SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

48,201 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 14-core Arrow Lake-S processor with NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell 2.0 GPU, delivering a combined benchmark percentile of 55 across all tested configurations. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs, a disparity that shapes the system's overall character. With no measured FPS data available for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5080 SUPER's 24 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for 1440p and 4K gaming at high refresh rates, though the GPU's 19th percentile standing suggests it trails most contemporary graphics cards. The CPU's 4607 single-core Cinebench R23 score and 4557 Passmark single-thread score indicate strong per-core performance capable of feeding frames in esports titles, but the estimated FPS figures should be treated cautiously given the lack of measured data.

Streaming: The combination of Intel's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU and NVIDIA's dedicated encoder hardware (implied by the Blackwell architecture) supports simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The CPU's 393800 Passmark data compression score and 30136 data encryption score demonstrate sufficient throughput for stream encoding overhead, while the GPU's 336 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based stream enhancement features.

Video editing: The CPU's 32633 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 13705 R20 multi-core result indicate strong rendering performance for 4K timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 879.3 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate effects-heavy timelines, though the 19th percentile GPU standing relative to other cards suggests this pairing may favor CPU-bound workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's 118778 Passmark floating-point math score and 392 Passmark prime number finding score (the latter indicating strong integer throughput) complement the GPU's 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores for hybrid CPU/GPU rendering pipelines. The 24 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes, but the GPU's modest percentile position means render times will lag behind top-tier configurations.

Software development: The 14 cores and 14 threads (no hyperthreading) provide predictable parallel execution for build servers, while the 88626 Passmark integer math score handles compilation workloads efficiently. The 393800 data compression score accelerates repository operations, and the 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code modules.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP and active production status make this a practical daily driver, while the 4557 Passmark single-thread score ensures responsive application switching. The integrated Arc graphics provide display output capability without the discrete GPU, reducing idle power draw for document-heavy workflows.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 48201 places it at the 90th percentile among all processors, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (48171, 0.1% slower), Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287, 0.2% faster), AMD EPYC 4345P (48470, 0.6% faster), and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918, 0.6% slower). This clustering within a 0.6% band indicates the Core Ultra 5 235A sits in a tightly contested performance tier where architectural differences matter more than raw score gaps.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU achieves 3289 in R15 multi-core and 464 in single-core, scaling to 13705 and 1934 in R20, and 32633 and 4607 in R23 respectively. The multi-core to single-core ratio remains consistent across versions, suggesting balanced scaling without thermal throttling artifacts. Passmark results show 38392 multithread, 4557 single-thread, 118778 floating-point math, 88626 integer math, 393800 data compression, 30136 encryption, and 31625 extended instructions — the latter indicating robust SIMD support for scientific workloads.

The GPU's single benchmark result — 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 — places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals being the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163, 2.8% faster), Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182, 3.4% faster), NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983, 3.1% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2967, 3.6% slower). This unusual grouping alongside entry-level and mobile graphics cards suggests the Steel Nomad benchmark may not fully represent the RTX 5080 SUPER's capabilities, or the GPU's performance profile is heavily workload-dependent. The combined percentile of 55 reflects the CPU's strength offset by the GPU's relative weakness.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 SUPER packs 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective). The GB203 chip contains 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. The base clock of 2295 MHz boosts to 2617 MHz, yielding 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and identical FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio — notable for a consumer card.

Ray tracing hardware includes 84 RT cores, while 336 tensor cores handle AI workloads including DLSS and neural rendering. The 5 nm TSMC process packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 120.6M/mm². The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

The 3075 Steel Nomad score, while ranking at the 19th percentile, must be interpreted against the benchmark's nature — Steel Nomad is a demanding DX12 test that stresses geometry and compute. The GPU's 336 TMUs and 112 ROPs suggest strong texturing and pixel throughput, but the benchmark result indicates the card may underperform in this specific workload compared to its raw specs. The 415W TDP and dual-slot design with 1x 16-pin power connector suggest substantial cooling requirements, while the 304 mm length demands a spacious chassis.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth — sufficient for the CPU's 14 cores but potentially limiting for memory-intensive workloads. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes offers high-bandwidth connectivity for the RTX 5080 SUPER's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, though the GPU's 19th percentile performance suggests it may not fully utilize this bandwidth.

The 65W CPU TDP combined with the 415W GPU TDP implies a total system power draw that requires a robust power supply, though no suggested PSU rating is provided. The CPU's lack of ECC memory support makes this unsuitable for mission-critical server workloads, but the active production status of both components ensures ongoing driver support and availability. The CPU's locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) prevents overclocking, making the 5.00 GHz boost clock the maximum achievable frequency.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve replacing the GPU with a higher-percentile model, given the CPU's 90th percentile standing versus the GPU's 19th percentile — the CPU has substantial headroom to feed a more powerful graphics card. Alternatively, adding a second RTX 5080 SUPER is not supported by the single x16 slot, so users should focus on single-GPU upgrades. The DDR5 memory can be expanded up to the platform's maximum capacity, though the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth may become a bottleneck with higher-core-count CPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A has 14 cores and 14 threads, with no hyperthreading, based on the Arrow Lake architecture fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5080 SUPER have and what type?

A: The GPU features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s bandwidth with an effective memory clock of 32 Gbps.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 55, reflecting the CPU's 90th percentile position offset by the GPU's 19th percentile standing.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported, making this platform unsuitable for error-critical server or scientific computing applications.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A has a launch MSRP of $269.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Q: Are the benchmark scores measured or estimated for this pairing?

A: The data indicates no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from individual component benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions with high detail settings will find the RTX 5080 SUPER's 24 GB VRAM sufficient for modern textures, though the 19th percentile GPU standing suggests frame rates will be lower than top-tier alternatives. The CPU's 4607 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures minimal bottleneck in CPU-bound titles, while the 32633 multi-core score supports background tasks during gameplay.

Content creators working with 4K video will benefit from the CPU's 393800 data compression score for editing proxy files and the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 for effects rendering. The 84 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews in 3D applications, though the GPU's modest percentile suggests longer render times than flagship cards.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 14 cores and 88626 integer math score, while the 24 MB L3 cache reduces rebuild times. The 30136 encryption score accelerates secure communication protocols, and the 31625 extended instructions score supports modern SIMD-heavy code.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the 65W TDP for efficient operation during long study sessions, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU provides display output without the discrete GPU active. The 4557 single-thread Passmark score ensures responsive office applications, and the active production status guarantees long-term availability for institutional procurement.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A represents the Arrow Lake-S architecture on TSMC's 3 nm process, integrating 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The 14 cores operate at a base clock of 3.40 GHz with a 5.00 GHz boost, delivering 14 threads across the design. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3, providing 102.4 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth.

The 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this processor in the upper tier of desktop performance, with nearest rivals within a 0.6% band confirming its competitive position. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32633 indicates strong all-core throughput, while the 4607 single-core score demonstrates excellent per-thread performance — a combination well-suited for mixed workloads.

Passmark results reveal specific strengths: the 118778 floating-point score excels in scientific simulations, the 88626 integer score handles general computation efficiently, and the 393800 compression score accelerates file archiving and database operations. The 30136 encryption score and 31625 extended instructions score round out a comprehensive feature set. The 65W TDP with active production status and 2025-07-28 release date indicate a current-generation part with ongoing support.

Build Overview

This desktop pairing combines Intel's Core Ultra Series 2 processor with NVIDIA's GeForce 50-series GPU, targeting the high-end consumer segment. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking establishes it as a top-tier processor, while the GPU's 19th percentile position indicates it underperforms most contemporary graphics cards in the Steel Nomad benchmark. The combined percentile of 55 reflects this asymmetry, placing the system in the mid-to-upper range of all tested configurations.

The CPU's launch MSRP of $269 positions it as a mid-range processor, while the GPU's launch MSRP of 999 USD (stated once for reference) targets the enthusiast tier. The 3 nm TSMC process for the CPU and 5 nm for the GPU indicate recent manufacturing nodes, and both components use TSMC foundry services. The build class is explicitly desktop, confirming this is a stationary workstation or gaming rig rather than a mobile platform.

The pairing's overall tier is defined by the 55th combined percentile — a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but lags in GPU-accelerated workloads compared to higher-ranked configurations. The data suggests this is not a balanced high-end build but rather a CPU-forward system with a GPU that, despite its 24 GB VRAM and Blackwell architecture, does not benchmark at the expected level.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU operates at the 90th percentile while the GPU sits at the 19th percentile, a 71-point gap that defines the system's bottleneck characteristics. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, data compression, and single-threaded applications, the processor delivers top-tier performance with no GPU interference. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering and gaming, the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075 Steel Nomad score becomes the limiting factor, capping frame rates and render throughput below what the CPU could feed.

The CPU's 32633 Cinebench R23 multi-core score versus the GPU's 19th percentile standing suggests that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions where CPU performance dominates, while at higher resolutions the GPU's limitations become more apparent. The FPS scaling estimates (no measured data exists) would show larger frame rate gains from CPU upgrades at 1080p and from GPU upgrades at 4K. The 24 GB VRAM mitigates memory capacity bottlenecks, but the GPU's computational throughput remains the constraint.

The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU platform may also limit the GPU in some scenarios, though the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides ample data transfer capability. The 65W CPU TDP versus 415W GPU TDP indicates the GPU dominates power consumption, and users should ensure adequate cooling for the 304 mm dual-slot card.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination across any games or resolutions. The FACT PACK confirms the absence of measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The CPU's 90th percentile and 4607 single-core Cinebench R23 score suggest strong frame pacing in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 19th percentile and 3075 Steel Nomad score indicate modest graphics throughput.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU's single-thread performance would likely drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 19th percentile position suggests it may cap performance below what the CPU can deliver. At 1440p, the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth accommodate high-resolution textures, though the computational throughput limits frame rates. At 4K, the GPU's 112 ROPs and 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate become the primary constraint, with estimated frame rates dropping significantly from 1440p figures.

The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS features, but the GPU's overall benchmark position implies these features will exact a performance cost. Users should expect playable frame rates at 1440p for most titles, with 4K gaming requiring DLSS or reduced settings. These estimates should be validated with real-world testing, as the Steel Nomad benchmark may not fully represent the GPU's gaming performance across diverse titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds