SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a study in contrasts: a mainstream 10-core desktop processor harnessed to the most powerful consumer GPU currently on the market. This combination produces a system that is unequivocally GPU-bound in most gaming scenarios, yet the CPU’s own performance ceiling defines the upper limits of competitive esports titles. The data indicates a pairing where the RTX 5090 delivers immense raw throughput, but the Core Ultra 5 225 ensures that no frame rate target is left unreachable, provided the workload scales with graphics fidelity rather than pure CPU logic.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, while the Core Ultra 5 225 sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. This 7-point gap suggests that in most graphically intense scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, which is typical for a high-resolution gaming build. The measured FPS data confirms this: across 51 games at 1080p, the average frame rate is 223 FPS, but at 4K, that average drops to 87 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows the GPU being pushed progressively harder, with CPU headroom remaining.

In CPU-bound titles like Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant, the Core Ultra 5 225’s single-thread performance becomes the star. The processor scores 3,655 points in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is a strong result. This translates to 368 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, and a remarkable 553 FPS in Valorant at the same resolution. These numbers indicate that for esports, the CPU is not a bottleneck; it is fully capable of feeding the RTX 5090. However, in titles with heavy physics or simulation, like Microsoft Flight Simulator, the 10-core/10-thread configuration shows its limits, dropping to 133 FPS at 1080p, which is still high but not as dominant as the GPU’s raw power might suggest.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,459 places the CPU in a competitive position against its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945, which is 0% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018, which is 0.2% faster. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112, which is 0.5% faster. These deltas are negligible, meaning the Core Ultra 5 225 is not a bottleneck in multi-threaded workloads compared to its direct competitors. The bottleneck analysis, therefore, is clear: the RTX 5090 is the performance anchor, and the CPU is sufficient to keep up in most scenarios, but the system will not scale infinitely in CPU-limited tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 36,938, which places it at the 85th percentile. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 25,891, and its single-core score is 3,655. These are solid figures for a desktop processor. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,412 is notable, as it indicates strong per-core performance, which is crucial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 79,842, placing it at the 92nd percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 18,355, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 334,370. The PassMark G3D score is 39,650, which is a very high figure. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79,605 (0.3% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, which scores 78,940 (1.1% slower). The RTX 5090 leads these by a small margin, but the real story is its raw compute capability.

Combined, this pairing yields a build percentile of 89. The GPU is clearly the dominant component in terms of benchmark scores, but the CPU holds its own. The combined picture is a system that can handle any modern game at maximum settings and can also tackle demanding productivity tasks, though the CPU will be the first to show strain in heavily multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering. The data shows that the CPU’s scores are consistently in the upper echelon, but the GPU’s scores are in a class of their own, making this a system where the GPU dictates the overall performance tier.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 a good match for the RTX 5090?

A: The benchmark data shows the CPU is at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 92nd. The CPU is strong enough to avoid being a major bottleneck in most games, as evidenced by high frame rates in CPU-intensive titles like Counter-Strike 2 (368 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (553 FPS at 1080p). However, the GPU is clearly the more powerful component, and in CPU-heavy simulations, the processor may limit performance.

Q: What is the average frame rate for this system across all tested games?

A: The pair rank by FPS is 75 out of 3,861 pairs, with an average FPS of 223 across all games at all tested resolutions. This indicates that the system performs in the top 2% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225 has an average score of 36,938. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112 (-0.5% delta). This means the Core Ultra 5 225 is effectively performance-equivalent to these rivals, with less than 1% difference.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 have?

A: The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. This is an enormous amount of memory bandwidth and capacity, which is more than sufficient for 4K gaming and heavy content creation workloads.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5090 has a TDP of 575 W and requires a 950 W suggested power supply. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This means the GPU is the dominant power consumer in the system.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the measured FPS at 3840x2160 across various games shows playable frame rates. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 129 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 53 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 49 FPS. These are all at ultra settings, and the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM ensures no memory capacity issues.

Q: What is the release date of these components?

A: The CPU was released on 2025-01-06, and the GPU was released on 2025-01-29. Both are currently in active production.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at gaming performance. The data is measured, not estimated, and covers 51 games at three resolutions. At 1080p, the system is overwhelmingly fast, with many titles exceeding 200 FPS. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leads the pack at 812 FPS, followed by Valorant at 553 FPS, and Roblox at 475 FPS. These numbers are indicative of a system that is heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions, but the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures high minimum frame rates.

At 1440p, frame rates remain high, with Valorant still at 524 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 243 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 81 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 34 FPS, showing the GPU’s limits under heavy load. The 1440p resolution is the sweet spot for this system, offering a balance between visual fidelity and high refresh rates.

At 4K, the GPU is pushed to its limits. Valorant still manages 487 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 53 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 18 FPS. The average FPS across all games at 4K is significantly lower than at 1080p, but the system still delivers playable performance in most titles. The RTX 5090’s 32 GB of VRAM is a key factor here, as it allows for high-resolution textures without stuttering. The data shows that this pairing is best suited for 1440p high-refresh gaming, but it is also capable of 4K gaming at respectable frame rates in less demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the primary use case. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,412 and the GPU’s immense power deliver 368 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 553 FPS in Valorant at 1080p. For 1440p, the system still pushes Rainbow Six Siege to 286 FPS. The data clearly supports a 240Hz or higher monitor at 1080p or 1440p for competitive titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 10 threads are adequate for streaming, but not ideal. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,459 is respectable, and the GPU’s NVENC encoder (part of the Blackwell architecture) would offload the encoding work. The system can handle 1080p streaming while gaming, as the CPU has enough headroom for the encoding overhead, though the lack of hyper-threading means there is less spare capacity than a 20-thread processor would offer.

Video Editing: The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32 GB of VRAM make it a powerhouse for video editing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 is solid for timeline operations and export tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 302,811 and integer math score of 65,345 indicate strong performance in codec and effect processing. This system can handle 4K video editing with ease, and the GPU will accelerate rendering significantly.

3D Rendering: The GPU is the star here, with its 21,760 shading units and 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. For GPU-accelerated renderers, this is an exceptional system. The CPU’s multi-core score is adequate for scene setup and simulation, but the GPU will do the heavy lifting. The CPU’s performance is comparable to its rivals, so it won't be a bottleneck in most rendering workflows.

Software Development: The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (4,412 PassMark) is beneficial for compilation and code analysis. The PassMark extended instructions score of 27,162 and data encryption score of 22,285 indicate solid performance for cryptography and SIMD-heavy workloads. The 20 MB of L3 cache helps with rapid data access. This is a capable development machine, though the GPU is overkill for most coding tasks.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overpowered for these tasks. The CPU’s integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU) would be more than sufficient for office work, and the discrete GPU's power is entirely unnecessary. The system would excel at any office task, but it is a waste of resources for this scenario. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is efficient, but the GPU’s 575 W TDP makes the overall system power-hungry.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5090 is a behemoth. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the GB202 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process. The GPU contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 122.9M / mm². It has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The core clock runs at a base of 2017 MHz and boosts to 2407 MHz.

The memory subsystem is equally impressive: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus provides 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a huge amount of memory, more than enough for 4K gaming with maximum texture quality and for large machine learning models. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute is 104.8 TFLOPS, which is a significant jump over the previous generation.

The GPU has 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, which are crucial for ray tracing and DLSS. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and the PassMark G3D score of 39,650 confirm its dominance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 is also very high. The nearest rivals, the Tesla P100 and the RX 6850M XT, are significantly slower, with the RTX 5090 leading by over 1% in most benchmarks. This GPU is designed for the most demanding workloads, and the benchmark scores reflect that.

Who Should Build It

This system is for gamers who demand the absolute highest frame rates at 1440p and want the capability to play at 4K with high settings. The data shows that at 1440p, games like Counter-Strike 2 run at 243 FPS, and Valorant at 524 FPS. For 4K, the system handles Call of Duty: Warzone at 129 FPS. This is a system for enthusiasts who want to max out their high-refresh-rate monitors.

Content creators, especially video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS of compute. The PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 indicates strong performance in compute-heavy applications. This is a workstation-class GPU for those who also want to game.

Software developers working on performance-critical code will appreciate the CPU’s strong single-thread score. Students and small business workstations would be better served by a less powerful GPU, as the RTX 5090 is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets. However, for researchers working with large datasets or machine learning, the GPU’s tensor cores and memory capacity make it an excellent choice.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 10-core, 10-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture. The GPU is the flagship GeForce 50-series card. The combined percentile for this pair is 89, indicating it is in the top 11% of all tested pairs.

The pair rank by FPS is 75 out of 3,861, with an average FPS of 223 across all games. This is an exceptionally high rank. The overall tier is high-end, driven almost entirely by the GPU’s performance. The CPU is a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range component, but the GPU is a top-tier part. This is not a balanced system in terms of price or performance class, but it is a system that will deliver top-tier gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake-S architecture. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is efficient for a desktop processor. It is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC and contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 16 EUs. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $246. It is not multiplier unlocked.

The benchmark scores show a processor that is strong in single-thread and competitive in multi-thread. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,655 is high, and the multi-core score of 25,891 is respectable. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,412 is excellent. The PassMark data compression score of 302,811 and floating point math score of 92,038 are also strong. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average score, indicating that it is very competitive in its class. The lack of hyper-threading is a potential weakness in heavily threaded workloads, but the high core clock mitigates this. This is a capable processor for gaming and productivity, but it is not a high-end workstation chip.