SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 3 205 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 3 205

31,473 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pairing is a desktop configuration that combines a modern 3nm processor with a workstation-class GPU from the Turing generation. The CPU is a current-generation part, while the GPU is end-of-life, creating a system that excels in processor-heavy tasks but lags in modern graphics features. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 is an 8-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, marking Intel's move to a 3nm process node manufactured by TSMC. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 57W TDP that places it in an efficient power envelope for a desktop chip. The CPU is built on the Intel Socket 1851 platform and supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The cache hierarchy is notable: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 15 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration prioritizes per-core responsiveness over large shared pools, which aligns with its 8-thread design. The processor includes an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU solution, though it is not intended for serious gaming. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for storage and expansion cards. It is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking options are limited.

Benchmark results show a strong single-thread performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 2803 in single-core and 19856 in multi-core. The single-core result places it in the upper tier for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The multi-core score of 19856 indicates that while 8 threads are sufficient for modern productivity, it is not a high-core-count workstation part. PassMark single-thread performance is 4575, reinforcing its strength in tasks that rely on one or two cores.

In multi-threaded PassMark tests, the CPU scores 26167, with integer math at 54755 and floating-point math at 75136. Data compression scores 260651, while encryption hits 18772. The extended instructions score of 22578 shows reasonable SIMD throughput. The physics test scores 2016, and random string sorting reaches 31083. The find prime numbers test scores just 268, a lower result that suggests integer-heavy algorithms are not a primary strength.

The percentileVsAllCpus rating of 82 places this CPU in the top 18% of all processors, a solid position for a mainstream desktop chip. Its nearest rivals are telling: the Intel Core 7 240H scores 31483 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31495 (-0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H scores 31508 (-0.1%), and the Intel Core i5-13500 scores 31510 (-0.1%). The average benchmark score of 31473 means this CPU is statistically tied with those parts, despite the Core 7 240H and Core Ultra 5 225H being mobile processors. This suggests the desktop Ultra 3 205 trades blows with mobile chips that have similar thread counts, while the Ryzen 9 5980HX brings more cores but similar overall throughput.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, built on a 12nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The GPU includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, though the Turing generation's RT performance is dated by current standards.

Memory configuration is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective data rate. This capacity is a major advantage for large datasets and high-resolution textures, making it suitable for professional rendering and data science.

Clock speeds are listed at 1620 MHz base and 1815 MHz boost. The compute throughput is 11.15 TFLOPS for FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. Power draw is 230W, requiring a 550W suggested PSU. The card uses a dual-slot cooler with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors.

The GPU is a PCIe 3.0 x16 part, which is older than the CPU's Gen 5 support, creating a potential interface bottleneck. Display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which ensures compatibility with modern software.

Benchmark performance is mixed. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 78999, and Vulkan scores 92309, indicating strong compute and API-level performance. However, the PassMark DirectX results are concerning: DirectX 9 scores 195, DirectX 10 scores 113, DirectX 11 scores 140, and DirectX 12 scores just 59. These low DirectX scores suggest that the GPU underperforms in legacy and modern gaming APIs relative to its compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score is 15616, and G2D is 709. GPU compute scores 6525.

The percentileVsAllGpus rating of 67 places it in the top third of all GPUs, but its nearest rivals reveal its age. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB scores 21856 (-1% delta), the RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379 (1.2%), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237 (1.8%), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153 (2.3%). The GTX 1060 being a near-peer is a significant statement about the Quadro RTX 5000's gaming performance. Its average benchmark score of 21629 means it is roughly on par with a mid-range consumer GPU from several generations ago.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19856 is a strong result for an 8-thread part, placing it well above entry-level chips but below high-core-count workstations. The single-core score of 2803 is excellent, ranking it among the best for single-threaded tasks. In PassMark, the multithread score of 26167 and single-thread score of 4575 confirm this pattern.

The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 is its strongest benchmark, indicating good general-purpose compute. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is very low, suggesting that gaming performance will be poor by modern standards. The G3D score of 15616 is moderate, but the DirectX numbers are more telling for real-world gaming.

The combined percentile for this build is 75, which is respectable but not top-tier. The CPU's 82nd percentile pulls the average up, while the GPU's 67th percentile holds it back. In the context of the nearest rivals, the CPU is competitive with mobile chips and older desktop parts, while the GPU is comparable to a GTX 1060 in gaming scenarios.

For gaming, the lack of measured FPS data means estimates must be derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's low DirectX 12 score suggests that at 1080p with high settings, the system would struggle to maintain 60 FPS in modern titles. At 1440p, performance would be worse, and 4K gaming is likely out of reach for demanding games. The 16 GB VRAM is ample, but the underlying compute power is not sufficient for high-refresh gaming.

FAQ

Q: Is this CPU good for gaming?

A: The CPU is strong for gaming due to its high single-thread score of 2803 in Cinebench R23 and 4575 in PassMark single-thread. This ensures good frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 59 will limit overall gaming performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a GTX 1060?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, which is 1% below the GTX 1060 6 GB's score of 21856. This means the two are statistically equivalent in overall performance, though the Quadro has 16 GB VRAM versus 6 GB.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes, the CPU's multi-core score of 19856 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth make it capable for video editing. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 supports GPU-accelerated effects.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is sufficient for most productivity tasks but is not exceptional for a modern desktop platform.

Q: Is the GPU good for ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 48 RT cores, but they are from the Turing generation. The low DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that ray tracing performance would be poor compared to newer architectures.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a 57W TDP, which is low for a desktop part with 8 cores. This makes it suitable for compact builds with modest cooling solutions.

Q: Does the GPU support modern APIs?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with current software, though performance may be limited.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the processor. The CPU sits in the 82nd percentile, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming and graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's high single-thread performance can feed frames effectively, but the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 59 will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can support.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression (260651 in PassMark) and integer math (54755), the processor will be the limiting factor. The GPU's compute score of 6525 is modest, so tasks that rely on GPU compute, such as rendering or machine learning inference, will be constrained by the Quadro's older architecture.

The memory bandwidth mismatch is notable. The CPU provides 102.4 GB/s, while the GPU has 448.0 GB/s. This is expected, but the PCIe 3.0 interface on the GPU (versus the CPU's Gen 5 support) means data transfer between components is slower than theoretically possible. In practice, this will not be a major issue for most workloads, but it is a limitation.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, shows that the GPU will be the constraint in gaming. At 1080p, the GPU's performance is comparable to a GTX 1060, which means modern games will run at medium to low settings to achieve playable frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle further, and 4K is not viable for demanding titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current for the Core Ultra Series 2. The motherboard supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, so there is headroom for faster storage and newer expansion cards. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option, but the 57W TDP means a capable air cooler is sufficient.

The GPU is end-of-life and uses PCIe 3.0, so upgrading to a modern PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 GPU would improve bandwidth and performance. The suggested PSU is 550W, which provides headroom for a more power-hungry GPU. The 230W TDP of the Quadro is modest, so a newer GPU with similar or higher power draw would fit within the existing PSU budget if the system is not otherwise loaded.

The memory support for DDR5 is a forward-looking feature, allowing for future upgrades to faster kits. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate a high-speed NVMe SSD, which would improve load times and data-intensive tasks. For a sensible next upgrade, replacing the GPU with a current-generation part would yield the largest performance gain, especially for gaming and modern rendering workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 and equivalence to a GTX 1060 mean that 144Hz or 240Hz monitors are wasted. At 1080p with low settings, competitive titles may reach 60-90 FPS, but demanding games will fall below 60 FPS. The CPU's single-thread score of 2803 in Cinebench R23 ensures it is not the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 threads and 19856 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 can handle software encoding at moderate settings. The GPU's 384 tensor cores could assist with encoding, but the Turing-era NVENC is older. For 1080p60 streaming, the system is adequate, but 1440p streaming may strain the CPU.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM make this a capable video editing machine. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 supports effects and color grading. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 4K timelines, though export times will be longer than with a newer GPU.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM are useful for rendering scenes that fit in memory. The CPU's multi-core score of 19856 in Cinebench R23 will handle CPU-based rendering, but the overall render times will be moderate. The low DirectX 12 score does not affect rendering performance.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 4575 in PassMark is excellent for compilation and code analysis. The 8 threads handle parallel builds reasonably well, and the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces compile times. The GPU is not a factor in most development tasks.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in word processing and spreadsheets. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is unnecessary for office work, but the system will handle productivity suites and web browsing with ease.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a modern, efficient 8-core CPU with an older workstation GPU. The CPU is a current-generation part with a 3nm process, while the GPU is from the Turing generation on 12nm. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds. The CPU is the stronger component, ranking in the 82nd percentile, while the GPU sits in the 67th percentile.

The class is desktop, and the overall tier is solid for productivity and workstation tasks, but weak for gaming. The CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores make it a good foundation for a workstation, but the GPU's age limits its usefulness in modern graphics workloads. The 16 GB VRAM is a highlight, but the underlying compute power is dated.

Who Should Build It

This system is suitable for professionals who need strong CPU performance for single-threaded and moderately multi-threaded tasks. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's 4575 PassMark single-thread score and 26167 multithread score. Video editors working with 1080p or light 4K footage will find the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth adequate.

Content creators using CPU-based rendering will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19856. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, though it is overprovisioned for such use. Small business workstations handling data analysis or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 54755 and data compression score of 260651.

Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings may find acceptable performance, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming should look elsewhere. The GPU's equivalence to a GTX 1060 means it is not a gaming part by modern standards. For users who need a CPU-heavy workstation with a large VRAM buffer for compute tasks, this build is a viable option, provided the GPU's age is acceptable.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 3 205 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 3 205

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds