SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

21,440 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# System Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

This laptop-class pairing combines Intel's Lunar Lake mobile processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4060 Mobile GPU, delivering a combined performance percentile of 71. The CPU sits at the 75th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 67th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a balanced mid-to-upper tier mobile platform, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion herein is estimated from the benchmark scores provided.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the AD107 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming and mid-range content creation, though the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth-heavy workloads compared to wider-memory designs.

The rendering pipeline includes 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The GPU's pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s and texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s indicate solid fill-rate capabilities for its class. The FP32 performance of 11.61 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 11.61 TFLOPS at 1:1 ratio) positions this GPU firmly in the mainstream mobile segment. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, respectively, making this a capable solution for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) titles with ray-traced effects.

Benchmark data shows the GPU achieving a Passmark G3D score of 17469, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 22729 sits just 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895), 0.8% above the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (22549), 1.3% below the Intel Arc B580 (23021), and 1.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435). This clustering indicates the RTX 4060 Mobile performs essentially on par with desktop GPUs from the previous generation and current-generation desktop mid-range options.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420 and Vulkan score of 89569 demonstrate strong compute performance across both APIs. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 6816 reflects capable general-purpose compute, though not exceptional. For rendering workloads, the DirectX 12 score of 73 and DirectX 11 score of 157 (Passmark indices) suggest the GPU handles modern APIs efficiently, while the DirectX 9 score of 216 and DirectX 10 score of 107 indicate legacy API performance is comparatively weaker. The G2D score of 730 shows modest 2D performance, typical for a discrete mobile GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's 75th percentile and GPU's 67th percentile create a pairing where the processor holds a slight advantage over the graphics card in overall relative performance. This suggests the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU can generally feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios. The CPU's average benchmark score of 21440 is nearly identical to the GPU's average of 22729 when normalized, but the different benchmark suites make direct comparison imprecise.

In gaming workloads, the RTX 4060 Mobile's position at the 67th percentile means it will constrain frame rates in demanding titles, particularly at higher resolutions and with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1758 and Passmark single-thread score of 3836, provides sufficient headroom for most gaming scenarios where the GPU becomes the bottleneck. However, in CPU-intensive games with heavy physics or simulation elements, the CPU's 8-core/8-thread configuration could become the limiting factor.

For content creation and productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the task. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9932, Passmark multithread score of 18227) means CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or compilation will be well-served. Conversely, GPU-accelerated rendering tasks will leverage the RTX 4060 Mobile's compute capabilities, where its 67th percentile ranking indicates mid-pack performance. The data suggests a well-balanced system for mixed workloads, with neither component dramatically outstripping the other in a way that would cause significant wasted potential.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Lunar Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process. It features 8 cores and 8 threads (no hyperthreading), with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The TDP is 17 W, making it an extremely power-efficient part suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The processor uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket and is not multiplier-unlocked, indicating it is designed for system integration rather than enthusiast overclocking.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration provides decent data locality for single-threaded workloads, though the total L3 capacity is modest by desktop standards. The integrated graphics is Arc 130V, which complements the discrete RTX 4060 Mobile for additional display output options.

Benchmark results show the CPU's multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1502.5, R20 multi-core of 6491, and R23 multi-core of 9932. Single-core scores are 267 (R15), 916 (R20), and 1758 (R23). Passmark results include a multithread score of 18227, single-thread score of 3836, and physics score of 1538. The data compression score of 173924 and data encryption score of 13032 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 14801 and floating-point math score of 53310 demonstrate robust computational capability, while the integer math score of 39679 and find prime numbers score of 168 show more modest integer performance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 21440 places it at the 75th percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (21484, -0.2% delta), Intel Core i9-11900H (21367, +0.3%), Intel Xeon D-1746TER (21635, -0.9%), and AMD EPYC 9454 (21223, +1.0%). This places the Ultra 5 228V in a performance class comparable to older desktop Ryzen 5 processors and previous-generation mobile Core i9 parts, which is impressive given its 17 W TDP. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle everyday productivity, software development, and moderate content creation tasks with ease, though it will not match high-core-count desktop processors in heavily threaded workloads.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060 Mobile's Passmark G3D score of 17469 and 67th percentile ranking suggest this system can drive 1080p high-refresh gaming in most titles, though the GPU will be the limiting factor in demanding games. The CPU's single-thread score of 3836 (Passmark) and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1758 ensure the processor keeps up with frame generation, though ultra settings with ray tracing may push the GPU beyond its comfortable range.

Streaming: The GPU's tensor cores and 96 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features, while the CPU's 17 W TDP means the system can maintain sustained streaming workloads without excessive thermal throttling. The Passmark GPU compute score of 6816 indicates adequate parallel processing for encoding tasks, and the CPU's data compression score of 173924 suggests efficient handling of stream data.

Video editing: The CPU's multithread score of 18227 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 9932 provide solid performance for timeline editing and export tasks, while the GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 and DirectX 12 score of 73 enable hardware-accelerated effects and rendering. The 8 GB VRAM with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 4K editing workflows.

3D rendering: The GPU's 3072 shading units and 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 deliver capable 3D rendering performance, with the 24 RT cores accelerating ray-traced renders. The CPU's floating-point math score of 53310 supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks, though the 8-core/8-thread configuration limits multi-frame rendering throughput compared to higher-core-count processors.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 39679 and extended instructions score of 14801 indicate strong compilation performance, while the Passmark random string sorting score of 21254 shows efficient data manipulation. The 8 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support (though memory bandwidth is not specified) provide adequate resources for development tools and virtual machines.

Student and office work: The CPU's 17 W TDP and 75th percentile ranking ensure responsive everyday performance, with the single-thread score of 3836 handling document processing and web browsing efficiently. The integrated Arc 130V GPU provides a fallback for display tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, and the system's overall 71st combined percentile indicates a capable productivity machine for academic and professional use.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 21440, placing it at the 75th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (21484, -0.2%), Intel Core i9-11900H (21367, +0.3%), Intel Xeon D-1746TER (21635, -0.9%), and AMD EPYC 9454 (21223, +1.0%). This tight clustering means the Ultra 5 228V performs within 1% of these diverse processors, spanning desktop Ryzen 5, mobile Core i9, server Xeon, and enterprise EPYC parts.

Key CPU benchmark scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core of 9932 and single-core of 1758, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 6491 and single-core of 916, and Cinebench R15 multi-core of 1502.5 and single-core of 267. Passmark results show multithread at 18227, single-thread at 3836, physics at 1538, floating-point math at 53310, integer math at 39679, extended instructions at 14801, data compression at 173924, data encryption at 13032, random string sorting at 21254, and find prime numbers at 168.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 22729, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals bracket it closely: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, -0.7%), AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (22549, +0.8%), Intel Arc B580 (23021, -1.3%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435, +1.3%). The GPU's Passmark G3D score is 17469, with Geekbench OpenCL at 89420 and Vulkan at 89569. DirectX performance indices are 73 (DX12), 157 (DX11), 107 (DX10), and 216 (DX9), with G2D at 730 and GPU compute at 6816.

The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting a balanced pairing where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means these scores provide the best estimate of real-world gaming performance, suggesting the system will perform in the mid-to-upper tier of laptop gaming solutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform with no upgrade path for the processor. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only), and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Memory support is listed as "unknown" and depends on the motherboard, with dual-channel memory bus configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

The CPU's TDP of 17 W and the GPU's TDP of 115 W indicate the total system power draw is modest for a laptop with discrete graphics. No suggested PSU is provided, and the GPU uses no power connectors (portable device dependent), meaning power delivery is handled through the motherboard. The GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP" (integrated graphics package), which is unusual for a discrete GPU and suggests a compact form factor.

Given the BGA socket, the CPU cannot be upgraded. The GPU is also soldered or integrated into the motherboard, so no discrete GPU upgrade is possible. A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase system memory (subject to motherboard support, which is unspecified) or to add faster storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. For users seeking more performance, the entire laptop would need to be replaced, likely with a system featuring a higher-percentile GPU such as the RTX 5060 Mobile, which scores 1.3% higher than the RTX 4060 Mobile.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop platform targets users who need balanced CPU and GPU performance in a mobile package. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the RTX 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile ranking adequate for most titles, with the CPU's 75th percentile ensuring smooth frame delivery. The GPU's performance relative to the RTX 2080 (-0.7%) and RX 7700 XT (+0.8%) suggests it can handle esports and mainstream AAA titles at high settings, though not at maximum settings with ray tracing.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9932 and the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute of 6816, Geekbench OpenCL of 89420). The 8 GB VRAM supports moderate 4K editing timelines, and the 24 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews. The system's 71st combined percentile indicates it sits above the median for mixed workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 39679 and extended instructions score of 14801, which support fast compilation and code analysis. The data compression score of 173924 aids in handling large codebases. Students and office workers benefit from the 17 W CPU TDP, which extends battery life while providing responsive performance for document processing, web browsing, and light multitasking. Small business workstations can leverage this platform for general productivity, data analysis, and light design work without requiring a full desktop setup.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V mobile processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile GPU. The CPU, based on Lunar Lake architecture with a 3 nm process, delivers desktop-class performance in a 17 W TDP envelope. The GPU, based on Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process, provides mainstream gaming and compute performance.

The combined percentile of 71 places this system in the upper-mid tier of all measured configurations. The CPU's 75th percentile and GPU's 67th percentile indicate a system that outperforms roughly two-thirds to three-quarters of all processors and graphics cards respectively. This pairing is well-suited for users who want a single laptop capable of handling gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks without significant compromise in any area.

The lack of measured FPS data means these percentile rankings and benchmark scores are the primary indicators of performance. The system's average benchmark scores (CPU 21440, GPU 22729) and their proximity to rival components (all within 1.3% of nearest rivals) suggest consistent, predictable performance that will meet the needs of most mainstream users.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, with the CPU at the 75th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile among all processors and graphics cards.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

A: The Ultra 5 228V has an average benchmark score of 21440, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 2600's 21484, making them effectively performance equivalents.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system in games?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination; all gaming performance estimates are based on the benchmark scores provided.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect system design?

A: The CPU has a 17 W TDP, which is very low for a processor with this performance level, enabling thin-and-light laptop designs with extended battery life.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to the RTX 2080?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile's average benchmark score of 22729 is 0.7% lower than the RTX 2080's 22895, placing them at virtually identical performance levels.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in this platform?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform with no upgrade path; the GPU is likewise integrated into the motherboard.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds