SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This pairing combines an 8-core Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's top-tier workstation GPU, placing the combined system at the 92nd percentile overall. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 98th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a high-end desktop configuration with a distinct workload bias toward GPU-accelerated professional tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile GPU ranking indicates exceptional rasterization throughput, but the 8-core/16-thread CPU at the 86th percentile provides adequate feeding for high-refresh 1440p and 4K gaming. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the primary drivers for pushing frame rates at higher resolutions, where the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3635 ensures minimal bottlenecking in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 18571 and multithread score of 30298 suggest capable handling of encoding workloads alongside gaming. The 36 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain low-latency access for streaming software, while the GPU's 400 tensor cores can offload encoding tasks via hardware acceleration, though the lack of measured streaming-specific benchmarks means this assessment relies on aggregate compute scores.

Video Editing: The combination of 8 cores with a 5.60 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 32 GB GDDR6 memory makes this build particularly strong for timeline editing and effects work. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10816 indicates solid export performance, while the GPU's 12800 shading units accelerate effects rendering and color grading. The 76,300 million transistors on the AD102 chip provide massive parallel compute headroom for 4K and 8K video timelines.

3D Rendering: This is where the system excels. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 100 RT cores deliver professional-grade rendering throughput, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 handles scene preparation and physics. The PassMark floating point math score of 81089 indicates strong numerical processing for ray tracing calculations, making this a viable workstation for offline rendering studios.

Software Development: The 8-core/16-thread configuration with 2 MB L2 per core provides responsive compilation times, evidenced by the PassMark integer math score of 112736. The 36 MB L3 cache benefits large codebases, and the CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures snappy IDE performance. The GPU's compute capabilities also support local machine learning model training, with 400 tensor cores available for accelerated inference workloads.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The single-core Cinebench R15 score of 366 and PassMark single-thread score of 4354 make everyday applications feel instant, but the 250 W GPU TDP and dual-slot cooler are impractical for most student environments. The 65 W CPU TDP is efficient, but the overall system's power demands make it more suited to dedicated workstation desks than shared spaces.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37911 across all tests. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 average score, a delta of 0%, indicating statistical parity. The Intel Core 5 211E trails by only 0.2% at 37829, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X leads by 0.1% at 37943. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 sits at 37804, a 0.3% deficit.

For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 yield an average benchmark score of 184664, placing it at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187147, which leads by 1.3%. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB trails by 0.5% at 183725, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 1.4% behind at 182109. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is 3.7% behind at 178050.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU dominates the performance envelope. The 98th percentile GPU ranking versus the 86th percentile CPU ranking indicates that graphics-accelerated workloads will see the most dramatic performance, while CPU-bound tasks will perform well but not at the absolute top tier. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30298 and data compression score of 288777 confirm strong general compute, but the GPU's near-top-tier position is the defining characteristic of this build.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 5000 Ada Generation faster than the GeForce RTX 4090 D?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184664 compared to 178050 for the RTX 4090 D, a 3.7% advantage according to the nearest rival data.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU lists ECC memory support as enabled, alongside dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory support.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 250 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 600 W, with a single 16-pin power connector required.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911, while the Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943, meaning the AMD part is 0.1% faster — a negligible difference.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU and GPU each use?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation includes 100 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and can it be overclocked?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and has a locked multiplier, so it does not support overclocking.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals in GPU-accelerated fields where the 98th percentile GPU ranking translates directly to reduced render times and faster simulation throughput. 3D animators and visual effects artists will benefit from the 32 GB GDDR6 memory and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute, allowing larger scenes and higher-resolution textures than consumer GPUs. Engineers running finite element analysis or computational fluid dynamics will find the CUDA cores and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth valuable for solver iterations.

Content creators working with 4K or 8K video will appreciate the dual capability of the CPU's 8 cores for editing responsiveness and the GPU's 12800 shading units for accelerated effects and color processing. The 36 MB L3 cache and 5.60 GHz boost clock keep timeline scrubbing smooth, while the GPU handles export encoding. Data scientists and machine learning practitioners can leverage the 400 tensor cores for model training, though the 32 GB memory capacity is the standout feature for larger batch sizes.

For gamers, this is a 4K-focused build. The 98th percentile GPU ensures maximum settings at 4K resolution in most titles, while the 86th percentile CPU provides sufficient single-core performance for high-refresh 1440p gaming. Students and general office workers are poorly served by this configuration — the 250 W GPU TDP and dual-slot cooler are overkill for document workloads, and the system's compute strengths are wasted on basic productivity.

Small business workstations handling CAD, architectural visualization, or medical imaging will find the ECC memory support and professional-grade GPU drivers compelling. The combination of 8 cores with 16 threads and workstation GPU compute provides a balanced platform for mixed CPU/GPU workflows common in these fields.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm², and features a base clock of 2.80 GHz that boosts to 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache.

Despite being labeled as a Core i9, the 8-core configuration is unusual for the flagship tier, yet the benchmark results show it competes effectively with modern 8-core rivals. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 is strong for an 8-core part, driven by the high 5.60 GHz boost clock. The single-core R23 score of 3635 places it near the top for desktop processors, explaining the 86th percentile ranking.

In real workloads, the high boost clock benefits lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office suites, and legacy software, while the 16 threads handle modern multitasking. The PassMark single-thread score of 4354 is competitive with the best consumer chips, and the data encryption score of 18571 indicates strong AES performance for security-conscious workflows. The floating point math score of 81089 and integer math score of 112736 show balanced ALU and FPU capabilities.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a Core i9 part, suggesting efficient power delivery through the 10 nm process. This makes thermal management simpler, though the locked multiplier prevents enthusiast overclocking. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support for workstation reliability. The L3 cache of 36 MB is shared across all cores, reducing latency for frequently accessed data.

The nearest rival comparison shows this CPU is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X, with all three within 0.1-0.3% of each other in average benchmark score. This means users should not expect meaningful performance differences between these parts in CPU-bound tasks; the choice comes down to platform features and pricing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest it can handle 4K gaming at maximum settings in most titles, with the 32 GB GDDR6 memory providing ample headroom for high-resolution textures.

At 1440p, the CPU's single-core performance becomes more relevant, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 should prevent major bottlenecks in most games. The 86th percentile CPU ranking indicates this processor can sustain high frame rates in esports titles, though the GPU is likely overkill for competitive shooters where 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates is common.

For 4K gaming, the GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 176 ROPs are the key specifications. The 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests strong fill-rate performance, which translates to high frame rates at 4K with anti-aliasing enabled. The 100 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the performance impact depends on the game's implementation.

Given the lack of measured FPS data, the estimated gaming experience is one of consistent high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, with the GPU being the primary performance driver. The CPU's 8 cores are sufficient for modern games that use 4-8 threads, and the high boost clock ensures good performance in single-threaded game engines. However, users targeting 240 Hz or higher refresh rates at 1080p may find the CPU's 86th percentile ranking a limiting factor, as it is not at the absolute top tier for this specific workload.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance heavily favors the GPU, which sits at the 98th percentile compared to the CPU's 86th percentile. This 12-point gap indicates that GPU-bound workloads will see near-top-tier performance, while CPU-bound tasks will be slightly further from the top. The combined percentile of 92 reflects this asymmetry, with the GPU pulling the overall score upward.

In gaming at 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck, as the 98th percentile GPU ranking suggests it can deliver frame rates that the CPU's 8 cores can feed without issue. At 1080p with lower graphics settings, the CPU would become the limiting factor, as the high single-core performance of 3635 in Cinebench R23 is good but not at the absolute top tier needed for 500+ FPS in esports titles.

For productivity, the bottleneck shifts depending on the application. In 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation dominates, and the CPU's role is limited to scene preparation and data transfer. In CPU-only rendering with tools that use the processor, the 8-core configuration will be the constraint, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 being moderate for a workstation CPU.

The FPS scaling evidence from the GPU's 98th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 86th percentile suggests that upgrading the CPU would yield diminishing returns for gaming at 4K, where the GPU is the primary driver. Conversely, users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding or software compilation would find the CPU the limiting factor, and a processor with more cores or a higher percentile ranking would be a more significant upgrade.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is the platform for Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors. This means the motherboard can accept a range of CPUs, though the 14901E's locked multiplier limits overclocking. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no bandwidth bottleneck from the GPU's interface.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 250 W TDP and requires a 600 W suggested PSU. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot cooler design, measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height. The 600 W PSU recommendation leaves headroom for the CPU's 65 W TDP and other system components, but users planning to add more peripherals should consider a larger supply.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same LGA 1700 socket, provided the motherboard's power delivery can support it. The GPU's 32 GB memory and 98th percentile ranking are already near the top, so upgrading the GPU would yield minimal gains. Alternatively, users could upgrade to a newer platform with a higher percentile CPU, though this would require a new motherboard and potentially new memory.

The system's PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is a future-proofing feature, though current GPUs like the RTX 5000 Ada Generation use PCIe 4.0. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs limit the display connectivity to 60 Hz at 8K, which is sufficient for most professional monitors but not the latest high-refresh displays.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's 8-core Raptor Lake refresh CPU with NVIDIA's workstation-grade RTX 5000 Ada Generation GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 98th percentile rankings place the combined system at the 92nd percentile, firmly in the high-end tier for desktop workstations.

The Core i9-14901E is an unusual processor, offering the Core i9 brand with 8 cores and a 65 W TDP, making it an efficient but not flagship-level CPU. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a professional workstation GPU with 32 GB GDDR6 memory, 12800 shading units, and 100 RT cores, designed for compute-intensive workloads rather than pure gaming.

The overall tier of this build is high-end workstation, with the GPU providing near-top-tier compute performance and the CPU offering solid mid-high tier processor performance. The 12-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles means the system is best suited for GPU-accelerated professional workloads like 3D rendering, AI inference, and video production, where the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile ranking delivers maximum impact. For general-purpose computing and gaming, the system is capable but overprovisioned on the GPU side, with the CPU's 86th percentile ranking being the more modest component.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds