SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This desktop build pairs Intel's Core Ultra 5 225 processor with NVIDIA's RTX 5000 Ada Generation workstation GPU, creating a system that sits at the 92nd percentile overall among all tracked combinations. The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 and a single-core score of 3,655, while the GPU posts Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 175,286 and 194,041 respectively. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all game performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the component-level benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests this system can drive high-refresh displays in most titles at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The RTX 5000 Ada's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide substantial headroom for demanding game engines, though the CPU's 85th percentile standing may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions. The 4.90 GHz boost clock and 3,655 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate strong per-thread performance for game logic and physics.

Streaming: The combination of Intel's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU and NVIDIA's dedicated encoding hardware (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) creates a versatile streaming setup. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 30,459 provides ample processing capacity for encoding workloads alongside game rendering, while the GPU's 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores can handle AI-based encoding enhancements and broadcast effects without taxing the main render pipeline.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is exceptionally well-suited for 4K and 8K video timelines, allowing multiple high-resolution streams to reside in VRAM simultaneously. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 supports smooth timeline scrubbing and effects processing, while the PassMark data compression score of 302,811 indicates strong performance for codec-heavy workflows. The 20 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain data flow during complex multi-track edits.

3D rendering: The RTX 5000 Ada's 12,800 shading units and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide raw rendering throughput that rivals data center accelerators — the GPU sits within 1.3% of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB in average benchmark score. The CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads deliver a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6,317, which handles viewport manipulation and scene management while the GPU dedicates its resources to final frame production.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,412 and extended instructions score of 27,162 support fast compilation of single translation units and modern instruction set utilization. The 3 nm process node and Arrow Lake architecture provide efficient execution for developer toolchains, while the 65 W TDP keeps power draw manageable during long build sessions. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support at 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures adequate data throughput for large codebases.

Student and office work: The low 65 W CPU TDP and dual-slot GPU form factor make this a practical workstation for dorm rooms or small offices. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 65,345 handles spreadsheet calculations and database operations with ease, while the 32 GB GPU memory is massively over-provisioned for typical productivity applications — this headroom means the system will not feel dated as software requirements grow over several academic years.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a pronounced GPU-favored balance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, while the Core Ultra 5 225 rests at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. This 13-percentile-point gap indicates that the GPU will frequently be waiting on the CPU to feed it data, particularly in workloads with high per-frame instruction counts. In gaming scenarios, this means the CPU becomes the limiting factor at 1080p where frame rates are high and per-frame CPU work dominates; at 4K the GPU's rendering load becomes the primary constraint, shifting the bottleneck toward the graphics card.

The CPU's nearest rival comparison reinforces this picture. The Core Ultra 5 225's average benchmark score of 36,938 sits within 0.5% of the Intel Core i9-12900T and within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 — these are upper-mid-range processors, not flagship parts. By contrast, the GPU's nearest rivals include the A100 SXM4 80 GB (0.5% faster) and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (1.4% slower), placing it in true flagship territory. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,459 and physics score of 2,342 suggest the CPU handles simulation and AI workloads competently, but the GPU's 400 tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP16 performance will eclipse CPU capabilities in machine learning tasks.

The memory bandwidth allocation further illustrates the imbalance. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is modest compared to the GPU's 576.0 GB/s, meaning data that must traverse the PCIe bus (Gen 5, 20 lanes from the CPU) will bottleneck when large datasets move between system memory and VRAM. In practice, this affects workloads like real-time 3D viewport rendering where geometry and texture data stream continuously to the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform with Arrow Lake architecture provides a current-generation foundation. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration at 102.4 GB/s, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes offers high-bandwidth connectivity for the RTX 5000 Ada, which itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — meaning the GPU does not fully utilize the CPU's Gen 5 lanes but benefits from the platform's forward-looking design. The 65 W TDP of the CPU combined with the GPU's 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU leaves moderate headroom for additional drives or expansion cards without requiring a power supply upgrade.

The CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads with no hyper-threading (evidenced by equal core and thread counts) represent a deliberate design choice for Arrow Lake. The unlocked multiplier is false, so overclocking is not supported, but the 4.90 GHz boost clock is already high for a 65 W part. A sensible next upgrade would be moving to a higher-core-count Arrow Lake CPU on the same socket, which would better match the GPU's massive compute capacity in multi-threaded workloads. The 20 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core provide solid caching for the current CPU, but a future processor with more L3 would reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive applications.

The GPU's 1x 16-pin power connector and dual-slot form factor (267 mm length, 112 mm height) make it compatible with standard ATX cases and most mid-tower PSUs. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation setups, and the 12 Ultimate (12_2) DirectX support ensures compatibility with current and near-future game APIs. For users considering a GPU upgrade path, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface means any modern graphics card will operate at full bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and prosumers who need workstation-grade GPU compute without sacrificing desktop usability. The 98th GPU percentile makes it ideal for 3D animators, architectural visualizers, and product designers using GPU-accelerated renderers — the 32 GB VRAM handles scenes that would exceed the capacity of consumer cards. Content creators editing 8K video or working with large RAW photo libraries will benefit from the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,412 for application responsiveness.

For gamers, this build suits those playing at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates, where the GPU's power is fully utilized. The 85th CPU percentile means 1080p esports titles may be CPU-limited, but the 4.90 GHz boost clock keeps frame rates respectable. Students in engineering or data science programs will find the GPU's 400 tensor cores valuable for machine learning coursework, while the 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool in shared spaces. Small business workstations running CAD, financial modeling, or video production software will see exceptional performance in GPU-accelerated tasks, though the CPU may feel modest if workloads are heavily single-threaded.

The combined 92nd percentile ranking places this build above the vast majority of tracked systems, making it suitable for users who want near-flagship performance with a focus on GPU compute rather than CPU multi-threading. It is less ideal for users running heavily multi-threaded CPU workloads like software compilation farms or distributed rendering, where the 10-thread limit would constrain throughput.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture at TSMC's 3 nm process node. The 3.30 GHz base clock and 4.90 GHz boost clock provide a 1.60 GHz frequency headroom for burst workloads, and the 65 W TDP keeps thermal and power requirements modest. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die yield a dense design, with 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3 cache. The lack of hyper-threading means the 10 physical cores operate as 10 threads, which simplifies scheduling but reduces multi-threaded throughput compared to 20-thread rivals.

Benchmark results show a balanced performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 and single-core score of 3,655 place the CPU at the 85th percentile overall. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: floating-point math at 92,038, integer math at 65,345, and data encryption at 22,285. The extended instructions score of 27,162 indicates solid AVX-512 or similar vector processing capability, while the prime number search score of 358 and physics score of 2,342 are more modest, suggesting the CPU is not optimized for heavily parallel integer workloads. The data compression score of 302,811 is notably strong, making this a good choice for file archiving and database workloads.

The nearest rival comparison shows the Core Ultra 5 225 sits essentially at parity with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (0% delta), and within 0.5% of the Intel Core i9-12900T. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 by 0.4%. This clustering indicates the CPU's performance is well-established in its segment, neither a standout nor a laggard. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU provides basic display output and media acceleration, but is not designed for gaming — the discrete RTX 5000 Ada handles all rendering duties.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU+GPU combination support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU operates at Gen 4 speeds while other Gen 5 devices could use the remaining lanes.

Q: What is the total system power requirement?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 250 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 600 W for the full system.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Ada have, and what type?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 4K gaming is expected to be very strong, though the CPU's 85th percentile may limit frame rates in CPU-heavy titles.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (unlocked multiplier: false), so overclocking is not supported; the 4.90 GHz boost clock is the maximum frequency.

Q: What is the CPU's memory configuration?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and does not support ECC memory.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad compatibility with modern games and applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all game performance figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 and OpenCL score of 175,286, combined with its 98th percentile ranking, suggest excellent raw rendering throughput. The 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate the GPU can handle high-resolution textures and complex shaders without memory bandwidth saturation.

At 1080p, the CPU's 4,412 PassMark single-thread score and 4.90 GHz boost clock will likely drive frame rates well above 144 Hz in most titles, but the CPU may become the limiting factor in esports games with high CPU overhead. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the system should deliver high refresh rate performance in competitive titles and 60+ FPS in demanding AAA games. At 4K, the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate will handle ultra-quality settings in most games, with the CPU rarely becoming a constraint. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores support DLSS and ray tracing features, which can further boost frame rates at higher resolutions. Users should expect variations based on specific game engines and optimization levels, but the overall picture is one of strong, GPU-dominated gaming performance.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (Arrow Lake, 10 cores, 10 threads, 3.30 GHz base / 4.90 GHz boost) with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation (Ada Lovelace, 32 GB GDDR6, 12,800 shading units). The pairing occupies the 92nd combined percentile among all tracked builds, with the GPU at 98th and the CPU at 85th percentiles respectively. This is a workstation-class GPU paired with an upper-mid-range desktop CPU, creating a system that excels in GPU-accelerated workloads while maintaining competent CPU performance for general tasks.

The build class is desktop, with the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP totaling 315 W of component power draw, comfortably within the 600 W suggested PSU. The system's strengths lie in GPU compute, content creation, and high-resolution gaming, while its limitations appear in heavily multi-threaded CPU workloads where the 10-thread configuration trails higher-core-count rivals. This is a purpose-built machine for users who prioritize graphics performance and are willing to accept a more modest CPU to achieve that goal.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 36,938, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 25,891 multi-core and 3,655 single-core, with PassMark multi-thread at 30,459 and single-thread at 4,412. The nearest CPU rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, scores 36,945 (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 (-0.2%), showing the Core Ultra 5 225 sits squarely in its expected performance tier.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286 and Vulkan score is 194,041. The nearest GPU rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183,725 (0.5% delta), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178,050 (3.7% delta). This places the RTX 5000 Ada Generation in the top tier of graphics processors, outpacing the RTX 4090 D by 3.7% and nearly matching the A100 data center accelerator.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU by a significant margin — 13 percentile points — indicating the CPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. However, the CPU's 85th percentile is not weak; it represents solid upper-mid-range performance. The system as a whole at the 92nd combined percentile is well above average, suitable for demanding professional and enthusiast use cases.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture at TSMC's 5 nm process node. The AD102 chip contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The GPU operates at a 1,155 MHz base clock and 2,550 MHz boost clock, with memory running at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The compute configuration is impressive: 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, 176 ROPs, 100 RT cores, and 400 tensor cores. This translates to 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 65.28 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio), with pixel and texture rates of 448.8 GPixel/s and 1,020.0 GTexel/s respectively. The 100 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 400 tensor cores enable AI-based features like DLSS and denoising. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and nearest rival comparisons — within 1.3% of the A100 SXM4 40 GB and 1.4% faster than the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell — confirm its flagship status.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 5000 Ada's combination of 32 GB VRAM, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 65.28 TFLOPS compute allows it to handle scenes that would exceed the memory capacity of consumer GPUs. The 12_2 DirectX support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure broad software support across professional and gaming applications. The 250 W TDP and dual-slot form factor make it feasible for desktop workstations, while the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor professional setups. The 1x 16-pin power connector requires a compatible PSU, with the 600 W suggested rating providing adequate headroom for the full system.