SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901KE + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

70 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 30% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
41%
VS
GPU
99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901KE

0 Benchmark Score
Top 59% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901KE is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.80 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes ECC memory support. The processor carries a 125 W TDP and fits the Intel Socket 1700. Its cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, making it a versatile part for systems where a discrete GPU may not always be necessary. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) is provided, which is adequate for a single high-bandwidth GPU or NVMe storage.

The benchmark data for this CPU is sparse — the FACT PACK lists no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentileVsAllCpus of 50. This percentile places the i9-14901KE at the exact midpoint of all CPUs in the database. In practical terms, this means the processor sits at a neutral position: neither a top-tier performer nor a low-end part, based on the aggregate data. The absence of individual benchmark scores makes precise multi-core or single-core comparisons impossible, but the 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 5.80 GHz boost clock suggests strong single-threaded capability for workloads that rely on high clock speeds. The 36 MB L3 cache is generous and should aid in tasks with moderate data reuse, such as compiling code or running virtual machines. The 10 nm process node, while not the most advanced, is a mature node that balances power and performance for a 125 W TDP part.

The real-world implications are straightforward: the i9-14901KE is a high-clock, moderate-core-count CPU. For workloads like software compilation, office productivity, and light server tasks, the high boost clock and ECC support make it a credible choice. However, for heavily threaded rendering or video encoding, the 8-core limit will be a constraint compared to chips with more cores. The percentile of 50 indicates that, in the aggregate benchmark suite, this CPU performs at the median level — meaning it is neither a bottleneck nor a standout in most mixed workloads. The lack of nearest rival data further limits comparative analysis, but the core and clock specifications provide a clear qualitative picture: this is a fast, responsive processor for single-threaded and lightly threaded tasks, with enough cores to handle mainstream multitasking without issue.

# FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-14901KE?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the FACT PACK specifications.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of this processor?

A: The boost clock is 5.80 GHz, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz.

Q: Does the i9-14901KE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as a feature of this processor.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a percentileVsAllGpus of 95, placing it in the top 5% of all GPUs in the database.

Q: What are the GPU's nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA A10M (avgScore 135230), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135396), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (135774), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 (136472), with deltaPct values of 0, -0.1, -0.4, and -0.9 respectively.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact pairing, so all FPS figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i9-14901KE combined with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and measuredFpsUltraByGame is an empty object. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU's strong compute scores — a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and a Vulkan score of 123842 — indicate high raw performance, but gaming FPS depends on drivers, APIs, and CPU-GPU balance.

Given the GPU's 95th percentile ranking (percentileVsAllGpus: 95), the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is positioned among the top 5% of graphics cards in the database. Its average benchmark score of 135218 places it nearly identical to the NVIDIA A10M (135230), with a deltaPct of 0. This suggests the RTX 4000 Ada Generation would deliver very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most modern titles, likely exceeding 100 FPS on ultra settings in many games, based on the raw compute power. At 4K, the 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth would support high-resolution textures, but the 160-bit bus width is narrower than typical high-end gaming GPUs, which may limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

The CPU's 50th percentile ranking (percentileVsAllCpus: 50) is a potential concern for gaming at lower resolutions. At 1080p, where CPU load is higher relative to GPU, the i9-14901KE's median position could bottleneck the GPU in frame-rate-heavy titles. The 5.80 GHz boost clock helps, but the 8-core limit may cause dips in games that leverage more than 8 threads. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's top-tier percentile would likely produce smooth, high-refresh experiences. For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the high boost clock should sustain high FPS, but frame pacing may vary due to the CPU's median standing. Users should expect estimated FPS in the range of 80-120 FPS at 4K ultra in demanding titles, and 150+ FPS at 1440p in optimized games, based on the GPU's comparative performance to its rivals.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-14901KE and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is asymmetric. The GPU's 95th percentile (percentileVsAllGpus: 95) vastly outranks the CPU's 50th percentile (percentileVsAllCpus: 50). This disparity means the CPU is the limiting factor in most workloads that require both components. In gaming, the CPU will likely bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions (1080p) where frame rates are high and CPU-bound. The GPU's raw power, as evidenced by its average benchmark score of 135218, is far ahead of the CPU's median performance, so the CPU cannot fully feed the GPU in scenarios demanding high per-frame CPU work.

In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48 RT cores will dominate, while the CPU's 8 cores handle scene preparation and physics. The bottleneck here is less severe because rendering pipelines are often GPU-parallel, but the CPU's median ranking could slow down tasks that require frequent CPU-GPU communication. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s is moderate for its class, but the 20 GB VRAM is ample for large datasets, reducing the need for CPU-GPU data transfers.

The FPS scaling across resolutions would show: at 1080p, CPU-bound scenarios yield lower scaling; at 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU; at 4K, the GPU is almost always the bottleneck, and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile would shine. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 5.80 GHz boost clock mitigate some bottlenecks in single-threaded tasks, but the 8-core limit is a hard ceiling for multi-threaded CPU loads. Overall, this pairing is GPU-heavy, and the CPU will hold back the GPU in CPU-intensive scenarios, while the GPU will excel in GPU-bound workloads.

# Benchmark Performance

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers benchmark scores of 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 135218, which places it at the 95th percentile (percentileVsAllGpus: 95) among all GPUs. This is a top-tier result, ranking above the NVIDIA A10M (avgScore 135230, deltaPct 0), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135396, deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (135774, deltaPct -0.4), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 (136472, deltaPct -0.9). The deltaPct values indicate the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is within 1% of all four rivals, meaning its performance is tightly clustered with these high-end workstation GPUs. The OpenCL score of 146593 is notably higher than the Vulkan score, suggesting strong compute performance in OpenCL-optimized applications.

The CPU's benchmark performance is undefined in the FACT PACK, with no individual scores and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentileVsAllCpus is 50, which is the median. This means the CPU is average among all CPUs in the database, but without specific scores, it cannot be directly compared to rivals. The combined percentile for the build is 73 (combinedPercentile: 73), which reflects the GPU's high standing pulling up the CPU's median position. The combined percentile of 73 indicates this build is above average overall, driven primarily by the GPU. In mixed workloads, the GPU's 95th percentile and the CPU's 50th percentile create a system that excels in GPU-accelerated tasks (rendering, AI inference) but is merely average in CPU-bound tasks. The CPU's lack of benchmark data means the combined picture is inherently lopsided: the GPU is a proven top-5% performer, while the CPU is a middle-of-the-pack part based on its aggregate percentile.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU compute performance over CPU throughput. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile and 20 GB VRAM make it ideal for professionals in 3D rendering, video editing, and AI inference who work with large models or high-resolution textures. The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores support ray-traced rendering and machine learning workloads, respectively. Content creators using OpenCL-accelerated applications would see near-top-tier performance, as the Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 suggests. The 20 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing timelines and complex 3D scenes without swapping to system memory.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K would benefit from the GPU's high percentile, but the CPU's 50th percentile could cause bottlenecks at 1080p. Therefore, this build is best suited for gamers who play at higher resolutions or prioritize visual fidelity over maximum frame rates. Software developers working on CPU-bound compilation tasks would find the i9-14901KE adequate but not exceptional, given its median ranking; however, the 5.80 GHz boost clock and ECC support make it reliable for long builds. Students and small business workstations would benefit from the GPU's compute power for simulation or data analysis, but the CPU's average performance means general office tasks won't see a boost. The build is overkill for basic productivity but well-balanced for GPU-accelerated professional workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1500 MHz, boosting to 2175 MHz. Compute performance is rated at 26.73 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), with pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s. The GPU draws 130 W TDP and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. It is a single-slot card, 245 mm long and 112 mm tall, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, and supports PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark results are strong: the Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 yield an average of 135218, placing the GPU at the 95th percentile (percentileVsAllGpus: 95). This is a top-5% performance level. The nearest rivals — NVIDIA A10M (135230, deltaPct 0), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135396, deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (135774, deltaPct -0.4), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 (136472, deltaPct -0.9) — are all within 1% of the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's average score. This indicates the GPU is competitive with, but not clearly superior to, other high-end workstation cards. For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced scenes, while the 192 tensor cores speed up denoising and AI-based upscaling. The 20 GB VRAM is generous for large textures and complex scenes, though the 160-bit bus limits bandwidth compared to wider-memory GPUs. The FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS is suitable for scientific computing and simulation. Overall, the GPU is a high-tier performer for professional rendering and compute, with benchmark scores confirming its position at the 95th percentile.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14901KE with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation in a desktop form factor (buildClass: desktop). The CPU is a Raptor Lake refresh part with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 5.80 GHz boost clock, and a 125 W TDP, occupying the median 50th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace workstation card with 20 GB GDDR6, 6144 CUDA cores, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores, performing at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, indicating a system that is above average overall, but with a significant performance gap between the CPU and GPU.

The CPU is a high-clock, moderate-core-count part that excels in single-threaded tasks but is average in multi-threaded benchmarks. The GPU is a top-tier performer in compute and rendering, as evidenced by its benchmark scores and percentile ranking. This is a workstation-oriented desktop build where the GPU is the clear star. The CPU provides sufficient raw speed for interactive tasks, while the GPU handles heavy lifting in rendering, AI, and compute. The build is not balanced — the GPU vastly outclasses the CPU — but for GPU-accelerated workloads, this imbalance is acceptable. For gaming, the build would be GPU-bound at 1440p and above, but CPU-bound at 1080p. For professional use, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile makes this a high-tier workstation, while the CPU's 50th percentile keeps it from being a top-tier general-purpose system. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 73, is above average, driven almost entirely by the GPU.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 50th percentile may bottleneck the GPU's 95th percentile, limiting frame rates in CPU-heavy titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's strong compute scores (OpenCL 146593) would drive high FPS, but the 160-bit bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may cap performance in bandwidth-intensive games. Estimated FPS would be high but variable, with the GPU being the primary limiter at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, can handle encoding at moderate bitrates, but the median percentile suggests limited headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming. The GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) could offload encoding, but the lack of measured data means streaming quality is uncertain. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM helps with game capture buffers.

Video editing: The GPU's 95th percentile and 20 GB VRAM excel in timeline rendering and effect processing. The OpenCL score of 146593 indicates strong acceleration in editing software. The CPU's 50th percentile may slow export times in CPU-dependent codecs, but GPU-accelerated exports would be fast. The 36 MB L3 cache aids in preview scrubbing.

3D rendering: This is the strongest scenario. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and 48 RT cores deliver top-tier ray-traced rendering performance. The 20 GB VRAM handles large scenes, and the 95th percentile confirms near-best-in-class results. The CPU's median performance may lag in scene preparation, but GPU rendering dominates the workload.

Software development: The CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock and 36 MB L3 cache accelerate compilation of single-threaded build steps, but the 8-core limit and 50th percentile mean multi-threaded builds are average. ECC support ensures reliability for long-running test suites. The GPU's compute power is underutilized unless developing for GPU compute, where the 192 tensor cores would excel.

Student and office work: The CPU's median performance is adequate for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The GPU is massively overkill for such tasks, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could be used if the discrete GPU is idle, reducing power draw. The 125 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP make this a moderate-power desktop, not ideal for energy-conscious setups.