SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901TE + AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

69 / 100
MID-RANGE

Solid Performer

Top 31% of systems. Great for 1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium gaming.

1080p Ultra1440p Med

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
41%
VS
GPU
98%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901TE

0 Benchmark Score
Top 59% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

70,829 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Solid Mid-Range

Great for 1080p gaming. Consider upgrading GPU for better 1440p performance.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs Intel’s Core i9-14901TE with AMD’s Radeon RX 6600 LE, creating a desktop configuration that sits at the 71st percentile overall. The CPU holds the 50th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks far higher at the 91st percentile, indicating a system where the graphics card is the dominant performer. The benchmark data for this exact combination contains no measured frame rates, so all gaming performance discussed here is an estimate derived from the component scores.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i9-14901TE use, and does it support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: How many cores and threads does the i9-14901TE have, and what are its clock speeds?

A: The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 2.30 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the RX 6600 LE support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU is based on RDNA 2.0 architecture and includes 28 ray tracing cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the RX 6600 LE compare to the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile in benchmark scores?

A: The RX 6600 LE has an average benchmark score of 70,829. The RTX A3000 Mobile scores 70,140, which is 1% lower, making the RX 6600 LE slightly faster in this comparison.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 132 W. The suggested power supply for this GPU is 300 W.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The Intel CPU is built on a 10 nm process, while the AMD GPU uses a 7 nm process from TSMC.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors the system to the Core 14th Gen series. The i9-14901TE is a locked processor, meaning its multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is not a supported path for extracting additional performance. The platform’s memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility, but the dual-channel configuration means that populating two modules is necessary to achieve the full memory bandwidth potential. The presence of ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation-oriented tasks where data integrity is critical.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself. This is a forward-looking interface, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The RX 6600 LE’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is electrically compatible with the slot, but the system will operate at the lower PCIe 4.0 specification. For storage and other expansion, the Gen 5 lanes offer headroom, but the current GPU does not utilize the full bandwidth potential of the CPU’s PCIe controller.

Power requirements are modest for this pairing. The CPU’s 45 W TDP is exceptionally low for a Core i9-series part, keeping overall system draw manageable. The GPU’s 132 W TDP and its single 8-pin power connector are typical for a mid-range card. The suggested power supply of 300 W indicates that a standard desktop PSU will have ample headroom. A sensible next upgrade would involve a GPU with higher performance, as the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support and the CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost clock can feed more powerful graphics cards without a platform change. The CPU’s 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 16 threads remain competitive for gaming and content creation workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE is the standout component in this build, ranking at the 91st percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 70,829 is derived from a Geekbench OpenCL score of 69,229 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 72,428. These scores place it in direct competition with several professional and mobile cards, showing a 1% lead over the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and a 1.2% lead over the NVIDIA Quadro P6000. It also sits 1.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6650M and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200. This clustering indicates that the RX 6600 LE delivers performance at the upper edge of its class.

The GPU’s memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit interface, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For modern games, 8 GB is the baseline for 1080p and 1440p textures, and the bandwidth is sufficient for the rasterization workload this card is designed to handle. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, effective 14 Gbps, which is a standard configuration for the RX 6000 series.

The compute capabilities are defined by 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. These translate to a pixel rate of 159.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 279.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 8.942 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 17.88 TFLOPS (2:1). The inclusion of 28 ray tracing cores means the card can handle DirectX 12 Ultimate features, but the relatively low FP32 count suggests that ray tracing performance will be modest, requiring lower resolutions or upscaling for playable frame rates in RT-heavy titles.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is targeted at users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU compute. The 91st percentile GPU ranking makes it a strong choice for gamers playing at 1080p, where the RX 6600 LE’s 8 GB VRAM and 8.942 TFLOPS of FP32 power are well-suited for high-detail settings. The CPU’s 50th percentile ranking is adequate for this purpose, ensuring that the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates in most scenarios.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated applications will benefit from the Vulkan and OpenCL scores. The 72,428 Vulkan score suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based renderers and games. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p video editing and moderate 3D rendering, but the 128-bit bus may limit performance in tasks that require high memory bandwidth, such as 4K compositing.

Developers targeting DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 APIs will find this hardware capable for testing and development. The ECC memory support on the CPU side makes this a viable option for small business workstations where data reliability is important, though the GPU’s consumer focus is better suited for design and visualization rather than compute-heavy simulations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this build is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The RX 6600 LE at the 91st percentile vastly outperforms the CPU at the 50th percentile. In gaming workloads, this means the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most titles, but at lower resolutions or in CPU-intensive strategy games, the i9-14901TE’s 8 cores and 16 threads may become the limiting factor.

The CPU’s boost clock of 5.50 GHz is high and compensates for the moderate core count, but the 45 W TDP confines sustained all-core workloads. In multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that use the CPU, the processor’s performance will be capped by its power envelope. Meanwhile, the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 159.7 GPixel/s pixel rate are well-matched for 1080p gaming, but the 128-bit bus can limit performance at 1440p with high-resolution textures.

The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a potential bottleneck in theory, but for this performance class, the bandwidth is unlikely to degrade frame rates significantly. The system is balanced for its intended use: GPU-bound gaming at 1080p, with the CPU providing sufficient single-thread performance for responsive gameplay. For CPU-bound workloads, the pairing is less balanced, with the GPU sitting idle while the CPU’s 16 threads work through tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, specifically the GPU’s 91st percentile ranking and its Vulkan score of 72,428. The GPU’s performance relative to rivals like the RTX A3000 Mobile and Quadro P6000 indicates that this card is positioned for smooth 1080p gaming.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 6600 LE’s 8 GB VRAM and 8.942 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, assuming the game engine is not heavily CPU-bound. The CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost clock provides strong single-thread performance, which is critical for frame pacing in games like first-person shooters. For esports titles, frame rates should exceed 60 FPS easily, given the GPU’s high pixel rate of 159.7 GPixel/s.

At 1440p, the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a limiting factor. Players should expect lower frame rates at ultra settings, and adjustments to texture quality or the use of FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) would be necessary to maintain smooth performance. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p, but the bandwidth is not generous, so memory-intensive scenes may cause stuttering. Overall, this build is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the GPU’s strengths are fully utilized.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901TE is a Raptor Lake-R architecture processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process. Despite being named i9, it has only 8 cores and 16 threads, which is fewer than other i9 parts, but its boost clock of 5.50 GHz is exceptionally high. The base clock of 2.30 GHz is low, which helps keep the TDP at 45 W. The processor has a die size of 257 mm² and a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 50th among all CPUs places it in the middle of the pack, which is surprising for an i9 label. This is due to the power constraints and core count. The 45 W TDP limits sustained multi-core performance, as the processor cannot maintain high clocks across all cores under load. The 5.50 GHz boost clock is only achievable on a single core or a few cores, giving it excellent single-thread performance for tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light gaming.

The 16 threads are sufficient for modern multitasking and for running virtual machines or compilation tasks, but the lack of a higher core count means it will lag behind other i9 parts in heavy rendering workloads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, but it is not a gaming solution. The CPU’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with ECC, makes it flexible for various system builds, from budget gaming to workstation use. The 50th percentile score is a reflection of its balanced but not extreme compute capability.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a mid-tier CPU with a high-tier GPU. The combined percentile of 71 reflects the GPU’s strong performance pulling the system upward. The i9-14901TE is a power-efficient processor with high boost clocks, while the RX 6600 LE is a capable 1080p gaming card with professional-level benchmark scores.

The overall tier of this build is upper-mid-range, suitable for gamers and content creators who want strong GPU performance without the cost of a flagship CPU. The system excels in GPU-accelerated tasks and 1080p gaming. The CPU is not a bottleneck for the GPU in most cases, but it is not a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads. The build is a practical choice for a small form factor or power-conscious desktop, given the CPU’s 45 W TDP and the GPU’s 132 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is listed as 0, with no individual benchmark tests provided in the data. Its percentile ranking of 50th among all CPUs indicates it performs at the median level. The GPU, in contrast, has concrete scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 69,229, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 72,428. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 70,829, placing it at the 91st percentile among all GPUs.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. The GPU is a top-10% performer, while the CPU sits in the middle. The nearest rivals to the GPU show a tight cluster of performance: the RTX A3000 Mobile at 70,140 (1% lower), the Quadro P6000 at 69,986 (1.2% lower), the RX 6650M at 71,768 (1.3% higher), and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69,870 (1.4% lower). This indicates that the RX 6600 LE is finely balanced with its competitors, offering no massive advantage or disadvantage.

For the user, this means the system’s overall performance will be dictated by the GPU in most scenarios. The CPU’s 50th percentile score is adequate for feeding the GPU, but it is not a highlight of the build. The 71st combined percentile is a fair representation of the system’s capabilities, showing that it outperforms the majority of desktops, primarily due to the GPU’s strength. The lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions are drawn from synthetic benchmarks, which correlate with real-world gaming but do not guarantee specific frame rates.