SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

37,313 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance tier, with the CPU holding the 85th percentile among all processors and the GPU sitting at the 87th percentile among all graphics cards. The combined percentile for this build is 86, placing it in the upper echelon of desktop systems, though the data shows a notable asymmetry between the two components that defines its character. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power demands modest relative to its performance class. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, though it lacks ECC support and integrated graphics.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die underscore the density of the design, and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides modern connectivity options. The processor is unlocked in neither multiplier nor frequency, meaning overclocking headroom is limited, but the boost clock of 4.90 GHz is already aggressive for a 65 W part.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a strong mid-range contender. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 16467 in multi-core and 1893 in single-core, while Cinebench R20 shows 11059 multi-core and 1561 single-core, and Cinebench R15 records 2660 multi-core and 287 single-core. These scores indicate that the 225F handles both heavily threaded workloads and single-threaded tasks with competence, though the 10-core/10-thread configuration means it cannot match higher-core-count parts in sustained multi-threaded rendering.

PassMark results add depth to the analysis. The multithread score of 31004, single-thread score of 4397, and integer math score of 66417 suggest robust general-purpose compute. The floating-point math score of 92554 is notably strong, indicating good performance for scientific and engineering workloads that rely on FP32/FP64 operations. Data compression scores 310843, while data encryption hits 22648, and extended instructions reach 28027 — all respectable figures for a desktop CPU.

The average benchmark score of 37313 places the 225F in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals highlight the competitive landscape: the Intel Core i9-13900HK scores 37425, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the 225F trails by a hair; the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161, a delta of 0.4% in favor of the Intel part; the Intel Core i7-13700 scores 37135, a 0.5% advantage; and the AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117, also a 0.5% lead. This places the 225F in a tight cluster where a few percentage points separate it from mobile and desktop rivals, making it a competitive choice for its power envelope.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a high-end desktop graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It packs 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed, and the 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die give a transistor density of 120.6M per mm².

The GPU boasts 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Computational throughput is substantial: FP32 performance reaches 56.28 TFLOPS, and FP16 is identical at 56.28 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s.

The power profile is significant, with a TDP of 360 W and a suggested PSU of 750 W. The card is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b. API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it future-proof for modern titles and applications.

Benchmark scores demonstrate the card's high-end positioning. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 8637. Geekbench results are strong: OpenCL scores 235901 and Vulkan scores 255450. PassMark tests show a G3D score of 36565 and a GPU compute score of 21789, alongside DirectX scores of 389 for DX9, 324 for DX11, 208 for DX10, and 151 for DX12. The average benchmark score of 56083 places the RTX 5080 in the 87th percentile of all GPUs.

The nearest rivals show a tight race at the top. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a delta of 0.6% in favor of the RTX 5080; the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a 0.7% lead; the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, a 2.3% advantage; and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367, a -2.2% deficit, meaning the RX 9070 GRE is actually 2.2% faster on average. This indicates the RTX 5080 is competitive but not dominant in its immediate peer group, with performance differences of a few percentage points either way.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark data shows a system that is well-above average but not at the absolute peak. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37313 and the GPU's average score of 56083 together yield a combined percentile of 86, reflecting a balanced high-tier desktop build. The CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting neither component dramatically outclasses the other in aggregate terms.

Breaking down the CPU scores, the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 16467 is a strong indicator for rendering workloads, though it falls short of the highest-end desktop CPUs that often exceed 30000 in this test. The single-core score of 1893 is competitive, placing it near the top for single-threaded tasks. PassMark multi-thread of 31004 and single-thread of 4397 reinforce this profile, with the processor showing balanced capabilities across both metrics.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark that reflects real-world gaming performance at high resolutions. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 255450 and OpenCL score of 235901 indicate strong compute performance for both gaming and non-gaming workloads. PassMark G3D of 36565 is a solid figure, though the nearest rival data shows only marginal separation from cards that score around 55000 on average.

The aggregate scores place the CPU and GPU in the same percentile band, which is a favorable sign for overall system balance. The CPU trails its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HK, by only 0.3%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H by 0.4%. The GPU leads the AMD Radeon 8060S by 0.6% and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 0.7%, but trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2%. These tight deltas mean the system competes within a narrow performance window where individual workloads could tip results either way.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 5 225F and the RTX 5080 is a study in contrasts. The CPU, with its 65 W TDP and 10-core configuration, is designed for efficiency and moderate multi-threaded performance. The GPU, with a 360 W TDP and massive compute resources, is a high-power component aimed at maximum graphical fidelity. This asymmetry suggests that in CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulations, data compression, or single-threaded applications — the 225F may be the limiting factor, while in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution rendering or ray tracing, the RTX 5080 will dominate.

The percentile data supports this interpretation. The CPU's 85th percentile is respectable, but the GPU's 87th percentile edges it out slightly. In gaming scenarios where the GPU is typically the bottleneck at high resolutions, the RTX 5080 will push frame rates, but the CPU must keep up with game logic and draw calls. The 225F's single-core score of 4397 in PassMark and 1893 in Cinebench R23 are strong enough for most titles, but demanding CPU-heavy games could expose a bottleneck.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the task. Multi-threaded rendering in Cinebench R23 shows the CPU scoring 16467, which is adequate but not exceptional; the GPU's compute score of 21789 in PassMark indicates it can handle some rendering tasks better than the CPU. However, tasks that rely heavily on CPU integer or floating-point math — like the PassMark scores of 66417 for integer and 92554 for floating-point — will depend almost entirely on the 225F, where it performs at a mid-range level.

The FPS scaling picture is limited by the absence of measured data. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU and GPU percentiles suggest that in GPU-bound scenarios at 1440p or 4K, the RTX 5080 will provide high frame rates, but in CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p with low graphical settings, the 225F could limit maximum FPS. The data does not include pair-specific FPS metrics, so precise bottleneck quantification is not possible.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not actual measurements. The RTX 5080's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 and PassMark G3D score of 36565 place it in the 87th percentile of GPUs, which typically translates to excellent performance at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most titles.

Given the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, memory-intensive games with high-resolution textures will perform well, with the large VRAM buffer reducing stutter and allowing maximum texture quality settings. The 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing and DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles. The boost clock of 2617 MHz ensures consistent performance under load.

The CPU's gaming-relevant scores — a single-thread PassMark of 4397 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1893 — are sufficient for most modern games, which typically rely on one or two cores for game logic. However, in esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rates, the 225F's 10-core/10-thread configuration could be a limiting factor if the game relies on many threads. The lack of hyper-threading means 10 threads total, which is adequate but not generous for heavily threaded game engines.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary determinant of frame rates, and the RTX 5080's high percentile suggests it will deliver high FPS in most titles, potentially exceeding 60 FPS at 4K in demanding games and much higher at 1440p. At 1080p, the CPU's influence increases, and the 225F's performance should support high refresh rates in less demanding titles, though the absence of measured data means these are expectations rather than verified results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current as of the processor's release in January 2025. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for desktop platforms, and ECC memory is not supported, limiting its use in mission-critical server environments.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The RTX 5080's 360 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP together suggest a total system power draw that the suggested PSU of 750 W can handle with headroom. The GPU's single 16-pin power connector is a modern standard, and the dual-slot design means it should fit in most mid-tower and full-tower cases, though the 304 mm length requires adequate clearance.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the CPU, as the GPU is already at the 87th percentile. Moving to a higher-core-count Intel Socket 1851 processor would improve multi-threaded performance in rendering and compression workloads, though the 225F's 85th percentile shows it is already a capable part. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory could benefit memory-intensive applications, though the dual-channel configuration is already standard. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs and storage devices will not be bottlenecked by the interface.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong GPU performance for gaming and creative workloads, paired with an efficient CPU for everyday tasks. The RTX 5080's 87th percentile makes it suitable for gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth support high-resolution textures and ray tracing. The CPU's 85th percentile handles general productivity well, making it a fit for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes, though the 10-core configuration may be a limitation for very heavy multi-threaded rendering.

Software developers will find the CPU's strong single-thread performance — a PassMark single-thread score of 4397 — useful for compilation and code analysis, while the GPU's compute capabilities, evidenced by a Geekbench OpenCL score of 235901, can accelerate machine learning or data processing tasks. Students and small business workstations will benefit from the system's balance of CPU efficiency and GPU power, handling office applications, web browsing, and light content creation without strain, though the GPU's power draw may be overkill for such workloads.

The build is not ideal for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding or large-scale physics simulations, where the 225F's 10 threads may bottleneck. It is also not suited for budget-constrained builds, given the GPU's high-end positioning. Instead, it fits users who want a high-refresh gaming experience at high resolutions and occasionally dabble in content creation or compute acceleration.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, a combination that targets the upper-mid-range to high-end segment of the desktop market. The CPU, a 10-core/10-thread Arrow Lake part, and the GPU, a Blackwell 2.0 flagship, together achieve a combined percentile of 86, placing them in the top tier of desktop systems.

The CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile are closely matched, indicating a balanced system where neither component drastically outclasses the other in aggregate benchmark terms. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37313 and the GPU's average score of 56083 reflect a system that can handle demanding workloads, but the tight rival deltas — such as the CPU trailing the Core i9-13900HK by 0.3% and the GPU trailing the Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2% — show that this build is competitive rather than dominant.

The desktop classification is clear from the buildClass field, and the power profile — a 65 W CPU and 360 W GPU — requires a capable PSU, with the suggested 750 W providing sufficient headroom. The system is a solid choice for high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated compute, though the CPU's 10-thread limit means it is not a top-tier workstation part. Overall, this is a high-performing desktop build with a strong GPU bias, suitable for users who prioritize graphical performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, based on the CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile among all processors and GPUs, respectively.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HK?

A: The 225F has an average benchmark score of 37313, which is 0.3% lower than the i9-13900HK's score of 37425, making the two nearly identical in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5080, and how much VRAM does it have?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 5 225F support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the memory specifications.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 750 W, which accommodates the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 360 W TDP with headroom.

Q: What is the RTX 5080's score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The RTX 5080 scores 8637 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark.

Q: How does the RTX 5080's average benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE?

A: The RTX 5080's average score is 56083, which is 2.2% lower than the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's score of 57367, meaning the AMD card is slightly faster on average.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5080's 87th percentile and strong DirectX 12 performance, evidenced by a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637, make it capable of driving high frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The CPU's single-thread score of 4397 in PassMark supports this, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates.

Streaming: The GPU's 336 tensor cores and 84 ray tracing cores can handle encoding and real-time effects, while the CPU's multi-thread score of 31004 in PassMark provides sufficient headroom for streaming software. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory bottlenecks when running games and streaming simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16467 and the GPU's compute score of 21789 in PassMark indicate a system that can handle 4K video editing, with the GPU accelerating effects and rendering, though the 10-core CPU may slow timeline scrubbing in very complex projects.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS and Geekbench OpenCL score of 235901 make it a strong choice for GPU-accelerated rendering, while the CPU's 16467 in Cinebench R23 provides adequate CPU-based rendering performance for moderate scenes.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1893, accelerates compilation and code analysis, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 255450 supports compute-heavy development tasks like shader compilation or machine learning experiments.

Student and office work: The system is over-specified for typical office tasks, but the CPU's 65 W TDP and efficient Arrow Lake architecture keep power consumption low, and the 10-core configuration handles multitasking well. The GPU's power draw is excessive for this use case, but the system remains functional for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets.