SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, representing the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. Fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, this CPU operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The absence of hyper-threading means the 10 cores map directly to 10 threads, which is a notable design choice for a modern desktop part. The 65 W TDP classifies it as a mainstream-power processor, not an extreme overclocking chip, and the multiplier is locked, so performance headroom comes from the boost algorithm rather than manual tuning.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This arrangement supports the high-bandwidth demands of the 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bus. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, which is critical for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. Integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units provide a basic display output capability, though this pairing will rely on the discrete GPU for any serious graphics work. The socket is Intel Socket 1851, and the production status is active, indicating current availability.

Benchmark data paints a clear picture of a mid-range performer with strong single-thread characteristics. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 21,971 and single-core score of 3,101 show a balanced design. The single-core result is particularly strong for a 65 W part, suggesting excellent per-clock efficiency from the 3 nm process. The multicore score, while respectable, is limited by the lack of SMT and the 10-core count. PassMark results reinforce this: a single-thread score of 4,348 is competitive with higher-tier mobile and desktop parts, while the multithread score of 25,358 places it in the upper-middle tier. The data compression score of 233,998 and floating-point math score of 82,751 indicate strong integer and FP throughput for productivity tasks, while the encryption score of 18,289 and extended instructions score of 20,083 show capable but not exceptional specialized workloads.

The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, which is a solid position for a mainstream desktop chip. Its average benchmark score of 30,468 places it in close competition with several notable rivals. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11980HK, scores 30,422, a delta of just 0.2% in favor of the Ultra 5 225T. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30,390 (0.3% behind), the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30,548 (the Ultra 5 trails by 0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30,364 (0.3% behind). These deltas are within noise, meaning the Ultra 5 225T is essentially performance-equivalent to a previous-generation high-end mobile CPU and a current mid-range laptop chip. For desktop workloads, this means the CPU will handle most tasks without bottlenecking, but it is not a high-core-count workstation monster. The 82nd percentile indicates it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database, making it a capable choice for general productivity, light rendering, and gaming.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T support hyper-threading?

A: No, the CPU has 10 cores and 10 threads, meaning each core handles exactly one thread. This is reflected in the benchmark scores, where the multicore performance (Cinebench R23 score of 21,971) is lower than what a 10-core/20-thread part would typically achieve.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is a moderate figure for a mainstream desktop processor and is sufficient for most gaming and productivity workloads, though it may limit extreme memory-intensive tasks.

Q: How does the Ultra 5 225T compare to the Intel Core i9-11980HK?

A: The two are statistically tied. The Ultra 5 225T scores 30,468 on average, while the i9-11980HK scores 30,422, a delta of just 0.2%. This means the newer Ultra 5 offers similar performance to a high-end mobile chip from a previous generation, but with a lower TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, it includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units. This is a basic integrated solution intended for display output and light 2D workloads, not for gaming or 3D rendering, which is handled by the discrete RTX 4060 in this build.

Q: What socket does the Ultra 5 225T use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1851. This is a newer socket for the Core Ultra Series 2, meaning it requires a compatible motherboard and cannot be installed on older LGA1700 boards.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so manual overclocking is not supported. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is the maximum achievable under load, and performance tuning is limited to adjusting power limits and memory settings.

Q: What is the CPU's position relative to all other CPUs?

A: The CPU is at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30,468. This places it in the upper-midrange tier, outperforming most processors but trailing high-core-count enthusiast parts.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is defined by a strong CPU at the 82nd percentile and a mid-range GPU at the 61st percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 72. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30,468 demonstrates solid all-around performance, while the GPU's average score of 17,639 indicates a more modest capability. The disparity in percentiles suggests the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, meaning the RTX 4060 is likely the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads.

Focusing on the CPU, the Cinebench R15 scores of 2,214 (multicore) and 312 (single-core) show a balanced profile that scales well with thread count. The R20 scores of 9,227 (multicore) and 1,302 (single-core) continue this trend, with the single-core result being particularly strong. The R23 scores of 21,971 and 3,101 confirm that the CPU maintains its efficiency at higher sustained loads. PassMark results are consistent: multithread score of 25,358, single-thread score of 4,348, and integer math at 59,543. The floating-point math score of 82,751 is notably higher than integer math, suggesting the architecture excels at FP-heavy calculations typical of scientific and rendering workloads.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,302 is a modern benchmark that indicates the RTX 4060 can handle DirectX 12 titles at playable settings. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95,057 and Vulkan score of 48,643 show strong compute and graphics API performance. PassMark scores are more varied: DirectX 11 at 175, DirectX 12 at 76, and DirectX 9 at 236. The G3D score of 19,545 is the headline figure, placing the GPU at the 61st percentile. The G2D score of 1,037 is lower, reflecting weaker 2D performance. The GPU compute score of 9,213 indicates moderate compute throughput for non-graphics tasks.

The nearest GPU rivals are all significantly older or lower-tier parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17,666 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17,588 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17,551 (0.5% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17,509 (0.7% behind). This is telling — the RTX 4060 is only marginally faster than an integrated GPU like the Radeon 780M in average score, though the real-world gaming performance of the RTX 4060 is expected to be much stronger due to its dedicated VRAM and drivers. The 61st percentile position means the GPU is below average for all GPUs, but this is skewed by the inclusion of many professional and high-end parts. For a mainstream desktop build, the RTX 4060 is a competent 1080p and entry-level 1440p card.

The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU is a top-quartile performer, while the GPU is a mid-pack performer. This means the system will excel at CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data analysis, and multitasking, but will hit GPU limits in gaming and 3D rendering. The 72nd combined percentile is a reasonable score for a balanced mainstream build, but the components are not equally matched.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 82nd percentile and strong single-thread score of 4,348 in PassMark ensure it can feed frames quickly, while the RTX 4060 at the 61st percentile is capable of driving frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles at 1080p. However, at 1440p or with ultra settings, the GPU will likely become the bottleneck, limiting refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 25,358, provide enough headroom for software encoding at moderate bitrates. The RTX 4060's NVENC encoder (implied by the 40-series architecture) can offload encoding to the GPU, freeing CPU resources for gameplay. This pairing is adequate for 1080p streaming with minimal impact on frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multicore performance (Cinebench R23 score of 21,971) and floating-point math score of 82,751 make it capable of handling video timelines and effects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate rendering and effects previews, though the 61st percentile GPU score suggests longer export times than with a higher-tier card.

3D rendering: The CPU will handle viewport and scene logic well, but the GPU is the limiting factor. The RTX 4060's FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS is modest for GPU rendering, and the 24 RT cores are sufficient for entry-level ray tracing but not for heavy production work. The combined 72nd percentile reflects a system that can do light rendering but will struggle with complex scenes.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The 82nd percentile and high integer math score of 59,543 mean compilation times will be respectable. The 20 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases and virtual machines. The GPU is less relevant here, but the system's overall responsiveness will be high.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical office tasks like word processing and spreadsheets. The CPU's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics could handle these workloads alone, but the RTX 4060 provides acceleration for any graphics or video tasks. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption modest, making it a reasonable choice for a dorm room or small office.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and component positions. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 61st percentile suggest a system that is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, with the CPU rarely being the bottleneck.

From the benchmark scores, the RTX 4060's PassMark G3D score of 19,545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,302 indicate it can handle modern DirectX 12 titles at high settings in 1080p. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p textures but may be strained by 1440p ultra settings in VRAM-hungry titles. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,348 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent in CPU-bound games, avoiding stutter.

Estimated gaming performance: at 1080p ultra settings, most esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs should run at high frame rates (well above 100 FPS), given the CPU's single-thread prowess. AAA titles will likely run between 60 and 100 FPS depending on optimization, with the GPU being the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles on ultra settings, and users may need to lower settings to medium or high. The lack of measured data means these are qualitative expectations, not verified results.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, specifically the AD107 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio of 15.11 TFLOPS.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2,125 MHz, translating to 17 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1830 MHz, with a boost clock of 2460 MHz. This memory configuration is a known compromise for the 40-series — while 8 GB is sufficient for 1080p gaming, it may be limiting for 1440p or high-texture workloads. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, and the 128-bit bus is narrower than higher-tier cards.

For ray tracing and AI acceleration, the GPU includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. These are essential for features like DLSS and ray-traced effects. The RTX 4060's RT core count of 24 is modest, and the tensor core count of 96 is sufficient for DLSS upscaling but not for heavy AI compute. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and APIs.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,302 is a good indicator of modern DX12 performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 48,643 shows strong low-level API performance, while OpenCL at 95,057 indicates capable compute. PassMark G3D score of 19,545 places it at the 61st percentile, which is below average for all GPUs but respectable for a mainstream card. The GPU compute score of 9,213 is lower than expected, suggesting that compute-heavy workloads like mining or scientific simulations are not this card's strength.

The nearest rivals are all much older or lower-tier parts, with deltas under 1%. This means the RTX 4060's average score of 17,639 is not far from that of an integrated GPU like the Radeon 780M (17,588), though the RTX 4060's dedicated VRAM and drivers will deliver far better gaming performance. The 61st percentile is a realistic assessment: this is a mid-pack GPU for 1080p gaming, not a high-end 4K card.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a specific user: the 1080p gamer who wants a responsive system for both gaming and productivity. The CPU's 82nd percentile makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile code frequently, as the integer math score of 59,543 and multithread score of 25,358 will handle builds and tests efficiently. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for standard tasks, though the discrete GPU is unnecessary for that use case.

Content creators working with 1080p video will benefit from the combination. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 handles timeline scrubbing and exports, while the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate effects and encoding. For 3D artists, this is an entry-level system that can handle moderate scenes but will hit GPU limits on complex renders. The 24 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but users should expect to use DLSS to maintain playable frame rates in RT-enabled games.

The system is not ideal for high-refresh 1440p gaming, as the GPU's 61st percentile and 8 GB memory will struggle. Nor is it suitable for professional 3D rendering or heavy AI workloads, where the GPU's 9,213 compute score and 96 tensor cores are insufficient. This is a mainstream desktop build for users who want a single system that can do everything reasonably well at 1080p.

Build Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 form a desktop-class build (buildClass is "desktop") that targets the mainstream performance tier. The CPU is a 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace card with 8 GB VRAM and a 115 W TDP. The combined percentile of 72 places this system in the upper-midrange, outperforming roughly 72% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU's 82nd percentile is a strong indicator of its capability, while the GPU's 61st percentile is more modest. This is a pairing where the CPU is the stronger component, which is typical for a gaming build where the GPU is often the bottleneck. The system is well-suited for 1080p gaming and productivity, but it is not a high-end workstation or a 4K gaming rig. The launch MSRP of the GPU is 299 USD, which is a mid-range price point for a desktop GPU. The CPU has no launch MSRP listed, but its 65 W TDP and mainstream socket suggest a similar price positioning.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,348 ensures it can process game logic and physics quickly, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,302 will cap frame rates in demanding titles. The result is that the GPU will be at 100% utilization in most games, while the CPU sits at a lower usage, indicating a GPU-bound scenario.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, video encoding (using the CPU), and data analysis, the CPU's 82nd percentile will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have minimal impact. The GPU's compute score of 9,213 is lower than the CPU's floating-point score of 82,751, but these are not directly comparable. For tasks that use the GPU for acceleration, such as video rendering with CUDA, the GPU will be the bottleneck due to its 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM.

The FPS scaling picture, while not measured, can be inferred: at 1080p, the GPU is likely the bottleneck in most games, but the CPU's headroom means that lowering graphics settings will yield higher frame rates without CPU stutter. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have even more unused headroom. In productivity tasks, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is underutilized. This is a system where the CPU has room for a future GPU upgrade, but the GPU cannot be upgraded without also considering the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are more than sufficient for current cards. The overall balance is acceptable for a mainstream build, but users should know that the GPU is the component to upgrade first for better gaming performance.