SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 8-core Raptor Lake refresh CPU with NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU, targeting the desktop market. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 72nd percentile, creating a combined percentile of 79. The data shows a system that prioritizes single-thread responsiveness and modern GPU features, though the GPU's 8 GB frame buffer and the CPU's 8-core/16-thread configuration define clear boundaries for what this build can realistically handle.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in the LGA 1700 ecosystem alongside other Core 14th Gen parts. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility when selecting RAM. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented builds that require error correction. PCIe connectivity comes through Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for a modern GPU and NVMe storage.

The CPU's TDP is rated at 65 watts, which is modest for an i9-class part. This low power draw means a standard air cooler is sufficient, and the platform does not demand exotic cooling solutions. The GPU, meanwhile, has a TDP of 145 watts and a suggested PSU rating of 300 watts. Combined, this system requires a modest power supply, leaving substantial headroom for additional drives, fans, or peripherals. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 241 mm in length, so it fits comfortably in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade path from this build would focus on the GPU first, as the CPU's single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 and multi-core score of 25753 in the same test indicate it has headroom to drive a faster graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 x8 interface on the GPU is backward compatible, so a future GPU upgrade would not require a platform change. Memory upgrades are also straightforward, given the dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5. The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache suggest it can handle more demanding workloads if paired with a stronger GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943 (-0.1%), the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 (0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 (0.3%). This tight cluster means the i9-14901E is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in overall CPU performance, though individual workload characteristics differ.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25753 multi-core and 3635 single-core. The single-core result is particularly strong, suggesting excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 scores are 10816 multi-core and 1526 single-core, while R15 shows 2595 multi-core and 366 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 30298, single-thread of 4354, integer math at 112736, floating-point math at 81089, and data compression at 288777.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 860M at 26401 (-0.3%), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421 (-0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553 (-0.8%), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT at 26011 (1.2%). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3628, and it posts 112787 in Geekbench OpenCL and 113321 in Geekbench Vulkan.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in percentile terms by 14 points. This imbalance suggests the CPU is capable of feeding a faster GPU, but the RTX 5060 may limit CPU-bound workloads in certain scenarios. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 72nd percentile indicates the processor is the stronger component of this pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E features 8 cores and 16 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-R codename. The base clock is 2.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop-class processor with integrated UHD Graphics 770, though discrete GPU usage is expected in this build.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 indicates strong all-core throughput for a 65-watt part. The single-core score of 3635 is exceptional, placing it among the fastest single-thread performers in this class. The PassMark single-thread score of 4354 reinforces this strength, while the multithread score of 30298 shows balanced scaling across the 16 threads.

In real workloads, the high single-core performance translates to snappy application launches, fast spreadsheet calculations, and responsive web browsing. The multi-core score handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation competently, though it falls short of higher-core-count parts. The PassMark data encryption score of 18571 and extended instructions score of 17249 indicate solid performance for security-related tasks and SIMD-optimized software. The find prime numbers score of 189 is modest, but this is not a typical real-world workload.

The 36 MB L3 cache is generous for an 8-core part, which helps with gaming and database workloads that benefit from larger caches. The 65-watt TDP is remarkably efficient for the performance on offer, making this an attractive option for compact builds or systems where heat dissipation is a concern. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it above the majority of processors, but its nearest rivals show that the competition is fierce at this performance tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU is the stronger component. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 72nd percentile creates a 14-point gap, meaning the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can fully utilize in GPU-bound scenarios. However, the nature of the bottleneck depends heavily on the specific workload.

In CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will be the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 is respectable, but it is the ceiling for this system in multi-threaded productivity. The GPU's compute capabilities, as shown by the PassMark GPU compute score of 10899, will not compensate for CPU limitations in these workloads.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-core performance (3635 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU may struggle to keep up in graphically intensive scenes. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, as its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus constrain texture quality and resolution scaling. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may show limitations at 4K.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from this data set, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the percentile gap suggests that at 1080p, the CPU can push frame rates higher than the GPU can render, while at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. This is a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, where both components contribute meaningfully, but it is not optimized for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 4354 indicate it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU's 72nd percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at high refresh rates in most titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture settings in newer games.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, though dedicated streaming hardware would offload this work. The PassMark multithread score of 30298 supports concurrent gaming and encoding, but the 65-watt TDP means thermal throttling is unlikely even under sustained load.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and PassMark floating-point math score of 81089 indicate solid performance for video editing timelines, especially in 1080p and 1440p projects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM can accelerate effects and color grading, but 4K projects with heavy effects may strain the memory capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance handles CPU-based rendering workloads, while the GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-based renderers. The PassMark extended instructions score of 17249 suggests good performance for SIMD-optimized rendering engines, though the 8-core limit means longer render times than higher-core-count alternatives.

Software development: The fast single-core performance accelerates compilation of individual files, while the multithread score handles parallel builds. The PassMark integer math score of 112736 supports heavy integer workloads common in code compilation, and the 36 MB L3 cache benefits large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures responsive application usage, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 65-watt TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day use, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for document storage and spreadsheet work.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 72nd percentile provide a framework for these estimates.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking suggests it can achieve playable frame rates (60+ FPS) in most modern titles, with the CPU's strong single-core performance ensuring minimal frame time spikes. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 and PassMark G3D score of 20891 indicate it sits in the mid-range tier of graphics cards, comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (1.2% higher score) and slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (-0.8% lower score).

At 1440p, frame rates will drop as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become limiting factors. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p gaming but may require reduced texture quality in VRAM-intensive titles. The CPU's headroom means it will not be the bottleneck at this resolution, but the GPU will struggle to maintain high refresh rates in demanding games.

At 4K, the GPU's 72nd percentile places it below the threshold for comfortable high-settings gaming. The 8 GB VRAM will be exceeded by many modern titles at 4K, causing texture pop-in or reduced detail settings. The CPU's performance advantage becomes irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU is the clear bottleneck.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors. The CPU's single-core performance ensures high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU handles modern AAA games at 1080p ultra settings. Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the CPU's multi-core performance and the GPU's CUDA acceleration, though 4K projects may require a GPU with more VRAM.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times and responsive system feel, with the 36 MB L3 cache benefiting large codebases. Students and office workers get a system that handles everyday tasks effortlessly while providing headroom for occasional gaming or content creation. Small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support for reliability in data-sensitive applications.

The build is not ideal for 4K gaming or high-end 3D rendering, where the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and the CPU's 8-core limit become constraints. However, for users who prioritize 1080p gaming with occasional productivity work, this pairing offers a balanced experience.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, combining a 14th-gen Raptor Lake refresh CPU with a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The CPU is a 65-watt, 8-core/16-thread part with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the GPU features 3840 shading units, 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, and 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The combined percentile ranking is 79, placing this system above the majority of desktop configurations.

The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 72nd percentile create a system where the processor outperforms the graphics card in relative terms. This is a 1080p gaming build with productivity capabilities, suited for users who want strong single-thread performance and modern GPU features like ray tracing (30 RT cores) and DLSS (120 tensor cores) without requiring extreme multi-core throughput or high-resolution gaming. The launch MSRP for the GPU is 299 USD.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i9-14901E use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with Core 14th Gen motherboards.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5060 have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The CPU scores 25753 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3635 in single-core.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 300 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 145 watts.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 37911, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 7 9700X's 37943.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The RTX 5060 scores 3628 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds