SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing of the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an unusual one, placing a high-end desktop CPU with a decidedly entry-level GPU. The benchmark data shows a significant performance disparity that defines the system's character: it is a processing powerhouse constrained by its graphics output. The CPU operates in the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 18th percentile, creating a combination that is exceptional for compute-heavy tasks and less suited for graphics-intensive gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using a 10 nm process from Intel. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that supports simultaneous multithreading for demanding workloads. The base clock is 2.80 GHz, which can scale up to a 5.60 GHz boost clock for single-threaded performance. This is a 65 W TDP part, indicating a focus on efficiency within its performance envelope, and it is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is not a supported path.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This large cache pool helps feed the cores with data, reducing latency in complex calculations. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, and ECC memory is supported, which is a feature relevant for workstation stability. The platform uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for modern storage and expansion. Integrated graphics are present in the form of UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output capability.

The CPU's benchmark scores reinforce its position as an upper-mid-range to high-end processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 25753 points in multi-core and 3635 points in single-core. The multi-core score reflects its ability to handle heavily threaded tasks, while the single-core score is strong for everyday responsiveness. PassMark results show a multithread score of 30298 and a single-thread score of 4354. Data compression performance is particularly high at 288777, suggesting excellent archival and file management capabilities. Floating-point math scores 81089, and integer math scores 112736, both indicating robust number-crunching power for scientific and financial applications.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database show how competitive this CPU is. It is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which has an average score of 37904, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, which scores 37943, with the Core i9-14901E trailing by a negligible 0.1%. It also edges out the Intel Core 5 211E by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 by 0.3%. This places the processor in a performance tier where it can go toe-to-toe with modern mid-range and high-end alternatives, making it a versatile choice for a variety of professional tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of asymmetric performance. The Intel Core i9-14901E achieves an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, indicating the processor outperforms the vast majority of its peers in the database. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% performance delta, confirming that the i9-14901E is at the top of its class, trading blows with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 presents a much weaker showing. Its average benchmark score is 2893, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a low position, indicating that the graphics card is outperformed by over 80% of its competitors. The single benchmark result available, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, shows a score of 2893. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, which scores 2907 (a 0.5% difference), and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, which scores 2910. Interestingly, it is also close to the NVIDIA Quadro P600, a much older card, scoring 2923. This proximity to a legacy product underscores the RTX 4010's entry-level positioning.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The system's overall percentile is 52, which is the midpoint of the database, but this is an average of two very different components. The CPU is pulling the system's potential upward, while the GPU anchors it down. For applications that are CPU-bound, such as compilation or database processing, the system will feel very fast. For tasks that are GPU-bound, such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the system will perform at a level consistent with its low GPU percentile, meaning it will be a limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear and significant bottleneck: the GPU is the limiting component in graphics-intensive scenarios. The CPU's 86th percentile rank and high compute scores suggest it has ample headroom to feed a much more powerful graphics card. The GPU's 18th percentile rank means it cannot keep up with the CPU's processing pace in tasks that rely heavily on rasterization or ray tracing.

This imbalance is quantifiable through the benchmark scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 demonstrates it can handle complex physics, AI calculations, and game logic with ease. However, the GPU's 3DMark score of 2893 is the sole metric for graphics performance, and it is a low one. Consequently, in games at high settings, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU's capabilities, not the CPU's. The CPU will likely sit idle waiting for the GPU to render frames, resulting in performance that is typical of a low-end graphics card.

For non-graphics workloads, the bottleneck reverses. In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression, with a PassMark score of 288777, or multi-threaded rendering in software that uses the CPU, the GPU becomes an irrelevant bystander. The system will excel in these scenarios. The practical takeaway is that this is not a balanced gaming machine. Instead, it is a powerful workstation CPU paired with a basic display adapter. The user is paying for the CPU's 86th percentile performance, while the GPU's 18th percentile performance is a significant compromise for any visual task.

Who Should Build It

This combination is not for gamers. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking is too low for modern gaming at high settings. However, the CPU's 86th percentile ranking makes this an excellent choice for specific professional and productivity-focused users.

Software Developers: The CPU's high multi-core scores (25753 in Cinebench R23) are ideal for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and managing containers. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and 2D desktop acceleration.
Data Analysts and Financial Professionals: The PassMark data encryption score of 18571 and floating-point math score of 81089 show strength in heavy calculation tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running data processing jobs.
Students in STEM Fields: For coursework involving simulation, statistical analysis, or programming, this system provides the necessary CPU horsepower. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle desktop workloads, and the RTX 4010 offers a step up for basic visualization tasks.
Small Business Workstations: The CPU's robust performance for office applications, database management, and financial modeling makes it a solid foundation. The low-power GPU (50 W TDP) keeps the system cool and quiet, ideal for an office environment.
Content Creators (Light): For photo editing and light video editing, the CPU's performance is excellent. However, the GPU will be a bottleneck for heavy effects or 4K video encoding, making this a less suitable choice for full-time creators.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The RTX 4010's low benchmark scores would struggle to achieve high frame rates at any resolution above 1080p with modern titles. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will severely limit performance.
Streaming: This is a mixed bag. The CPU has enough power to handle encoding, but the GPU's weak performance will make gaming and streaming simultaneously difficult. The system would likely fail to maintain a smooth stream while gaming.
Video Editing: The CPU excels in this task. The multi-core performance will handle timeline editing and rendering in software like Premiere Pro, but the GPU's low scores will slow down effects rendering and export times that rely on hardware acceleration. It is workable but not optimal.
3D Rendering: For CPU-based renderers, this system is a powerhouse. The 25753 score in Cinebench R23 is directly relevant to rendering performance. However, for GPU-accelerated renderers like Octane or V-Ray, the RTX 4010 will be a severe bottleneck, leading to long render times.
Software Development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's high multi-threaded performance (30298 in PassMark multithread) will speed up builds significantly. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a practical and efficient choice for a developer workstation.
Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks like word processing and spreadsheets. However, the CPU's efficiency and the low power draw of the GPU make it a quiet and responsive machine for heavy multitasking, research, and running statistical software.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14901E a good CPU for productivity?

A: Yes. The processor scores in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with a strong multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 25753, making it excellent for demanding multi-threaded workloads like video editing and software compilation.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The two are statistically tied. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943, which is only 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-14901E's score of 37911.

Q: Can this system play modern video games?

A: It can run games, but at low performance levels. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, so frame rates in modern titles will be low, particularly at higher settings and resolutions.

Q: What kind of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory for enhanced data integrity.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This can be used for basic display tasks, but the dedicated RTX 4010 GPU is still the primary graphics processor.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is in the 86th percentile, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile. This is a massive gap, indicating the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive application.

Q: Is this a desktop or a laptop build?

A: This is a desktop build. The build class is "desktop," and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the fact pack. The data is not based on direct testing. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and the GPU's performance percentile.

Given the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010's low 18th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893, gaming performance is expected to be poor. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is below the requirements of many modern titles at high settings. At 1080p with low to medium settings, older or less demanding games may be playable, but frame rates will not be high. For modern AAA titles, the system will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS, even at 1080p with low settings. At 1440p or 4K, the performance would be insufficient for a smooth experience. The CPU's high performance means it will not be the limiting factor; the GPU will cap the frame rate. The data suggests this is not a gaming-oriented system. The system's overall percentile is 52, which is dragged down by the GPU, and its pair rank by FPS is null, confirming the lack of measured gaming data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700. This socket supports the Core 14th Gen series, to which this CPU belongs. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, so the motherboard choice will determine which type is used. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is ideal for a high-bandwidth graphics card or NVMe SSD.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a 50 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This means the system has a very low power draw. The most sensible upgrade path is to replace the GPU. The CPU has enough performance headroom to support a significantly more powerful graphics card. The low PSU requirement of the current GPU means there is ample headroom in most power supplies to accommodate a more power-hungry card. For example, a user could upgrade to a card in the RTX 4060 Ti class, which scores near the RTX 4010 in benchmarks but is actually a more capable card for gaming, though the data shows they are within 1% of each other in this specific benchmark. The CPU's 86th percentile performance ensures it will not bottleneck a more powerful GPU for the foreseeable future. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a feature not commonly found on consumer platforms, making it a stable base for a workstation build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a high-end Intel Core i9-14901E processor with a low-end NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 graphics card. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-R architecture part with 8 cores and 16 threads, achieving an 86th percentile performance rank. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 4 GB of memory, achieving only an 18th percentile rank. The combined percentile for the system is 52, which reflects the significant disparity between the two components. This is a workstation-oriented configuration where the CPU is the primary driver of performance. It is an unbalanced pairing for gaming, but a highly capable one for single-threaded and multi-threaded productivity tasks, software development, and data processing. The system's overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU, but its CPU performance is decidedly high-end.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds