SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E pairs an 8-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake design with a 65W TDP, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 brings Ada Lovelace architecture with 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This combination targets a desktop build where CPU efficiency and GPU compute density matter more than raw core counts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and single-core score of 3,635 place it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in both threaded and lightly-threaded tasks. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark entries, so its standing is defined entirely by its specifications rather than measured results. The combined percentile for this pair is 68, reflecting a system that is stronger on the CPU side than the GPU side. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is built on Raptor Lake architecture using a 10nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 8 physical cores and 16 threads, which is a mainstream configuration rather than a high-core-count workstation part. The base clock is 2.80 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, giving it strong single-thread performance when workloads demand it. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for a 65W part and helps with frequently accessed data in multi-threaded applications. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a desktop part and valuable for error-sensitive computing tasks. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides modern I/O bandwidth for storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark data shows a balanced performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 indicates strong sustained throughput for a 65W chip, while the R23 single-core score of 3,635 confirms excellent lightly-threaded speed. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30,298 and single-thread score of 4,354 reinforce this picture. In integer math, the CPU scores 112,736, and in floating-point math it scores 81,089, showing robust arithmetic capability for scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression scores 288,777 in Passmark, which is exceptionally high and suggests strong memory and cache performance for archive and database tasks. Data encryption at 18,571 and extended instructions at 17,249 indicate competent but not outstanding cryptographic and SIMD throughput. Physics simulation scores 3,041, and random string sorting scores 39,138, both reasonable for the core count.

The average benchmark score is 37,911, placing the CPU at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 with a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 with a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 with a delta of 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 with a delta of 0.3%. This means the i9-14901E is statistically tied with these competitors in aggregate benchmark performance, despite differences in core counts and clock speeds. The data shows that the 65W TDP does not cripple performance; it delivers results comparable to higher-power alternatives. For real workloads, this translates to snappy responsiveness in office tasks, fast compile times in software development, and smooth multi-threaded rendering in video editing, all while keeping power draw low enough for compact systems.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,635 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,354 indicate strong frame generation capability in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 50th percentile standing suggests that at high resolutions, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. Estimated FPS at 1080p in esports titles could exceed 144 FPS, while at 4K, frame rates will drop significantly due to the GPU’s mid-range positioning.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and high Passmark multi-thread score of 30,298, which allows simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting without stutter. The 36 MB of L3 cache helps maintain low latency for real-time processing tasks, and the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU can serve as a backup encoder if the discrete GPU is saturated, though the RTX 5000 Embedded’s tensor cores are more efficient for this purpose.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve sees strong CPU performance from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753, which handles timeline scrubbing and effects rendering. The GPU’s 16GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, but the 50th percentile GPU score means complex 4K timelines may experience slowdowns compared to higher-tier graphics cards.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya leverages the CPU’s Passmark floating-point score of 81,089 for physics simulations and the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance for viewport rendering. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced previews, but final renders will be slower than systems with higher-percentile GPUs given the 50th percentile standing.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high integer math score of 112,736 and data compression score of 288,777, which speed up code compilation and package management. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces compilation times for large codebases, making this a capable developer workstation.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and 65W TDP, which allows quiet, low-power operation in shared spaces. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,354 ensures snappy spreadsheet and browser performance, while the 16 threads handle multitasking with many open applications simultaneously.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform for Intel’s 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders the choice between cheaper DDR4 modules and faster DDR5 kits. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory support is included, which is a rare feature on consumer platforms and useful for workstations that require data integrity. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides high bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards, though the GPU in this system uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible.

The CPU’s 65W TDP is modest, so a capable air cooler is sufficient to maintain boost clocks. There is no launch MSRP provided for this CPU, so pricing is not discussed. The GPU has a 150W TDP and uses no power connectors, indicating it is designed for embedded or mobile applications with integrated power delivery, which means the PSU headroom is primarily determined by the rest of the system. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-percentile GPU, as the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking leaves headroom for more graphics performance without bottlenecking. The socket supports future Intel 14th generation upgrades, but since the i9-14901E is already a high-end part in that lineup, the most impactful upgrade path is the GPU rather than the CPU.

Memory bandwidth is not specified in the FACT PACK, but the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means that upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 could improve memory-intensive workloads like data compression, which scores 288,777 in Passmark. The 36 MB of L3 cache is shared across all cores, and adding more system memory would help with large datasets in video editing or 3D rendering. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for future storage upgrades to Gen 5 SSDs, which would reduce load times in games and application startup, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface is not a bottleneck given its bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for multi-threaded productivity tasks but do not require top-tier graphics performance. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions will find the CPU’s single-core scores adequate for high-refresh gaming, but those seeking 4K ultra settings will need a more powerful GPU. Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and the GPU’s 16GB of VRAM for caching large textures and frames, though render times will be longer than with higher-end GPUs.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 112,736 and data compression score of 288,777, which speed up compilation and version control operations. The 16 threads handle parallel builds effectively, and the ECC memory support provides stability for long-running test suites. Students and office workers will find the 65W TDP and 86th percentile CPU performance more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and light programming, all while running quietly and efficiently. Small business workstations that run database queries or financial models will benefit from the high data encryption score of 18,571 and the CPU’s multithread score of 30,298, which ensure smooth operation under concurrent user loads.

The GPU’s 50th percentile standing means this is not a system for gamers who want maximum frame rates or professionals who need GPU-accelerated rendering at scale. Instead, it suits users who prioritize CPU throughput and need a reliable, low-power platform. The 16GB of VRAM is generous for mid-range GPU work like photo editing or machine learning inference, but not for training large models. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming expectations should be conservative, based on the GPU’s specifications rather than actual results.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip built on a 5nm process from TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The transistor density is 121.1 million per mm², which is high and reflects the advanced manufacturing node. The GPU has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units, giving it a solid foundation for traditional rasterization. The clock speeds are a base of 930 MHz and a boost of 1680 MHz, which are modest for a discrete GPU but appropriate for an embedded design with a 150W TDP.

Memory consists of 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz and an effective speed of 18 Gbps. This yields a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, which is substantial for moving large textures and datasets. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is also 32.69 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, which means the GPU can handle both single-precision and half-precision workloads at the same speed, useful for AI inference and certain scientific computations.

Ray tracing is handled by 76 RT cores, and tensor operations by 304 tensor cores, which accelerate DLSS and other AI-driven features. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern games and applications. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s memory and compute capabilities. Display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning this is not a standard desktop card but rather an embedded solution, which aligns with its slot width of IGP and lack of power connectors.

There are no benchmark scores for this GPU, and it sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0. This means its performance is entirely theoretical, inferred from its specifications. The 16GB of VRAM is above average for a mid-range GPU, but the lower boost clock of 1680 MHz compared to desktop counterparts suggests it may not reach the same frame rates. The GPU’s predecessor is Ampere-MW and its successor is Blackwell-MW, indicating it is part of a mobile or embedded workstation line. For rendering workloads, the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 RT cores provide respectable performance for ray-traced scenes, but the lack of measured data means users should expect performance below higher-tier desktop GPUs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,635 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,354 suggest it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not saturated. The GPU’s 16GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern game textures at 1080p and 1440p, but the 50th percentile standing implies it will perform below average compared to other GPUs.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimated FPS in competitive titles like CS:GO or Valorant could reach 144 FPS or higher, given the CPU’s strong single-core performance and the GPU’s fill rates. In AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed, estimated FPS might range from 60 to 80 FPS at 1080p ultra, but this is speculative. At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s 1680 MHz boost clock and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding games, and users may need to lower settings to medium or high. At 4K ultra, the GPU will likely fall below 30 FPS in most modern titles, making it unsuitable for high-resolution gaming without upscaling.

The 76 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, but the modest clock speeds mean ray tracing will further reduce frame rates. DLSS via the 304 tensor cores could recover some performance, but with no measured data, the improvement is uncertain. The CPU’s 65W TDP and 86th percentile ranking mean it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s 50th percentile is the limiting factor for gaming. Users should treat these estimates as approximations, not guarantees, and prioritize a GPU upgrade if gaming is a primary use case.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile create an imbalance where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative performance. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and physics simulation, the CPU will be the executing component, and its scores reflect strong capability. The Passmark data compression score of 288,777 and integer math score of 112,736 show the CPU handles these tasks with ease, and the 65W TDP ensures thermal headroom for sustained loads.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The 50th percentile standing means it performs averagely compared to all GPUs, and its 1680 MHz boost clock is low for a modern discrete card. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16GB of VRAM are adequate, but the compute throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 is not exceptional. For gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance will feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at 4K, leading to GPU-limited frame rates. At 1080p, the CPU might still have headroom, but the GPU will cap FPS in most titles.

The combined percentile of 68 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU carrying the system’s performance. For productivity tasks that rely on CPU multithreading, such as video encoding or 3D scene processing, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU assists with acceleration. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, and upgrading to a higher-percentile GPU would better match the CPU’s capability. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 150W TDP of the GPU mean the system has low overall power consumption, but the GPU’s lack of power connectors suggests it is not designed for overclocking or extreme loads, reinforcing its mid-range positioning.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance ranking relative to other processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,911. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37,904 with a delta of 0%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 with a delta of -0.1%.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, derived from 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with an effective speed of 18 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, which is listed as true in the specifications. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which support ray-traced rendering and AI acceleration. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which contributes to its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,635.

Q: Are there any measured gaming FPS figures for this system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores and specifications.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 16GB of GDDR6 memory, which is sized for high-resolution textures and large datasets. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are comprehensive and place it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2,595 and single-core is 366, while the R20 multi-core is 10,816 and single-core is 1,526. The R23 multi-core score is 25,753 and single-core is 3,635, which are the most relevant for modern workloads. Passmark tests show a multi-thread score of 30,298 and single-thread score of 4,354, with integer math at 112,736 and floating-point math at 81,089. Data compression scores 288,777, data encryption scores 18,571, extended instructions score 17,249, find prime numbers scores 189, physics scores 3,041, and random string sorting scores 39,138. The average benchmark score is 37,911, and the CPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37,904 with 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37,943 with -0.1% delta, the Intel Core 5 211E at 37,829 with 0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37,804 with 0.3% delta.

The GPU has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0. Its performance is defined by its specifications: 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS, and the FP16 throughput is also 32.69 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 68, indicating that the system’s overall performance is above average but not exceptional, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong showing. The lack of GPU benchmarks means the combined picture relies on CPU scores, which show a capable processor that matches its closest rivals within 0.3% in aggregate performance. For users, this means the CPU is a reliable choice for multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU should be considered a mid-range component that will handle modern games at reduced settings or resolutions.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds