SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing represents a balanced desktop configuration aimed at high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious content creation. The data shows a CPU that sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, paired with a GPU at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 83. This is a system built for performance, though the specific strengths and weaknesses of each component define where it excels and where it falls short.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features a 20 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core, with 192 KB L1 per core. This is a modern design focused on efficiency and strong single-thread performance, which is reflected in its benchmark scores.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 3,655 points in single-core and 25,891 in multi-core. The single-core result is exceptional, placing it in the top tier for tasks that rely on responsiveness and low-latency execution. The multi-core score is also strong, but the 10-core/10-thread configuration means it lacks the parallel throughput of higher-core-count chips. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,412 reinforces the single-core strength, while the multithread score of 30,459 shows a capable, though not dominant, multi-threaded presence.

The nearest rivals based on average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (-0.2%), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (-0.4%), and Intel Core i9-12900T (-0.5%). This places the Ultra 5 225 in close competition with the Ryzen 5 series, meaning its real-world performance is essentially equivalent to those chips in aggregate benchmarks. The data shows a processor that is not a class leader in multi-threaded workloads but holds its own due to excellent single-core capability. For real workloads, this means snappy application launches, fast compile times for lightly threaded code, and strong performance in games that are not heavily multi-threaded.

Passmark sub-tests reveal specific strengths: data compression at 302,811 and floating point math at 92,038 are high, indicating solid performance in archiving and scientific calculations. Integer math at 65,345 and extended instructions at 27,162 are more modest, suggesting that heavily parallel integer workloads will not see the same level of advantage. The data encryption score of 22,285 is respectable but not exceptional, meaning encryption-heavy tasks will be adequate rather than blazing fast.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has 10 cores and 10 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, with a 0% delta in average benchmark score. The CPU is effectively tied with it, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is 0.2% behind and the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.5% behind.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,648.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all tested system combinations.

Q: What is the measured average FPS across games?

A: The pair achieves an average FPS of 161.6 across all tested games at ultra settings, ranking 912th out of 3,732 pairs.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 36,938, placing it at the 85th percentile. This is a strong result, but the nearest rivals show that it is not a runaway leader. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945, a negligible 0% difference, meaning in aggregate synthetic tests, these chips are interchangeable. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 (-0.2%), and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112 (-0.5%). The data indicates the Ultra 5 225 is a solid mid-range performer that competes directly with previous-generation Ryzen 5 parts.

The GPU, the RTX 4070, has an average benchmark score of 37,648 and sits at the 81st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% lower), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% higher), and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (1.3% lower). The GPU's Passmark G3D score is 26,927, which is a strong directX 12 performance indicator. In compute workloads, it scores 14,720 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 154,858 in Geekbench OpenCL, showing its capability for general-purpose compute.

The combined picture is one of a balanced system. The CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile combine for an 83rd percentile overall. The measured FPS data confirms this balance: the average FPS across 51 games at ultra settings is 161.6. This is a high number, driven by excellent performance in esports titles, but the system also handles demanding AAA games at playable frame rates. The pair ranks 912th out of 3,732 system pairs by FPS, placing it in the top quarter of all tested combinations, indicating that the components work well together without a major bottleneck.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideally suited for gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh-rate monitors. The data shows strong FPS at 2560x1440, with games like Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 153 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 reaching 168 FPS. For 1080p esports, the performance is exceptional, with Valorant at 553 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 561 FPS. This is a machine for competitive play where frame rates matter most.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find the system capable, but not top-tier. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 is solid for rendering, but the 10-core limit means it will not match higher-core-count workstations. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance are sufficient for most video editing timelines and moderate 3D scenes. The data suggests this is a good fit for a solo creator who needs a machine that can game and create without compromise.

Software developers will appreciate the strong single-thread performance (3,655 in Cinebench R23 single-core) for compilation and code analysis. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for a home office or small business workstation. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the high single-thread scores ensure a snappy experience in any productivity suite. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU provides a fallback for basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles all graphics work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a well-balanced pairing with no single component dominating. The CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile are close, meaning neither is a bottleneck in general. The average FPS of 161.6 across all games suggests the system can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios.

Looking at FPS scaling, the data shows how the system behaves at different resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is often the limiting factor in esports titles, but the high single-thread score (4,412 Passmark) ensures it can push high frame rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 75 at 1080p to 56 at 1440p and 37 at 4K. This is a clear GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions. Conversely, in Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 254 at 1080p to 168 at 1440p and 94 at 4K, showing a more even scaling that suggests both components are being taxed.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU is the bottleneck. The 10-core/10-thread configuration limits parallel throughput, as shown by the Passmark multithread score of 30,459. In gaming, the balance is better. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p ultra settings, but at 4K, some games may exceed it, causing a performance drop. The data shows a system that is balanced for 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It operates at a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

The GPU features 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, which are essential for modern rendering techniques. The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 FP16 ratio. This makes the card a strong performer for both rasterization and ray-traced workloads. The data shows a Passmark G3D score of 26,927, placing it at the 81st percentile.

In rendering, the 12 GB VRAM is a key asset. It allows for high-resolution textures and complex scenes without running out of memory. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth ensures the GPU can feed its 5,888 shading units efficiently. The RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, which is critical for modern AAA games. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can boost frame rates significantly. The GPU's compute performance (14,720 Passmark GPU Compute) makes it suitable for machine learning and other compute-heavy tasks, though it is not a dedicated workstation card.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system excels. At 1080p, competitive titles run at extreme frame rates: Valorant hits 553 FPS, CS:GO reaches 561 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege achieves 302 FPS. At 1440p, these numbers remain high, with Valorant at 496 FPS and CS2 at 168 FPS. This is a top-tier esports machine.

For streaming, the 10-core CPU and 29.15 TFLOPS GPU provide ample headroom. The GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) offloads encoding work, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance handles the game logic. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 ensures smooth streaming while gaming.

For video editing, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K timelines. The Passmark data compression score of 302,811 on the CPU helps with media encoding. The system can handle 4K editing, though it may not be as fast as a dedicated workstation GPU.

For 3D rendering, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 indicates the CPU can handle moderate rendering tasks. The GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-based renderers. This is a capable, but not professional-grade, rendering system.

For software development, the single-thread performance is excellent. The 3,655 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures fast compilation and IDE responsiveness. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool under load, which is ideal for long build sessions.

For student and office work, this system is overkill. The high single-thread scores will make any productivity suite feel instant, but the power and cost are unnecessary for basic tasks. The integrated graphics provide a fallback, making the system versatile.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system, combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GPU. The CPU is a 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake chip with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace card with 12 GB VRAM and a 200 W TDP. The combined percentile is 83, placing this system in the top 17% of all tested configurations.

The CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile indicate a well-matched pair. The system is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it is a high-mid-range configuration that can handle most tasks with ease. The average FPS across games is 161.6, which is a strong indicator of gaming performance. This is a desktop system designed for serious gaming and content creation, without the extreme cost of flagship components.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings shows a system that is a 1080p and 1440p powerhouse, with capable 4K performance. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional results in esports titles: CS:GO at 561 FPS, Valorant at 553 FPS, and Roblox at 328 FPS. Even demanding AAA games are playable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 75 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 68 FPS.

At 1440p, the performance remains strong for competitive gaming. Valorant hits 496 FPS, CS2 reaches 168 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 153 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 56 FPS, which is still playable, but not at high refresh rates. The data shows that 1440p is the sweet spot for this system, balancing visual quality and frame rate.

At 4K, the system struggles with the most demanding games. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 37 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 34 FPS, and The Medium at 35 FPS. However, less demanding games still perform well, with Valorant at 397 FPS and CS:GO at 228 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 4K textures, but the GPU's raw power limits high-refresh 4K gaming. The data confirms that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a secondary consideration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is designed for the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU operates at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

The GPU has a 200 W TDP, and the system's suggested PSU is 550 W. This leaves headroom for a CPU upgrade within the same socket, as long as the power draw does not exceed the PSU's capacity. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low, so a future CPU upgrade with a higher TDP would require a PSU upgrade. The platform supports DDR5 memory, so users can upgrade to higher-capacity or higher-speed modules without changing the motherboard.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-end Core Ultra Series 2 CPU with more cores, as the platform supports it. The GPU could be upgraded to a newer generation, such as the GeForce 50 series, which is the successor to the 40 series. However, the current pairing is well-balanced, and the data shows that the CPU and GPU are closely matched in performance, so upgrading one without the other may introduce a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that future GPUs will not be limited by the interface, and the 550 W PSU provides a baseline for upgrades, though a more powerful GPU would require a higher-wattage PSU.