SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E pairs an 8-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-R design with a 65 W TDP and a 5.60 GHz boost clock, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 brings Blackwell 2.0 architecture, 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, and a 960.0 GB/s bandwidth to the desktop. This is a desktop-class pairing that lands at the 87th percentile overall, indicating a high-tier configuration, though the CPU sits slightly below the GPU in relative standing — the processor is at the 86th percentile versus the graphics card’s 87th. The data shows a system built around a power-efficient CPU with strong single-threaded capabilities and a GPU that dominates compute and rasterization workloads, making it a versatile but distinctly graphics-forward build.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on Raptor Lake-R architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It runs at a 2.80 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.60 GHz, which is a substantial frequency range for a chip with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported, making it suitable for workstation tasks that require data integrity. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, though this build pairs it with a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that prioritizes single-thread performance and multithreaded efficiency within a modest power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25,753 in multi-core and 3,635 in single-core, while Cinebench R20 shows 10,816 multi-core and 1,526 single-core. These figures place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,911. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 (-0.1% delta), and the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (0.2% delta). This indicates the 14901E is essentially performance-equivalent to these competitors, with differences of less than a third of a percent, meaning real-world workloads will not favor one over the other based on raw CPU throughput alone.

PassMark results reinforce the single-thread strength: the single-thread score is 4,354, while multithread is 30,298. Integer math scores 112,736 and floating-point math 81,089, showing solid arithmetic throughput for compute-heavy tasks. Data compression hits 288,777, which is a strong result for archiving and file handling, while data encryption is 18,571 and extended instructions 17,249. The physics score of 3,041 and find prime numbers score of 189 are lower, but these are less representative of typical desktop workloads. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means it can sustain these scores without requiring exotic cooling, which is a practical advantage for dense builds or small-form-factor systems.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5080 is the primary driver here, but the CPU’s 5.60 GHz boost clock and 4,354 single-thread PassMark score ensure that frame pacing is not held back by the processor in most titles. The CPU’s 86th percentile standing is sufficient to feed the GPU at high refresh rates, though the lack of measured FPS means exact figures are estimates based on the GPU’s 87th percentile and compute scores.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration handles encoding offloads alongside gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 providing headroom for simultaneous game and stream workloads. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means thermal headroom is available for sustained multi-threaded use, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with the rapid data shuffling that streaming requires.

Video editing: The combination of strong single-thread (3,635 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and respectable multi-core (25,753) makes this a capable editor for timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and rendering, while the 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth handles large frame buffers and preview caches without stutter.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 16 threads and 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, but this is not a top-tier render workstation CPU — it trails the 86th percentile group by less than 1% from its nearest rivals, meaning it is average for its class. GPU rendering is where this build excels, with the RTX 5080’s 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores providing massive acceleration for ray-traced and AI-denoised workloads.

Software development: The 5.60 GHz boost clock and 4,354 single-thread PassMark score make compilation of single-threaded build steps swift, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds with a 30,298 multithread PassMark score. The 65 W TDP allows for quiet operation during long compile sessions, and ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity, but the CPU’s efficiency means it will idle cool and quiet, with the integrated UHD Graphics 770 available as a fallback if the discrete GPU is ever disabled. The 36 MB L3 cache accelerates spreadsheet and database operations, and the 288,777 data compression score ensures fast file archiving for coursework or administrative tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37,911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, at 37,904 — a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is 0.1% higher at 37,943, and the Intel Core 5 211E is 0.2% lower at 37,829. This tight grouping means the 14901E is effectively interchangeable with these parts in CPU-bound tasks, and any performance difference will be within noise margins. The GPU, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 56,083, which is the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55,757 (0.6% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698 (0.7% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 57,367 (2.2% higher). The RTX 5080 sits between these, with a notable 2.2% deficit to the RX 9070 GRE but a clear lead over the other listed rivals.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 8,637, which is a strong result for a high-end card. Geekbench OpenCL shows 235,901 and Vulkan 255,450, both indicating excellent compute throughput. PassMark G3D is 36,565 and G2D is 1,415, while GPU compute is 21,789. The DirectX 12 score of 151 is lower than DirectX 11’s 324, but this is typical for PassMark’s synthetic DX12 test and does not reflect real-world gaming performance. The combined picture is a system where the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU, meaning the graphics card is the dominant component in this pairing.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who want 4K or high-refresh 1440p performance without compromising on ray tracing, given the RTX 5080’s 84 RT cores and 87th percentile standing. Content creators working with video or 3D renders will benefit from the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 336 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workflows, while the CPU’s 16 threads handle multitasking between creative applications. Software developers who need fast single-threaded compilation and parallel builds will find the 5.60 GHz boost and 30,298 multithread PassMark score adequate, though the CPU is not a standout for heavily threaded compile farms. Students and small business workstation users will find the 65 W TDP and ECC memory support appealing for reliability, but the GPU is far beyond what office tasks require — this is a system for those who also game or render on the side.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a GPU that is slightly ahead of the CPU in relative performance, with the GPU at the 87th percentile and the CPU at the 86th. This suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rate, especially at high resolutions where pixel throughput is paramount. The CPU’s 4,354 single-thread score and 5.60 GHz boost are sufficient to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but in CPU-heavy titles with many AI agents or physics calculations, the 8-core design could become the bottleneck due to its lower multi-core percentile relative to the GPU’s compute lead. For productivity, the CPU’s 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is the ceiling for CPU-bound tasks, while the GPU’s 21,789 PassMark GPU compute score accelerates parallel workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP versus the 360 W GPU TDP also indicates that the GPU will dominate system power draw, so the CPU is unlikely to throttle under combined load.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5080’s 87th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 suggest it will deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K with ultra settings, while the CPU’s 5.60 GHz boost clock and 4,354 single-thread PassMark score indicate it can keep up with frame pacing in most titles. In esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance will push frame rates into the hundreds, but the GPU’s 960.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB GDDR7 memory will handle high-resolution textures without issue. For AAA games at 4K, the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 84 RT cores will be the primary drivers for rasterized and ray-traced performance, with the CPU playing a supporting role. At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the CPU for high-refresh monitors, but the GPU remains the dominant factor. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance will vary by title and driver optimization.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform that supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, both in dual-channel configuration. The 65 W TDP and 360 W GPU TDP combine for a total that the 750 W suggested PSU can comfortably handle, leaving headroom for additional drives or peripherals. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface on the GPU ensures full bandwidth for the RTX 5080, and the CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide direct connection for the graphics card. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory to the maximum supported by the motherboard, as the dual-channel DDR5 support can be leveraged for better bandwidth in memory-sensitive tasks. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not an option, but the 5.60 GHz boost is already high. The GPU’s successor is listed as GeForce 60, so an upgrade within the 50-series is not necessary; instead, users should consider whether more CPU cores are needed, but the 14901E’s 86th percentile means it will not be a weak link for several generations.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, landing at the 87th combined percentile. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-R part with a 65 W TDP and a 5.60 GHz boost, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 37,911. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32, sitting at the 87th percentile with an average score of 56,083. The overall tier is high-end, but the CPU is slightly less exceptional than the GPU, making this a graphics-first system. The 65 W CPU TDP means the processor is efficient, while the 360 W GPU TDP demands robust cooling and the 750 W PSU is sufficient. This is a balanced build for gaming and GPU-accelerated work, with the CPU providing adequate support for the GPU’s capabilities.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-14901E compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37,943, which is 0.1% higher than the 14901E’s 37,911. This is a negligible difference, so the two CPUs are effectively equal in performance.

Q: Is the RTX 5080 stronger relative to its peers than the CPU?

A: Yes. The GPU is at the 87th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 56,083, while the CPU is at the 86th percentile with an average score of 37,911. The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, is 2.2% higher, but the GPU still holds a slightly stronger relative position than the CPU.

Q: What memory types does the 14901E support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and size?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for high-resolution textures and large compute workloads.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the 5.60 GHz boost clock is the maximum frequency. Users should rely on the stock boost behavior rather than manual overclocking.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The build is at the 87th combined percentile, indicating it is a high-tier configuration, though individual component percentiles vary slightly (CPU at 86th, GPU at 87th).

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores, so actual gaming performance will vary by title and settings.