SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

37,313 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 225F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Database Analysis

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile across all desktop builds is 92, placing it in the top 8% of all configurations tracked in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HK?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F scores 37,313 in the average benchmark, which is 0.3% behind the Core i9-13900HK's 37,425 — a negligible difference in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile position among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits at the 98th percentile, meaning it outperforms 98% of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does this build support error-correcting memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz across its 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: The build class is desktop, with the CPU using Intel Socket 1851 and the GPU using a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this pairing is exceptional. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 37,313, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU far exceeds that, with an average benchmark score of 184,664 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, landing at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Together, the pairing reaches a combined percentile of 92, indicating that this system outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations.

The GPU's performance is particularly striking when compared to its nearest rivals. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.4% higher than the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, and 3.7% higher than the GeForce RTX 4090 D. The only rival that edges it out is the A100 SXM4 40 GB, which leads by 1.3%. These margins are all within a narrow band, suggesting the RTX 5000 Ada is competitively positioned at the very top of the GPU hierarchy.

On the CPU side, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is tightly clustered with its nearest rivals. It trails the Core i9-13900HK by just 0.3%, leads the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H by 0.4%, the Core i7-13700 by 0.5%, and the Ryzen 7 160 by 0.5%. This clustering indicates that the Ultra 5 225F delivers performance squarely in the range of previous-generation high-end mobile and desktop chips.

The data shows a system with an extremely strong GPU and a solid mid-to-high-range CPU. The GPU carries the bulk of the performance weight, while the CPU provides adequate support without creating a significant imbalance. The combined 92nd percentile reflects a build that excels in GPU-bound workloads while remaining competitive in CPU-bound tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is built on Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It features 10 cores and 10 threads, with no hyper-threading, operating between 3.30 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 16,467 in multi-core and 1,893 in single-core. The single-core result is strong, indicating excellent per-thread performance for lightly threaded applications. The multi-core score, while respectable for a 10-thread chip, reflects the lack of simultaneous multithreading; the chip relies on its high boost clocks and efficient architecture to compete with chips that have more threads.

PassMark results provide a detailed breakdown of workload characteristics. The CPU achieves 31,004 in multithreaded tests and 4,397 in single-threaded tests. Integer math scores 66,417, while floating-point math reaches 92,554 — the higher floating-point number suggests strong performance in scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression scores 310,843, and data encryption reaches 22,648, indicating solid throughput for data-intensive tasks. Extended instructions score 28,027, and random string sorting hits 37,325. Physics simulation scores 2,430, and prime number finding scores 352.

The 85th percentile CPU ranking means this chip outperforms 85% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Core i9-13900HK, is essentially tied in average score, which is notable because that rival is a mobile processor with a higher core count. The Ultra 5 225F achieves comparable results with fewer threads, highlighting the efficiency of the Arrow Lake architecture and the benefit of the 3 nm process.

For real workloads, this CPU handles everyday productivity with ease, offers strong single-threaded performance for applications that rely on one or two cores, and provides adequate multi-core throughput for content creation. The 65 W TDP suggests efficient operation, and the DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provides ample data throughput for most applications.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU-heavy workloads and need professional-grade graphics performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile GPU ranking makes it suitable for 3D rendering, AI inference, and complex scientific visualization — tasks that benefit from the GPU's 32 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Gamers at high resolutions will find this system compelling. The GPU's top-tier performance supports 4K gaming with ultra settings, and the CPU's strong single-core score of 1,893 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains smooth in games that depend on CPU throughput. The 85th percentile CPU ranking means it won't bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing software can leverage the GPU's CUDA and tensor cores for accelerated encoding and effects. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 31,004 provides sufficient processing power for timeline scrubbing and export tasks, while the GPU handles rendering and real-time previews. The combined 92nd percentile ranking indicates a system that excels across the creative suite.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 66,417 and data compression score of 310,843. The 10 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and the fast single-thread performance reduces latency for interactive development tools. Students and small business workstations gain professional-grade GPU capabilities for CAD, simulation, and data analysis without requiring a dedicated workstation platform.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear performance hierarchy: the GPU operates at the 98th percentile while the CPU sits at the 85th percentile. This 13-point gap indicates that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing, and in GPU-bound workloads, the CPU will not limit performance. Games at high resolutions and rendering tasks that scale with GPU throughput will be limited by the GPU, which is the desired behavior.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios, the balance shifts. Applications that rely heavily on single-threaded performance — such as legacy software, certain simulation tools, or games with poor multi-core scaling — will be limited by the CPU's single-core score of 1,893 in Cinebench R23. The 10-thread configuration without hyper-threading may also constrain heavily threaded workloads that expect more parallelism.

The FPS scaling evidence is not measured for this exact combination, as no measured FPS rows exist in the database. All frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and the CPU's 85th percentile ranking suggest that at 1080p, the CPU may become a limiting factor in high-refresh scenarios, as the GPU can produce frames faster than the CPU can feed it. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, which is the typical target for this class of hardware.

The memory subsystem also plays a role. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional, and the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for its 32 GB VRAM. Neither component appears to starve the other. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface for the GPU provides sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 5000 Ada, and the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer headroom for future storage or expansion needs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F uses Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform is current-generation, meaning future upgrades within the same socket generation are possible, though the database does not specify which specific processors share this socket.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a TDP of 250 W, and the suggested PSU is 600 W. This leaves headroom for a CPU upgrade that draws more power, as the 65 W TDP of the current CPU is modest. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Arrow Lake processor, which would improve multi-threaded performance without requiring a motherboard change.

The GPU's power connector is 1x 16-pin, and the card is dual-slot with a length of 267 mm and height of 112 mm. This form factor requires a case with adequate clearance. The display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor professional setups.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, and the CPU does not support ECC memory. For users who require ECC for data integrity in professional workloads, this platform is not suitable. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the CPU's needs, but users upgrading to a higher-core processor may want to consider higher-speed DDR5 modules, though the database does not specify supported speeds beyond the DDR5 generation.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile ranking supports high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, and the CPU's 85th percentile single-thread performance of 4,397 in PassMark ensures that most games will not be CPU-limited at these resolutions. Estimated frame rates at ultra settings would be high, but no measured data exists for this exact pairing.

Streaming: The GPU's tensor cores and RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and decoding, while the CPU's 10 threads handle game logic and streaming software simultaneously. The 3 nm process keeps thermals manageable, and the 65 W TDP leaves power headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for smooth scrubbing and rendering of high-resolution footage. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,467 handles export tasks, and the floating-point math score of 92,554 supports color grading and effects processing.

3D rendering: This is the strongest scenario for this build. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 100 RT cores deliver professional-grade rendering throughput. The 98th percentile GPU ranking places it ahead of the RTX 4090 D by 3.7%, making it suitable for production rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 66,417 and data compression score of 310,843 accelerate compilation and build processes. The 10 cores handle parallel builds, and the fast single-thread performance of 4,397 in PassMark reduces latency for interactive coding tools.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for standard productivity, but the 85th percentile CPU ranking ensures that even demanding multitasking — spreadsheets, presentations, research databases — runs without perceptible lag. The GPU's capabilities remain available for specialized coursework in engineering, data science, or design.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, and the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 92 places this system in the top 8% of all tracked desktop configurations.

The performance tier is defined by the GPU's 98th percentile ranking, which positions this build at the professional workstation level. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking is respectable but secondary. This is a system designed for GPU-accelerated workloads — rendering, simulation, AI — where the GPU's massive compute throughput and memory capacity are the primary assets. The CPU provides competent support without being the star of the show.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $231, and the GPU has no listed launch MSRP in the database. The overall build class is desktop, and the hardware is currently in active production status for both components.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The chip, designated AD102, contains 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. It operates at a base clock of 1,155 MHz and boosts to 2,550 MHz.

The memory subsystem consists of 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute reaches 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1).

In Geekbench benchmarks, the GPU scores 175,286 in OpenCL and 194,041 in Vulkan, averaging 184,664. This places it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183,725 — the RTX 5000 Ada leads by 0.5%. The A100 SXM4 40 GB leads by 1.3%, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell trails by 1.4% and the GeForce RTX 4090 D trails by 3.7%.

For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM is particularly significant, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside entirely in GPU memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports fast data movement, and the 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering. The tensor cores enable AI denoising and DLSS-style upscaling, which can improve frame rates in real-time applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the database contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows for this pairing. All frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's 98th percentile ranking and the CPU's 85th percentile ranking, this system is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions with ultra settings. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 32 GB VRAM suggest it can handle demanding titles at maximum quality. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,397 in PassMark is sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks at higher resolutions.

At 1080p, the CPU may limit performance in CPU-intensive games, as the GPU can generate frames faster than the 10-thread processor can process game logic. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, which is the preferred scenario for this class of hardware. Ray tracing workloads will benefit from the 100 RT cores, and the tensor cores support DLSS for additional performance headroom.

These estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The actual gaming performance will vary by title, driver optimization, and system configuration. The data confirms that this is a top-tier GPU pairing with a capable mid-to-high-range CPU, making it suitable for high-refresh gaming at high resolutions.