SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

48,201 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a modern desktop pairing built on the latest platforms from both Intel and NVIDIA. The data provided shows no measured frame rates for this specific combination, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. This analysis examines the raw specifications and synthetic test results to interpret what this system can do, where its bottlenecks lie, and who should consider building it.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 21,900 million transistors into a 181 mm² die. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is a critical factor for rendering workloads, as the capacity is modest for modern high-resolution textures, but the bandwidth is substantial for the class. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz, while the memory runs at 1750 MHz, effectively 28 Gbps.

The rendering hardware includes 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, which translate to a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s. The RTX 5060 also carries 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. In terms of raw compute, the GPU achieves 19.18 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), a figure that indicates strong general-purpose compute for a mainstream card.

The benchmark scores paint a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3628, which is a solid result for a mid-range card. Geekbench scores show 112787 in OpenCL and 113321 in Vulkan, indicating strong compute performance in both APIs. However, the Passmark DirectX scores are notably low: 127 for DX10, 200 for DX11, 77 for DX12, and 225 for DX9. These low DX scores likely reflect the specific nature of the Passmark tests rather than real-world gaming performance, as the GPU's overall Passmark G3D score is 20891, placing it in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 10899 further supports the notion that the card is compute-capable.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331, which places it very close to the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3%) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3%). It also slightly edges out the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.8%) and trails the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011, 1.2%) by a small margin. This suggests the RTX 5060 sits in a competitive mid-range tier where the differences between rivals are within a couple of percentage points, making architectural features and driver optimizations more important than raw score deltas.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A sits in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 5060 sits in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This 18-percentage-point gap suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, which means in many gaming scenarios at lower resolutions, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4557 in Passmark and its 4607 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's mid-range position means it will cap frame rates in GPU-intensive titles.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 38392 and its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32633 show strong parallel performance. The GPU's Passmark GPU Compute score of 10899 is respectable but not exceptional, so tasks that rely heavily on GPU compute—like certain rendering or machine learning workloads—will be limited by the RTX 5060. Conversely, tasks that are CPU-bound, such as compilation or data processing, will be well-served by the Ultra 5 235A.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. However, benchmark results indicate that in CPU-light, GPU-heavy games, the RTX 5060 will be the primary limiter, especially at 1440p or higher where the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may become constrained. In CPU-heavy scenarios like simulation games or high-frame-rate esports titles, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4557 Passmark single-thread) will prevent it from being a bottleneck, allowing the GPU to operate closer to its full potential.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5060's Passmark G3D score of 20891 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 suggest it can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming well, though the 8 GB VRAM may require texture compromises in newer titles. The CPU's 4557 Passmark single-thread score ensures it can keep up with high frame rates in esports and competitive shooters, where CPU overhead is minimal.

Streaming: The GPU's 120 tensor cores and 30 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI features, though the absence of a dedicated NVENC mention in the data means we rely on the tensor core count for AI-driven enhancements. The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and overlays, with the Passmark multithread score of 38392 indicating it can handle simultaneous game and stream processing.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32633 and Passmark data compression score of 393800 suggest fast export times and responsive timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 112787 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerate effects and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit the use of very large project files or complex multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renders, the Ultra 5 235A's 32633 Cinebench R23 score will deliver solid performance for Blender or similar workloads. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5060's 10899 Passmark GPU Compute score and 19.18 TFLOPS are adequate for mid-complexity scenes, but the 8 GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for high-poly assets or large textures.

Software development: The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 38392, handle compilation and testing efficiently. The 393800 Passmark data compression score indicates fast build artifact handling, and the 30136 encryption score supports secure development workflows. The absence of ECC memory (eccMemory: false) is worth noting for mission-critical development.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4557 in Passmark ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU provides a fallback for basic display tasks. The GPU's 1154 Passmark G2D score indicates solid 2D performance for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing, making this a capable if overkill machine for standard academic or office tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The combined percentile of 81 places this system in the upper tier of desktop builds, making it suitable for users who need strong CPU performance and competent GPU acceleration. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or entry-level 1440p will find the RTX 5060's 20891 G3D score sufficient for most titles, while the CPU's 90th percentile ranking ensures no gaming bottleneck.

Content creators who work in video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's 32633 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which reduces render times, and the GPU's 112787 Geekbench OpenCL score for preview acceleration. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for heavy 3D work, but for intermediate projects, this pairing is capable.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 14 cores and 38392 Passmark multithread score for parallel builds and testing. The 393800 data compression score speeds up package management, and the 30136 encryption score supports secure development practices.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4557 Passmark) and 14 threads useful for coursework, though the GPU is overkill for most academic tasks. Small business workstations that handle moderate multitasking, data analysis, or light CAD work will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile performance and the GPU's compute capabilities, all while staying within a 65 W CPU TDP and 145 W GPU TDP envelope.

The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier card, so enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates at 4K will need to look elsewhere. This build is for users who prioritize a balanced system where the CPU outpaces the GPU, allowing for future GPU upgrades without changing the platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake-S architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for the RTX 5060's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 145 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, leaving significant headroom for additional components or a future GPU upgrade.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 90th percentile performance can support more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will have full bandwidth available. Memory can also be expanded, as the dual-channel DDR5 support allows for higher-capacity kits, though the current bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is already respectable.

The platform's production status is Active, and the release date of 2025-07-28 suggests a modern socket with potential for future CPU upgrades within the same generation. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already high. The GPU's dual-slot design and single 8-pin power connector make it easy to swap, and the 300 W suggested PSU means most existing power supplies will handle the current configuration without issue.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 5060's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 and Passmark G3D score of 20891 suggest it can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p ultra settings in most titles, with the 8 GB VRAM being the primary constraint for texture-heavy games at higher resolutions.

At 1440p, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 19.18 TFLOPS compute will handle many games at high settings, but the 8 GB VRAM may cause stuttering or require reduced texture quality in newer AAA titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4557 Passmark) ensures that frame rate drops will be GPU-bound rather than CPU-bound, which is the preferable scenario for consistent performance.

For esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, the high single-thread score and the GPU's 119.9 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest very high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding games. The absence of measured data means these are educated estimates, but the benchmark scores support a capable 1080p gaming experience and a passable 1440p experience with settings adjustments.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A is a 14-core, 14-thread processor with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and it includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32633 places the CPU in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong multi-threaded performance for a desktop chip. The single-core score of 4607 in the same test shows excellent single-thread capability, which is crucial for gaming and legacy applications. Passmark scores reinforce this: a multithread score of 38392, a single-thread score of 4557, and a floating-point math score of 118778 suggest the CPU excels in both integer and floating-point workloads.

The 14 threads (equal to the core count, meaning no hyperthreading) are a notable design choice, but the high core count and boost clock compensate in multi-threaded scenarios. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (48171 avg, 0.1% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287 avg, -0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470 avg, -0.6% delta). These scores are within 0.6% of each other, showing that the Ultra 5 235A is squarely in the competitive mid-range CPU tier.

The Passmark data encryption score of 30136 and extended instructions score of 31625 indicate solid performance for security and SIMD workloads. The find prime numbers score of 392 is notably low, but this is a specific test that may not reflect real-world integer performance, as the integer math score of 88626 is strong. Overall, the CPU is a well-rounded performer with a slight edge toward single-thread and mixed workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, placing this desktop build in the upper tier of systems.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5060's average benchmark score is 26331, which is 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon 860M (26401) and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421), and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011).

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A scores 4607 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which contributes to its 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 30 RT cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and applications.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5060?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and foundry?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, using the Arrow Lake architecture.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 48201, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (48171, 0.1% delta), Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287, -0.2% delta), AMD EPYC 4345P (48470, -0.6% delta), and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918, 0.6% delta). The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32633 and single-core score of 4607 are representative of its strong performance. Passmark scores include 38392 for multithread, 4557 for single-thread, 118778 for floating-point math, and 393800 for data compression.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 3628, and its Geekbench scores are 112787 (OpenCL) and 113321 (Vulkan). The Passmark G3D score is 20891, while the GPU compute score is 10899. The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3%), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.8%), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011, 1.2%).

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart relative to their respective markets. The CPU's 90th percentile is 18 points higher than the GPU's 72nd percentile, indicating that the processor is the more capable component in this pairing. This is beneficial for productivity workloads that are CPU-bound, but it means the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The combined percentile of 81 reflects a system that is above average overall, with a strong foundation for future GPU upgrades.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0-based card with 8 GB GDDR7 memory and a 145 W TDP. The system's combined percentile of 81 places it in the upper tier of desktop configurations, meaning it outperforms the majority of builds in the benchmark database.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it a high-end processor, while the GPU's 72nd percentile places it in the mid-range. This asymmetry defines the system's character: it is a workstation-leaning build that can game competently but excels in CPU-intensive tasks. The 14 cores and 14 threads provide robust multi-threading, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance. The RTX 5060, while not a top-tier GPU, offers solid 1080p gaming and capable compute through its 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores.

The platform is modern, with Socket 1851, DDR5 memory support, and PCIe Gen 5, ensuring longevity. The 300 W suggested PSU provides headroom for upgrades. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance, with the clear upgrade path of swapping to a higher-tier GPU when needed. The overall tier is solidly upper-mid-range, competitive with systems that have lower CPU but higher GPU performance, and it offers a balanced experience for a wide range of tasks.