SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

46,062 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 85th percentile overall, a strong indicator of a balanced high-end system. The CPU holds an 89th percentile rank against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at an 81st percentile rank against all GPUs, showing that this build prioritizes processing power slightly more than graphics power, yet both components remain in the upper tier. This is a combination designed for demanding workloads and high-refresh gaming, with the data to back up that claim.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system that excels in both CPU-intensive and GPU-accelerated tasks. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 delivers an average benchmark score of 46062, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scoring 46030 (a 0.1% difference) and the Intel Core i9-13900HX scoring 46098 (-0.1% difference). The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is particularly strong, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and a single-core score of 2085, indicating excellent scaling across its 14 cores. In PassMark tests, the processor shows versatility with a multi-thread score of 37816 and a single-thread score of 4516, alongside specialized results like a floating-point math score of 117951 and an integer math score of 87948.

On the graphics side, the RTX 4070 achieves an average benchmark score of 37648, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P4, scores 37628 (a 0.1% difference), while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 trails at 37507 (0.4% difference). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927 highlight its DirectX 12 proficiency, while a Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 shows strong cross-API performance. The combined percentile of 85 for the entire build suggests that when working together, these components deliver a cohesive experience that outperforms the vast majority of systems, though the slight gap between CPU and GPU percentiles hints that the processor has a bit more headroom than the graphics card.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across a wide range of titles confirms that this build is a formidable gaming machine, particularly at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates in esports and competitive titles: Counter-Strike 2 hits 254 FPS, Valorant reaches 566 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 302 FPS. These numbers are well beyond the 144Hz refresh rate threshold, making the pairing ideal for high-refresh monitors. At 2560x1440, performance remains strong, with Valorant at 496 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 168 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 156 FPS, all still comfortably above 144Hz.

In AAA and demanding titles, the system shows its limits but remains playable. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 75 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 56 FPS at 1440p and 37 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 follows a similar pattern with 68 FPS at 1080p, 51 FPS at 1440p, and 34 FPS at 4K. More optimized titles like Grand Theft Auto V achieve 116 FPS at 1080p and 78 FPS at 1440p, while Microsoft Flight Simulator manages 92 FPS at 1080p and 74 FPS at 1440p. The average FPS across all tested games is 161.9, which ranks this pair 897th out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 24% of all CPU-GPU combinations. At 4K, most titles fall below 60 FPS, with only lighter games like Valorant (397 FPS), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (228 FPS), and Roblox (124 FPS) maintaining high frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is exceptional for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The measured data shows 254 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 566 FPS in Valorant at 1080p, while at 1440p these titles still hit 168 FPS and 496 FPS respectively, ensuring a smooth experience on 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors. Heavier titles like Call of Duty: Warzone at 176 FPS at 1080p and 156 FPS at 1440p further cement this capability.

Streaming: The combination of the CPU’s strong multi-threaded score of 37816 in PassMark and the GPU’s 184 tensor cores provides solid headroom for encoding while gaming. The 14-core processor can handle the overhead of streaming software, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769, while the GPU can offload encoding tasks without significantly impacting frame rates in the measured titles.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 390711 and encryption score of 29293 indicate strong throughput for codec-heavy workloads. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 12 GB of VRAM provide ample acceleration for effects and rendering in editors that leverage CUDA or DirectX 12, making this a capable workstation for 4K video timelines.

3D rendering: The RTX 4070’s 46 ray tracing cores and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 demonstrate solid ray-tracing performance, while the CPU’s multi-threaded Cinebench scores (1488 in R15, 6202 in R20, 14769 in R23) show it can handle geometry and physics calculations efficiently. This pairing is suitable for moderate 3D rendering tasks, particularly in hybrid CPU-GPU pipelines.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4516 and extended instructions score of 32752 indicate strong compilation performance for single-threaded build steps, while the 24 MB of L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases and virtualized environments. The 14 threads handle parallel builds effectively, as shown by the multi-thread score of 37816.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic productivity, but the data shows it handles office workloads effortlessly. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 81st percentile ensure that spreadsheet, document, and browsing tasks run instantaneously. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU provides a backup display solution, though the discrete GPU will handle any visual tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in average benchmark score, with the Intel part scoring 46062 and the AMD part scoring 46030, a difference of just 0.1%. This makes them effectively performance equals in overall CPU benchmarks.

Q: What is the RTX 4070’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at ultra settings, as well as 4K in less demanding titles.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming is possible but not consistently above 60 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 37 FPS at 3840x2160, while Valorant reaches 397 FPS at the same resolution. Lighter and esports titles are playable at 4K, but AAA games will require lower settings or upscaling.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This 1.6 GHz range allows the processor to scale from power-efficient operation to high-performance bursts.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The processor has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not support hyper-threading. Despite this, its multi-threaded performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is marked as end-of-life in production status. It was released on 2023-04-11, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series.

Q: What is the pair’s ranking in terms of FPS across all tested pairs?

A: The CPU-GPU pair ranks 897th out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 161.9 across all games tested. This places it in the top 24% of all combinations, indicating strong gaming performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

Analyzing the percentiles and FPS scaling reveals a nuanced bottleneck picture. The CPU’s 89th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 81st percentile suggests that the processor has slightly more headroom than the graphics card, meaning the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. This is evident in the FPS data: at 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates (e.g., 254 FPS in Counter-Strike 2), but at 4K, the GPU’s limitations become apparent, with many titles dropping below 60 FPS. For instance, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 75 FPS at 1080p to 37 FPS at 4K, a 50% reduction, while the CPU’s performance in single-threaded tasks remains constant.

In CPU-intensive workloads, the GPU is not the bottleneck. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and PassMark multi-thread score of 37816 indicate that it can sustain heavy processing loads, and the GPU’s compute performance (PassMark GPU compute score of 14720) complements this without capping CPU output. However, in gaming, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a typical GPU-bound pattern: average FPS drops by about 30-40% across most titles (e.g., Fortnite from 122 to 77 FPS), which is consistent with the GPU being the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The pair’s average FPS of 161.9 and 85th combined percentile confirm that the balance is well-tuned for 1440p gaming, where neither component consistently holds the other back.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured data shows that esports titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2 exceed 250 FPS at 1080p, while AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 maintain playable frame rates above 50 FPS at 1440p. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 89th percentile multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the strong single-thread score of 4516 and the 24 MB of L3 cache.

Students and office workers will find this build far exceeds their needs, but the 85th combined percentile ensures longevity and responsiveness for years. Small business workstations running data analysis or virtualization workloads can leverage the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 390711 and encryption score of 29293. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM also makes it suitable for machine learning inference tasks or GPU-accelerated databases. For gamers at 4K, this build is less suitable, as most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS at that resolution, but it remains a strong choice for those targeting high-refresh 1440p or competitive 1080p play.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The card has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. Its base clock is 1920 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, and memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 26927 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854, placing the GPU in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 and OpenCL score of 154858 demonstrate strong compute capabilities. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The 46 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, which is reflected in playable frame rates in ray-traced titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (75 FPS at 1080p). The 184 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-driven features, enhancing performance in supported games. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 37648 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628), showing that it punches at a professional level in compute tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 graphics card. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, featuring Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm process, while the GPU uses Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 85, placing this system in the upper echelon of all builds. The pair ranks 897th out of 3732 CPU-GPU combinations by average FPS, with an average of 161.9 FPS across all measured games.

The CPU’s 89th percentile and the GPU’s 81st percentile indicate that this is a well-matched pairing, though the processor is slightly stronger relative to its peers. The build targets high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with the data showing that most esports titles exceed 200 FPS at 1080p and remain above 150 FPS at 1440p. For AAA games, 1440p is the sweet spot, with most titles hovering between 50-80 FPS at ultra settings. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for modern textures and effects, while the CPU’s 14 cores and 5.00 GHz boost clock ensure no processing bottlenecks in most scenarios. This is a balanced, high-performance desktop system suitable for gamers and power users who want consistent, above-average performance without stepping into the extreme high-end tier.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip features a total of 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units, and is not multiplier-unlocked.

Benchmark scores demonstrate a well-rounded performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and single-core score of 2085 place it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46062. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, scores 46030 (0.1% difference), while the Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098 (-0.1% difference), showing near-parity with these high-end processors. In PassMark tests, the CPU shows specific strengths in data compression (390711) and encryption (29293), indicating robust throughput for archival and security workloads. The floating-point math score of 117951 and integer math score of 87948 suggest strong scientific and general-purpose compute capabilities.

For real workloads, the 14 threads handle parallel tasks effectively, as shown by the multi-thread score of 37816, while the single-thread score of 4516 ensures snappy responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The 5.00 GHz boost clock provides high peak performance for bursty tasks, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The lack of hyper-threading is offset by the high core count and efficient Arrow Lake architecture, which delivers competitive performance against rivals with more threads. This CPU is a capable choice for gaming, productivity, and content creation, as its benchmark scores consistently place it in the top 11% of all processors.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds