SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T represents a notable shift in Intel's desktop strategy, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. This is a 10-core, 10-thread processor with no hyper-threading, a design choice that prioritizes efficiency and predictable power delivery over raw multi-threading throughput. The base clock sits at 2.50 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 4.90 GHz, giving the chip a wide operating range for bursty workloads and sustained single-core tasks.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. This arrangement supports the high boost clock, as the large L2 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The 17,800 million transistors are packed into a 243 mm² die, which is modest compared to larger flagship dies, indicating that Intel has focused on efficiency rather than raw transistor count. The 65 W TDP classifies this as a power-conscious desktop part, suitable for systems where thermal headroom is limited but performance demands remain significant.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that punches above its modest power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 21,971 is strong for a 10-thread part, while the single-core score of 3,101 highlights excellent per-thread performance. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,348 further confirms this, placing the chip in the upper echelon for lightly threaded tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 25,358 and an average benchmark score of 30,468 position this CPU at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

The nearest rivals provide context for its positioning. The Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30,422, a mere 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30,390, also 0.3% behind. The Intel Core i5-13600H leads slightly at 30,548, which is 0.3% ahead. These are all mobile-class processors, suggesting that the Ultra 5 225T delivers performance comparable to high-end laptop chips from previous generations, but in a desktop form factor with a 65 W TDP. The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U trails at 30,364, 0.3% behind. This clustering indicates that the Ultra 5 225T sits in a competitive sweet spot, neither dominating nor lagging its peers by a significant margin.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 scores of 9,227 multicore and 1,302 single-core suggest that the CPU handles multi-threaded rendering and compilation tasks competently, while the Passmark floating-point math score of 82,751 and integer math score of 59,543 indicate balanced arithmetic performance. The Passmark data compression score of 233,998 is particularly high, suggesting strong memory subsystem performance and cache efficiency. The encryption score of 18,289 and extended instructions score of 20,083 show that the chip supports modern cryptographic and SIMD workloads without bottlenecking.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for users who require error-correcting memory for critical computations. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-speed connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG with 16 execution units, provides a basic display output for systems without a discrete GPU, though it is far from a gaming solution.

The suggested PSU for the GPU in this pairing is 850 W, which provides ample headroom for the 65 W CPU and the high-power GPU. The CPU's modest power draw means that the PSU capacity is dictated almost entirely by the graphics card. For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider moving to a higher-core-count Arrow Lake-S part on the same socket, provided the motherboard BIOS supports it. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer headroom for future storage devices, and the DDR5 memory support allows for capacity and speed upgrades.

The platform's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is sufficient for the CPU's needs, but it may not be the bottleneck in memory-intensive applications. The lack of ECC support is a limitation for server-like workloads, but for gaming and content creation, it is largely irrelevant. The integrated Arc graphics can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, but it is not intended for demanding graphical tasks. The 850 W suggested PSU is a conservative recommendation, ensuring stability even under peak transient loads from the GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of this CPU and GPU pairing is one of high overall capability. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30,468 places it at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 60,347 places it at the 88th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 85, indicating that the system outperforms 85% of all possible configurations. This is a high-tier desktop build, albeit with a CPU that is not the absolute flagship.

The GPU's benchmark results are dominated by its compute capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 is respectable, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416 and Vulkan score of 271,631 show strong cross-API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 38,194 is very high, and the Passmark GPU compute score of 26,613 indicates substantial parallel processing power. The Passmark DirectX scores are lower (DX10: 224, DX11: 326, DX12: 150, DX9: 397), but these are synthetic tests that may not reflect real-world gaming performance accurately.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 scores of 21,971 multicore and 3,101 single-core, combined with the Passmark multithread score of 25,358, suggest that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60326, 0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60140, 0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896, -2.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, 2.9% delta). These are professional and workstation GPUs, indicating that the RTX 4090's average score is in a professional-class performance tier, though the 4090 is a consumer gaming card.

The data shows a system that is heavily GPU-bound in most graphics workloads, with the CPU providing sufficient support for high-refresh gaming and content creation. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking and 88th percentile GPU ranking mean that the GPU is the stronger component, but the CPU is not a weak link. The combined 85th percentile reflects a well-matched pairing.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning these are projections, not verified results.

The RTX 4090's benchmark scores are exceptionally high, with a Passmark G3D score of 38,194 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 271,631. These scores suggest that the GPU is capable of driving modern games at very high frame rates, even at 4K resolution with ultra settings. The CPU's single-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,101 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,348, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 10-core, 10-thread configuration may limit performance in games that scale well beyond 10 threads, but the high boost clock of 4.90 GHz mitigates this for single-threaded game logic.

For 1080p gaming, the GPU is likely to be underutilized, as the CPU may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles. For 1440p and 4K gaming, the GPU's massive compute throughput will likely dominate, with the CPU providing adequate support. The 24 GB of VRAM ensures that even the most demanding textures and resolutions will not exceed memory capacity. The estimated FPS for this pairing would be very high across the board, but without measured data, precise figures cannot be provided. The 82nd percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU rankings suggest that this system is built for high-refresh gaming at 1440p and 4K, with the potential for 240 Hz or higher refresh rates in less demanding titles.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who demand top-tier graphics performance without needing the absolute highest CPU core counts. The RTX 4090's 88th percentile ranking makes it a premier choice for 4K gaming and high-resolution content creation. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures that it can handle most workloads without being a bottleneck, but users who frequently engage in heavily multi-threaded tasks such as 3D rendering or video encoding may find the 10-thread limit constraining.

Gamers targeting 4K resolution with ultra settings will benefit from the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth. Content creators working with 8K video or large 3D scenes will appreciate the GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workflows. Software developers can leverage the CPU's strong single-core performance for compilation tasks, while the GPU accelerates parallel workloads. Students and small business workstations that require occasional high-performance computing will find this system overkill but capable.

The CPU's 65 W TDP makes it an efficient choice for users who prioritize lower power consumption, though the GPU's 450 W TDP dominates the system's power draw. Users who build this system should have a clear need for the GPU's capabilities, as the CPU is a mid-range part that pairs well with a high-end GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a monster of a graphics card, built on the AD102 chip using Ada Lovelace architecture and a 5 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². The GPU has 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation units. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads.

The memory subsystem is equally impressive: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is crucial for high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The base clock is 2235 MHz, with a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both 82.58 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these precision levels.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its raw power. The Passmark G3D score of 38,194 places it in the top tier, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416 and Vulkan score of 271,631 show strong compute and graphics performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 is a modern benchmark that stresses current-gen features. The Passmark GPU compute score of 26,613 indicates that the GPU excels at general-purpose compute tasks.

For rendering, the RTX 4090's 128 RT cores enable real-time ray tracing with hardware acceleration, and the 512 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-based features. The 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is more than sufficient for 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya, though the lack of measured FPS data means that exact render times cannot be estimated. The GPU's 450 W TDP and triple-slot design require a spacious case and robust cooling. The 1x 16-pin power connector and 850 W suggested PSU ensure stable operation under load.

The GPU's nearest rivals are professional workstation cards, which suggests that the RTX 4090's average benchmark score is comparable to or better than many pro-level GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro A60 matches the 4090's average score exactly (0% delta), while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M leads by 2.5%, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 trails by 2.9%. This indicates that the RTX 4090, despite being a consumer card, performs in the same league as professional GPUs in synthetic benchmarks.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is skewed heavily toward the GPU. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking is higher than the CPU's 82nd percentile, and the GPU's average benchmark score of 60,347 is nearly double the CPU's 30,468. In gaming, this means the GPU will be the primary driver of performance, with the CPU providing support but rarely being the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios.

However, the CPU's 10-thread limit could become a bottleneck in CPU-intensive games or in scenarios where the GPU is not fully utilized. At 1080p resolution, where frame rates are high, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,101) will be critical. The Passmark physics score of 2,053 suggests that the CPU handles physics calculations adequately, but this is not a top-tier result. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 284 is low, indicating that the CPU's integer-heavy single-thread performance is not exceptional.

In content creation, the balance is more favorable. The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates rendering, while the CPU's multicore score of 21,971 in Cinebench R23 handles scene preparation and simulation. The Passmark data encryption score of 18,289 shows that the CPU can handle encryption tasks without offloading to the GPU. The bottleneck in this system is likely to be the CPU in scenarios that require more than 10 threads, such as video encoding with x264 or complex physics simulations. The GPU's massive compute throughput will outpace the CPU in most parallel workloads.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, suggests that at higher resolutions the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck, as the CPU has more time to prepare frames. At 4K, the RTX 4090 will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will not hold it back. At 1080p, the CPU may limit frame rates in esports titles, but the high boost clock of 4.90 GHz mitigates this. Overall, the system is well-balanced for 1440p and 4K gaming, with the CPU being the weaker link at lower resolutions.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads, with no hyper-threading.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 30,468 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13600H.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning the system outperforms 85% of all configurations.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The GPU has 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4090's 88th percentile ranking and 24 GB VRAM enable very high frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The CPU's single-core score of 3,101 in Cinebench R23 supports high refresh rates in esports titles, though the 10-thread limit may cap performance in some CPU-bound games.

Streaming: The GPU's 512 tensor cores and NVENC (not explicitly listed) support hardware-accelerated encoding, while the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 25,358 provides enough headroom for encoding and gaming simultaneously, though the 65 W TDP may limit sustained multi-threaded workloads.

Video editing: The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 handles timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The 24 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers and 8K editing.

3D rendering: The GPU's 128 RT cores and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provide fast ray tracing and compute rendering. The CPU's 20 MB L3 cache and 4.90 GHz boost clock support scene preparation, but the 10-thread limit may slow complex simulations.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,348 speeds up compilation of single files, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 271,631 accelerates parallel workloads like shader compilation or data processing. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support fast NVMe storage for large codebases.

Student and office work: This system is vastly overprovisioned for typical office tasks, but the CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated Arc graphics provide an efficient baseline. The Passmark data compression score of 233,998 indicates fast file handling, and the 10-core configuration handles multitasking with ease.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The CPU is a 65 W, 10-core Arrow Lake-S part on Socket 1851, while the GPU is a 450 W, triple-slot Ada Lovelace card with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 85 places this system in the top 15% of all configurations, while the GPU's 88th percentile ranking is the dominant component.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking shows that it is a solid mid-to-high-range part, but it is not the flagship of the Arrow Lake lineup. The GPU, at the 88th percentile, is a top-tier card that is now end-of-life but still delivers exceptional performance. The data shows a system that is GPU-heavy, with the CPU providing adequate support for most workloads. This is a high-tier desktop build for users who prioritize graphics performance, whether for gaming at 4K, content creation, or compute-intensive tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means that exact gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores indicate a very capable system.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds