SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010: Database Analysis

This pairing combines a 10-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with a 4 GB Ampere-based entry-level GPU, landing at the 52nd percentile overall among all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is a strong performer — sitting at the 85th percentile among all CPUs — while the GPU sits at just the 18th percentile among all GPUs, creating a notable imbalance where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics card in raw capability. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a high-refresh setup. The RTX 4010's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, which indicates 1080p gaming at modest settings rather than high-refresh competitive play. The CPU's single-thread score of 3655 in Cinebench R23 is more than capable of feeding frames, but the GPU will be the constraining factor.

Streaming: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30459 and data compression score of 302811 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, though the GPU's 24 tensor cores and 6 RT cores can handle NVENC-style acceleration. The 4 GB VRAM limit will restrict resolution and encoding quality options in modern titles.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25891 ranks at the 85th percentile, making timeline scrubbing and export rendering reasonably responsive. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 96 GB/s memory bandwidth are entry-level figures, so GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will be slower than on higher-tier cards.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering benefits from the 10 physical cores and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, with Cinebench R20 multicore at 6317 and R15 multicore at 2609. GPU rendering in applications that leverage CUDA will be limited by the RTX 4010's 768 shading units and 4 GB frame buffer, which restricts scene complexity and texture resolution.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the PassMark integer math score of 65345 and extended instructions score of 27162. The 10 cores and 10 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4412 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interaction and quick incremental compiles.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4412 and data encryption score of 22285 handle everyday productivity with ease. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU provides a fallback display output, and the 65W TDP keeps system cooling requirements modest for dorm-room or small-office builds.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 36938, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F at 36945, a delta of 0%, meaning the two processors are statistically equivalent in average performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D trails by 0.2% at 37018, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 trails by 0.4% at 37093, and the Intel Core i9-12900T trails by 0.5% at 37112 — all within a tight 0.5% band, indicating the Core Ultra 5 225 sits squarely in a competitive mid-range cluster.

The GPU's single benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, returns a score of 2893, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907, a delta of -0.5%, followed by the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (-0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913 (-0.7%), and the NVIDIA Quadro P600 at 2923 (-1%). These deltas are remarkably small, but the percentile gap between the CPU and GPU — 85 versus 18 — reveals a severe performance asymmetry.

The combined percentile of 52 reflects this imbalance, pulling the overall system rating to the middle of the distribution despite the CPU's strong showing. The average benchmark score of 36938 for the CPU is over twelve times the GPU's 2893, quantifying just how much processing headroom the CPU has relative to the graphics subsystem.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is built on Arrow Lake-S architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It features 10 cores and 10 threads, meaning no hyper-threading — each core handles a single thread. Base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration delivers strong single-thread performance, evidenced by Cinebench R23 single-core at 3655 and R20 single-core at 891. The PassMark single-thread score of 4412 confirms responsive day-to-day operation.

In multithreaded workloads, the 10 cores deliver Cinebench R23 multicore at 25891, R20 multicore at 6317, and R15 multicore at 2609. The PassMark multithread score of 30459 and floating-point math score of 92038 indicate solid number-crunching capability for a mid-range desktop part. The data compression score of 302811 is particularly strong, suggesting efficient handling of archival and file-management tasks.

The 65W TDP is modest for a 10-core desktop processor, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU provides basic display output without requiring a discrete GPU. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, which limits its appeal for certain workstation reliability scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile while the GPU sits at the 18th percentile — a 67-point gap that means almost any graphics-intensive workload will be constrained by the RTX 4010. In gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4412 in PassMark will easily keep up with frame generation, but the GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 96 GB/s memory bandwidth will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could support.

In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, or spreadsheet calculation, the GPU's weakness is irrelevant — the CPU's 85th percentile ranking will shine. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering with ray tracing or high-resolution texture work, the CPU will sit mostly idle while the GPU struggles. The 4 GB VRAM on the RTX 4010 is a hard ceiling for modern game assets at higher settings.

The FPS scaling picture follows directly from this imbalance: in esports titles at low settings, the CPU can push high frame rates but the GPU will still limit maximum output. In AAA titles at higher settings, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, and frame rates will drop to the GPU's capability level regardless of the CPU's headroom. The combined percentile of 52 reflects this tug-of-war, landing the system near the median of all tested pairings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 20 CPU lanes. This gives the system headroom for future GPU upgrades — a faster card with PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 interface would be fully supported. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 50W TDP of the GPU mean the system draws minimal power, and the suggested PSU rating of 250 W indicates that a modest power supply is sufficient.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, and the bus interface is a potential bottleneck for a future upgrade — a high-end card would benefit from the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the current RTX 4010 is unlikely to saturate even the x8 Gen 4 connection. The motherboard platform supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family, and the locked multiplier on the CPU means upgrades would come from swapping the processor rather than overclocking.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as this would directly address the 67-point percentile gap between CPU and GPU. The CPU's strong benchmark scores — 85th percentile overall — mean it has years of useful life left, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide bandwidth headroom for any modern graphics card. The 250 W suggested PSU also means upgrading to a mid-range GPU would likely require a PSU replacement, as most discrete cards draw more than 50 W.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3655, PassMark single-thread 4412) indicate it can handle any modern game's CPU demands. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, however, place it firmly in entry-level territory.

At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM should deliver playable frame rates in esports and older titles, but modern AAA games will require significant settings reductions. At 1440p, the 96 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit memory bus become severe constraints, and frame rates will drop substantially. At 4K, the GPU is out of its depth entirely — the 4 GB frame buffer is insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate limits fill-rate-bound scenes.

The CPU's 10 cores and 20 MB L3 cache will keep frame pacing smooth in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS in nearly every graphics-intensive situation. For competitive titles like CS2 or Valorant at 1080p low settings, the system could approach high refresh rates, but for visually demanding games, 60 FPS at 1080p medium is a more realistic ceiling. These are estimates, not measurements, and actual performance will vary by title and settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 52, placing this system at the median of all tested CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36938, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36945, a delta of 0% — they are statistically equivalent in average performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s and a memory clock of 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, which limits its use in certain reliability-critical workstation scenarios.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, which reflects the CPU's 65W TDP and the GPU's 50W TDP.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 4010 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225 has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, a 10-core Arrow Lake-S processor on Intel Socket 1851, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, a 4 GB Ampere-based entry-level GPU. The CPU is an active, current-generation part released on January 6, 2025, while the GPU is an active member of the GeForce 40-series, released on April 15, 2024. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $246; the GPU has no launch MSRP listed.

The system's overall tier is mid-range, driven by the CPU's 85th percentile ranking pulling up the combined 52nd percentile. The CPU is a capable performer in its class, matching the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F within 0%, while the GPU's 18th percentile ranking places it below most discrete graphics cards. This is a CPU-heavy pairing where the processor vastly outstrips the graphics component in raw capability.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations will find this pairing workable, particularly for esports or older titles where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark 4412) keeps frame pacing smooth. Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or batch image processing will benefit from the 10 cores and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25891, though GPU-accelerated effects will be slow.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 65345 and extended instructions score of 27162, which indicate strong compilation throughput. Students and office workers will find the system more than adequate for document work, spreadsheets, and web browsing, with the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics providing a backup display option.

Small business workstations running productivity suites, accounting software, or light database applications will perform well, given the CPU's data compression score of 302811 and encryption score of 22285. The 65W CPU TDP and 50W GPU TDP also make this a low-heat, low-power option for compact or densely populated office environments. However, anyone planning GPU-intensive 3D rendering, high-resolution video editing, or modern AAA gaming at high settings should look elsewhere, as the RTX 4010's 4 GB VRAM and 18th percentile ranking will be a persistent bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is built on the GA107 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units, delivering a pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s and a memory clock of 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). This is a narrow memory interface that will constrain performance in bandwidth-intensive workloads. The GPU includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features, though the low overall compute throughput limits their practical benefit.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 places this GPU at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2893. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 (-0.5%), though that card has 4x the VRAM and a much wider memory bus — the benchmark similarity masks significant real-world differences in texture-heavy scenes. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1417 MHz and boost clock of 1762 MHz, with a 50W TDP, single-slot cooling, and no power connectors required.

The 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for the card's bandwidth needs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation — complex scenes with high-resolution textures will exceed this capacity, forcing asset streaming or reduced quality settings. The 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput places this card firmly in entry-level territory, suitable for light GPU compute, basic CAD, and 1080p gaming at reduced settings.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds