SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

48,201 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 pair as a desktop configuration that mixes a high-end modern processor with a mid-tier professional mobile GPU. This analysis derives all conclusions from the benchmark data and architectural specifications provided, with the key caveat that no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the component-level benchmark scores and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. The chip operates at a base clock of 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and its 65 W TDP places it in the mainstream power envelope. The processor features a three-tier cache hierarchy: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Notably, the 235A lacks Hyper-Threading, so its 14 cores correspond exactly to 14 threads, which influences how it handles heavily threaded workloads.

The Cinebench results reveal a processor that excels in single-threaded performance relative to its multi-threaded standing. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4607 positions it strongly for latency-sensitive applications, while the multi-core score of 32633 demonstrates substantial throughput for content creation tasks. The Cinebench R20 scores reinforce this pattern with 1934 single-core and 13705 multi-core. The processor achieves a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms approximately 90% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 48201 places it in close competition with several notable rivals: the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 48171 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470 (0.6% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47918 (0.6% lower). These sub-1% deltas mean the 235A effectively trades blows with these chips, with no meaningful performance separation.

PassMark sub-tests provide insight into specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 88626 and floating-point math score of 118778 indicate strong general-purpose arithmetic performance, while the extended instructions score of 31625 shows capable SIMD throughput. Data compression at 393800 and encryption at 30136 demonstrate solid data handling capabilities. The single-thread score of 4557 confirms the processor's strength in lightly threaded scenarios, which is critical for many legacy applications and certain game engines. The multi-thread score of 38392 aligns with the Cinebench multi-core results, confirming balanced scaling across the 14 physical cores.

For real workloads, the data suggests the 235A is a versatile processor that handles both single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded rendering workloads competently. The 90th percentile ranking means it sits comfortably in the upper echelon of available CPUs, though the tight clustering of its nearest rivals indicates that platform-level features and pricing would likely differentiate these options more than raw performance. The 65 W TDP suggests efficient operation under sustained loads, and the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 provides adequate data throughput for most applications, though not exceptional for memory-intensive workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is an integrated GPU (IGP) based on the AD103 chip using Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). It comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth — a substantial figure that supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

The GPU's compute resources are substantial: 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. For specialized workloads, it includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The raw compute throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio), which positions it for professional rendering and compute tasks. Pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering.

The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning it performs at the median level — neither exceptional nor weak. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and there are no nearest rivals provided, so comparative analysis must rely on the architectural specifications and the percentile ranking alone. The 150 W TDP with no power connectors suggests this is a power-efficient part designed for embedded or mobile implementations, despite being listed within a desktop build class. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides adequate bandwidth for most workloads, though it is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe 5.0 capability.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside in video memory without spilling to system memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports this capacity well, enabling rapid texture streaming and framebuffer operations. The ray tracing cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for workloads that leverage these features, including realistic lighting simulations and AI-based upscaling or denoising. The 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute places it in a capable range for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, though it is not at the extreme high end.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the CPU and GPU benchmarks shows a system with a strong processor and a mid-range GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking contrasts sharply with the GPU's 50th percentile, creating a configuration where the processor is clearly the more capable component relative to its peers. The combined percentile for this pairing is 70, reflecting the average of these two disparate rankings weighted toward the CPU's strength.

In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves 32633 multi-core and 4607 single-core, with the multi-core score placing it within 0.6% of the AMD EPYC 4345P and 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX. The single-core score of 4607 reinforces its position among top-tier desktop processors for lightly threaded tasks. The Cinebench R20 results of 13705 multi-core and 1934 single-core follow the same pattern, and the R15 scores of 3289 multi-core and 464 single-core round out the rendering benchmark suite.

The PassMark average benchmark score of 48201 places the CPU in a cluster of rivals separated by less than 1%: the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 at 48171, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX at 48287, the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48470, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 at 47918. This clustering means that for multi-threaded workloads, the choice between these processors would have negligible performance impact. The 235A's edge over the Ryzen 9 3900 is just 0.6%, while the EPYC 4345P holds a 0.6% advantage over the 235A.

The GPU's lack of benchmark data makes direct performance comparisons impossible, but the 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs provides a reference point. This suggests the GPU performs at the median level across the database, which for a professional embedded part may reflect its specialized positioning rather than raw gaming capability. The absence of measured FPS data for this combination means all gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the component specifications and benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth suggest capable 1440p gaming, but the GPU's median percentile ranking indicates it will not drive maximum settings at high refresh rates in demanding titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for Intel's Arrow Lake processors. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest GPUs and NVMe storage devices. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest for a desktop processor, and the GPU's 150 W TDP is also relatively low, suggesting the combined system power draw is manageable with a standard desktop power supply. The GPU has no power connectors, indicating it draws power entirely from the motherboard slot, which further simplifies power delivery requirements. The suggested PSU field is null, so no specific power supply recommendation can be made from the data, but the component TDPs suggest a mid-range unit would suffice.

For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful change would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance mean it would not bottleneck a more capable GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for the latest graphics cards, and the 65 W TDP leaves thermal and power overhead for a larger GPU. The 16 GB VRAM on the current GPU is already substantial, so a GPU upgrade would focus on raw compute performance rather than memory capacity. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory beyond the dual-channel configuration is not possible since the memory bus is dual-channel, so the upgrade path is primarily GPU-focused or a move to a higher-core-count Arrow Lake processor on the same socket.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 4607 Cinebench R23 single-core score provides the per-thread performance needed to feed high-refresh displays in CPU-bound games. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at maximum settings in demanding titles, particularly at 1440p and above. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the median-level compute performance limits overall frame output.

Streaming: The 14-core processor with a 90th percentile ranking provides ample headroom for simultaneous game rendering and video encoding. The CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting game performance, and the 65 W TDP keeps thermal output manageable during extended streaming sessions. The GPU's tensor cores could accelerate AI-based encoding features, though the specific implementation depends on software support.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32633 indicates strong performance for video rendering and export tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking places it above most desktop processors, making it capable of handling 4K video timelines with multiple tracks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth support GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, though the median compute performance may slow preview rendering in effects-heavy projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (32633 in Cinebench R23) positions it well for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 76 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers, though the 50th percentile ranking suggests it will not be a top-tier renderer. The 16 GB VRAM is valuable for scenes that exceed smaller GPUs' memory capacity.

Software development: The 14-core, 14-thread configuration handles parallel compilation workloads efficiently, and the 4607 single-core score ensures responsive IDE performance. The extended instructions score of 31625 and integer math score of 88626 indicate solid performance for code processing and data manipulation. The encryption score of 30136 supports secure development workflows without significant overhead.

Student and office work: The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means this system is far more powerful than needed for typical productivity applications. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for a desktop, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU provides basic display output even without the discrete GPU. The 16 GB GPU VRAM is irrelevant for office tasks, but the overall system would handle any productivity workload with ease.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is a professional who needs strong CPU performance for multi-threaded workloads but does not require top-tier GPU compute. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM, which accommodates larger scenes than 8 GB GPUs. The GPU's ray tracing and tensor cores make it suitable for professionals using AI-accelerated workflows in applications like DaVinci Resolve or Blender.

For gamers at 1080p, this system provides a capable experience, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensuring high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. At 1440p, the GPU's median percentile ranking means settings will need to be adjusted in demanding games to maintain playable frame rates. At 4K, the GPU will likely become the primary bottleneck, requiring reduced settings or reliance on upscaling technologies.

Software developers building large codebases will appreciate the 14-core processor for parallel compilation, and the 90th percentile ranking ensures the system remains relevant for years. Students in engineering or computer science programs would benefit from the CPU performance for simulation and compilation workloads, though the GPU's capabilities exceed what most coursework requires. Small business workstations handling data analysis, financial modeling, or CAD workloads would find the CPU's integer math score of 88626 and data compression score of 393800 sufficient for demanding spreadsheet and database tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU ranks at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This means the GPU is the limiting component in most graphics-intensive workloads, including gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4607 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it will not starve the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's median compute performance caps overall graphics output.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck depends on the title and resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread strength can push high frame rates, but the GPU will limit maximum FPS in demanding titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as the limiting factor, with the CPU providing ample headroom. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth mitigate memory-related bottlenecks, but the 32.69 TFLOPS compute throughput is the primary constraint.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the stronger component, so multi-threaded rendering tasks will scale well with the 14 cores. GPU-accelerated tasks such as ray tracing or AI inference will be limited by the GPU's 50th percentile ranking. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU pulling the system upward while the GPU holds it back. Users seeking a more balanced system would need a significantly more powerful GPU, though the CPU would remain the stronger component in that configuration.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 235A scores 48201 in average benchmarks, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (48171), 0.2% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287), 0.6% lower than the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470), and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918). These differences are negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs at the median level. Its average benchmark score is 0, and no nearest rivals are provided for comparison.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures discussed are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores and architectural specifications.

Q: What socket does the CPU use and what memory does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 32633 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4607 in single-core. These scores place it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and tensor operations?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI-based features. It delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 compute.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and architectural specifications. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and strong single-core score of 4607 in Cinebench R23 indicate it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, particularly at 1080p resolution. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it performs at the median level, which translates to playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most games, but likely requiring reduced settings at 1440p in demanding titles.

The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures at 1440p and even 4K in many games, but the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS compute throughput will limit raw frame output. Esports titles with low GPU requirements could run at very high frame rates, leveraging the CPU's strong single-thread performance. AAA games with heavy GPU demands would see frame rates constrained by the GPU's median-level compute, with the CPU rarely acting as the bottleneck. For 4K gaming, the GPU would require significant settings reductions or reliance on upscaling technologies like DLSS, which the tensor cores can accelerate.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A processor with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, ranking at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture embedded part with 16 GB GDDR6 memory and a 150 W TDP, ranking at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 70, reflecting a system where the processor is the dominant component in terms of relative performance.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 and Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX within a 0.6% margin. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs, making it a mid-tier performer in graphics workloads. The combination yields a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, while providing adequate but not exceptional gaming performance. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are standout features that support large textures and professional workloads, but the raw compute throughput limits high-end gaming and GPU rendering scenarios.