SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

46,062 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing represents a modern desktop configuration aimed at delivering a balanced experience across productivity and gaming. The processor sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card lands in the 66th percentile, creating a system where the CPU often has headroom over the GPU. This analysis examines the benchmark data to define the system's capabilities, limitations, and suitable workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, the combination achieves strong frame rates in competitive titles, with Valorant reaching 375 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 361 FPS. The RTX 5050 is the limiting factor here, as the CPU could push even higher frames, but the measured results comfortably exceed 144 Hz in esports titles.

Streaming: The 14-core, 14-thread CPU provides ample parallel processing for encoding workloads, evidenced by a Passmark multithread score of 37816. The GPU's 80 tensor cores can assist with AI-accelerated encoding features, though the measured gaming FPS at 1080p leaves enough margin for simultaneous streaming overhead in most titles.

Video Editing: Cinebench R23 multicore results of 14769 points indicate solid rendering capability for timeline previews and exports. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and 1440p video effects well, though the 66th percentile GPU ranking suggests longer render times for complex projects compared to higher-tier cards.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 89th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (0.1% ahead) and Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.1% behind) in average benchmark scores. The GPU's FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS provides entry-level GPU rendering capability, suitable for preview work and lighter final renders.

Software Development: The Passmark data encryption score of 29293 and extended instructions score of 32752 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The 24 MB shared L3 cache supports large codebase compilation, while the single-thread score of 4516 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and Office Work: The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU provides display output capability, while the CPU's 65 W TDP keeps system power demands modest. The 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures snappy spreadsheet, document, and browser performance, with the GPU remaining idle for most office workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 46062, placing it in the 89th percentile of all processors. This places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030, 0.1% higher) and Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098, 0.1% lower). The Cinebench R23 results show a multicore score of 14769 and single-core score of 2085, demonstrating balanced performance across both threaded and single-threaded workloads.

The GPU averages 21035 across its benchmark suite, putting it in the 66th percentile of all graphics cards. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, 0.6% higher), while the AMD Radeon HD 8970M sits 1% ahead and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.6% higher. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 represents modern API performance, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 90334 and 89381 respectively show compute capability.

The combined system percentile is 78, with the CPU clearly being the stronger component. The measured FPS data across 50 games shows an average of 106.4 FPS, ranking this pair 2402nd out of 3732 tested configurations. This combined picture reveals a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms, making the graphics card the primary determinant of gaming performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates the RTX 5050 is the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile creates a significant gap in relative capability. This manifests in the FPS scaling across resolutions: at 1080p, games like Counter-Strike 2 hit 163 FPS, but at 1440p this drops to 108 FPS, and at 4K to 60 FPS. This steep decline with resolution increase points to GPU limitations rather than CPU constraints.

In CPU-light titles, the bottleneck shifts. Valorant maintains 375 FPS at 1080p and still achieves 320 FPS at 1440p, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in esports scenarios. However, in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the system manages only 48 FPS at 1080p and 36 FPS at 1440p, indicating the GPU is overwhelmed at higher settings.

The Passmark G3D score of 17326 versus the CPU's multithread score of 37816 reinforces this imbalance. For productivity workloads, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor, but for gaming at 1440p or higher, the GPU dictates performance. The pair rank by FPS at 2402nd of 3732 confirms this is a mid-tier gaming configuration, not a high-end one.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake-S architecture, built on a 3 nm process from TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards.

The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x8 and has a 130 W TDP, with the suggested PSU rated at 300 W. This leaves ample headroom for upgrades, as the CPU's 65 W TDP means the total system draw is modest. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on the GPU is the most likely upgrade trigger for users seeking higher resolution gaming, as the 128-bit bus and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth limit performance in VRAM-heavy titles.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU within the same PCIe Gen 5 ecosystem, as the CPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests it can handle a significantly faster graphics card without becoming the bottleneck. The 20 PCIe lanes from the CPU also support multiple NVMe drives or other expansion cards. The DDR5 memory support ensures the platform remains current for several more generations.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data is available across 50 games at three resolutions, all at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent esports performance: Valorant at 375 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 361 FPS, Roblox at 211 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 194 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 176 FPS, showing strong performance in modern shooters.

At 2560x1440, performance remains playable in most titles but with noticeable drops. Valorant still hits 320 FPS, Warzone 156 FPS, and CS:GO 249 FPS. However, demanding titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 33 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15 FPS. These latter figures fall below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, only a few titles maintain playable frame rates. Valorant hits 256 FPS, Warzone 132 FPS, and CS:GO 147 FPS, but most AAA games fall below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 manages 24 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 22 FPS, and The Medium 23 FPS. This resolution is not viable for ultra settings in graphically intensive games. The average FPS across all games is 106.4, but this is skewed by lighter titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 78, indicating it outperforms 78% of all tested desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has an average score of 46062, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900HX.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160 with ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 24 FPS, which is not playable. At 1920x1080 it achieves 48 FPS.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, accounting for the GPU's 130 W TDP and CPU's 65 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units, providing basic display output without a discrete GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 features 14 cores and 14 threads, indicating a design without hyperthreading. The base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC. The die contains 17,800 million transistors across 243 mm², with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multithreaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085 places it among the top-tier desktop processors, while the multicore score of 14769 demonstrates strong parallel performance. Passmark results reinforce this, with a single-thread score of 4516 and multithread score of 37816.

The data encryption score of 29293 and extended instructions score of 32752 indicate robust security and SIMD performance, useful for encryption, scientific computing, and media encoding. The floating-point math score of 117951 and integer math score of 87948 show balanced arithmetic capability. The 89th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, making it suitable for demanding productivity applications without bottlenecks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile creates a CPU-heavy system, where the processor has more relative headroom than the graphics card. The combined percentile of 78 places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of tested desktop systems.

The pair ranks 2402nd out of 3732 tested configurations by FPS performance, with an average of 106.4 FPS across 50 games. This indicates a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming in most titles, playable 1440p in less demanding games, and 4K only in esports or older titles. The CPU is not the limiting factor in any tested workload, while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions and quality settings.

The platform supports modern connectivity with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 memory, ensuring relevance for several years. The 300 W suggested PSU leaves substantial upgrade headroom, allowing for a future GPU upgrade without platform changes. This is a balanced mid-range desktop configuration, leaning toward CPU-heavy productivity with capable 1080p gaming performance.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays will find this configuration well-suited, with measured FPS exceeding 144 Hz in Valorant, CS:GO, and Rainbow Six Siege. At 1440p, the system handles esports titles comfortably but struggles with AAA games at ultra settings, making it suitable for competitive gamers rather than those seeking maximum visual fidelity.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 89th percentile performance, which rivals the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core i9-13900HX. The 14 cores handle multitasking well, and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM supports 1080p video effects and moderate 3D workloads.

Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the strong encryption and extended instruction scores, alongside the 24 MB L3 cache for larger working sets. Students and office workers receive a system that exceeds their requirements for document processing, web browsing, and productivity suites, while the 65 W CPU TDP keeps operational costs low.

Small business workstations handling lighter rendering, CAD, or data processing will find the CPU sufficient for most tasks, with the GPU providing acceleration for compatible applications. This build is less suitable for 4K gaming enthusiasts or users requiring high VRAM capacity for large texture packs or machine learning workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 uses the GB207 chip based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, with a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2317 MHz with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and memory operates at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed. The pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS and equal FP16 throughput.

The benchmark results place this GPU in the 66th percentile, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 indicating modern DX12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 90334 and 89381 respectively show strong compute capability for its class. However, the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 66 and DirectX 11 score of 150 suggest varying API optimization levels.

The 80 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features, while the 20 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support. The 130 W TDP with a 300 W suggested PSU makes it power-efficient for its performance class. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures but becomes a limiting factor at 1440p in VRAM-intensive titles, as evidenced by the measured FPS drops in games like Ark: Survival Ascended.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds