SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

21,440 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile represents a specific kind of laptop build: one that prioritizes efficiency and modern architecture in the CPU while relying on a high-end GPU for heavy lifting. The data indicates a system that is far more capable than its modest 17 W CPU TDP might suggest, thanks to a GPU that punches well above its weight class. This analysis draws strictly from the provided benchmark scores to outline what this combination can realistically achieve.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the primary strength of the build. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20355 places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, directly rivaling the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (deltaPct -0.1) and RTX 2080 Ti (deltaPct 0.5). This level of graphics performance is sufficient to drive high-refresh-rate displays at high settings, with the CPU's single-thread score of 3836 in Passmark ensuring that frame pacing remains stable. The CPU's 4.50 GHz boost clock further supports this, preventing the processor from becoming a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The RTX 5070 Mobile's architecture includes dedicated tensor cores, which are essential for modern encoding and streaming workloads. While the CPU's 8 cores and 8 threads are not numerous, the GPU can offload the encoding task, keeping the CPU free for game logic. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9932 suggests that even with a game running, there is enough headroom in the CPU to handle a streaming application, though the lack of hyper-threading means users should not expect to run heavily threaded background tasks concurrently without impacting performance.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The GPU's OpenCL score of 122238 in Geekbench indicates strong compute performance for effects and rendering. The CPU's Passmark Integer Math score of 39679 and Floating Point Math score of 53310 provide a solid foundation for timeline editing and codec handling. For 4K editing, the 8 GB of GDDR7 VRAM on the GPU is a critical asset, as it allows for smoother scrubbing and preview of high-resolution footage without constant data swapping.

3D rendering: The GPU is the clear workhorse here. Its FP32 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS and 36 RT cores make it highly capable for both rasterization and ray-traced rendering in applications like Blender or D5 Render. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6491 is respectable for a mobile chip, but it is the GPU that will dominate render times. The data suggests that this system is better suited for real-time viewport rendering and final frame renders that leverage the GPU, rather than CPU-bound render farms.

Software development: The CPU's architecture is well-suited for compilation tasks. The Passmark Data Compression score of 173924 is exceptionally high, which translates to fast file I/O and rapid build processes that are often disk or compression-bound. The single-core performance (Cinebench R20 single-core: 916) also ensures that the IDE and UI remain responsive. However, developers working on massive codebases requiring heavy parallel compilation may find the 8-thread limit a constraint, as the Passmark Multithread score of 18227 is modest compared to the CPU's own single-thread capabilities.

Student and office work: This is where the efficiency of the Core Ultra 5 228V shines. With a TDP of just 17 W, the CPU is designed for excellent battery life, making it ideal for all-day portability. The integrated Arc 130V graphics provide a capable fallback for everyday tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed. For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, the CPU's high single-thread score (3836) ensures a snappy and responsive experience, and the system's overall 75th percentile ranking across all components indicates a premium level of performance for professional and academic tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of a high-performing mobile platform. The CPU's average benchmark score is 21440, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. This performance is remarkably close to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (avgScore 21484, deltaPct -0.2) and the Intel Core i9-11900H (avgScore 21367, deltaPct 0.3). This is a significant achievement for a 17 W chip, matching the multi-threaded performance of older high-power desktop and mobile processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29928, also in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. It sits nearly identically between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (avgScore 29945, deltaPct -0.1) and the RTX 2080 Ti (avgScore 29783, deltaPct 0.5). This confirms that the RTX 5070 Mobile delivers desktop-class graphics performance from a previous generation. The combined percentile for the entire build is 75, indicating that both components are well-matched in their relative performance tiers, creating a balanced system where neither part is dramatically holding back the other.

Specific CPU scores show a strong single-thread focus. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1758 is a high mark, while the multi-core score of 9932 indicates that the chip scales reasonably but is not a multi-threaded monster. The Passmark Single Thread score of 3836 corroborates the single-core strength. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20355 is the definitive gaming metric, while its Passmark GPU Compute score of 8279 shows its capability in compute-heavy tasks beyond graphics.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a compact but powerful graphics processor. Built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and TSMC's 5 nm process, it packs 21,900 million transistors into a die size of just 181 mm². This efficiency allows it to deliver high performance within a 50 W TDP, making it suitable for thinner laptops. The memory subsystem is a key strength: 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth for a mobile GPU and is crucial for high-resolution textures and 1080p and 1440p gaming.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. More importantly for modern workloads, it features 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. These hardware units are essential for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) technologies. The FP32 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 FP16 ratio, indicates that it can handle both standard graphics and AI-accelerated tasks with equal proficiency. The pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s are solid figures that will ensure high fill rates at demanding resolutions.

Benchmark results for the GPU are consistently strong. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 show excellent cross-API compute performance. The Passmark G3D score of 20355 places it in the top tier of mobile GPUs, comparable to the desktop RTX 3070 Ti. However, the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 93 and DirectX 11 score of 192 are lower than expected, which might indicate driver overhead or that these tests are not fully optimized for the newer architecture. The G2D score of 896 is less relevant for gaming but indicates adequate 2D performance for desktop tasks. Overall, the GPU is a rendering powerhouse, with the RT and tensor cores providing the necessary hardware for future-proofing against upcoming games that rely heavily on ray tracing and AI upscaling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of a GPU-centric system. The CPU, while efficient and having strong single-core performance, is the limiting factor in highly parallel, multi-threaded workloads. Its Passmark Multithread score of 18227 is significantly lower than its single-thread score of 3836, indicating a large gap in scaling. In contrast, the GPU's performance is top-tier, rivaling desktop parts from a previous generation.

In gaming, the bottleneck will be the CPU in specific scenarios. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the GPU can render frames very quickly, and the CPU's 8 threads may struggle to feed it enough draw calls, especially in CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or MMOs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9932 suggests that the CPU can handle modern games, but its performance ceiling is lower than the GPU's. Conversely, at higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, and the CPU has enough headroom.

For productivity, the balance shifts. In tasks like 3D rendering, the GPU will vastly outperform the CPU, making the processor a minor bottleneck. For tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the CPU's 8 threads are the hard limit. The Passmark Data Encryption score of 13032 and Extended Instructions score of 14801 are decent, but they will cap performance in these specific areas. The data suggests that this is not a workstation for heavy multi-threaded CPU workloads, but rather a system where the GPU is the star and the CPU is designed to be efficient and responsive, not a multi-threading champion.

Who Should Build It

This build is designed for the gamer and content creator who prioritizes graphics performance and portability. The RTX 5070 Mobile's performance, comparable to a desktop RTX 3070 Ti, makes it ideal for gamers who want to play at high refresh rates on 1080p or 1440p displays. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for current titles at these resolutions, and the 75th percentile GPU ranking ensures it will handle demanding games for years to come.

Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated software, such as video editors using DaVinci Resolve or 3D artists using Blender, will benefit immensely from the 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The GPU's compute score of 8279 in Passmark confirms its ability to handle offloading tasks from the CPU. This is a machine for creators who are GPU-bound, not CPU-bound.

Students and small business professionals will appreciate the efficiency of the Core Ultra 5 228V. The 17 W TDP and integrated Arc 130V graphics mean the system can be used for daily office work, web browsing, and document editing with excellent battery life, only activating the powerful discrete GPU when needed for gaming or demanding creative tasks. Software developers will find the CPU's high single-thread score and data compression score of 173924 beneficial for a responsive coding environment, though they should be aware of the 8-thread limit for large builds. This is not a server-grade workstation, but a high-performance, portable laptop for a power user who needs both gaming and creative capabilities in one device.

Gaming Performance

Important Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as such. The data is not from direct gameplay measurements.

Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20355, which is on par with an RTX 3070 Ti, this system is expected to deliver excellent gaming performance. At 1080p Ultra settings, this should translate to high frame rates in most modern titles. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, frame rates are expected to be well above 144 FPS, often reaching 200+ FPS, thanks to the strong single-core CPU performance and high GPU fill rate. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III, the system should comfortably achieve 100-140 FPS on average, with the 8 GB VRAM being sufficient for high-resolution textures.

At 1440p Ultra settings, the GPU will still be the dominant force. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is enough to feed the GPU at this resolution. Expect frame rates of 80-120 FPS in AAA titles, with the CPU's 8 threads being less of a bottleneck as the GPU takes on more rendering load. The system will begin to stress the VRAM capacity in some of the most demanding titles with Ultra textures, but for the vast majority of games, 8 GB is adequate.

At 4K Ultra settings, the system is playable but will require adjustments. The GPU's performance is comparable to an RTX 3070 Ti, which is a capable 4K card but not a native 4K powerhouse. Expect frame rates of 40-60 FPS in demanding AAA titles. However, the presence of 144 tensor cores suggests that DLSS will be a decisive factor here. Using DLSS in Performance or Balanced mode, which renders at a lower internal resolution and upscales, could push frame rates to 60-90 FPS, making 4K gaming a viable option. The data suggests that this is a 1080p and 1440p gaming machine first, with 4K being possible through upscaling technologies.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, which uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This high-bandwidth connection ensures that the RTX 5070 Mobile is not bandwidth-limited. Memory support is listed as "unknown" and depends on the motherboard, but the CPU uses a Dual-channel memory bus, indicating that LPDDR5X memory is likely soldered on-package for this Lunar Lake architecture.

Given the soldered CPU and likely soldered memory, the upgrade path for this specific laptop is essentially non-existent for core components. The primary upgrade a user can make is to the storage, as the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are likely connected to a fast NVMe SSD slot. A future upgrade would mean purchasing a new laptop entirely. For users looking for more GPU performance, the 50 W TDP of the RTX 5070 Mobile is a fixed limit, and there is no PSU headroom to consider, as the `suggestedPsu` field is null and the power connector is listed as "None" (being an IGP-style mobile part). The system is designed to be a balanced, self-contained package, and the data suggests that any future upgrade would require a full platform change.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

A: The data shows they are nearly identical in overall performance. The Core Ultra 5 228V has an average benchmark score of 21440, while the Ryzen 5 2600 scores 21484, representing a deltaPct of only -0.2. This is a remarkable result for the 17 W mobile chip.

Q: Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile faster than a desktop RTX 3070 Ti?

A: Based on the average benchmark scores, they are essentially equivalent. The RTX 5070 Mobile has an average score of 29928, while the RTX 3070 Ti has a score of 29945, a deltaPct of -0.1. This indicates that the mobile GPU matches the desktop performance of the previous generation.

Q: What is the performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU is 75. The CPU is in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is also in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a well-balanced, high-end system.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists `eccMemory` as false for the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V. This is a consumer-focused mobile chip and does not support error-correcting code memory.

Q: What is the process node for both the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the GPU is on a 5 nm process, also by TSMC. This advanced manufacturing contributes to the high efficiency of both components.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is in addition to the 192 KB of L1 cache and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the GPU has a boost clock of 1425 MHz. These clocks are key to their respective single-thread and graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds