SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing produces a system where the CPU holds a clear percentile advantage over the GPU, but the practical bottleneck shifts depending on workload type. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 66th percentile among all graphics cards. This 16-percentage-point gap indicates that in lightly threaded or single-core-bound scenarios, the processor has headroom to spare, whereas in graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Benchmark data shows the CPU's single-thread performance is robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3101 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4348. These figures place it in a position where it can feed frames to the GPU without stalling in most gaming scenarios. However, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17326 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 suggest that at higher resolutions, the rendering pipeline will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits.

The Passmark physics score of 2053 and multithread score of 25358 indicate that heavily threaded workloads, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, will engage all 10 cores effectively. The GPU's compute performance, measured at 9184 in Passmark GPU Compute, is comparatively modest, meaning that GPGPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning inference or render previews will not be as dominant as the CPU's compute throughput.

For gaming, the balance favors CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions. The CPU's Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1302 and R15 single-core score of 312 suggest strong per-thread performance that can drive high frame rates in esports titles. Conversely, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will become the constraint in modern AAA titles at 1440p or 4K, especially with ultra settings enabled.

The combined percentile of 74 for this pairing reflects a system where neither component is drastically mismatched, but the CPU is clearly the stronger half. In productivity tasks that stress the processor—such as compilation or spreadsheet calculations—the CPU will dominate the experience. In gaming, the GPU will dictate the ceiling for graphical fidelity and resolution scaling. Users should expect that upgrading the GPU later would yield more tangible gains in gaming performance than upgrading the CPU, given the current percentile disparity.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 225T delivers a strong multi-core showing with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21971, placing it in the upper tier of desktop processors. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3101 is equally impressive, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 25358 and average benchmark score of 30468 reinforce the CPU's position at the 82nd percentile.

Looking at nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 5 225T edges out the Intel Core i9-11980HK by 0.2%, with average scores of 30468 versus 30422. It also surpasses the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS by 0.3% (30468 vs 30390) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U by the same margin (30468 vs 30364). The Intel Core i5-13600H is the closest competitor, leading by 0.3% with a score of 30548. These narrow margins demonstrate that the Ultra 5 225T competes directly with established high-performance mobile and desktop chips from previous generations.

The RTX 5050 GPU posts a Passmark G3D score of 17326 and an average benchmark score of 21035, landing at the 66th percentile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 reflects modern DirectX 12 rendering capabilities. In Geekbench compute tests, it achieves 90334 in OpenCL and 89381 in Vulkan, indicating balanced performance across different compute APIs.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a tight competitive field. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL leads by 0.6% with a score of 21153, while the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is ahead by 1% at 21237. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile leads by 1.6% with 21379, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT trails by 1.6% at 20713. This puts the RTX 5050 in a competitive mid-range position, slightly below some older high-end parts but above others.

The combined picture shows a desktop system where the CPU performs at a high level relative to all processors, while the GPU sits in the middle of the graphics card hierarchy. The combined percentile of 74 indicates an above-average overall system, suitable for demanding productivity work and capable 1080p gaming, with the CPU being the component that boosts the system's standing.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 225T compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T trails the Core i5-13600H by just 0.3% in average benchmark score, with 30468 versus 30548. This places the two processors in the same performance tier for most workloads, with the difference being negligible in real-world use.

Q: What is the RTX 5050's performance position relative to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT?

A: The RTX 5050 leads the RX 5600 XT by 1.6% in average benchmark score, posting 21035 versus 20713. This is a modest advantage that translates to slightly better frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance, and does it matter for gaming?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T scores 3101 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4348 in Passmark single-thread. These strong single-thread scores are critical for gaming since most game engines rely heavily on a few fast cores for physics, AI, and frame pacing.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5050 have, and what resolution is it suited for?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming with ultra settings, but at 1440p or higher, some modern titles may exceed this memory capacity, causing texture streaming issues.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption, and does it require a high-end cooling solution?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T has a TDP of 65 W, which is moderate for a desktop processor. This allows for a standard air cooler to manage thermals effectively, without the need for elaborate liquid cooling solutions.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 5050 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with all current game engines and modern rendering techniques like ray tracing and mesh shaders.

Q: What is the combined system percentile, and what does it indicate?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 74, placing it above the majority of desktop systems. This indicates a balanced, capable machine that can handle both productivity and gaming tasks without major compromises.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop system targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity alongside moderate gaming capability. The Core Ultra 5 225T's 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs makes it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and students who run multi-threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21971 supports smooth video editing timelines, faster code compilation, and responsive virtual machine workloads.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the RTX 5050's 66th percentile position adequate for high-refresh-rate play in esports and medium-to-high settings in AAA titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth handle most games at this resolution, while the CPU's strong single-core scores (3101 in Cinebench R23) prevent frame rate dips in CPU-intensive scenes.

Small business workstations benefit from the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 25358, which accelerates spreadsheet calculations, database operations, and data compression tasks (233998 in Passmark data compression). The DDR5 memory support and dual-channel bus provide 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, ensuring snappy application loading and multitasking.

Content creators working in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve will appreciate the CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads, which handle timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently. The GPU's 2560 shading units and 80 tensor cores assist with effects rendering and AI-enhanced tools, though the 8 GB VRAM limits 4K editing with multiple layers.

Students and office users gain from the system's balanced profile. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4348 ensures fast document processing and web browsing, while the GPU's Passmark G2D score of 1113 supports smooth desktop compositing and 2D applications. The 65 W CPU TDP also means lower system power draw and quieter operation for shared workspaces.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC, featuring 10 cores and 10 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. This is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, designed for Socket 1851. The architecture is a departure from previous generations, focusing on efficiency and single-thread performance rather than raw core counts.

The cache hierarchy comprises 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the CPU's strong benchmark performance, with Cinebench R23 multi-core reaching 21971 and single-core hitting 3101. The Passmark integer math score of 59543 and floating point math score of 82751 indicate robust arithmetic capabilities for scientific and engineering applications.

Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for most workloads, though it may limit memory-intensive tasks like large dataset analysis. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which narrows its appeal for mission-critical server applications but is fine for consumer desktop use.

The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes enables fast connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units provides basic display output and media acceleration, though the discrete RTX 5050 handles all demanding graphics work. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die indicate a dense, modern design.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths: Passmark data compression at 233998 and data encryption at 18289 are strong for file archiving and security tasks. The extended instructions score of 20083 supports modern SIMD workloads like video encoding and scientific computing. The find prime numbers score of 284 is lower, but this is a niche benchmark that does not reflect typical usage.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-11980HK and AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, with the Ultra 5 225T outperforming both by 0.2% and 0.3% respectively. This places it in a competitive position against older high-end mobile chips, offering similar performance with a desktop form factor and lower power draw.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores of both components.

The RTX 5050's Passmark G3D score of 17326 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 indicate solid 1080p gaming capability. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3101) combined with the GPU's 2560 shading units should drive frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings.

For AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most games released in recent years. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 66 and DirectX 11 score of 150 suggest that the GPU handles modern APIs efficiently, though the low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 may indicate some driver overhead in certain titles.

At 1440p, the RTX 5050 will struggle to maintain high frame rates with ultra settings in demanding games. The GPU's 32 ROPs and 82.30 GPixel/s pixel rate limit fill-rate-bound scenarios, such as heavy post-processing or high-resolution textures. Gamers should expect to lower settings to high or medium to achieve playable frame rates at this resolution.

The CPU's role in gaming is supportive but important. The Passmark physics score of 2053 ensures that physics calculations in games are handled smoothly, while the multithread score of 25358 prevents frame drops in scenes with many AI-driven characters. The 65 W TDP also means the CPU will not thermally throttle during extended gaming sessions, maintaining consistent clock speeds.

Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the CPU can push high frame rates and the GPU can handle modern titles at high settings. For 1440p or 4K gaming, users should consider the GPU the primary bottleneck and manage settings accordingly.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring the GB207 chip with 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die. It has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 20 RT cores, and 80 tensor cores, providing a solid foundation for both rasterized and ray-traced rendering.

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a mid-range capacity that suits 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads. The memory clock runs at 2500 MHz with an effective 20 Gbps data rate. The GPU's base clock is 2317 MHz with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, delivering 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a matching 13.17 TFLOPS for FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio for compute tasks.

The RT cores and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with all modern game engines. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting high refresh rates and multi-monitor setups.

Benchmark results show the GPU's strengths: Passmark G3D score of 17326 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 indicate solid compute performance for rendering and general-purpose GPU tasks. The Vulkan score of 89381 is nearly identical to OpenCL, suggesting consistent performance across different APIs. The Passmark GPU compute score of 9184 is lower, reflecting the GPU's mid-range positioning for compute-heavy workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and RX 5600 XT, with the RTX 5050 trailing the former by 0.6% and leading the latter by 1.6%. This places it in a competitive mid-range segment, roughly equivalent to previous-generation mid-range cards. The 66th percentile rank among all GPUs confirms its position as an upper-mid-range option.

Power requirements are modest at 130 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300 W and a single 8-pin power connector. The dual-slot design and PCIe 5.0 x8 interface ensure compatibility with most modern motherboards. The 20 Gbps effective memory speed and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient throughput for 1080p gaming, though they may limit performance at higher resolutions with ultra textures.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, creating a system that is decidedly CPU-forward in its performance profile. The CPU's 82nd percentile rank among all processors is significantly higher than the GPU's 66th percentile, giving the system a combined percentile of 74. This places the overall build in the upper-mid-range tier of desktop systems.

The Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process. This is a modern, efficient desktop CPU with a 65 W TDP, designed for mainstream productivity and gaming workloads. The RTX 5050 is a mid-range graphics card based on the Blackwell architecture, featuring 8 GB VRAM and 2560 shading units, positioned for 1080p gaming.

The system's class is desktop, indicating it is intended for stationary use rather than portable computing. This allows for a wider range of cooling solutions, larger power supplies, and more expansion options compared to laptops. The CPU's Socket 1851 and PCIe Gen 5 support provide a modern foundation for future upgrades.

The performance tier is defined by the combined percentile of 74, which means this system outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested configurations. This is a strong result for a mid-range pairing, driven primarily by the CPU's excellent multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU is adequate for the target use case but does not boost the system beyond its mid-range classification.

In summary, this is a balanced desktop system with a clear CPU advantage. It excels at productivity tasks, content creation, and software development, while offering capable 1080p gaming performance. Users seeking higher graphical fidelity should consider a more powerful GPU, while those prioritizing compute-heavy workloads will find the CPU more than sufficient.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the combination of the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3101 and the GPU's 17326 Passmark G3D score should deliver frame rates exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles and high refresh rates in optimized AAA games. The CPU's strong single-thread performance prevents bottlenecks, while the GPU's 2560 shading units handle the rendering workload.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21971, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously. The Passmark data compression score of 233998 supports efficient stream encoding, while the GPU's tensor cores can offload AI-based encoding tasks in compatible software.

Video Editing: The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 25358 ensures smooth timeline scrubbing and faster export times in editing software. The GPU's 80 tensor cores and 13.17 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate effects rendering and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit work with high-resolution footage and multiple layers.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9227 and Passmark floating point math score of 82751 provide solid CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU's 20 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in render engines, and the 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles GPU-based renderers, though the modest VRAM capacity may constrain complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark 4348) ensures fast IDE responsiveness and quick code compilation. The Passmark extended instructions score of 20083 supports modern compiler optimizations, while the 20 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce compilation times for large projects.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4348 and data encryption score of 18289 provide responsive application launching and secure file handling. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics can handle basic display tasks if the discrete GPU is unavailable, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for energy-conscious users.