SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 134U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

15,910 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 134U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

This build pairs a 12-core Intel Core Ultra 5 134U mobile processor with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU in a laptop chassis. The CPU sits at the 70th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU reaches the 81st percentile among all GPUs, placing the combined system at the 76th percentile overall. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all game performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct observations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile, with a PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and an 81st percentile ranking, is clearly capable of driving high-refresh displays. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS and texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s suggest it can maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, though the CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3,063 may limit maximum FPS in CPU-bound scenes. For esports titles at lower settings, the combination should deliver well above 144 FPS at 1080p; for AAA games at high refresh, expect 100+ FPS at 1440p with adjustments.

Streaming: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 12,464 and its 12 cores/14 threads provide reasonable headroom for encoding alongside gaming. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics can serve as a secondary encoder, though the discrete GPU’s NVENC on the Ada Lovelace architecture is the primary tool. The CPU’s extended instructions score of 7,002 suggests adequate AVX-class performance for x264 encoding, but the modest 9W TDP indicates sustained encoding workloads may cause thermal throttling in thin chassis designs.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5,572 positions this CPU as a mid-tier mobile processor for export tasks. Timeline scrubbing and effects work will leverage the GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and its 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 indicates strong compute acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, though the CPU will be the bottleneck in CPU-only export pipelines.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores make it highly capable for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated denoising in renderers like Blender or Octane. The FP16 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) is notable for AI workloads. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5,572 is modest for CPU-based rendering, meaning hybrid renderers that offload to the GPU will dramatically outperform pure CPU rendering on this system.

Software development: The 12-core/14-thread configuration with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz provides solid parallel compilation performance. PassMark integer math score of 51,306 and data compression score of 124,771 indicate strong throughput for code compilation and build servers. The CPU’s 70th percentile ranking versus all CPUs suggests it handles typical developer workloads — IDE background processes, local testing, and Docker containers — without significant strain.

Student and office work: This system is overpowered for basic productivity, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,063 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,063 ensure snappy response in office applications. The 9W TDP means excellent battery life potential during light tasks, while the GPU remains idle. The combination of 12 GB VRAM and 12 MB L3 cache provides ample resources for multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, documents, and communication tools.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and its 81st percentile ranking suggest it belongs in the upper tier of mobile GPUs. The CPU’s single-thread performance, however, is the limiting factor for high-refresh gaming.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU’s 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 386.3 GTexel/s texture rate should push frame rates beyond 144 FPS in most competitive titles. For AAA single-player games, expect 120-160 FPS in titles like Call of Duty or Fortnite, and 80-110 FPS in more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant. Frame rates will drop by roughly 20-30% versus 1080p, putting most AAA titles in the 70-100 FPS range. Ray tracing workloads will benefit from the 58 RT cores, but these cores also reduce overall throughput when enabled, potentially cutting frame rates by another 15-25%.

At 4K ultra, the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute is sufficient for 60+ FPS in many titles, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,063 may cause frame pacing issues in CPU-intensive scenes. The 192-bit memory bus and 12 GB VRAM could also become limiting in VRAM-heavy 4K textures, potentially requiring texture quality reductions in the most demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 134U is a 12-core, 14-thread mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 700 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 9W TDP that classifies it as a low-power part. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results show a processor that is solidly mid-range among mobile CPUs. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5,572 and single-core score of 1,576 indicate balanced performance across threaded and single-threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 12,464 puts it nearly even with the AMD Ryzen 5 40 (delta 0.2%) and AMD EPYC 75F3 (delta 0.3%), while slightly ahead of the AMD EPYC 9334 (delta -0.2%) and EPYC 9354P (delta 0.5%).

The CPU’s 70th percentile vs all CPUs reflects its position as a competent but not flagship mobile processor. Data encryption score of 8,077 and floating point math score of 32,425 show reasonable cryptographic and scientific computing performance. The find prime numbers score of 56 is notably low, indicating weak integer-heavy single-threaded workloads. The 9W TDP is a defining characteristic — it enables thin-and-light designs but constrains sustained performance under load.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need discrete GPU performance in a mobile form factor without a high-end desktop replacement CPU. Gamers playing at 1440p or 1080p with high refresh rates will find the RTX 4080 Mobile sufficient for most titles, though they should expect CPU limitations in esports at ultra-high frame rates.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated software — video editors using DaVinci Resolve, 3D artists using Blender, or AI developers using PyTorch — will benefit from the GPU’s 58 RT cores, 232 tensor cores, and 12 GB VRAM. The CPU’s modest multicore score means CPU-only tasks will be slower, but GPU-offloaded workflows will be fast.

Software developers compiling large codebases or running containerized workloads will appreciate the 12 cores and 14 threads, with the PassMark integer score of 51,306 indicating strong build throughput. Students and office workers get far more performance than needed, but the 9W CPU TDP supports long battery life for all-day use.

Small business workstations needing GPU acceleration for CAD or video conferencing with background rendering will find this system capable, though the mobile form factor means limited expandability compared to desktop workstations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 15,910 across all tests, placing it at the 70th percentile vs all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 40 (avg 15,882, delta 0.2%), AMD EPYC 9334 (avg 15,940, delta -0.2%), AMD EPYC 75F3 (avg 15,859, delta 0.3%), and AMD EPYC 9354P (avg 15,826, delta 0.5%). This places it squarely in the same performance class as several server-class EPYC processors, which is notable given the 9W TDP.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 38,135, placing it at the 81st percentile vs all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (avg 38,299, delta -0.4%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (avg 38,349, delta -0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (avg 37,648, delta 1.3%), and NVIDIA Tesla P4 (avg 37,628, delta 1.3%). The RTX 4080 Mobile sits nearly identical to the MX570 and RTX 5080 Mobile, suggesting these GPUs offer similar overall benchmark performance despite different architectures.

The combined percentile of 76 reflects a system where the GPU is the stronger component. PassMark G3D score of 24,926 for the GPU contrasts sharply with the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 12,464, indicating the GPU carries most of the heavy compute load in gaming and rendering scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 1,576 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3,063 in PassMark single-thread, placing it at the 70th percentile vs all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does it mean for thermals?

A: The CPU has a 9W TDP, making it a low-power part suitable for thin-and-light laptops, but this limits sustained performance under heavy multi-core loads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU is within 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and Tesla P4, and within 0.6% of the RTX 5080 Mobile and MX570 in average benchmark score.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Arc Xe-LPG 64EU integrated graphics, which can be used for display output or as a secondary encoder.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance distribution in this system is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 70th percentile means the GPU is the stronger component in most workloads. In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,063 will be the limiting factor at high frame rates, particularly in esports titles where CPU-bound physics and game logic can cap FPS below what the GPU can deliver.

The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 12,464 is actually higher than several EPYC server processors, but its 9W TDP means these scores are achieved in short bursts, not sustained loads. Under prolonged gaming sessions, the CPU may throttle, reducing its effective performance and potentially causing frame drops in CPU-heavy scenes.

The GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute is more than sufficient to feed most displays, but the CPU’s modest single-thread performance creates a bottleneck at 1080p where the GPU is less stressed. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as its pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s struggles to fill 4K frames at high refresh rates.

For productivity workloads, the GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL score 159,575) offload significant work from the CPU, but CPU-only tasks like data compression (124,771) or encryption (8,077) will be limited by the CPU’s 12 cores and 9W power envelope.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2551 socket, which is soldered in mobile designs, meaning CPU upgrades are not practical. The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, though the exact memory capacity depends on the motherboard. PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU limits expansion options, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The GPU has a 110W TDP and is marked as "IGP" slot width with no power connectors, indicating it is a mobile part soldered to the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined TDP of 9W (CPU) plus 110W (GPU) suggests a modest power supply requirement for the laptop’s AC adapter — likely in the 130-180W range, though this is not stated in the FACT PACK.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be memory, as the DDR5 support is dependent on the motherboard and adding more RAM can improve multitasking and reduce reliance on slower storage. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 are also possible, though the 8-lane CPU connection limits bandwidth for multiple NVMe drives. For users needing more CPU performance, the only option is a new laptop, as the BGA socket is not upgradeable.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. The system sits at the 76th combined percentile, indicating it performs better than roughly three-quarters of all tested systems. The GPU is the dominant component, ranking at the 81st percentile vs all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 70th percentile vs all CPUs.

The CPU’s 12 cores and 14 threads with a 4.40 GHz boost clock provide adequate general-purpose performance, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and Ada Lovelace architecture deliver high-end graphics capability. The 9W CPU TDP and 110W GPU TDP together indicate a system designed for mobility without sacrificing GPU performance — a common pattern in thin-and-light gaming laptops.

In the context of the nearest rivals, the CPU is statistically tied with several AMD EPYC server processors (deltas of 0.2-0.5%), while the GPU is essentially tied with the RTX 5080 Mobile and MX570 (deltas of -0.4% to -0.6%). This creates an unusual pairing where a mid-range CPU is combined with a high-end GPU, which is typical for laptops where GPU choice is the primary differentiator.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has 7,424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores. Base clock is 1290 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus.

Memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for 1440p gaming and most 4K scenarios, though VRAM-heavy textures at 4K may exceed this capacity. The pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance for high-resolution rendering.

Compute performance is substantial: FP32 and FP16 both hit 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is excellent for AI inference and GPU compute. The PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 confirm strong general-purpose compute. The Vulkan score of 145,807 shows good cross-API performance.

The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking and its proximity to the RTX 5080 Mobile (delta -0.6%) in average benchmark score suggest it remains competitive despite being a previous-generation part. Its 110W TDP is low for the performance level, indicating efficient power management. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 ensures compatibility with modern games and applications, while the 232 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for DLSS and other AI-based features.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 134U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds