SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop configuration that combines a modern, efficient 10-core Arrow Lake processor with a high-end Ampere graphics card. The data shows this pairing sits at the 78th percentile overall, indicating a system that is well above average for both productivity and gaming workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225T leads with a 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs, while the RTX 3090 follows closely with a 73rd percentile rank among all GPUs. This combination is not about extreme overclocking or chasing the absolute top frame rates; it is about delivering a balanced, high-performance desktop experience for a wide range of applications, from demanding content creation to 4K gaming.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is a formidable graphics card built on the Ampere architecture. It is equipped with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a massive 936.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This configuration is particularly significant for rendering and AI workloads, as the high capacity and bandwidth allow for loading large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex 3D scenes without running into memory limitations. The card’s memory clock runs at 1219 MHz, translating to 19.5 Gbps effective, which is a key factor in its ability to sustain high throughput in memory-intensive tasks.

The GPU’s compute core is substantial, featuring 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. Its base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz. This hardware translates to a pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 556.0 GTexel/s. In terms of raw compute, the card delivers 35.58 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, which indicates a strong capacity for general-purpose compute and a 1:1 ratio for workloads that can utilize half-precision. For real-time ray tracing, the RTX 3090 includes 82 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 328 tensor cores. These dedicated units are crucial for modern rendering pipelines that rely on hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, making the card not just a rasterization beast but also a capable tool for next-generation graphics features.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU’s strength. The card posts a Passmark G3D score of 26645 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 15356. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it achieves a score of 5118. For OpenCL compute, a Geekbench score of 172758 is recorded, while the Vulkan score is 53927. These numbers place the RTX 3090 in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. It is closely matched with rivals such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (0.5% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (0.5% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M (1.1% slower). The data indicates that while the RTX 3090 is an older flagship, its performance remains competitive with modern mid-range and high-end mobile parts, making it an excellent choice for rendering where memory capacity is often the primary bottleneck.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 78, indicating it outperforms the majority of systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11980HK?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T has an average benchmark score of 30468, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11980HK's average score of 30422.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090?

A: The RTX 3090 features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU power for the GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has a TDP of 65 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has a TDP of 350 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 750 W.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T support ECC memory?

A: No, the memory support for the Core Ultra 5 225T is DDR5, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and the GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 uses an 8 nm process node from Samsung.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090?

A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is 1,499 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform foundation for this build is the Intel Socket 1851, which hosts the Core Ultra 5 225T. This socket is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, which uses the Arrow Lake architecture. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It is important to note that ECC memory is not supported, so a standard DDR5 kit is required. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a significant upgrade path for storage and future expansion, ensuring that high-speed NVMe SSDs and other peripherals can operate at full bandwidth.

The RTX 3090 utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The power requirements for this system are notable. The CPU has a modest 65 W TDP, but the GPU is a power-hungry component with a 350 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 750 W, which indicates that a robust power supply is necessary for the entire system. When considering the total system draw, a 750 W PSU provides a reasonable headroom for the CPU and other components, though a higher-wattage unit would be a sensible choice for overclocking or adding more peripherals.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points toward the GPU being the more aged component, as it is marked as "End-of-life" production status. The CPU, by contrast, is listed as "Active" production. While the RTX 3090 remains powerful, a future upgrade to a newer generation GPU with a higher percentile and newer features would be the most impactful change. The platform itself has room to grow; since the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, overclocking is not the path forward, but the PCIe Gen 5 support and a robust 750 W PSU foundation mean that a top-tier GPU from the current or next generation could be installed without needing to overhaul the power delivery or motherboard.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Analyzing the balance between the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 requires looking at their respective percentiles and benchmark scores. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 73rd percentile. This suggests that, on average, the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. However, the bottleneck is highly dependent on the specific workload.

For heavily threaded productivity tasks, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 21971, which is strong but not class-leading. The Passmark multithread score of 25358 and the Passmark physics score of 2053 further illustrate that while the CPU is capable, it is not the absolute fastest for multi-threaded rendering. In contrast, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 26645 is a high-water mark, and its 24 GB of VRAM provides a massive buffer for complex scenes. In a 3D rendering workload, the GPU would likely finish its part of the task faster than the CPU can feed it data, making the CPU the primary bottleneck.

In gaming, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score is 4348, which is excellent for game logic and physics, ensuring the CPU can keep up with the GPU. The GPU’s performance, as indicated by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5118, is more than sufficient for high frame rates. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s single-core strength becomes more critical, and it might be the limiting factor in achieving the absolute maximum FPS. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as the rendering load increases significantly, and the GPU's raw compute power (35.58 TFLOPS) will be the deciding factor. The data suggests a well-balanced system where the CPU is strong enough to avoid being a major hindrance in most scenarios, but the GPU will be the component that determines the upper limits of frame rates in graphically demanding games.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB of L3 cache. This configuration, with a 65 W TDP, is designed for efficiency while still offering respectable performance. The processor also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units, which is useful for basic display output but is not intended for gaming.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in single-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3101, and its Passmark single-thread score is 4348. These are strong figures that translate to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks, fast compilation times in software development, and solid performance in applications that rely on a few fast cores. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s performance is moderate. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 21971, and the Passmark multithread score is 25358. While this is not a top-tier result, it is more than adequate for mainstream content creation, such as video editing and 3D modeling.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30468, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. It is ranked just above the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, both by 0.3%, and just below the Intel Core i5-13600H by 0.3%. This places it in the same performance tier as those popular mobile and desktop chips. The Passmark data encryption score of 18289 and data compression score of 233998 indicate solid performance for security and file-handling tasks. The floating-point math score of 82751 and integer math score of 59543 show a capable processor for scientific and financial calculations. Overall, the data shows this is a well-rounded CPU that is a great fit for a workstation that needs strong single-core performance and decent multi-core capabilities without a high power draw.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This desktop build is best suited for users who need a high-performance GPU for graphics-intensive work and a capable CPU for general and multi-threaded tasks. Based on the measured performance, gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit the most from this configuration. The RTX 3090’s massive memory bandwidth (936.2 GB/s) and high compute throughput are ideal for rendering high-resolution textures and complex geometry. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4348 ensures that game logic and physics are handled efficiently, preventing a CPU bottleneck at these higher resolutions where the GPU is the primary workload driver.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will find this system compelling. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM is a crucial asset for working with large video timelines or complex 3D scenes that exceed the memory capacity of lower-tier cards. The CUDA and tensor core capabilities also accelerate rendering and AI-assisted workflows. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21971 provides sufficient power for video encoding and compiling, though it is not the absolute fastest option available. Software developers will appreciate the strong single-thread performance for code compilation and the high memory bandwidth for running virtual machines or large databases.

Students and small business workstations can also benefit, provided their workloads involve GPU-accelerated tasks. For general productivity, the CPU’s 82nd percentile rank ensures a smooth experience with office applications, web browsing, and data analysis. However, the high TDP of the GPU (350 W) and the suggested 750 W PSU mean this is not a system for a basic office; it is a workstation for those who need serious computational power. The 78th combined percentile indicates that this build is significantly more powerful than an average system, making it a worthwhile investment for professionals who rely on their PC for income-generating work.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The benchmark performance of this pairing is documented by a set of scores that define its capabilities. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T achieves an average benchmark score of 30468, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals include the Intel Core i9-11980HK (30422, 0.2% slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (30390, 0.3% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (30364, 0.3% slower). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548, 0.3% faster than the 225T). Key CPU scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21971 and a single-core score of 3101. In Passmark tests, it scores 25358 in multithread and 4348 in single-thread.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 posts an average benchmark score of 27565, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (27435, 0.5% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, 0.5% slower). It is slightly faster than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839, 1% faster than the 3090) and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M (27883, 1.1% faster than the 3090). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5118, and its Passmark G3D score is 26645.

The combined picture is a system that ranks in the 78th percentile overall. This suggests that the two components work well together, with neither one being a severe bottleneck for the other. The CPU is a modern, efficient part with strong single-core performance, while the GPU is a high-end part with massive memory and compute resources. The data indicates that this is a high-performing desktop system suitable for a wide range of demanding applications. The absence of measured FPS data means these scores are the primary quantitative evidence of performance, and they show a system that is well above average for both CPU and GPU tasks.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is a desktop-class system combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T processor and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 graphics card. The Core Ultra 5 225T is a member of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture, and is designed for the desktop market. The RTX 3090 is a high-end graphics card from the GeForce 30-series, built on the Ampere architecture. This pairing represents a specific tier of performance: the CPU is a modern, efficient 10-core part, and the GPU is a previous-generation flagship with enormous memory capacity.

The overall tier of this system is high, as indicated by its 78th combined percentile. This places it above the majority of systems in the benchmark database. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 73rd percentile show that both components are strong, but the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU. This is a system for users who prioritize a balanced experience but have a slight emphasis on CPU-driven tasks like single-threaded applications and general productivity. The GPU, while not the newest, is more than capable of handling modern games and professional rendering workloads.

The build class is definitively desktop. This is not a laptop or a mobile workstation; the GPU’s 350 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design (336 mm length, 140 mm height, 61 mm width) are clear indicators that this is a full-size desktop component. The CPU’s socket, Intel Socket 1851, also confirms this is a desktop platform. This is a high-performance desktop workstation or gaming rig that requires a case with ample space and a robust power supply (suggested 750 W). Overall, this is a top-tier desktop build that offers a compelling mix of efficiency and raw power.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The figures presented here are projections, not empirical test results.

Based on the GPU’s benchmark performance, specifically its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 and Passmark G3D score of 26645, this system is expected to deliver excellent gaming performance. The RTX 3090’s 24 GB of VRAM and 936.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are more than sufficient for the highest quality textures at 4K resolution. The GPU’s 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores will also enable high frame rates with ray tracing enabled and DLSS, as these technologies rely on those dedicated hardware units.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4348) ensures that it will not be the limiting factor in most games. For esports titles and games that are less graphically demanding, the system is likely to achieve very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. For AAA games at 4K with ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, and frame rates will depend on the specific title’s optimization. However, the data suggests that the RTX 3090 is still a top-tier card for 4K gaming, and the CPU is powerful enough to keep up. In summary, while exact FPS numbers cannot be provided, the benchmark data indicates that this is a very capable gaming system, likely to deliver high frame rates at high resolutions and settings across most titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds