SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing that targets the mid-range performance tier, with a combined percentile of 77 across all benchmarked systems. The CPU, part of the Arrow Lake-S family, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its 65W TDP, while the GPU offers modern Blackwell architecture features in a compact package. This analysis examines the quantitative relationship between these two components based exclusively on their benchmark scores and architectural specifications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 5 225T and the RTX 5060 is characterized by a notable asymmetry in their performance percentiles. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches only the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards. This 10-point gap suggests the CPU has more headroom relative to its class than the GPU does, implying that in most gaming and mixed workloads, the RTX 5060 will be the limiting factor. The data supports this interpretation: the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 25358 and single-thread score of 4348 indicate robust processing capability, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20891 is solid but not exceptional.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or data compression, the Ultra 5 225T demonstrates clear strength. Its PassMark physics score of 2053 and data compression score of 233998 reflect a processor that can handle complex calculations without significant strain. The 10-core, 10-thread configuration with a 4.90 GHz boost clock provides the raw throughput needed to feed a mid-range GPU effectively. However, at higher resolutions where pixel throughput dominates, the RTX 5060’s 119.9 GPixel/s pixel rate and 299.6 GTexel/s texture rate will likely become the constraint, especially in graphically intensive titles.

The memory subsystem further clarifies the bottleneck dynamics. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for feeding 10 cores. The GPU’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth over a 128-bit bus is generous for an 8 GB GDDR7 buffer, suggesting memory bandwidth is not the primary limiting factor. Instead, the 8 GB VRAM capacity itself may prove restrictive in modern titles at ultra settings, potentially capping performance before either compute or bandwidth limits are reached. The combined benchmark picture—CPU at 82nd percentile versus GPU at 72nd—points to a system where the GPU is the more probable bottleneck in gaming, while the CPU leads in productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, packing 21,900 million transistors into a 181 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz, delivering 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. This positions the card as a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p performer, though its 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it sits below the top tier of available graphics hardware.

Memory configuration is a defining feature: 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus yields 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GDDR7 type is a generational improvement, offering higher data rates than predecessor memory types, with the effective speed listed at 28 Gbps. The 128-bit bus width, while narrower than higher-end cards, is compensated by the memory technology’s efficiency. The card’s 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively, with the tensor cores enabling features like DLSS that could extend the card’s practical lifespan in demanding titles.

Benchmark results show a mixed performance profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 indicates strong DirectX 12 ultimate capability, while Geekbench scores of 112787 in OpenCL and 113321 in Vulkan demonstrate solid compute performance across different APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 20891 is the headline gaming metric, but the lower DirectX 11 score of 200 compared to DirectX 12’s 77 suggests the card is optimized for modern APIs. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10899 reveals that non-graphics compute tasks, such as rendering or machine learning inference, are handled competently but not spectacularly. The card’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, scores 26011 with a deltaPct of 1.2, meaning the RTX 5060 trails by approximately 1.2% in average benchmark score—a negligible difference that places these cards in the same performance class.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 225T delivers a strong benchmark showing across multiple test suites. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 21971 in R23 multicore and 3101 in single-core, with R20 results of 9227 and 1302 respectively. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads while maintaining competitive single-thread performance. The R15 scores of 2214 multicore and 312 single-core follow the same pattern. PassMark results reinforce this: multithread score of 25358, single-thread of 4348, and an average benchmark score of 30468. This places the CPU at the 82nd percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i9-11980HK (30422, deltaPct 0.2) and AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (30390, deltaPct 0.3), showing the Ultra 5 225T is essentially on par with these mobile flagship processors despite being a desktop part.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is more modest. With an average benchmark score of 26331, the RTX 5060 ranks at the 72nd percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 is a modern metric that reflects current-generation gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 112787 and 113321, respectively, show consistency across compute APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 20891 is the most comprehensive gaming indicator, while the G2D score of 1154 covers 2D graphics tasks. The card’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 860M, scores 26401 with a deltaPct of -0.3, meaning the RTX 5060 is 0.3% ahead—essentially a statistical tie. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, deltaPct -0.3) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, deltaPct -0.8) are also close competitors, placing the RTX 5060 firmly in a crowded mid-range segment.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms its class more decisively than the GPU. The CPU’s 82nd percentile versus the GPU’s 72nd percentile creates a system with a combined percentile of 77, reflecting that the CPU carries more of the performance weight. For users prioritizing CPU-heavy workloads like compilation or 3D rendering, this pairing is well-suited; for GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming, the RTX 5060 will be the limiting factor.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this combination is a desktop builder seeking balanced performance for 1080p gaming and moderate productivity work. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make it suitable for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes, as the 21971 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates substantial rendering throughput. The GPU’s 72nd percentile and 8 GB VRAM suggest it can handle 1080p ultra settings in most titles, with entry-level 1440p capability in less demanding games.

Students and small business workstation users would find this pairing adequate for office productivity, software development, and data analysis. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 233998 and encryption score of 18289 demonstrate efficiency in data-intensive tasks, while the GPU’s compute capabilities support acceleration in applications that leverage OpenCL or Vulkan. The 65W CPU TDP and 145W GPU TDP keep power requirements manageable, making this a viable option for compact desktop builds where thermal and power constraints are considerations.

Developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the CPU’s 10-core, 10-thread configuration and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which support parallel compilation workloads. The GPU’s 120 tensor cores offer potential for machine learning experimentation, though the 8 GB VRAM limits model sizes. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will find the pairing capable, though those targeting 1440p or higher may need to adjust settings given the GPU’s 72nd percentile standing.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 225T compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 30468 is 0.2% above the Intel Core i9-11980HK (30422) and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (30390), placing it in a statistical tie with these mobile processors. It trails the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548) by 0.3%.

Q: What is the RTX 5060’s standing among GPUs?

A: The GPU ranks at the 72nd percentile with an average benchmark score of 26331. It is 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011) and 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon 860M (26401).

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this pairing?

A: The CPU is stronger relative to its class, ranking at the 82nd percentile compared to the GPU’s 72nd percentile. This suggests the GPU is more likely to be the performance bottleneck in most workloads.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with benchmark scores indicating strong performance in DX12 workloads.

Q: What memory type does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 5060 uses 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 3 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 77, reflecting the average of the CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 72nd percentile positioning.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5060’s PassMark G3D score of 20891 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 provide the basis for these projections. At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, with the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4348 ensuring minimal bottlenecking in CPU-light scenes.

For 1440p gaming, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely become constraints in memory-hungry titles, potentially requiring reduced texture quality or other settings adjustments. The 119.9 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests adequate fill rate for 1440p, but the 72nd percentile ranking implies the card is not optimized for this resolution in demanding games. At 4K, the RTX 5060 would struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings, and users should expect to significantly lower graphical presets.

The GPU’s tensor cores enable DLSS functionality, which could provide meaningful performance boosts in supported titles by rendering at lower resolutions and upscaling. The 120 tensor cores are adequate for this purpose, though not as abundant as in higher-tier cards. The CPU’s 10 threads are sufficient to handle game logic and streaming workloads simultaneously, with the PassMark multithread score of 25358 supporting this assertion.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 3 nm process. It houses 17,800 million transistors in a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The 65W TDP is notably efficient for a desktop part with this level of performance, making it suitable for systems where power consumption is a concern.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports high-bandwidth access to frequently used data, which is reflected in the PassMark data compression score of 233998 and random string sorting score of 28774. The CPU’s memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which may be a consideration for workstation use cases requiring error correction.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs well above its class average. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21971 is particularly strong, while the single-core score of 3101 indicates good per-thread performance. PassMark integer math score of 59543 and floating-point math score of 82751 demonstrate balanced arithmetic capability. The extended instructions score of 20083 and find prime numbers score of 284 provide additional context for specialized workloads. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking places it among the top fifth of all processors, with nearest rivals being mobile parts that achieve similar average scores.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units provides basic display output and light graphics acceleration, though the discrete RTX 5060 will handle all demanding graphics tasks. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for the GPU and other peripherals.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, creating a system that targets the mid-range performance tier. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 72nd percentile combine for a 77th percentile overall ranking, placing this system above the majority of configured builds while not reaching the top tier. The CPU is a recent addition to the Core Ultra Series 2, released in late 2024, while the GPU is part of the GeForce 50-series from 2025.

The CPU’s Arrow Lake architecture and 3 nm process node represent current-generation technology, while the GPU’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture on 5 nm is similarly modern. This pairing leverages recent advancements in both processing and graphics technology. The 65W CPU TDP and 145W GPU TDP keep total system power requirements moderate, with a suggested PSU of 300 W providing adequate headroom for the components.

This build is best characterized as a balanced desktop system for users who prioritize CPU performance slightly over GPU performance. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores support productivity applications, while the GPU’s modern architecture ensures compatibility with current game titles and APIs. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is the most significant limitation, potentially capping performance in future titles or at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is well-suited. The CPU’s 4348 PassMark single-thread score ensures it can keep up with frame generation, while the GPU’s 20891 G3D score and 119.9 GPixel/s pixel rate support high frame rates in competitive titles. Users can expect smooth gameplay in most esports and mainstream games at ultra settings.

Streaming while gaming is feasible given the CPU’s 10 threads and 25358 multithread score. The CPU can handle encoding workloads alongside game logic, though dedicated encoding hardware on the GPU may be preferable for reduced performance impact. The tensor cores could also assist with AI-based encoding enhancements.

Video editing workloads benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with the 21971 Cinebench R23 multicore score accelerating rendering and export times. The GPU’s compute capabilities, evidenced by the 10899 PassMark GPU compute score, can accelerate effects and color grading in supported applications.

3D rendering is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s 10 cores and 20 MB L3 cache provide solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU’s 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute supports GPU-accelerated rendering. The 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in GPU-based renderers, but the CPU can handle substantial workloads.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s compilation throughput, with the 233998 data compression score indicating efficient file handling. The 59543 integer math score supports code analysis and build tools. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 112787 can accelerate compute-heavy development tasks like unit testing or simulation.

Student and office work is easily handled by this system. The CPU’s efficiency at 65W TDP keeps operating costs low, while the integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled. The PassMark single-thread score of 4348 ensures responsive application performance for typical productivity software.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth expansion cards. The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 5060’s capabilities.

Memory upgrades are straightforward, with support for dual-channel DDR5 and a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Users could increase system memory capacity to support larger workloads, though the CPU’s lack of ECC support limits certain workstation applications.

The GPU’s 145W TDP and suggested PSU of 300 W leave headroom for a more powerful graphics card in the future. The 1x 8-pin power connector is standard, and the dual-slot form factor at 241 mm length fits most cases. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM, as the 8 GB capacity is the most likely limiting factor in this build.

The CPU’s 65W TDP and active production status suggest it will remain available for some time, but the socket 1851 platform may see future processor releases. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with next-generation storage and expansion cards. For users seeking more CPU performance, a higher-core-count part on the same socket could be considered, though the current 10-core configuration is well-matched to the GPU’s capabilities.