SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

19,368 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 226V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile: Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's Lunar Lake mobile processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace mobile GPU in a laptop-class build. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU also ranks at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, placing the combined system in the upper-midrange tier for portable computing. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all gaming performance discussion herein is estimated from the individual component benchmark scores and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4070 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 19587 places it at the 73rd percentile, roughly on par with an AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct: 0) and within 1.1% of an NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient throughput for competitive esports titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates cannot be confirmed.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 8 threads, combined with the GPU's 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores, support hardware-accelerated encoding and real-time effects. The Geekbench multicore score of 8598 and single-core score of 1930 indicate enough processing headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding, while the GPU's Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated encoder hardware that offloads the streaming workload from the CPU.

Video Editing: The GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 244.1 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate timeline rendering and effects processing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9848 and single-core score of 1744 suggest responsive scrubbing and export performance for 1080p projects. The 8 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory bus support the data movement patterns common in video editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 4608 shading units and 144 tensor cores deliver 15.62 TFLOPS FP32, which places it among capable mobile rendering solutions. The PassMark GPU compute score of 8399 indicates solid compute throughput for GPU-accelerated renderers. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6381 and R15 multicore score of 1501 show moderate CPU-based rendering capability, suitable for hybrid rendering pipelines that distribute work across both processors.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 38647 and data encryption score of 12710 support compilation and cryptographic operations. The single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 1930 and PassMark single-thread score of 3754, ensures responsive IDE interaction and fast incremental builds. The 8 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code and data structures.

Student and Office Work: The 17 W TDP CPU delivers adequate performance for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing while maintaining battery efficiency. The PassMark multithread score of 17850 and floating-point math score of 52270 handle productivity suites with margin to spare. The integrated Arc 130V graphics provide display output capability when the discrete GPU is idle, extending battery life for portable use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not user-upgradeable; any processor change requires a full motherboard replacement or new laptop. The memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, with dual-channel configuration, and the system uses PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU only. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, providing adequate bandwidth for the RTX 4070 Mobile.

The CPU's TDP of 17 W is exceptionally low for a mobile processor, while the GPU's TDP of 115 W dominates the system power envelope. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined power requirements indicate that the laptop's power adapter must supply at least the GPU's 115 W plus the CPU's 17 W along with other system components. The GPU has no power connectors, being an IGP-class mobile part, meaning power delivery is handled through the motherboard.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on the GPU, should a future laptop revision offer a higher-tier GeForce 50 Mobile successor. The CPU's 8 cores and 8 threads represent a ceiling for the Lunar Lake architecture in this segment, and the 73rd percentile ranking suggests headroom exists in the GPU hierarchy. However, given the soldered nature of both components, any upgrade path requires acquiring an entirely new laptop rather than swapping individual parts.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the AD106 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the primary constraint for high-resolution textures and large scene data.

The GPU includes 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s. The 36 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, while the 144 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and similar technologies. The FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio) places this GPU in the mainstream mobile tier.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 19587, which is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (deltaPct: -0.5) and exactly matches the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct: 0). This indicates that the mobile RTX 4070 delivers desktop-class rasterization performance despite its power-constrained mobile implementation. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 confirm strong compute and graphics API performance. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with modern game engines and rendering features.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 and 144 tensor cores accelerate both traditional rasterization and AI-enhanced rendering techniques. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while not excessive, is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive applications such as high-resolution texture streaming or large compute kernels.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimated from the individual benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19587, positioned at the 73rd percentile and matching the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, suggests capable 1080p gaming performance. The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 1930 and PassMark single-thread score of 3754 indicate sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the combination of the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 output should support high frame rates, though exact figures cannot be confirmed without measured data. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity and throughput for modern game assets at 1080p resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU's performance relative to the desktop RTX 3090 (within 0.5% in PassMark G3D) suggests playable frame rates in moderately demanding titles, though the mobile power envelope may limit sustained performance compared to desktop counterparts. The 36 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, but the GPU's overall compute capacity will require DLSS or similar upscaling to maintain high frame rates with ray tracing enabled.

For 4K gaming, the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking indicates it sits above the median but below high-end desktop solutions, suggesting that 4K gaming would require significant graphical compromises or rely heavily on upscaling technologies.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking indicate a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19368 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (19364, deltaPct: 0) and Intel Core i5-1345U (19411, deltaPct: -0.2), placing it in the upper-midrange mobile processor tier. The GPU's average score of 27435 similarly matches the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, deltaPct: 0) and falls just 0.5% short of the RTX 3090 (27565).

In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation and data compression, the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1449 and data compression score of 170687 represent the system's processing ceiling. The 8 cores and 8 threads, while efficient at 17 W TDP, will bottleneck heavily multithreaded workloads that scale beyond 8 threads. The GPU's compute capabilities, evidenced by the PassMark GPU compute score of 8399, can offload some parallel workloads but not all.

In GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the RTX 4070 Mobile becomes the limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth constrain texture-heavy scenes, while the 115 W TDP limits sustained clock speeds compared to desktop equivalents. The CPU's fast single-core performance, shown by the Geekbench single-core score of 1930, ensures it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios.

FPS scaling would depend on the specific game and resolution. At 1080p with lower graphical settings, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant, potentially creating CPU bottlenecks in physics-heavy titles. At 1440p and above with high settings, the GPU's rendering capacity dominates, and the system becomes GPU-limited.

Who Should Build It

This laptop-class build targets users who need balanced CPU and GPU performance in a portable form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rate displays will benefit from the GPU's desktop-class rasterization performance, matching the RX 6700 XT within 0% deltaPct. Content creators working with 1080p video editing and moderate 3D rendering will find the combination of the CPU's 8 cores and the GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 suitable for their workflows.

Software developers compiling code and running virtual machines will appreciate the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 17850 and data encryption score of 12710, while the single-thread performance ensures responsive tooling. Students and office workers needing a portable system for productivity tasks will benefit from the 17 W CPU TDP for battery efficiency, with the GPU providing headroom for occasional creative or gaming workloads.

Small business workstations requiring a balance of CPU and GPU performance for tasks like financial modeling, CAD, or data analysis will find this pairing adequate. The GPU's 144 tensor cores support AI-accelerated workloads, while the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking ensures general-purpose computation is handled competently. The system's combined 73rd percentile ranking places it above the majority of laptop configurations available.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Lunar Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process. It features 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The TDP of 17 W makes it highly power-efficient, suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU only, and includes integrated Arc 130V graphics.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3 cache. The memory support is listed as unknown and dependent on the motherboard, with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is not supported, and the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, indicating a locked design for OEM systems. The release date was September 23, 2024, and the production status is Active.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9848 and single-core score of 1744, along with Cinebench R20 scores of 6381 (multicore) and 900 (single-core). The Geekbench multicore score of 8598 and single-core score of 1930 demonstrate solid performance. PassMark scores include data compression at 170687, data encryption at 12710, extended instructions at 14724, floating-point math at 52270, integer math at 38647, multithread at 17850, physics at 1449, random string sorting at 20813, and single-thread at 3754.

The average benchmark score of 19368 places the CPU at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (19364, deltaPct: 0) and Intel Core i5-1345U (19411, deltaPct: -0.2). It edges out the Intel Core i7-8700K (19238, deltaPct: 0.7) and trails the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, deltaPct: -0.7). These comparisons show the Ultra 5 226V performing like a desktop-class processor from previous generations despite its mobile, low-power design.

For real workloads, the 8-core/8-thread configuration handles modern productivity and creative applications competently. The 4.50 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance, while the 8 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The 17 W TDP makes it an excellent choice for fanless or low-noise designs, though sustained multithreaded workloads may be limited by thermal and power constraints.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores: 19368 for the Ultra 5 226V and 19364 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, with a deltaPct of 0. Both place at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating equivalent overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective.

Q: Does this system support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU only. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is the bus interface specified for the RTX 4070 Mobile.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect system power?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V has a TDP of 17 W, which is very low for a mobile processor. The GPU's TDP is 115 W, so the GPU dominates the system power envelope significantly.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Mobile compare to the desktop RTX 3090?

A: In PassMark G3D benchmarks, the RTX 4070 Mobile scores 19587, while the RTX 3090 scores 27565. The mobile GPU is 0.5% behind the desktop RTX 3090 in this metric, indicating surprisingly close performance.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. The CPU cannot be replaced without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs and rendering features.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19368 places it at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (19364, deltaPct: 0), Intel Core i5-1345U (19411, deltaPct: -0.2), Intel Core i7-8700K (19238, deltaPct: 0.7), and Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, deltaPct: -0.7). This clustering indicates the Ultra 5 226V performs within a tight band around the 73rd percentile, neither exceeding nor falling behind its direct competitors by more than 0.7%.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 27435 places it at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, deltaPct: 0), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27565, deltaPct: -0.5), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (27135, deltaPct: 1.1), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839, deltaPct: -1.5). The GPU's performance is remarkably close to the desktop RX 6700 XT and RTX 3090, demonstrating that mobile power constraints do not significantly hamper its benchmark scores.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, indicating balanced performance across both components. The CPU's individual benchmarks show strength in single-threaded tasks (Cinebench R23 single-core: 1744, Geekbench single-core: 1930) and moderate multicore capability (Cinebench R23 multicore: 9848, Geekbench multicore: 8598). The GPU's benchmarks demonstrate strong rasterization (PassMark G3D: 19587) and compute performance (PassMark GPU compute: 8399, Geekbench OpenCL: 109197, Geekbench Vulkan: 108367).

The combined picture is a laptop-class system that punches above its weight class, with both components performing at the 73rd percentile and matching or exceeding desktop components from previous generations. The CPU's efficiency at 17 W TDP combined with the GPU's 115 W TDP suggests a system that balances performance and portability, suitable for a wide range of workloads from gaming to content creation.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, a Lunar Lake architecture mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, an Ada Lovelace architecture mobile GPU from the GeForce 40-series. The build class is laptop, indicating a portable, integrated design where both components are soldered to the motherboard and not user-upgradeable.

The CPU, released on September 23, 2024, is built on TSMC's 3 nm process with 8 cores and 8 threads, a 2.10 GHz base clock, and 4.50 GHz boost clock. The GPU, released on January 2, 2023, is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 4608 shading units, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. Both components are currently in Active production status.

The combined percentile of 73 places this pairing in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations. The CPU's performance matches the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Core i5-1345U, while the GPU's performance matches the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and comes within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. This level of performance, achieved in a laptop form factor with a 17 W CPU and 115 W GPU, represents a significant achievement in mobile computing efficiency.

The system is best characterized as a balanced mobile workstation and gaming platform. It handles CPU-intensive tasks like software development and data processing through the Ultra 5 226V's 8 cores and strong single-thread performance, while the RTX 4070 Mobile's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 and 144 tensor cores accelerate GPU-accelerated workloads. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth support 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, with the understanding that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination and all gaming expectations are estimated from benchmark scores.