SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pairing is a desktop configuration where a modern, efficient Arrow Lake processor meets a professional-grade Turing GPU. The data shows a fundamental mismatch in age and intent: the CPU is a 2024-era 3nm part with strong single-thread performance, while the GPU is an end-of-life 2018 workstation card. Benchmark results indicate that this is a capable productivity system, but gaming and high-end rendering workloads will be constrained by the GPU’s older architecture and 8 GB memory buffer.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC’s 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache layout is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop-class chip on Intel Socket 1851, with dual-channel DDR5 memory support and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units, though the discrete GPU makes that irrelevant here.

Benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in single-core tasks but is modest in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3101, which is strong, while the multi-core score is 21971. In Cinebench R20, the single-core score is 1302 and multi-core is 9227. The PassMark single-thread score of 4348 is notably high, and the PassMark multithread score is 25358. These numbers suggest that the 225T prioritizes responsiveness and lightly-threaded performance over raw parallel throughput.

The data implies that for real-world workloads, this CPU will handle everyday computing, office suites, and web development with ease. The high single-thread score in Cinebench R23 (3101) indicates strong performance in tasks like spreadsheet calculations, code compilation of small projects, and general UI responsiveness. However, the 10-thread limit means that heavily parallel tasks like video encoding or 3D scene rendering will show slower times compared to CPUs with more threads. The PassMark data compression score of 233998 and floating-point math score of 82751 show solid arithmetic capability, while the integer math score of 59543 is more modest, suggesting that encryption or hashing-heavy workloads will not be this chip’s primary strength.

The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30468. Its nearest rivals are close: the Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30422 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30390 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30548 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30364 (0.3% lower). This indicates the 225T is competitive with mobile H-series and HX-series chips from previous generations, despite being a desktop part. The 0.3% margin over the Ryzen 7 7736U and Ryzen 5 7640HS is negligible, meaning real-world differences will be within noise. The 10-core / 10-thread configuration is unusual; most modern CPUs have more threads than cores, but this one does not, which explains why its multi-core scores are not higher relative to its single-core performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear bottleneck: the GPU is the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 72, which is dragged down by the older GPU. The Quadro RTX 4000 has a PassMark G3D score of 15117, which is respectable but not modern. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4348 is far above what this GPU needs to feed it frames, so in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the constraint.

The PassMark physics score for the CPU is 2053, which is moderate and suggests that CPU-based physics calculations will not be a bottleneck in most titles. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is low, and its DirectX 11 score of 128 is also modest. These numbers indicate that the GPU’s driver-level performance in modern APIs is not strong. In contrast, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21971 is high enough to handle game logic and AI tasks while the GPU struggles to keep up with frame rendering.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent — there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU is capable of far more frames than the GPU can deliver. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and some 1440p gaming, but the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering. For productivity tasks, the balance is better: the CPU’s strong single-thread score helps in tasks like photo editing, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score of 6176) assist in GPU-accelerated effects. The bottleneck is not a problem in office work or coding, but it becomes severe in 3D rendering or high-refresh gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current for Arrow Lake desktop processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This is a modern foundation, but the GPU is the weak link. The Quadro RTX 4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which will work in a PCIe Gen 5 slot, but it will not fully utilize the bandwidth. The GPU’s 160 W TDP and suggested PSU of 450 W mean that the power supply is not a constraint; the 65 W CPU plus the 160 W GPU is well within a 450 W power supply’s capacity.

The platform supports a sensible next upgrade: replacing the Quadro RTX 4000 with a modern GPU would unlock the CPU’s potential. The CPU’s 82nd percentile rank means it has headroom to pair with a much stronger GPU. The PCIe Gen 5 interface is forward-looking, and the DDR5 memory support ensures that the platform is not memory-bandwidth limited. The CPU’s L3 cache of 20 MB is shared and adequate for gaming and productivity. The upgrade path is clear: keep the motherboard and CPU, swap the GPU. The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 slots will accommodate any modern card, and the 450 W PSU suggestion from the GPU indicates that a larger PSU may be needed for a more powerful GPU, but the current one works for this pairing.

The CPU’s integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG with 16 EU) offer a fallback for troubleshooting or basic display output, but they are not for gaming. The platform is a solid base for a workstation, with ECC memory not supported, which is a consideration for mission-critical data integrity. The production status is active for the CPU, so replacements and upgrades are available. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer produced, but it still functions.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need a reliable desktop for professional workstation tasks without pushing extreme graphics performance. The CPU’s high single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3101) makes it ideal for software developers who compile code frequently or run simulations that are not fully parallelized. The PassMark data encryption score of 18289 indicates decent security-related processing, which is relevant for IT professionals handling encrypted files. Students in engineering or computer science will find the CPU responsive for IDEs and virtual machines, though the 10-thread limit may slow large builds.

Small business workstations for accounting, document processing, and database management will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 59543 and the overall 82nd percentile rank. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are suitable for CAD viewing and light 3D modeling, but not heavy rendering. Content creators working in 1080p video editing will see acceptable performance from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21971, but the GPU’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit effects-heavy timelines. Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find this adequate, but the GPU’s 61st percentile rank means it is not a high-refresh gaming machine. This build is not for enthusiasts or those seeking maximum frame rates; it is for professionals who need a stable, quiet, and efficient desktop for daily work.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data shows this system is not suited for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors at competitive settings. The Quadro RTX 4000’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 and DirectX 11 score of 128 are low, indicating that modern game engines will not run at high frame rates. The CPU can handle the load, but the GPU will cap FPS well below high-refresh thresholds. Expect 60Hz or lower at 1080p in most titles.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s strong single-thread score (3101 in Cinebench R23) allows for x264 encoding at preset levels that use a few threads, but the lack of more than 10 threads means you cannot use very slow presets while gaming. The GPU has 288 tensor cores, which can assist with NVENC, but the Turing-era encoder is older. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p streaming, but the overall GPU performance will limit the game’s frame rate while encoding.

Video editing in 1080p is feasible. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21971 will handle timeline scrubbing and export in software encoders, but the GPU’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 will accelerate effects like color grading in supported applications. The 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with 4K timeline previews, but the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint on longer projects. 4K editing will be sluggish.

3D rendering is a weak point. The CPU’s 10 threads will render CPU-based scenes slowly compared to higher-core-count chips. The GPU’s 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores are Turing-era, so modern renderers that use RT will perform poorly. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 is low by current standards, indicating that GPU rendering will be slow for complex scenes.

Software development is a strong suit. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4348 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3101 make compilation of small-to-medium projects fast. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with repeated builds. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for a home office. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is ample for most development tasks.

Student and office work is where this system excels. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures snappy spreadsheet calculations and document editing. The PassMark data compression score of 233998 shows fast file archiving. The GPU is unnecessary for these tasks, but its presence does not hinder. The system will be quiet and efficient for a typical student or office worker.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T a good CPU for gaming?

A: The CPU is strong for gaming due to its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3101, which is high. However, the bundled Quadro RTX 4000 GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is low, so the GPU will bottleneck gaming performance significantly.

Q: How much VRAM does the Quadro RTX 4000 have, and is it enough for modern games?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the GPU’s overall performance (61st percentile) and older architecture will limit texture quality and framerates in newer titles.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 160 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which is adequate for this combination.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1851, which is designed for Arrow Lake desktop processors.

Q: Is the GPU’s production status a concern?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer manufactured. The CPU is active, so the platform is current, but the GPU is a legacy component.

Q: What are the CPU’s benchmark scores relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30468, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-13600H, and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has an average benchmark score of 30468, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 21971, and single-core is 3101. The PassMark multithread score is 25358, and single-thread is 4348. The GPU, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, has an average benchmark score of 17789, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score is 15117, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 74540.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 72. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% higher), AMD Radeon 780M (1.1% higher), and AMD Radeon Pro 560 (1.4% higher). These deltas are all small, indicating that the Quadro RTX 4000 is performance-adjacent to those GPUs, despite being much older. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its score, showing that it trades blows with several mobile and desktop chips from previous generations. The picture is of a CPU that is modern and capable, paired with a GPU that is old but still functional. The combined system is not balanced, but it is not broken either.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (Arrow Lake, 10 cores, 65 W TDP) with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Turing, 8 GB GDDR6, 160 W TDP). The CPU is an active, current-generation part, while the GPU is end-of-life, released in 2018. The pairing sits at the 72nd combined percentile, which is a mid-range tier overall. This is not a high-end gaming rig or a top-tier rendering workstation. It is a productivity-focused desktop where the CPU is the star and the GPU provides professional-grade features like 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, but with performance that lags behind modern consumer GPUs. The system’s strengths are in single-threaded tasks, office workloads, and light content creation.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a Turing-architecture GPU built on TSMC’s 12 nm process, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The GPU features 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI acceleration. The memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1005 MHz, and the boost clock is 1545 MHz. The pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1).

Benchmark results show a GPU that is capable but not competitive with modern cards. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 is solid, but the DirectX 12 score of 52 is very low, indicating poor performance in modern API-heavy workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 suggests decent compute capability, which is useful for professional applications like CAD or scientific visualization. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1873, which is modest. The GPU’s 61st percentile rank reflects its age; it is not a top-tier performer, but it is not obsolete either. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large textures or high-resolution rendering, but the 416.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate that somewhat. For rendering, the 36 RT cores are present, but Turing’s RT performance is far behind current generations, so ray-traced workloads will be slow.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4348 is high, indicating it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 12 score of 52 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will deliver low frame rates, likely below 60 FPS in modern titles. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU’s 61st percentile rank will further reduce performance. The data implies that this system is not suited for high-refresh gaming at any resolution. For esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the GPU might manage 60-100 FPS, given its PassMark G3D score of 15117, but AAA games will be significantly slower. The estimate is that this pairing is a 1080p/60Hz machine at best for older or less demanding games, and a 30-40 FPS machine for recent releases at medium settings.