SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

48,201 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The data for this pairing shows a desktop-class configuration where the CPU and GPU occupy different percentile tiers, which directly shapes where bottlenecks will appear. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER lands at the 86th percentile among all GPUs — a narrow gap that suggests a relatively balanced pairing rather than one component overwhelmingly dominating the other. However, balance is workload-dependent, and the benchmark scores reveal distinct scaling behaviors.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the Core Ultra 5 235A demonstrates strength that should keep most modern games from being processor-limited. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4607 and multi-core score of 32633 indicate robust per-thread performance and substantial multi-threaded throughput. The PassMark single-thread score of 4557 reinforces that the CPU’s single-core capability is a strong point, which matters for games that rely on a few heavily loaded threads. With 14 cores and 14 threads, the CPU has no hyper-threading, meaning each core handles exactly one thread — a design choice that can limit performance in heavily threaded workloads that benefit from simultaneous multi-threading, but the raw core count still provides respectable parallel throughput.

The RTX 4080 SUPER’s PassMark G3D score of 34245 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 place it firmly in high-end GPU territory. In GPU-bound scenarios — typically high-resolution gaming with demanding graphics settings — the GPU will be the limiting factor, which is expected and desirable for a gaming-focused build. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s and 16 GB of GDDR6X VRAM mean texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution rendering will keep the GPU fed without stalling on memory access.

The balance shifts noticeably in compute-heavy workloads. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 38392 and floating-point math score of 118778 are respectable for a 65W TDP part, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS massively outpaces what any CPU can deliver for parallel floating-point work. In rendering or scientific computing tasks that can leverage the GPU, the RTX 4080 SUPER will dominate the workload profile, leaving the CPU largely idle. Conversely, in lightly threaded tasks like data compression (PassMark score 393800) or encryption (30136), the CPU’s single-core performance becomes the deciding factor.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all frame-rate discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data shows no measuredFps entries, so the relative balance between components must be inferred from the synthetic benchmarks. Given the CPU’s 90th percentile position and the GPU’s 86th percentile, the pairing should exhibit GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions and quality settings, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom at lower resolutions where frame rates climb higher.

For streaming or multitasking scenarios, the CPU’s 14 threads without hyper-threading may become a constraint. A streamer running a game plus encoding software would share those 14 threads between game logic and stream encoding, potentially causing frame-time spikes in CPU-intensive titles. The PassMark physics score of 2437 suggests moderate physics simulation capability, which is relevant for games with heavy physics calculations.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 235A delivers an average benchmark score of 48201, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, scores 48171 — a delta of just 0.1% in the Intel chip’s favor, making the two effectively indistinguishable in aggregate performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX trails by 0.2% with a score of 48287, while the AMD EPYC 4345P comes in at 48470, 0.6% behind. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47918, 0.6% ahead of the 235A. This tight clustering means the 235A sits in a highly competitive performance band where no single rival holds a decisive advantage.

In single-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4607 and PassMark single-thread score of 4557 confirm strong per-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1934 and R15 single-core score of 464 round out a consistent picture of capable single-threaded execution. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32633 demonstrates that the 14-core configuration scales well, while the PassMark multi-thread score of 38392 and integer math score of 88626 indicate solid parallel throughput for integer-heavy tasks.

The RTX 4080 SUPER averages 54209 across its benchmark suite, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, scores 54247 — a 0.1% difference that makes the SUPER essentially a statistical tie with its non-SUPER predecessor. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, 1.1% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.7% ahead, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.8% ahead. These deltas are small enough that real-world differences will depend heavily on driver optimization and specific workload characteristics.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 reflects modern DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065 and Vulkan score of 260075 show strong compute capability across different APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 34245 and GPU compute score of 19822 provide additional evidence of high-end graphics and compute performance. DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features, while Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 round out API coverage.

The combined picture is a pairing where the CPU holds a slightly higher percentile position (90th vs 86th), meaning the GPU is marginally more likely to be the limiting factor in balanced workloads. The combined percentile of 88 for the entire build reflects a high-tier configuration that should handle demanding games and professional applications with ease. The benchmark data indicates the CPU punches slightly above the GPU’s relative standing, so the GPU will cap performance in graphics-heavy scenarios before the CPU becomes a constraint.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A compare to its closest rival in overall CPU performance?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235A averages 48201 across benchmarks, sitting 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (48171), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287), 0.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470), and 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918). The differences are minimal, placing all four chips in a tight performance band.

Q: What is the RTX 4080 SUPER’s position relative to the standard RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER averages 54209, which is 0.1% behind the standard RTX 4080’s 54247 score. The two cards are effectively identical in benchmark performance, with the SUPER’s higher clocks balanced against the standard model’s slightly different specifications.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), meaning the Core Ultra 5 235A cannot be overclocked through multiplier adjustment. Users must rely on the stock boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes.

Q: What is the GPU’s power connector requirement?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER uses a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 700W, and the GPU’s TDP is 320W.

Q: Is the CPU’s integrated graphics sufficient for basic display output?

A: The CPU includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units. This integrated GPU is suitable for basic display output and light tasks, but the discrete RTX 4080 SUPER will handle all graphics-intensive workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 235A uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Intel’s Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. This socket supports the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC’s 3nm process node. The platform provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for storage and expansion cards. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s — there is no DDR4 support, so users upgrading from older Intel platforms must replace memory alongside the CPU and motherboard.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes and does not represent a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER’s bandwidth requirements. The GPU’s 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth is internal to the graphics card, so PCIe bandwidth is not a limiting factor for most workloads. The 16-pin power connector means the system requires a power supply with that connector or an adapter; the suggested PSU rating of 700W provides headroom for the 320W GPU TDP plus the 65W CPU TDP and other system components.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count Arrow Lake CPU, should Intel release one on the same socket, which would improve multi-threaded workloads without requiring a motherboard change. The 14-core, 14-thread configuration of the 235A leaves headroom for a CPU with more cores on the same platform. The 65W TDP means the CPU is power-efficient, so upgrading to a higher-TDP part on the same socket would require checking motherboard VRM capability but should generally be feasible.

For the GPU side, the RTX 4080 SUPER is already an end-of-life product with the GeForce 50-series as its successor. Users looking to upgrade graphics later would need to consider whether the 700W suggested PSU provides sufficient headroom for a next-generation card with higher power requirements. The triple-slot form factor and 310mm length mean case compatibility must be verified before any GPU upgrade. The 16-pin power connector is likely to carry forward to future NVIDIA cards, so the power cabling should remain usable.

The platform’s lack of ECC memory support positions it for consumer and prosumer use rather than mission-critical server workloads. The dual-channel DDR5 configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for gaming and content creation but will not match the bandwidth of high-end workstation platforms with quad-channel memory. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide room for one high-bandwidth device (such as a Gen 5 NVMe SSD) alongside the GPU, though the GPU itself uses Gen 4.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture and built on TSMC’s 3nm process node. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65W. The processor uses Intel Socket 1851 and was released on July 28, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $269.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout provides each core with substantial private cache for latency-sensitive workloads while the shared L3 enables efficient data sharing across cores. The lack of hyper-threading means the 14 cores map directly to 14 threads, which simplifies scheduling but may reduce throughput in workloads that benefit from more threads than physical cores.

Benchmark results show strong single-core performance: Cinebench R23 single-core scores 4607, R20 single-core scores 1934, and R15 single-core scores 464. The PassMark single-thread score of 4557 confirms this trend. Multi-core results are equally solid, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 32633, R20 multi-core scoring 13705, and R15 multi-core scoring 3289. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38392 and integer math score of 88626 demonstrate robust parallel throughput for a 65W part.

Specialized workloads reveal specific strengths. The PassMark data compression score of 393800 is notably high, indicating efficient execution of compression algorithms. Data encryption scores 30136, and extended instructions score 31625. Floating-point math scores 118778, while integer math scores 88626. The find prime numbers score of 392 and random string sorting score of 49489 are moderate, suggesting the CPU is better suited to general-purpose and floating-point workloads than to specific algorithmic stress tests.

The 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs places the 235A in the upper decile of processor performance. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.6% in average score, meaning no single competitor decisively beats it. The 3nm process node and Arrow Lake architecture contribute to the CPU’s strong performance-per-watt, with a 65W TDP that keeps cooling requirements modest. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units provides basic display capability but is not intended for gaming.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is based on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC’s 5nm process node. The chip contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The GPU has 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units, along with 80 ray tracing cores and 320 tensor cores. Base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz.

Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1438 MHz, translating to 23 Gbps effective. This high bandwidth supports demanding 4K textures and compute workloads without memory stalls. The GPU’s pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 816.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS and FP16 at 52.22 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark scores show strong graphics performance: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 6600, Geekbench OpenCL scores 219065, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 260075. The PassMark G3D score of 34245 and GPU compute score of 19822 indicate solid performance across both graphics and compute workloads. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores of 193, 301, and 134 respectively, along with DirectX 9 score of 381, show consistent performance across older APIs. The PassMark G2D score of 1270 covers 2D graphics operations.

The 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs places the 4080 SUPER in the upper echelon of graphics cards. Its closest rival, the standard RTX 4080, is within 0.1% — a statistical tie. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S are 2.7% and 2.8% ahead respectively, though these deltas are small enough to be workload-dependent.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full range of modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections. The triple-slot cooler measures 310mm in length, 140mm in height, and 61mm in width. Power requirements include a 320W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 700W power supply. The GPU was released on January 30, 2024, with a launch MSRP of 999 USD, and is now end-of-life with the GeForce 50-series as its successor.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong performance in both CPU and GPU workloads without sacrificing either. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking create a balanced system for high-end gaming at resolutions where the GPU becomes the primary performance driver. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K with demanding graphics settings will benefit from the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth, which handle large textures and high-resolution rendering without memory pressure.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the combination useful. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32633 provides solid CPU rendering performance, while the GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 and 80 ray tracing cores accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers and ray-traced effects. The PassMark GPU compute score of 19822 indicates strong compute throughput for tasks like video encoding or physics simulation that can offload to the GPU.

Software developers writing and compiling code will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-core performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4557) for compilation tasks that are often single-threaded, while the 14 cores handle parallel builds. The data compression score of 393800 is relevant for developers working with large codebases or data processing pipelines. The 65W TDP keeps the CPU cool under sustained compile loads.

Students and small business workstation users who need a capable desktop for general productivity, office applications, and occasional creative work will find this build more than sufficient. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a fallback display output, and the CPU’s 14 cores handle multitasking across many applications. The lack of ECC memory support is a minor consideration for business use, but the dual-channel DDR5 configuration provides ample bandwidth for office workloads.

Builders targeting high-refresh gaming will appreciate that the CPU’s single-core strength supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s performance ensures GPU-bound scenarios remain smooth. The combination of 90th percentile CPU and 86th percentile GPU means neither component should consistently hold back the other in a well-balanced game.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Arrow Lake architecture on a 3nm process, with a 65W TDP and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, 10240 shading units, and a 320W TDP.

The combined percentile for this build is 88, placing it in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU holds a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU holds an 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This slight CPU advantage means the GPU is marginally more likely to be the limiting factor in balanced workloads, which is typical for gaming-focused builds.

The build’s overall tier is high-end desktop, suitable for demanding gaming, content creation, and professional workloads. The 65W CPU TDP combined with the 320W GPU TDP means the suggested 700W power supply provides adequate headroom. The Intel Socket 1851 platform supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, ensuring the system has modern connectivity standards.

This pairing represents a balanced high-performance desktop, with no extreme bottleneck in either direction. The CPU’s strong single-core performance complements the GPU’s high-end graphics capability, and both components rank in the top 15% of their respective categories. The absence of measured FPS data means exact gaming performance must be estimated from the benchmark scores, but the synthetic benchmarks indicate a capable high-refresh gaming and content creation system.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4557 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4607 provide strong per-core performance for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 and PassMark G3D score of 34245 indicate the graphics card can push high frame rates at 1440p or 4K, with 16 GB VRAM handling modern game textures. The 86th GPU percentile supports high-refresh 1440p and playable 4K frame rates.

Streaming: The 14-core, 14-thread CPU can handle game logic and encoding software simultaneously, though the lack of hyper-threading means fewer threads than competing 14-core parts with SMT. The GPU’s tensor cores and NVENC-capable hardware (implied by the tensor core count of 320) can offload encoding, reducing CPU load. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38392 indicates sufficient parallel throughput for streaming while gaming.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32633 provides solid CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and timeline playback. The GPU’s 736.3 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K video streams without memory stalling. The data compression score of 393800 aids in codec operations that use CPU compression.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 80 ray tracing cores and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 deliver strong GPU rendering performance for ray-traced scenes. The CPU’s 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache support CPU-based renderers, though the GPU will dominate compute-heavy rendering workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 19822 confirms substantial compute throughput.

Software development: The CPU’s strong single-core performance (4557 PassMark single-thread) accelerates compilation of single-threaded build steps, while 14 cores handle parallel builds. The 65W TDP keeps sustained compile loads cool, and the 24 MB L3 cache aids in large codebase caching. The data encryption score of 30136 supports secure development workflows.

Student and office work: The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides display output, and the CPU’s 14 cores handle multitasking across office applications, web browsers, and communication tools. The 3nm process and 65W TDP keep power consumption low for daily use. The PassMark integer math score of 88626 handles spreadsheet calculations and data processing efficiently.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds