SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 5 225 pairs with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation in a desktop configuration, combining a 10-core Arrow Lake processor with a professional-grade Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU holds the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, giving the pairing an overall combined percentile of 68. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5 via a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, with no ECC memory support.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in sustained multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25,891 points in multi-core and 3,655 in single-core. The R20 run shows 6,317 multi-core and 891 single-core, while R15 produces 2,609 multi-core and 368 single-core. PassMark tests paint a similar picture: multi-thread score of 30,459, single-thread of 4,412, integer math at 65,345, floating point math at 92,038, and extended instructions at 27,162. Data compression hits 302,811, data encryption 22,285, random string sorting 36,590, and physics simulation 2,342. Prime number finding lags at 358, a relatively low figure that suggests the CPU is not optimized for that specific workload type.

The average benchmark score of 36,938 places the Ultra 5 225 in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945 with a 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 with a -0.2% delta, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093 with a -0.4% delta, and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112 with a -0.5% delta. This means the Ultra 5 225 is effectively within statistical noise of these four competitors, trailing the fastest by just half a percent.

For real workloads, the data indicates a strong all-rounder. The single-core score of 4,412 in PassMark and 3,655 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly-threaded software. The multi-core figures — particularly the 25,891 Cinebench R23 result — show that the CPU can handle content creation tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering without becoming the limiting factor in a balanced system. The 3 nm process node and 65 W TDP suggest efficient power behavior, though the locked multiplier prevents overclocking.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F?

A: The two processors are effectively tied. The Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36,938, while the Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945, a delta of 0%. In practical terms, neither chip holds a measurable performance advantage.

Q: What is the memory configuration of this CPU?

A: The Ultra 5 225 supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It does not support ECC memory, which may matter for certain professional workstation applications.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it features Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units. This provides a basic display output capability, though the system in question also includes a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the production status and release date of the CPU?

A: The CPU is marked as active in production, with a release date of January 6, 2025. Its launch MSRP is $246.

Q: How does the CPU perform in terms of single-threaded workloads?

A: The single-thread score is 4,412 in PassMark and 3,655 in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This indicates strong performance for tasks that rely on a single core, such as many legacy applications and some games.

Q: What is the PCIe configuration?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only. This offers high bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage devices.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. Users cannot manually overclock the CPU beyond its factory boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores establish it as a solid mid-to-high-tier desktop processor. With an average benchmark score of 36,938, it sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 85% of processors in the database. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its score, confirming that the Ultra 5 225 is competitively positioned against other mid-range chips.

The GPU, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, presents a different story. It has a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, placing it exactly at the median of the GPU performance distribution. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals in the data, which complicates direct comparisons. The GPU is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with an AD103 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. Clock speeds range from a 930 MHz base to a 1,680 MHz boost, with memory running at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The combined percentile of 68 reflects the pairing of an above-average CPU with an average GPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile score is dragged down by the GPU’s 50th percentile position. This creates a system where the processor is capable of feeding the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The FP32 compute of 32.69 TFLOPS and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s indicate a GPU that is competent for professional rendering and moderate gaming, but not at the top of the consumer graphics hierarchy.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data is not measured, and readers should treat these as approximations rather than verified results.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance — 4,412 in PassMark and 3,655 in Cinebench R23 — suggests it can handle game logic and physics calculations without bottlenecking most titles. The 85th percentile CPU ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in gaming-relevant single-threaded tasks. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, however, indicates that frame rates will be moderate. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation can handle modern games at 1080p and 1440p with reasonable settings, but it is not a high-end gaming GPU.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing would likely deliver playable frame rates in most titles, perhaps 60-80 FPS in AAA games and higher in esports titles, given the CPU’s single-thread edge. At 1440p, the GPU’s 50th percentile position would likely push frame rates down to 40-60 FPS in demanding games. At 4K, the GPU would struggle, with frame rates possibly dipping below 30 FPS in graphically intensive titles. The presence of 76 RT cores means ray tracing is supported, but the GPU’s mid-tier position suggests ray tracing performance would be modest, requiring DLSS or reduced settings for smooth play.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU holds the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds only the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This gap of 35 percentile points indicates that the processor is significantly stronger than the graphics card in relative terms.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as data compression, encryption, and physics simulation — the Ultra 5 225 will perform admirably, with scores like 302,811 in PassMark data compression and 2,342 in physics. These tasks will not be hindered by the GPU. In GPU-bound workloads — such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering — the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation will be the limiting factor. Its 50th percentile ranking means it is an average GPU, and the CPU’s superior performance will go underutilized in these scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this analysis. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread strength can push frame rates higher, but the GPU’s compute limits will cap performance. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck, and the CPU’s advantage becomes less relevant. For productivity tasks that are purely CPU-bound, the system will perform at the level of its 85th percentile processor. For graphics-intensive tasks, the system will perform at the level of its 50th percentile GPU.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but do not require top-tier gaming graphics. The 85th percentile CPU makes it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where multi-threaded performance matters. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 and PassMark multi-thread score of 30,459 indicate the CPU can handle demanding workloads without complaint.

Gamers at 1080p will find this system adequate, as the CPU’s single-thread performance can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles, and the GPU’s 16 GB of memory provides enough capacity for modern game textures. Gamers at 1440p or 4K will be better served by a stronger GPU, as the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation’s 50th percentile ranking will limit visual fidelity and frame rates.

Software developers will appreciate the 10 cores and 10 threads for parallel builds and test execution. Students and small business users will find the system more than capable for office productivity, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, given the CPU’s strong single-thread scores. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 120 W TDP of the GPU suggest a system that does not require extreme cooling or power delivery, making it suitable for compact desktop builds.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,412 in PassMark can drive high frame rates in esports and less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking will cap performance in AAA games. Expect smooth 60+ FPS in competitive titles, but not the 144+ FPS that dedicated high-end gaming GPUs provide.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-thread performance — 25,891 in Cinebench R23 — can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously with gameplay, provided the GPU handles the rendering. The 76 RT cores in the GPU can assist with encoding tasks, though the mid-tier GPU may struggle with simultaneous gaming and streaming at high settings.

Video Editing: The PassMark integer math score of 65,345 and floating point math of 92,038 indicate strong processing for video codecs and effects. The CPU will not bottleneck most editing workflows, and the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM provides ample space for timeline previews and GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 shows the CPU can handle CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based renderers. The 50th percentile GPU ranking means rendering times will be moderate, not exceptional.

Software Development: The 10 cores and 10 threads, combined with a strong single-thread score of 4,412, make this ideal for compiling code, running tests, and managing virtual machines. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw reasonable during long build sessions.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensures snappy performance in word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and video conferencing. The GPU is overkill for these tasks but provides headroom for occasional graphics work.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The CPU is a 10-core Arrow Lake processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, released in January 2025 with a launch MSRP of $246. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture chip with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, released in March 2023.

The overall tier of this pairing is reflected in its combined percentile of 68. This places it in the upper-middle range of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is the stronger component at the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits at the median with the 50th percentile. The result is a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but is merely average at GPU-intensive tasks. It is a balanced choice for users who prioritize productivity and are willing to accept moderate gaming performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 120 W, with no suggested PSU value provided in the data. The system’s total power draw is modest, meaning most standard desktop power supplies should have adequate headroom, though the exact wattage is not specified.

The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 EU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, given that the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking leaves significant headroom for more graphics performance. The 50th percentile GPU is the clear bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. Upgrading to a higher-tier Ada Lovelace or newer architecture GPU would better utilize the CPU’s capabilities. The platform’s DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure that the CPU will not become obsolete quickly, making GPU upgrades the most effective path forward.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds