GPU. This makes the system suitable for small business workstations that require certified drivers for applications like CAD or engineering software. The 16 GB of VRAM is useful for handling large datasets and complex visualizations. For gamers, this system is best suited for those who play at 1080p resolution and prioritize CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulation games, rather than those who demand maximum frame rates at higher resolutions. The system is less ideal for gamers who want to play at 1440p or 4K with high settings, as the GPU will be a limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on a mobile socket, Intel BGA 2114, which means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The platform supports DDR5 memory, and the CPU has a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for fast NVMe storage. The system’s TDP is 55 W for the CPU and 110 W for the GPU, totaling 165 W. A suitable power supply would need to account for the rest of the system’s components, but the `suggestedPsu` field is null, so no specific wattage is provided in the data.

Given the constraints of a laptop platform, the most sensible upgrade path for this system would be to focus on memory and storage. Upgrading to a larger or faster DDR5 memory kit could improve system responsiveness. The most significant potential upgrade, however, would be to the GPU, but this is not feasible in a laptop. For a desktop user, this CPU’s performance class, as indicated by its rivalry with the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Core i9-13900F, suggests it would pair well with a more powerful, modern GPU. However, within this laptop’s constraints, the current configuration is what it is, and upgrades are limited to memory and storage.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a top-tier mobile CPU with a mid-range professional mobile GPU. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is a high-performance processor, and its 91st percentile ranking places it among the best CPUs available. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, while a professional part with 16 GB of VRAM, is a much older design and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this system is 71, indicating an above-average overall performance tier. This is a workstation-focused laptop where the CPU is the primary driver of performance, and the GPU provides a competent, but not class-leading, level of graphics power. It is a system designed for heavy compute and productivity tasks rather than high-end gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX has an average benchmark score of 52,073, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the data showing a 0.1% deficit to the AMD EPYC 8124P, a 0.2% advantage over the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, a 0.4% deficit to the Intel Core i7-14700, and a 0.7% advantage over the Intel Core i9-13900F. This confirms its position as a high-end performer. Specific scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,731 and a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2,059.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has no benchmark scores available in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, placing it in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This lack of data makes it harder to precisely quantify its performance relative to other GPUs, but its percentile rank clearly indicates a mid-pack position. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-10% performer, and the GPU is an average performer. This creates a significant performance gap between the two components, meaning the system’s overall capabilities are often limited by the GPU, especially in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU provides a massive amount of compute power, but the GPU is not in the same performance class.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds