SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

21,440 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

43,667 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile pairing represents a stark contrast in mobile computing priorities. The CPU is a highly efficient 8-core Lunar Lake part designed for thin-and-light systems, while the GPU is a flagship-class Ada Lovelace part with substantial power and memory resources. Benchmark data shows the CPU sitting at the 75th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 84th percentile among all graphics cards, with a combined percentile of 80. This analysis examines the platform, workload suitability, and balance of this unusual laptop configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in any traditional sense; the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard. The platform is built around the Lunar Lake architecture, which integrates the CPU, GPU, and memory controller onto a single package. The memory support is listed as "unknown" and depends on the motherboard, but the memory bus is dual-channel. This is a critical constraint for a system paired with a high-end GPU, as the CPU’s memory bandwidth will be shared with the discrete graphics card.

The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 4 lanes available from the CPU only. This is a limited number of lanes compared to desktop platforms, but it is sufficient for a single high-bandwidth device like a laptop GPU. The RTX 4090 Mobile uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The integrated graphics are Arc 130V, which provides a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is idle or for power-saving modes.

The CPU has a TDP of 17 watts, which is extremely low for a processor paired with a 120-watt GPU. This disparity suggests the system’s power delivery is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The PSU headroom is not specified, but the combined thermal envelope of a 17-watt CPU and a 120-watt GPU implies a total system draw that is manageable for a large laptop power brick, though the GPU dominates the power budget. A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not possible at the CPU level; the only meaningful upgrade path would be to a different laptop entirely, as the BGA 2833 socket and soldered design prevent any component-level improvements.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 4090 Mobile provides the bulk of the performance, with a Passmark G3D score of 27212 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 180831. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3836 in Passmark is strong enough to feed the GPU in most titles, though the 8-thread limit may constrain performance in heavily threaded game logic. Streaming is a mixed scenario: the GPU’s 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores handle encoding and ray tracing, but the CPU’s 8 threads are shared between the game and the stream encoder, which could cause frame drops in CPU-bound titles.

Video editing benefits from the GPU’s 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, which accelerates rendering and effects. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9932 is modest by desktop standards but adequate for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines. 3D rendering relies heavily on the GPU, and the 27212 Passmark G3D score places it in the top tier of mobile GPUs, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated renderers. The CPU’s multicore score is less relevant here, but its 8 cores will handle scene preparation and physics without major bottlenecks.

Software development is a mixed workload. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3836 and data encryption score of 13032 indicate strong per-core performance for compilation and encryption tasks, but the 8-thread limit will slow heavily parallel builds. The GPU is largely idle during code compilation, making this scenario CPU-bound. Student and office work is an area where this pairing is wildly overprovisioned. The CPU’s 17-watt TDP and efficient Lunar Lake architecture deliver excellent battery life for document editing and web browsing, but the GPU’s 120-watt TDP is unnecessary for these tasks and will only draw power when activated.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning no hyper-threading is enabled. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The architecture is Lunar Lake, built on a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a unified design where all 8 cores are performance-oriented, without the hybrid P-core/E-core split seen in other Intel mobile parts.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks but is limited in multicore throughput. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1758 is competitive with desktop parts from a few generations ago, while the multicore score of 9932 is roughly 5.6 times higher, reflecting the linear scaling of 8 cores at a 4.5 GHz boost. The Passmark single-thread score of 3836 confirms strong per-core performance, while the multithread score of 18227 shows the 8-thread ceiling. The data compression score of 173924 is high, indicating efficient memory and cache utilization, while the find prime numbers score of 168 is low, suggesting limited integer throughput in certain workloads.

The average benchmark score of 21440 places the CPU at the 75th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, with an average score of 21484, a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the Ultra 5 228V is nearly identical to a six-year-old desktop processor in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i9-11900H is 0.3 percent behind, and the AMD EPYC 9454 is 1 percent ahead. This indicates that the Ultra 5 228V delivers desktop-class performance from a 17-watt mobile package, but it does not exceed the multicore capabilities of older high-end desktop parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The CPU’s 75th percentile and the GPU’s 84th percentile suggest that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor at lower resolutions, while the CPU will become the bottleneck at higher resolutions where the GPU’s frame rate drops. The 8 threads of the CPU are a significant constraint; modern games increasingly use more than 8 threads for physics, AI, and streaming, which can cause the CPU to saturate before the GPU reaches its full potential.

The Passmark physics score of 1538 is low, indicating that the CPU will struggle with physics-heavy simulations in games or professional applications. The floating point math score of 53310 and integer math score of 39679 are moderate, suggesting balanced general-purpose compute. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 32.98 TFLOPS vastly exceeds the CPU’s compute capabilities, so any workload that can be offloaded to the GPU will see massive acceleration, while CPU-bound tasks will lag.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available since no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, the GPU can output hundreds of frames per second in esports titles at 1080p, but the CPU may limit the maximum frame rate to around 150-200 FPS in those scenarios. At 4K, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, and the CPU’s 8 threads will have ample headroom. For productivity tasks, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will dominate memory-intensive workloads, while the CPU’s 8 MB of L3 cache may cause cache misses in large datasets.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multicore score is 1502.5, and the single-core score is 267. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 6491 and the single-core score is 916. The R23 multicore score is 9932, and the single-core score is 1758. These scores indicate a processor that scales well with multicore loads but has a hard ceiling at 8 threads. The Passmark tests show a multithread score of 18227, a single-thread score of 3836, and a floating point math score of 53310. The data encryption score of 13032 and extended instructions score of 14801 show strong cryptographic and SIMD performance.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 180831, and the Vulkan score is 170774. The Passmark G3D score is 27212, with a GPU compute score of 12347. The DirectX 12 score is 107, which is low in isolation but must be interpreted in context; the Passmark DirectX tests are not representative of modern gaming performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 43667 places it at the 84th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000, with an average score of 43301, a delta of 0.8 percent, meaning the RTX 4090 Mobile is slightly ahead. The RTX 5050 Mobile is 0.9 percent behind, and the RTX A6000 is 0.9 percent ahead.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the dominant component, and the CPU is a supporting player. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 21440 is about half the GPU’s average score of 43667, but the two components serve different roles. The CPU handles system-level tasks and game logic, while the GPU handles rendering and compute. The combined percentile of 80 indicates that this laptop outperforms 80 percent of all recorded builds, but it is not a top-tier system due to the CPU’s multicore limitations.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for gamers who prioritize frame rates at 1440p or 4K, where the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and high bandwidth shine. The GPU’s 84th percentile ranking means it can handle demanding titles at high settings, while the CPU’s 75th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck at those resolutions. Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated renderers, such as Blender or Octane, will benefit from the 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the 304 tensor cores for AI denoising.

Software developers who write CUDA or DirectX code will find the GPU’s compute capabilities useful for prototyping, but the CPU’s 8-thread limit may slow large builds. The student and office market is not a target for this build, as the GPU is massively overprovisioned for document editing and web browsing. Small business workstations that run GPU-accelerated analytics or machine learning inference could use this system, but the CPU’s modest multicore performance may be a bottleneck for data preprocessing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 27212 suggests it can achieve high frame rates in most titles, but the CPU’s 8 threads may limit performance in CPU-bound games. At 1080p, the GPU is likely underutilized in esports titles, and the CPU may cap frame rates around 150-200 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU will be more fully utilized, and frame rates will be high but more variable. At 4K, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, and the CPU will have ample headroom.

For AAA titles, the 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for maxed-out textures at 4K, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle large texture streaming. Ray tracing performance is supported by 76 RT cores, and DLSS is supported by 304 tensor cores, which can boost frame rates significantly. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3836 is adequate for most game engines, but games that use more than 8 threads may see stuttering or frame drops.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build with an Intel Core Ultra 5 228V CPU and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a low-power Lunar Lake part with a 17-watt TDP, while the GPU is a high-power Ada Lovelace part with a 120-watt TDP. The combination is unusual because the CPU is designed for efficiency, while the GPU is designed for maximum performance. The overall tier is high, with a combined percentile of 80, but the CPU’s 8-thread limit prevents this from being a top-tier system. The build is best described as a GPU-first laptop for gamers and creators who need maximum graphics performance and are willing to accept a CPU that is efficient but not multicore-heavy.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket type and can it be upgraded?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. The CPU cannot be upgraded because it is permanently attached to the motherboard.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it compare to the GPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 120 watts. The GPU consumes over 7 times the power of the CPU.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The CPU is at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21440.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI acceleration?

A: Yes, the GPU has 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI acceleration, including DLSS.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 43667 and is at the 84th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is based on the AD103 chip and the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The base clock is 1335 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, and the memory clock is 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 515.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 32.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance matching at 32.98 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. The GPU has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that excels in compute tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 180831 and Vulkan score of 170774 indicate strong general-purpose compute. The Passmark G3D score of 27212 is high, but the GPU compute score of 12347 is notably lower, suggesting that the GPU is optimized for graphics over compute in certain workloads. The DirectX 12 score of 107 is low, but this is a synthetic test that does not reflect real-world gaming performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 43667 places it at the 84th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Quadro M6000 and RTX 5050 Mobile, all within 1 percent of each other. This indicates that the RTX 4090 Mobile is a top-tier mobile GPU, but not the absolute fastest, as the RTX A6000 is 0.9 percent ahead.

For rendering, the 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for large scenes and high-resolution textures, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports fast data transfer. The 76 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, and the 304 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based rendering. The GPU’s 120-watt TDP is high for a laptop, but it is the price of this level of performance. The slot width is IGP, meaning it is an integrated graphics package designed for laptops, and the display outputs are portable device dependent.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds