SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that sits at the 68th percentile overall, a position driven almost entirely by the CPU’s strong showing. The processor lands in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. This pairing is a study in asymmetry: a top-tier compute processor with a mid-tier graphics adapter, and the benchmark data reflects that split clearly.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 379 mm² and 45,900 million transistors. The chip, designated AD103, packs 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. The GPU’s base clock runs at 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1,680 MHz, figures that are modest compared to desktop-class Ada parts, but the context here is an embedded variant designed for power-constrained systems. The memory subsystem is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This is a configuration that prioritizes capacity and bandwidth over raw pixel throughput, and the numbers bear that out.

Rendering performance is anchored by the RT and tensor hardware. The GPU includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which places it in a capable position for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-assisted workloads like DLSS. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, while FP32 and FP16 compute both sit at 32.69 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio that simplifies mixed-precision workflows. For rendering tasks, the benchmark data shows the GPU at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which means it sits exactly at the median. That is not a flagship position, but it is a respectable one for an embedded part. The 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature — it provides enough capacity for large scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-layer compositing without spilling into system memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for feeding those 9,728 shading units, though it is not exceptional by 2024 standards.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern rendering APIs comprehensively. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, a generation behind the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support, which creates a minor bandwidth ceiling but is unlikely to bottleneck this GPU class. The power envelope is 120 W TDP with no external power connectors, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is designed to be soldered or integrated into a system rather than installed as a discrete card. The display outputs are described as portable device dependent, reinforcing the embedded nature of this part. For rendering workloads, the data suggests a GPU that handles 1440p and some 4K tasks comfortably, but the 50th percentile ranking indicates it will trail dedicated desktop GPUs in compute-heavy scenes. The 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 figure is the key number for raw shading throughput, and it is competitive for the embedded segment but not for high-end desktop workstations.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a comprehensive benchmark suite that paints a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 25,753 and the single-core score is 3,635. The R20 run shows 10,816 multicore and 1,526 single-core. The older R15 test yields 2,595 multicore and 366 single-core. PassMark results add further granularity: multithreaded performance scores 30,298, single-threaded scores 4,354, integer math reaches 112,736, floating-point math hits 81,089, and extended instructions score 17,249. Data compression scores 288,777, encryption scores 18,571, random string sorting scores 39,138, physics scores 3,041, and prime number finding scores 189. The average benchmark score across the suite is 37,911, placing the CPU in the 86th percentile among all processors.

The nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this performance tier is. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904, a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943, which is 0.1% ahead. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829, 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804, 0.3% behind. These deltas are negligible — within a fraction of a percent — meaning the i9-14901E is statistically tied with these competitors in aggregate performance. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,635 is particularly strong and indicates excellent responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data pack — the benchmarks array is empty — but its percentile ranking is given as 50th among all GPUs. This is the median point, meaning half of all GPUs perform better and half perform worse. The combined percentile for the pair is 68, which is pulled up by the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking. The avgBenchmarkScore for the GPU is listed as 0, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than actual performance. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering simulations, data processing — while the GPU handles standard graphics duties competently but without headroom for extreme settings. The 68th percentile combined position suggests a balanced mid-high tier system, but the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (86 vs 50) is the defining characteristic.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Core i9-14901E and the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 50th, the processor is the dominant component in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads — such as software compilation, data compression, physics simulation, and multitasking — the i9-14901E will perform at a level near the top of the desktop market. The PassMark multithread score of 30,298 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,753 confirm this. The GPU, by contrast, sits at the median, so in graphics-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5000 Embedded will be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling story is straightforward. In this configuration, the CPU is rarely the bottleneck; it has enough single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,635, PassMark single-thread 4,354) to feed even a faster GPU. The GPU, however, will cap frame rates in graphically intensive titles. At 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position means it will struggle to maintain ultra settings at high refresh rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear constraint, as the resolution increase adds load to the raster and shading units, which are at a mid-tier level. The 16 GB VRAM is not the issue — capacity is sufficient — but the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest relative to the CPU’s compute capabilities.

This imbalance matters for specific workloads. For video editing, the CPU handles timeline processing and effects that are single-threaded, while the GPU accelerates exports and previews — the GPU’s median position means export times will be average. For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads will handle CPU-based renderers like those in Cinebench, but GPU-based renderers will be limited by the RTX 5000’s 50th percentile standing. The data shows that this is a system for CPU-first users who need occasional GPU acceleration, not for GPU-first workflows where the graphics card is the primary compute engine.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The target audience for this pairing is defined by the CPU’s 86th percentile score and the GPU’s 50th percentile score. Gamers at 1080p will find the system capable, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K ultra settings will hit the GPU ceiling. The 16 GB VRAM supports high-resolution textures, so capacity-sensitive titles will run without memory stutter, but the raw shading throughput is median. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-heavy applications — video encoding, code compilation, data analysis — will benefit most. The PassMark data compression score of 288,777 and encryption score of 18,571 indicate strong throughput for archival and security tasks, making this suitable for small business workstations handling databases or file servers.

Software developers are a natural fit. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,753 and PassMark integer math score of 112,736 indicate swift build times and responsive IDE performance. The single-thread score of 4,354 ensures that UI interactions and code navigation remain fluid. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the CPU power for simulations and compilation, while the GPU handles CAD or light rendering adequately. The 65 W TDP of the CPU combined with the 120 W TDP of the GPU means a system with modest cooling and power requirements — a sensible workstation build that does not demand exotic power delivery. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, along with ECC memory support, makes this viable for reliability-focused small business servers or workstations where data integrity is paramount.

The GPU’s embedded nature — slot width IGP, no power connectors, portable device dependent outputs — suggests this is an OEM or workstation part rather than a consumer add-in card. Builders targeting a compact or integrated system would find this pairing coherent, as the GPU does not require additional power cabling. The 50th percentile GPU ranking means casual gaming at 1080p medium settings is achievable, but this is not a gaming-first build. The system is best described as a CPU-centric workstation with a competent, power-efficient GPU for auxiliary tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is anchored by the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture of the Core i9-14901E. The CPU supports dual-channel memory with both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility in memory selection based on board choice and budget. ECC memory support is present, a feature that adds reliability for workstation and server scenarios. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, which is a forward-looking interface for fast SSDs or accelerators, though the GPU in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The memory bandwidth figures are not listed in the data pack, so a qualitative statement is appropriate: the dual-channel bus is standard for this class, and DDR5 support provides a path to higher bandwidth compared to DDR4.

The TDP figures are the key for power planning. The CPU draws 65 W and the GPU draws 120 W, totaling 185 W for the core components. No suggested PSU is listed, but the low combined TDP means a standard ATX power supply with ample headroom for drives and peripherals would suffice; there is no need for a high-wattage unit. The GPU requires no power connectors, which simplifies cabling and reduces clutter in the chassis. A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a faster graphics card; swapping the RTX 5000 Embedded for a higher-tier discrete GPU would immediately lift the system’s graphics performance from the 50th percentile toward the upper quartile. The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is compatible with most modern GPUs, and the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for future storage or accelerator cards.

The socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change. However, the i9-14901E is already a high-tier part, so the more practical path is a GPU upgrade or adding more memory. The ECC support and dual-channel memory controller mean the platform can handle workstation-grade memory configurations, and the 36 MB shared L3 cache provides a large pool for data-intensive workloads. The upgrade path is clear: strengthen the GPU to match the CPU’s capability, or add memory capacity for larger datasets. The power envelope is forgiving enough that a future GPU with a higher TDP would still fit within typical desktop PSU ranges.

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS by game and resolution from the benchmark scores

The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest a card that handles 1080p ultra settings in most titles at playable frame rates, typically in the 60-80 FPS range for modern AAA games, based on the shading throughput relative to known GPU tiers. At 1440p, the frame rates would drop, with estimates in the 40-60 FPS range for demanding titles, as the pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s becomes a limiting factor. At 4K, the GPU would likely deliver 30-40 FPS on ultra settings, struggling with the highest detail levels.

The 16 GB VRAM is a saving grace for high-resolution textures — it will not run out of memory at 4K in most current titles, avoiding stutter from memory spilling. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the capacity, so texture streaming should remain smooth. The 76 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the 50th percentile compute means ray tracing at high settings will be demanding; estimates suggest enabling RT effects would cut frame rates by roughly a third to a half compared to rasterized performance. DLSS, supported through the tensor cores, would recover some of that loss, but the tensor cores are not top-tier either. The CPU, with its strong single-thread score of 4,354 in PassMark, will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution below 4K, so the GPU is the sole determinant of gaming frame rates. Esports titles at 1080p would run well above 100 FPS, but the system is not designed for competitive high-refresh gaming. The overall gaming picture is that of a capable 1080p machine that can dabble in 1440p, with 4K reserved for less demanding titles or with settings dialed back.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a Raptor Lake-R part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 8 cores and 16 threads, which is a more conservative core count than the flagship Core i9 parts that typically offer more, but the high clock speeds compensate. The base clock is 2.80 GHz and the boost clock is 5.60 GHz, a substantial boost range that allows the chip to scale from power-efficient idle states to high-performance bursts. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is beneficial for workloads with shared data sets, such as database queries or virtual machine hosting. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output and basic acceleration if the discrete GPU is unavailable.

The benchmark scores translate directly to real-world performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,753 indicates strong throughput for rendering and video encoding, though the 8-core count means it will trail higher-core-count parts in heavily parallel workloads. The single-core score of 3,635 is excellent, suggesting fast application launches, responsive spreadsheets, and quick compiles for single-threaded code. PassMark integer math at 112,736 and floating-point math at 81,089 show balanced compute; the integer figure supports cryptographic and compression tasks, while the floating-point figure aids scientific computations. The data compression score of 288,777 is particularly high, indicating the chip excels at file archiving and data storage tasks. The physics score of 3,041 and prime number score of 189 are more modest, reflecting the 8-core limit in those specific tests.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a Core i9 part, which means the chip is power-efficient and suitable for systems with limited cooling or in compact workstations. The production status is active, and the release date is June 2024, placing it as a recent addition to the Raptor Lake refresh lineup. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported, but the 5.60 GHz boost clock provides high stock performance. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, combined with ECC, makes this a flexible part for various motherboard pairings. The part number Q49ESRNJH and the market segment is desktop, confirming this is a socketed processor rather than a mobile or embedded chip. The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper echelon, statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which is strong company for a power-limited desktop part.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the i9-14901E and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, driven by the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores?

A: The i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37,911, which is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37,943) and within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37,804).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the power draw of the CPU and GPU combined?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 120 W TDP, totaling 185 W for the core components, with no external power connectors required for the GPU.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so frame-rate performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The CPU boosts up to 5.60 GHz and has 8 cores with 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is viable, with the GPU’s 50th percentile position supporting medium-to-high settings, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,354 ensures frame pacing is smooth, though the GPU will cap maximum FPS. Streaming is a mixed bag: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,753 handles encoding well, but the GPU’s median compute means game rendering plus encoding may cause frame dips unless the encoder is offloaded. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro benefits from the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 30,298 for timeline and effect processing, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate preview and export acceleration, though export times will be average. 3D rendering in CPU-based engines like Blender’s Cycles (CPU mode) will leverage the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,753 effectively, but GPU-based renderers will be limited by the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute, producing mid-tier render times. Software development is a strong use case: the integer math score of 112,736 speeds up compilation, and the single-core score of 3,635 in Cinebench R23 keeps IDEs responsive, making this an excellent developer workstation. Student and office work is easily handled, with the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking ensuring snappy spreadsheet and document performance, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is overkill but harmless for standard productivity tasks.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-14901E, a Raptor Lake refresh processor with 8 cores and 16 threads boosting to 5.60 GHz, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, an embedded GPU based on the AD103 chip with 9,728 shading units and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier, at the 68th combined percentile, is solidly mid-high. The CPU is the star, ranking in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. The GPU is the weak link, sitting at the 50th percentile, which makes this a CPU-centric workstation rather than a balanced gaming rig. The pairing makes sense for users who need top-tier processor performance for compilation, data processing, or rendering, with a GPU that provides competent graphics acceleration and generous VRAM without straining the power budget. The 185 W combined TDP keeps thermal and power requirements modest, and the platform’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 with ECC adds flexibility. This is a build that prioritizes compute over graphics, and the benchmark data reflects that clear priority.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS by game and resolution from the benchmark scores

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds