SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-14901E paired with NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a desktop configuration that sits at the 74th percentile overall, indicating a high-tier workstation setup. The CPU, a Raptor Lake Refresh part on Intel Socket 1700, posts an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile against all CPUs. The GPU, an end-of-life Turing architecture workstation card, manages a 61st percentile ranking with an average score of 17789. While the processor is a top-tier performer, the graphics card is comparatively mid-range, creating a distinct performance asymmetry that favors compute and multi-threaded workloads over raw gaming frame rates. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming frame rate discussions herein are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is built on the Turing architecture using the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The GPU packs 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, operating at a base clock of 1005 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz. Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s across 8 GB of VRAM. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz, translating to 13 Gbps effective. This memory subsystem is substantial for professional workloads, though the 8 GB capacity may feel constrained in modern high-resolution texture-heavy scenarios.

Hardware acceleration features include 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the tensor cores provide dedicated AI and deep learning inference capabilities. The FP32 throughput is rated at 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. These specifications point to a card designed for professional rendering and compute tasks rather than high-refresh gaming. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support, alongside OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensures modern graphics feature compatibility.

Benchmark results show a Passmark G3D score of 15117, with a Passmark GPU Compute score of 6176. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 indicate strong compute throughput. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 is modest, and the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 is notably low, suggesting the card struggles with the latest DirectX 12 rendering paths despite API support. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 10 score of 108 are better but still moderate. The card’s percentile ranking of 61 against all GPUs places it in a competitive position, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at a 0.7% delta, followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 0.9% delta. This shows the Quadro RTX 4000 delivers performance comparable to a modern entry-level gaming card, but it trails significantly behind the CPU’s standing.

For rendering, the data indicates the GPU handles compute-intensive tasks well, as evidenced by the strong OpenCL and Vulkan scores, but the low DirectX 12 performance suggests limitations in gaming-oriented workloads. The 288 tensor cores accelerate AI denoising and neural network inference, which benefits rendering pipelines that use these features. The 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate capacity for professional scenes, though complex 3D models with high-resolution textures may exceed this limit, causing performance degradation.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core i9-14901E and its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, resulting in a 0% delta. This indicates near-identical overall performance, making the two processors effectively equivalent in average benchmark results.

Q: How does the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in benchmark scores?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17789, while the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639, giving the Quadro a 0.9% delta advantage. The Quadro is also 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Quadro RTX 4000 and how does it affect performance?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has a memory bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s across an 8 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 256-bit bus. This bandwidth is sufficient for professional rendering tasks, though the 8 GB capacity may become a bottleneck for very large datasets.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation and server applications where data integrity is paramount. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has a TDP of 65 W, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has a TDP of 160 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which provides headroom for the combined power draw of both components.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has a launch MSRP of 899 USD, reflecting its positioning as a professional workstation graphics card when it was released in November 2018.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-threaded performance compare to its multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 3635 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 25753 in multi-core. The multi-core score is approximately 7.1 times higher, indicating strong scaling across its 8 cores and 16 threads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system exhibits a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU languishes at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. This gap is substantial and dictates workload-specific bottlenecks. In CPU-intensive tasks such as data compression, encryption, and scientific computing, the i9-14901E will dominate, leaving the GPU underutilized. The Passmark data compression score of 288777 and integer math score of 112736 indicate exceptional processing power for these tasks. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like real-time 3D rendering or gaming, the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the limiting factor, capping performance well below what the CPU could support.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, reinforces this bottleneck. With no measured FPS data, we rely on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 is low, suggesting that in modern game engines using DirectX 12, the GPU will produce modest frame rates. In contrast, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 ensures it will never be the constraint in gaming scenarios, as even the most demanding game logic rarely saturates an 8-core/16-thread processor at 5.60 GHz boost. The Passmark physics score of 3041 further supports the CPU’s gaming readiness, as physics calculations are a common CPU bottleneck.

The deltaPct values among rivals highlight the GPU’s marginal position. The Quadro RTX 4000 is only 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, a card from a much older generation, and 0.9% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4060. This indicates that the GPU’s performance is competitive with entry-level modern parts but does not leverage the CPU’s high-end capabilities. In professional rendering workloads that use OpenCL or Vulkan, the GPU’s scores of 74540 and 78844 respectively are respectable, but the low DirectX 12 score of 52 suggests that any workload heavily optimized for DX12 will underperform. The bottleneck shifts between workloads: compute-heavy tasks see CPU dominance, while graphics-intensive tasks see GPU limitations.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-bound professional workloads over gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The Intel Core i9-14901E’s 86th percentile ranking and strong Passmark scores in integer math (112736), floating point math (81089), and data encryption (18571) make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, and researchers performing numerical analysis. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 65 W TDP, offer high efficiency for sustained multi-threaded workloads. The ECC memory support further appeals to professionals requiring data integrity, such as financial modelers or database managers. The Passmark multithread score of 30298 indicates robust parallel processing capabilities for these users.

Content creators working with video encoding or 3D modeling software that primarily relies on CPU rendering will benefit from the i9-14901E’s performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and single-core score of 3635 indicate strong performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks, covering software that scales well across cores and software that is lightly threaded. The Passmark data compression score of 288777 is particularly relevant for professionals dealing with large archives or file transfers. However, those relying heavily on GPU rendering in applications like Blender or Octane will find the Quadro RTX 4000’s 61st percentile ranking limiting, as its 8 GB VRAM and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are modest by modern standards.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution with moderate settings may find this build acceptable, but the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 52 suggests poor performance in the latest game engines. The system is better suited for small business workstations handling office productivity, where the CPU’s single-thread score of 4354 in Passmark ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the GPU’s 846 Passmark G2D score handles 2D tasks adequately. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s compute power for compiling and simulation, while the GPU supports basic visualization needs. The 74th combined percentile confirms this is a high-tier system, but the GPU is clearly the weaker link, making it unsuitable for GPU-intensive professional work like 3D animation or deep learning training.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a Raptor Lake Refresh processor on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support for enhanced reliability. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported, but the high boost clock compensates with strong out-of-box performance.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 is exceptional, placing it among the fastest CPUs for lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software. The multi-core score of 25753 demonstrates substantial scaling across the 8 cores, with the Passmark multithread score of 30298 confirming this. The Passmark single-thread score of 4354 reinforces the CPU’s single-core dominance. Real-world implications include rapid code compilation, where the multi-core performance reduces build times, and responsive application launches, where the single-core performance minimizes latency.

The Passmark extended instructions score of 17249 indicates robust SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) capabilities, benefiting workloads like video encoding and scientific calculations that utilize AVX instructions. The floating point math score of 81089 and integer math score of 112736 show balanced arithmetic performance across both number types. The data encryption score of 18571 is adequate for encryption tasks, while the data compression score of 288777 is a standout, indicating excellent performance in file archiving and compression software. The find prime numbers score of 189 is lower, reflecting the CPU’s design priorities. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking places it above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which has a 0% delta, and slightly above the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X by 0.1% delta, showing it is a top-tier performer in its class.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is set to false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The GPU’s benchmark results, particularly the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873, suggest that modern games utilizing DirectX 12 will run at modest frame rates. At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 4000’s 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle many titles, but the low DX12 score indicates potential stuttering or reduced frame rates in demanding scenes.

For esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, which are typically CPU-bound, the i9-14901E’s high single-core performance (3635 in Cinebench R23 single-core) will drive high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p. However, the GPU may become a bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will struggle with modern AAA games, likely delivering frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range based on the Passmark G3D score of 15117. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844 provides some optimism for Vulkan-based games, which may perform better than DX12 titles.

At 4K resolution, the Quadro RTX 4000’s 8 GB VRAM and moderate compute power will severely limit performance, with estimated frame rates dropping below 30 FPS in most AAA titles. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking, which places it just 0.9% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4060, indicates it performs like a modern entry-level card. The CPU’s presence ensures that frame rate dips are not caused by processor limitations, as its 86th percentile ranking and Passmark physics score of 3041 guarantee sufficient headroom for game logic. Overall, this system is not optimized for high-refresh gaming; it is better suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, where the CPU can push frame rates while the GPU manages the rendering load.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The i9-14901E uses a locked multiplier, so CPU overclocking is not possible, but the 5.60 GHz boost clock already provides high performance. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The ECC memory support is an advantage for workstation reliability. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides ample bandwidth for the latest GPUs and NVMe SSDs, though the current Quadro RTX 4000 only uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 450 W, while its TDP is 160 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, meaning a combined power draw of approximately 225 W under full load, leaving significant headroom with the 450 W PSU. This headroom allows for upgrades to higher-power components without necessarily replacing the PSU, provided the system’s other components do not draw excessive power. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a single slot, making physical installation straightforward.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Quadro RTX 4000 with a more modern GPU, given its end-of-life status and 61st percentile ranking. The PCIe Gen 5 slot ensures compatibility with the latest graphics cards, though the Quadro’s PCIe 3.0 interface means the new card will operate at PCIe 3.0 speeds unless the motherboard supports PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 on the same slot. The 450 W PSU headroom suggests a GPU with a TDP up to around 280 W could be accommodated, but a PSU upgrade may be necessary for higher-end cards. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 memory could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The CPU’s locked multiplier means the upgrade path is limited to GPU and memory, as the processor is already a high-end part.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i9-14901E and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The configuration sits at the 74th combined percentile, indicating a high-tier system overall. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range component at the 61st percentile. This pairing creates a workstation-oriented system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks but is less capable in GPU-accelerated workloads. The build class is desktop, confirming it is intended for stationary use rather than portable computing.

The i9-14901E’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, make it a powerhouse for productivity and development. The Quadro RTX 4000, despite its age and end-of-life status, provides professional-grade features like ECC memory support on the CPU side and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores on the GPU side. The system’s overall tier is high, but the GPU’s lower percentile ranking prevents it from being a top-tier gaming or rendering machine. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance, placing it above average but not at the pinnacle of performance.

For users seeking a balanced system, this build may feel lopsided, with the CPU vastly outperforming the GPU. It is best suited for professionals who require maximum CPU compute power for tasks like software development, data analysis, or scientific computing, where the GPU is secondary. The Quadro RTX 4000’s 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth handle professional visualization tasks adequately, but the low DirectX 12 score of 52 limits its gaming potential. This is a specialized workstation build, not a gaming rig.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-14901E achieves an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it at the 86th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with an average score of 37904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with 37943 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 211E with 37829 (0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 with 37804 (0.3% delta). The CPU’s key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25753 and single-core at 3635, Passmark multithread at 30298, Passmark single-thread at 4354, Passmark integer math at 112736, Passmark floating point math at 81089, Passmark data compression at 288777, and Passmark data encryption at 18571.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 achieves an average benchmark score of 17789, placing it at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with 17666 (0.7% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with 17639 (0.9% delta), the AMD Radeon 780M with 17588 (1.1% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with 17551 (1.4% delta). The GPU’s key scores include Passmark G3D at 15117, Passmark GPU Compute at 6176, Geekbench OpenCL at 74540, Geekbench Vulkan at 78844, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 1873, and Passmark DirectX 12 at 52.

The combined picture shows a system with a dominant CPU and a modest GPU. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and high average score of 37911 make it one of the best processors available, while the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking and average score of 17789 place it in the middle of the pack. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this duality, indicating a system that is above average overall but not exceptional in any single area. The CPU’s performance is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, differing by only 0%, suggesting users can expect similar performance from either processor. The GPU’s performance is closest to the AMD Radeon HD 7790, with a 0.7% delta, showing it outperforms an older card but trails modern equivalents by a small margin. This system is a CPU-first build, with the GPU serving as a competent but not outstanding companion.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds