SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 pairing presents a striking imbalance, but not in the direction most would expect. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, a strong mid-to-upper tier position, while the GPU languishes at the 18th percentile among all graphics cards. This 64-point percentile gap is the defining characteristic of this build. The processor is dramatically more capable than the graphics solution, meaning that in virtually any graphically intensive workload, the RTX 4010 will be the limiting factor long before the Core Ultra 5 225T breaks a sweat.

The data confirms this asymmetry through the CPU's benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, the processor delivers 21,971 points in multi-core and 3,101 points in single-core. These are robust figures that place it within a hair's breadth of mobile gaming processors like the Intel Core i9-11980HK (0.2% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (0.3% ahead), while also edging out the Intel Core i5-13600H by 0.3%. A processor that can trade blows with high-end laptop silicon has no business being paired with a GPU whose 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893 puts it just 1% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P600, a workstation card from a previous era.

The bottleneck direction is unambiguous. For gaming at any resolution above 1080p, for 3D rendering, for video encoding with GPU acceleration — the RTX 4010 will saturate long before the CPU reaches even half its capacity. The Passmark multi-thread score of 25,358 and floating-point math score of 82,751 indicate a processor that can chew through parallel workloads with ease. Meanwhile, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 2.706 TFLOPS and 4 GB of VRAM on a 64-bit bus with 96 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level figures that will constrain frame rates and texture quality.

However, there is a workload class where this balance inverts: pure CPU-bound tasks. In data compression (Passmark score 233,998), encryption (18,289), and integer math (59,543), the Core Ultra 5 225T performs admirably, and the GPU is essentially irrelevant. For software compilation, spreadsheet crunching, database operations, or any single-threaded productivity task, the RTX 4010's limitations will never manifest. The 4.90 GHz boost clock and 3,101 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensure snappy responsiveness. Thus, the bottleneck is workload-dependent: GPU-bound in graphics tasks, CPU-bound only in compute-heavy non-graphics workloads, and balanced in neither.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate benchmark picture is one of quiet competence. With an average benchmark score of 30,468, the Core Ultra 5 225T sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are a mixed bag of mobile and desktop parts: the Intel Core i9-11980HK (30,422, +0.2% for the Ultra 5), AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (30,390, +0.3%), Intel Core i5-13600H (30,548, -0.3% for the Ultra 5), and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (30,364, +0.3%). The deltas are minuscule, all within a fraction of a percent. This tells a clear story: the Ultra 5 225T delivers performance squarely in the range of upper-mid-tier laptop and lower-high-tier desktop processors from recent generations. It is not a flagship, but it is far from a slouch.

Breaking down the CPU scores reveals its character. Cinebench R15 multi-core (2,214) and R20 multi-core (9,227) show consistent scaling. The single-core scores of 312 (R15), 1,302 (R20), and 3,101 (R23) are particularly strong, indicating excellent per-thread performance thanks to the 4.90 GHz boost clock. The Passmark suite reinforces this: single-thread score of 4,348, physics score of 2,053, and extended instructions score of 20,083. The processor handles both integer (59,543) and floating-point (82,751) math with authority. The only weak spot appears to be prime number finding (284), which is a niche workload that often favors different cache hierarchies.

The GPU benchmark data is sparser but equally telling. The RTX 4010 has a single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893, placing it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are, oddly, much more powerful cards on paper: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2,907, -0.5% for the RTX 4010), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2,910, -0.6%), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2,913, -0.7%), and Quadro P600 (2,923, -1%). The fact that the RTX 4010 scores within 1% of these cards is anomalous — it suggests either a benchmarking quirk, driver issue, or that the Steel Nomad test is not representative of the RTX 4010's real-world capabilities. The Quadro P600 is a 2017-era workstation GPU, and the RTX 4060 Ti is a mainstream gaming card; their near-identical scores here should raise eyebrows.

The combined picture is a system at the 50th overall percentile — exactly average. This is a machine that does nothing exceptionally well as a unified gaming or rendering platform, but whose CPU half is genuinely capable. The data suggests the RTX 4010 is the weak link holding the build back from a much higher combined ranking.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a peculiar entry in the 40-series lineup. Built on the GA107 chip with an 8 nm Samsung process, it packs 8,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die. The specifications read like a budget laptop GPU transplanted into a desktop single-slot form factor: 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. Clock speeds are modest at 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost, yielding 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. This is not a rendering powerhouse by any stretch.

The memory subsystem is the most severe limitation. With 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, the RTX 4010 achieves 96 GB/s of bandwidth. This is less than a third of what mainstream desktop GPUs offer, and it will choke on high-resolution textures and large scene geometries. The 1500 MHz memory clock (12 Gbps effective) is standard for GDDR6, but the narrow bus negates any advantage. For modern games at 1080p with high detail settings, 4 GB is already marginal, and at 1440p or above, it becomes a hard ceiling regardless of compute power.

The ray tracing and tensor hardware is present but minimal. Six RT cores and 24 tensor cores are enough to enable DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) features, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, but the raw throughput is insufficient for meaningful ray-traced effects at playable frame rates. DLSS is technically supported via the tensor cores, but the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 baseline means the card has little headroom for AI upscaling overhead. The pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s are entry-level figures that will limit fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893, while anomalously close to the RTX 4060 Ti, should be interpreted cautiously. The 18th percentile ranking places this card in the bottom fifth of all GPUs. For rendering workloads, the 96 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM cap will force reliance on CPU-side processing, which ironically plays into the Core Ultra 5 225T's strengths. The card's 50 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a low-power solution, but the suggested 250 W PSU indicates the rest of the system still needs adequate power delivery.

# Who Should Build It

The data paints a clear picture of the target user for this CPU+GPU combination. This is not a gaming rig for enthusiasts, nor a workstation for heavy 3D artists. Instead, the Core Ultra 5 225T's 82nd percentile CPU performance combined with the RTX 4010's 18th percentile GPU performance suggests a build for users whose primary workload is CPU-bound, with occasional light graphics duties.

Software developers and computer science students are the most obvious beneficiaries. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,971 and Passmark integer math score of 59,543 indicate strong compilation and code analysis capability. The single-thread score of 4,348 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering and 2D graphics but will not tempt the user into gaming distractions.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity will find the CPU's data compression score of 233,998 and encryption score of 18,289 valuable. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low, and the single-slot, low-profile GPU (163 mm length, 69 mm height) fits in compact cases. For accountants, legal professionals, or administrative staff, the 4 GB GPU memory is more than enough for document processing and web browsing.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound tasks — audio production, photo batch processing, or light video editing without GPU acceleration — will appreciate the 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake architecture. The 20 MB of L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth multitasking. However, anyone doing serious 3D rendering or GPU-accelerated video encoding should look elsewhere, as the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS will be a severe bottleneck.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations are a possible audience, but only for esports titles and older games. The CPU can easily feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution. This is a build for the pragmatic user who values CPU horsepower and accepts GPU limitations.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture for Socket 1851. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process, with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. This is a modern, efficient design that draws a 65 W TDP while delivering a 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.90 GHz boost clock. The lack of hyperthreading (10 cores, 10 threads) is notable, but the high boost clock compensates in single-threaded scenarios.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the strong Passmark scores, particularly the floating-point math score of 82,751 and the random string sorting score of 28,774. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,971 places it in the same league as high-end mobile processors like the Intel Core i9-11980HK and AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, which is impressive for a 65 W desktop part.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units is a functional fallback for basic display output, though the discrete RTX 4010 will handle all graphics duties. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it offers 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is not supported, which may be a consideration for certain workstation uses.

The 3 nm process node and TSMC foundry relationship indicate Intel's shift toward external manufacturing for this generation. The 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs is a strong showing, and the near-parity with the Core i9-11980HK (0.2% difference) and Ryzen 5 7640HS (0.3% difference) suggests this is a well-balanced processor. The Passmark multi-thread score of 25,358 and single-thread score of 4,348 confirm that both parallel and sequential workloads are handled competently. The only soft spot is the prime number finding score of 284, which is a niche benchmark.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The gaming potential of this system is constrained almost entirely by the RTX 4010. With a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893 and an 18th percentile GPU ranking, the graphics card is the clear limiting factor. The CPU's 82nd percentile position means it will rarely bottleneck the GPU at any resolution. For 1080p gaming, the RTX 4010's 768 shading units and 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at medium-to-high settings with frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range. The 4 GB VRAM and 96 GB/s bandwidth will allow 1080p textures at medium quality without excessive stuttering.

At 1440p, the picture dims considerably. The 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB capacity will force aggressive texture downscaling and likely result in sub-60 FPS performance in most modern titles. Ray tracing is effectively off the table despite the 6 RT cores, as the compute throughput is insufficient for real-time ray-traced effects at playable frame rates. The 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate will struggle with high-resolution shadow maps and post-processing effects.

Older games and indie titles will fare better. The CPU's 4.90 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score of 3,101 in Cinebench R23 ensure that CPU-bound games receive ample processing power. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with open-world titles that stream assets. For gamers willing to play at 1080p with reduced settings, this system can deliver a playable experience, but it is not a high-refresh-rate machine. The 50 W GPU TDP and single-slot design suggest thermal headroom is limited, which may cause clock drops during extended sessions.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Socket 1851 platform, which is the foundation for Intel's Arrow Lake desktop processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. This is a modern platform with room to grow, but the current GPU is the obvious upgrade target.

The RTX 4010's 50 W TDP and lack of power connectors mean the system's power delivery requirements are minimal. The suggested PSU of 250 W leaves substantial headroom for a future GPU upgrade. Replacing the RTX 4010 with a more powerful graphics card would immediately unlock the CPU's full potential, as the 82nd percentile processor is currently held back by the 18th percentile GPU. A mainstream GPU with a higher 3DMark Steel Nomad score would balance the system and move the combined 50th percentile ranking upward.

The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface of the RTX 4010 is another consideration. While it is sufficient for this GPU's bandwidth needs, a future GPU with a higher memory bandwidth would benefit from the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, provided the motherboard supports it. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs on the RTX 4010 limit multi-monitor setups to DisplayPort-only, which may require adapters for HDMI displays.

The CPU itself is not overclockable (multiplier locked), so performance gains must come from GPU upgrades or faster DDR5 memory. The 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom in most cases, but the 3 nm process is already efficient. A sensible next upgrade path is: first, replace the GPU with a card that has at least 8 GB of VRAM and a 128-bit or wider memory bus; second, consider adding more DDR5 capacity if the current amount is insufficient; third, ensure the PSU (250 W suggested) is upgraded if the new GPU demands more power.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (Arrow Lake, Socket 1851) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 (Ampere, GA107). The pairing is unusual: a top-20% CPU with a bottom-20% GPU. The combined percentile of 50 reflects this split — the system is exactly average overall, but for very different reasons on each component.

The CPU is a 10-core, 10-thread processor with a 4.90 GHz boost clock, 20 MB L3 cache, and 65 W TDP. It scores 21,971 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,101 in single-core, placing it at the 82nd percentile. The GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 card with 768 shading units, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores, scoring 2,893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad and sitting at the 18th percentile.

The tier positioning is clear: this is a productivity-first desktop system with limited gaming and graphics capability. The CPU is the star, rivaling high-end mobile processors, while the GPU is a placeholder suitable for basic display output and light workloads. Users who need CPU horsepower for development, office work, or data processing will find this a capable machine, but those seeking a balanced gaming or rendering system should consider a different GPU pairing.

# FAQ

Q: What is the biggest bottleneck in this system?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is the clear bottleneck. Its 18th percentile GPU ranking and 2,893 3DMark Steel Nomad score are far below the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and 21,971 Cinebench R23 multi-core score.

Q: Can this system handle modern games at 1080p?

A: The data suggests yes, but with caveats. The RTX 4010's 4 GB VRAM and 96 GB/s bandwidth limit texture quality, and the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance will deliver playable but not high-refresh frame rates in most esports and older titles at 1080p medium settings.

Q: Is the CPU competitive with other processors?

A: Yes. The Core Ultra 5 225T's average benchmark score of 30,468 is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-11980HK, AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, and just 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13600H.

Q: What are the GPU's memory specifications?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, and the base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Performance gains come from GPU upgrades or faster DDR5 memory.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The suggested PSU for this system is 250 W. The GPU has a 50 W TDP and no power connectors, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP.

Q: Can this system be used for 3D rendering?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The CPU's 21,971 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 82,751 Passmark floating-point math score are strong for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96 GB/s bandwidth will severely limit GPU-accelerated rendering workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The RTX 4010's 18th percentile GPU score and 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p, and the 4 GB VRAM caps texture quality. The CPU is capable, but the GPU is the hard limit.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 25,358 Passmark multi-thread score can handle software encoding for streaming, but the GPU's limited compute and memory will constrain game performance while streaming. The 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores offer some hardware acceleration, but the 2.706 TFLOPS baseline is low.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will benefit from the 21,971 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth. However, GPU-accelerated effects and encoding will be slow due to the RTX 4010's 96 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is viable with the 82,751 Passmark floating-point math score, but GPU rendering is impractical. The RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM will cause out-of-memory errors on complex scenes and slow render times.

Software development: Excellent. The 4,348 Passmark single-thread score and 59,543 integer math score support fast compilation, and the 20 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is sufficient for IDE rendering and 2D graphics.

Student and office work: The CPU's 233,998 data compression score and 18,289 encryption score handle spreadsheet and document workloads effortlessly. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low, and the single-slot GPU fits in compact cases, making this a quiet and efficient workstation for academic or administrative tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds