SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

21,440 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This page analyzes the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU in a laptop configuration. The data presented here is derived exclusively from benchmark scores and hardware specifications, as no direct frame rate measurements exist for this specific combination. All performance discussions regarding gaming are therefore estimates based on the relative strengths of the CPU and GPU in synthetic workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is a mobile processor built on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 8 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The chip is designed for efficiency, with a thermal design power (TDP) of just 17 W, which is exceptionally low for a processor with this level of performance.

In terms of memory hierarchy, the CPU has a per-core L1 cache of 192 KB and a per-core L2 cache of 2.5 MB, alongside a shared L3 cache of 8 MB. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the integrated graphics are provided by the Arc 130V. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for CPU-only operations, and it is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 9932 points in multi-core and 1758 points in single-core tests. The single-core score is notably strong, indicating high per-thread efficiency, which is critical for lightly-threaded workloads like gaming. The multi-core score, while lower than desktop high-core-count parts, is respectable for a 17 W mobile chip, suggesting it can handle productivity tasks without sustained thermal throttling.

PassMark results further break down performance: multi-thread score is 18227, single-thread is 3836, and integer math scores 39679. The floating-point math score of 53310 is particularly high, which is beneficial for scientific and engineering applications. Data compression (173924) and encryption (13032) scores indicate solid performance for archiving and security tasks. The average benchmark score is 21440, placing the CPU in the 75th percentile of all processors.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ultra 5 228V is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, showing a negligible delta of -0.2%. It is also 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900H and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9454, while being 0.9% behind the Intel Xeon D-1746TER. This indicates that the Ultra 5 228V sits in a performance tier equivalent to older desktop processors and mobile H-series parts, despite its much lower power draw, showcasing the efficiency gains of the Lunar Lake architecture.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (1758 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is sufficient to feed a high-end GPU. The bottleneck will primarily be the GPU, and the 8-core/8-thread configuration is adequate for modern game engines that typically use up to 8 threads effectively. However, the lack of extra threads may limit performance in games that benefit from more than 8 threads, but the high boost clock mitigates this in most scenarios.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s 17 W TDP suggests that simultaneous gaming and encoding could strain the processor, but the presence of the dedicated RTX 4080 Mobile GPU with NVENC capabilities means that hardware encoding can offload the work. The CPU’s multi-core score of 9932 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for the encoding overhead if using x264, but for best results, GPU-based encoding is recommended to keep frame rates high.

Video editing workflows will see strong performance from the CPU’s high floating-point math score (53310 in PassMark). This benefits tasks like rendering effects and color grading. The 8 MB L3 cache helps with data locality, and the dual-channel memory bus provides adequate bandwidth for 4K video timelines, though not as high as desktop platforms with quad-channel support.

3D rendering in applications like Blender benefits from the multi-core score of 9932 in Cinebench R23. This places the CPU in a range where it can handle moderate rendering tasks, but for professional-grade, time-critical renders, a higher-core-count desktop CPU would be faster. The efficiency of the 17 W TDP means that rendering on battery power is feasible, albeit slower.

Software development is a strong suit for this CPU. The single-thread performance (3836 in PassMark single-thread) speeds up compilation of individual files, while the multi-thread score accelerates parallel builds. The data encryption score of 13032 ensures secure communication and package signing are handled efficiently.

For student and office work, the CPU is more than adequate. The low TDP means long battery life, and the integrated Arc 130V graphics can handle 2D and light 3D tasks. The single-core performance ensures snappy response in productivity suites, and the multi-thread score handles background tasks like antivirus scans and system updates without noticeable slowdown.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Ultra 5 228V with the RTX 4080 Mobile creates a significant imbalance in favor of the GPU. The GPU is in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 75th percentile. This means that in GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming with ray tracing, the RTX 4080 Mobile will be the limiting factor. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or high-frame-rate esports titles at 1080p, the CPU might become the bottleneck.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21440, compared to the GPU’s average score of 38135. This large gap suggests that the GPU has significantly more raw compute power than the CPU, which is typical for gaming laptops where the GPU is prioritized. The 8 threads of the CPU may be a limiting factor in heavily multi-threaded games that expect 12 or 16 threads, but the high boost clock of 4.50 GHz helps in single-threaded scenarios.

In FPS terms, since no measured data exists, estimates suggest that at 1080p, the CPU might limit frame rates in less demanding titles, while at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3836 is strong, but the multi-thread score of 18227 is modest, meaning that games optimized for high core counts may see reduced scaling. The GPU’s pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s are more than capable of pushing high frame rates, provided the CPU can keep up.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, showing a delta of -0.2% in average benchmark scores. This means they have nearly identical overall compute performance, despite the Ultra 5 being a mobile chip with a much lower TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the CPU operates at its stock clocks of 2.10 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost, and users cannot manually increase the clock speeds.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, achieved with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 18 Gbps.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% slower than the desktop RTX 4070 in average benchmark scores, making them closely matched in raw compute performance, though the mobile part has different power characteristics.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 W, which is very low for an 8-core processor, contributing to its suitability for thin-and-light laptops with limited cooling.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The CPU is in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 75% of processors in the benchmark database, a strong showing for a mobile chip.

Q: What is the GPU’s process node and die size?

A: The GPU is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 294 mm² and 35,800 million transistors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable. The motherboard is proprietary to the laptop design, and memory support is listed as depending on the motherboard, with a dual-channel memory bus. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for CPU connectivity, but the GPU uses a separate PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Given the 17 W TDP of the CPU and the 110 W TDP of the GPU, the total system power draw is relatively modest for a laptop with this level of performance. There is no suggested PSU figure for the GPU, but the combination is unlikely to require an extremely large power adapter, typical for high-end gaming laptops. The upgrade path for this platform is limited; users cannot swap the CPU or GPU. The most sensible next upgrade would be to increase RAM if the motherboard supports it, or to replace the entire laptop to get a newer platform.

The GPU is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is current for mobile GPUs. The lack of discrete power connectors suggests it is a soldered mobile component, not upgradeable. The memory is 12 GB of GDDR6, which is ample for current games, and the 192-bit bus provides sufficient bandwidth for high resolutions. Future upgrades would require a new laptop with a newer GPU generation, such as the successor, the GeForce 50 Mobile series.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end mobile GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, with an effective speed of 18 Gbps.

The core configuration includes 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 80 raster operation units (ROPs). It also features 58 ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The boost clock is 1665 MHz, with a base clock of 1290 MHz. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 24926 in PassMark G3D, which is a strong result, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 159575, and Vulkan score is 145807, indicating strong compute performance for non-gaming workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score is 11191, which is lower than the G3D score, suggesting that the GPU is optimized for graphics rendering more than raw compute tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4080 Mobile is 0.4% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, which is an entry-level mobile GPU, but this is likely due to benchmark variations. More relevantly, it is 0.6% slower than the RTX 5080 Mobile, and 1.3% faster than both the desktop RTX 4070 and the Tesla P4. This places the RTX 4080 Mobile in a performance tier slightly above the desktop RTX 4070, making it a very capable part for 1440p gaming and high-refresh 1080p.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21440, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, has an average score of 21484, a difference of -0.2%. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, a 0.3% difference, and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, a 1% difference. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, a -0.9% difference. These scores indicate that the Ultra 5 228V is competitive with these older or higher-power parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 38135, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, scores 38299, a -0.4% difference. The RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38349, a -0.6% difference, and the RTX 4070 scores 37648, a 1.3% difference. The Tesla P4 scores 37628, also a 1.3% difference. This shows the RTX 4080 Mobile is very closely matched with these parts, with performance differences of less than 2%.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, which is a high overall tier. The CPU’s 75th percentile and GPU’s 81st percentile create a system that is well above average, with the GPU being the stronger component. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, all gaming performance estimates are based on these synthetic scores, which suggest that the system is capable of high-end gaming and demanding productivity tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, a low-power mobile CPU, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, a high-performance mobile GPU, in a laptop chassis. The CPU is designed for efficiency, with a 17 W TDP, while the GPU is a power-hungry part with a 110 W TDP. This creates a system where the GPU is clearly the dominant component in terms of raw performance, as indicated by its higher average benchmark score and percentile ranking.

The build class is laptop, and the overall tier, based on the 78th combined percentile, is high. This is not an entry-level or mid-range system; it is a premium configuration intended for users who prioritize graphics performance. The CPU’s low power draw allows for a thinner laptop design, but the GPU’s thermal requirements mean that adequate cooling is necessary. The 8-core CPU is sufficient for most tasks, but the 12 GB GPU memory and high shader count make this system ideal for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

The data shows a system that is balanced towards GPU-centric tasks, such as gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering, and AI inference. The CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures that it does not become a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, but the 8-thread limit may be a constraint in heavily multi-threaded applications. Overall, this is a capable high-end laptop build that excels in graphics-intensive workloads.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is targeted at gamers who want to play at 1440p or high-refresh 1080p with maximum settings. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 12 GB of VRAM and high pixel rate can handle modern titles, and the CPU’s single-core strength ensures smooth frame delivery. The lack of measured FPS data means that specific frame rates cannot be quoted, but the benchmark scores suggest a very capable gaming machine.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the CPU’s high floating-point math score. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video timelines and complex 3D scenes, and the tensor cores enable faster AI-based effects. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong single-thread performance for compilation and the GPU’s compute capabilities for parallel processing tasks.

Students and professionals in fields like engineering, architecture, and data science will find this system useful for running simulations and rendering models. The CPU’s 17 W TDP means it can sustain performance on battery, and the GPU can be used for CUDA-accelerated workloads. Small business workstations that require a mix of CPU and GPU power for tasks like CAD, financial modeling, and video conferencing will also be well-served by this configuration. The 75th percentile CPU and 81st percentile GPU place this system in a tier that is overkill for basic office work but ideal for demanding professional applications.