SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build combines the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in a desktop configuration that reaches the 84th combined percentile across all benchmarked systems. The CPU — an 8-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part on Intel Socket 1700 — averages 37911 across its benchmark suite and sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, an Ada Lovelace RTX 4070 with 12 GB of GDDR6X, averages 37648 and sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct game testing.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Core i9-14901E use?

A: Intel Socket 1700. The processor is a desktop part in the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i9-14901E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, and includes ECC memory capability.

Q: Does the processor have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides display output and basic compute when no discrete GPU is installed.

Q: What is the RTX 4070's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the RTX 4070?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W. The GPU's TDP is 200 W and it uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No — the multiplier is locked, so the processor is not unlocked for overclocking.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 still in production?

A: Its production status is end-of-life, and the GeForce 50 series is listed as its successor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU both sit in the upper quartile of their respective pools. The i9-14901E's average benchmark score of 37911 places it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are separated by a whisker. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904 — a 0.0% delta, meaning a dead tie. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel part. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804 (0.3% lower). In practical terms, all four CPUs are within a 0.4% band; the i9-14901E is statistically indistinguishable from its closest competition.

The GPU side is similar but with slightly wider gaps. The RTX 4070's average of 37648 puts it at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628 (0.1% lower), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507 (0.4% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135 (1.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157 (1.3% lower). The 1.3% gap to the RTX 4080 Mobile is the largest spread in either chart — the RTX 4070 is close to that mobile part but not quite at its level.

Looking at the raw numbers: the CPU scores 25753 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3635 in single-core; R20 gives 10816 multi and 1526 single; R15 gives 2595 multi and 366 single. The PassMark suite adds more color — multithread at 30298, single-thread at 4354, integer math at 112736, floating-point math at 81089, data compression at 288777, data encryption at 18571, extended instructions at 17249, find prime numbers at 189, random string sorting at 39138, and physics at 3041. The GPU scores 3854 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 26927 in PassMark G3D, 14720 in PassMark GPU compute, 154858 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 174152 in Geekbench Vulkan. The combined picture is a system that is strong in both CPU and GPU, with the CPU sitting four percentile points above the GPU — a slight CPU-forward tilt that matters for the bottleneck analysis below.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 86th-percentile CPU vs. 81st-percentile GPU tells a clear story: the processor is the stronger relative component. In multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core (25753) and PassMark multithread (30298), the CPU carries the system. In GPU-heavy tasks — particularly high-resolution gaming and 3D rendering — the RTX 4070 is the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 84 sits between the two individual percentiles, which is exactly what you'd expect from a pairing where one component is modestly stronger than the other.

The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single 3635, PassMark single 4354) is high enough that it will not hold the GPU back in most frame-rate scenarios. But the data does show that when frame rates drop at high resolution, the GPU is the component to suspect first. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 and PassMark G3D of 26927 are strong numbers, but they are not in the top 5% of the GPU pool. Conversely, the CPU's 86th percentile means it is near the top of its class, so CPU-bound scenarios like heavy multi-threaded compilation or batch rendering will be handled comfortably.

In compute-heavy hybrid workloads — the GPU's compute score of 14720 and the CPU's PassMark integer math of 112736 show different strengths — the system is well balanced: the CPU handles the serial and multi-threaded logic, while the GPU accelerates parallel floating-point work. The 12 GB of VRAM on the GPU (with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth) and the CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache complement each other well in rendering pipelines.

Who Should Build It

This is a desktop-class build, and the 84th combined percentile places it firmly in the upper tier of desktop systems. The audience splits into two broad groups.

Gamers are the first. The GPU's 81st percentile and the CPU's strong single-core performance (PassMark single 4354, Cinebench R23 single 3635) make this a system that can handle high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gameplay — though the lack of measured FPS data means those expectations are inferred from the benchmark scores, not confirmed. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU provides enough headroom for modern game textures, and the 46 RT cores plus 184 tensor cores give hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling.

Content creators and video editors benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and the GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle encoding and rendering; the GPU's compute (14720 in PassMark GPU compute, 154858 in Geekbench OpenCL) accelerates effects and render passes. The 184 tensor cores are useful for AI-accelerated editing tools.

Software developers get a CPU with strong single-thread performance (PassMark single 4354) and 16 threads for build parallelization. The ECC memory support makes it suitable for scientific or financial computing where data integrity matters. Students and small-business workstations benefit from the 65W CPU TDP — a modest power draw for a high-performance part — and the GPU's 200W TDP is manageable for a standard desktop power supply.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory (dual-channel, ECC capable). The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides fast connectivity for modern NVMe drives and GPUs, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — fully compatible with the Gen 5 slot, running at the lower 4.0 spec.

The GPU is end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series — that is the most natural next upgrade for this system. The CPU is not overclockable (locked multiplier), so squeezing more performance out of the processor is not possible through multiplier adjustments. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the GPU's 200 W TDP plus the CPU's 65 W TDP leaves headroom for a future GPU upgrade, though a more powerful card might require a higher PSU — the data only specifies 550 W for this GPU.

A sensible upgrade path would be: keep the CPU (already at 86th percentile) and swap the GPU for the GeForce 50-series successor when it becomes available. The CPU's 65 W TDP and Socket 1700 compatibility mean the motherboard and memory can be retained, making the GPU the primary upgrade target. The 550 W PSU suggestion is the only PSU guidance in the data, so any future card must be evaluated against that envelope.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no rows in the measured FPS table, so the following is estimated from the benchmark scores.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 and PassMark G3D of 26927 indicate a strong DX12 and DX11 performer. The PassMark DX9 score of 320, DX10 of 139, and DX11 of 244 show the GPU handles older APIs well, while the DX12 score of 103 is a separate metric that should not be read as a direct comparison to the DX11 number. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single 3635, PassMark single 4354) is high enough to feed the GPU in most games without creating a CPU bottleneck.

Based on the benchmark scores, this system should deliver smooth 1080p and 1440p gameplay at high settings. The 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for modern titles at those resolutions. 4K is possible in less demanding titles but will strain the GPU's 81st-percentile position. The RTX 4070's boost clock of 2475 MHz and base of 1920 MHz, combined with the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost, make this a fast pairing for high-refresh competitive gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The absence of measured FPS means the exact frame rates are unknown, but the benchmark scores position this system in the "high-refresh capable" range for these resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with an AD104 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 294 mm² and contains 35,800 million transistors. The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and tensor-based workloads.

The memory subsystem is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The GPU's base clock is 1920 MHz and boost is 2475 MHz. Its FP32 throughput is 29.15 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s.

The power envelope is a 200 W TDP with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The card is dual-slot, 240 mm long, 110 mm high, and 40 mm wide, with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The launch MSRP was 599 USD.

The benchmark results show a GPU that is strong but not elite. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 place it at the 81st percentile. It beats the Tesla P4 (37628, +0.1%) and RX Vega 56 (37507, +0.4%) by narrow margins, and trails the RTX 4080 Mobile by 1.3%. The 12 GB of VRAM is a practical amount for modern game textures and for rendering scenes that fit in the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The 184 tensor cores make this GPU a strong choice for DLSS and AI-accelerated rendering, while the 46 RT cores handle ray tracing with hardware support.

Build Overview

This is a desktop pairing of the Intel Core i9-14901E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, with a combined percentile of 84. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU at the 81st percentile of all GPUs — both in the upper quartile, with the CPU slightly ahead. The system's overall tier is "upper-tier desktop," suitable for gaming, content creation, and compute workloads.

The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with a 65 W TDP make it an efficient high-performance part, while the GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X and 200 W TDP give it a solid 1440p-class GPU. The combination is well matched: the CPU can drive the GPU without bottlenecking in most scenarios, and the GPU provides enough compute for modern games and rendering. The GPU is end-of-life, which means a successor (GeForce 50 series) is the likely next step for those who want more performance later.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-R). It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm².

The cache hierarchy is 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability. It has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and integrated UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not available. The TDP is 65 W. The release date is June 30, 2024.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 25753, R20 multi 10816, R15 multi 2595. Single-core scores are equally solid — R23 single 3635, R20 single 1526, R15 single 366. PassMark multithread is 30298 and single-thread 4354. The integer math score of 112736 and floating-point math of 81089 show a capable compute engine. The data compression score of 288777 and encryption score of 18571 indicate good performance for storage and security workloads. The extended instructions score of 17249 shows support for modern instruction sets.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its 37911 average — the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 (0.0%), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 (0.3% lower). In real-world terms, this CPU is interchangeable with the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 in benchmark performance, with all three within a fraction of a percent. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is the standout spec — it's a high frequency for a 65 W part, and it shows in the single-thread scores. The locked multiplier is the main limitation for enthusiasts, but the default boost is already near the top of the frequency range.