SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i9-14901E

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It presents an interesting configuration: 8 cores and 16 threads, which is a departure from the higher-core-count parts typically associated with the Core i9 badge. The base clock sits at 2.80 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, indicating that this chip prioritizes single-thread responsiveness and lightly-threaded workloads over raw multi-core throughput. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which should help with latency-sensitive applications.

The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support — a feature that leans toward workstation and small-server usage rather than pure gaming. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though any discrete GPU will vastly outperform it. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) means the platform is current for high-bandwidth storage and graphics, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 25753 and single-core score of 3635 show a processor that can handle heavy rendering tasks while still delivering excellent single-thread performance. The R20 scores — 10816 multi-core and 1526 single-core — reinforce this pattern. Passmark results are equally informative: multi-thread score of 30298, single-thread of 4354, and floating-point math at 81089. The data compression score of 288777 and encryption score of 18571 suggest strong throughput for archival and security workloads. The integer math score of 112736 and extended instructions score of 17249 indicate solid number-crunching capability for scientific or financial computations.

The percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 86, which places this chip comfortably in the upper tier of desktop processors. Its average benchmark score of 37911 puts it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (avgScore 37904, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (avgScore 37943, deltaPct -0.1), the Intel Core 5 211E (avgScore 37829, deltaPct 0.2), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (avgScore 37804, deltaPct 0.3). The deltas are razor-thin — within 0.3% — meaning these chips are effectively tied in aggregate performance. The i9-14901E sits at 0% delta versus the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, so the data shows no meaningful edge either way. This near-parity suggests that real-world differences will come down to workload-specific behavior rather than overall capability.

The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a Core i9 part, especially given the 5.60 GHz boost clock. This implies efficient power management, though the data does not include wattage figures beyond the TDP specification. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking headroom is limited, but the high stock boost clock already delivers strong single-core performance.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores, as detailed above, position it at the 86th percentile against all CPUs. The GPU, a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, achieves a 95th percentile ranking against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 131938. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 91, placing it in the upper echelon of desktop builds. The data shows a system that excels in both processor-centric and graphics-centric workloads, though the exact balance requires careful interpretation.

Looking at the GPU benchmarks specifically: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5741, which is a strong result for a high-end card from the Ampere generation. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 174441 and Vulkan score of 215633 indicate robust compute performance across different APIs. These numbers, combined with the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753, suggest a machine capable of handling demanding 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing tasks without obvious bottlenecks.

The GPU’s nearest rivals provide context. The NVIDIA L4 scores 131072 (deltaPct 0.7), meaning the RTX 3090 Ti is 0.7% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135218 (deltaPct -2.4), placing the 3090 Ti 2.4% behind. The NVIDIA A10M also scores 135230 (deltaPct -2.4), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396 (deltaPct -2.6). These are all professional or workstation-class GPUs, and the deltas are small — within 2.6% — so the RTX 3090 Ti is competitive with these cards in aggregate benchmark performance. However, the 3090 Ti’s 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth give it capabilities that some of these rivals may not match in memory-intensive tasks.

The combined picture is one of high-end performance. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 95th percentile, with a combined 91st percentile, indicate that neither component is dramatically holding back the other. The data shows a system where the GPU is slightly more dominant relative to its competition, but the CPU is not a weak link. For workloads that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the i9-14901E’s 5.60 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 will serve well. For multi-threaded tasks, the 25753 multi-core score is respectable, though not class-leading given the 8-core/16-thread configuration.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors and a die size of 628 mm². The transistor density of 45.1M / mm² is notable for a chip of this generation. The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. It features 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Memory configuration is a key strength: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. This large VRAM pool and high bandwidth make the card suitable for 4K texture-heavy workloads, large dataset processing, and AI model training — tasks that often exceed the memory capacity of smaller cards.

The base clock is 1560 MHz with a boost clock of 1860 MHz. Pixel rate is 208.3 GPixel/s and texture rate is 625.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 40.00 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These figures indicate strong raw compute capability for both gaming and professional rendering.

Benchmark scores reinforce this. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5741 is a direct measure of DX12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 174441 and Vulkan score of 215633 show excellent compute throughput across different programming models. The 95th percentile ranking against all GPUs confirms that this is a top-tier card, even though it is now end-of-life (released 2022-01-26, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor).

The RTX 3090 Ti draws a TDP of 450 W and requires a suggested PSU of 850 W. It uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a triple-slot card, measuring 336 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. This is a physically large card that demands ample case space and cooling. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors and multi-display setups.

For rendering workloads, the 24 GB VRAM is the standout feature. It allows for large scenes and high-resolution textures without swapping to system memory. The RT cores (84) and tensor cores (336) accelerate ray tracing and denoising tasks in supported applications. The benchmark scores indicate that this GPU can handle heavy 3D rendering, video editing with GPU acceleration, and machine learning inference tasks effectively. The 0.7% lead over the NVIDIA L4 in average benchmark score shows parity with a professional-grade card, while the 2.4% deficit versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is minor in real-world terms.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 91 suggests good overall balance, but examining the component percentiles reveals nuance. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 95th. This 9-point gap implies that the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU when compared to their respective markets. In practice, this means the RTX 3090 Ti may outpace the i9-14901E in some GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU must feed frames quickly.

However, the CPU’s high boost clock of 5.60 GHz and strong single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3635 mitigate this concern for gaming. The data shows that the CPU can deliver high single-thread performance, which is critical for frame pacing in games. The Passmark single-thread score of 4354 further confirms this strength. For multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads with a 25753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will handle most tasks, but it may lag behind higher-core-count CPUs in heavily threaded rendering or encoding scenarios.

The GPU’s 95th percentile and its 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance mean it will be the limiting factor only in GPU-intensive tasks like 4K gaming with ray tracing or large-scale neural network training. Conversely, the CPU could become the bottleneck in CPU-intensive simulations or when running many background tasks alongside gaming. The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 450 W TDP of the GPU highlights the power imbalance — the GPU dominates power consumption, but the CPU’s efficiency is notable.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means the bottleneck analysis relies on benchmark scores. The data indicates that for most workloads, the GPU will be the primary performance driver, but the CPU’s strong single-core scores will prevent it from being a significant bottleneck in gaming. For productivity tasks like video editing, both components contribute — the CPU for timeline processing and the GPU for effects and rendering.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 5.60 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635, combined with the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5741, indicate strong performance for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p or 1440p. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM ensures textures load fully, though the data does not provide specific FPS figures.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and Passmark multi-thread score of 30298 support concurrent encoding and gaming workloads. The GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate encoding tasks in supported software. The 65 W TDP of the CPU leaves thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU’s 25753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline operations and codec-heavy tasks, while the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and export rendering. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 174441 shows strong compute for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 8 cores provide adequate multi-threaded performance for scene preparation, while the GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 84 RT cores deliver fast ray-traced renders. The 24 GB VRAM allows large scenes to fit entirely in GPU memory.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4354 (Passmark) ensures fast compilation of single-threaded code, while the 16 threads handle parallel build processes. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide an energy-efficient baseline for document processing and web browsing. The GPU is overkill for such tasks but ensures future-proofing for any graphics-intensive coursework.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5741, this system is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles. The CPU’s 5.60 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 suggest it can keep up with the GPU’s output in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensure that high-resolution textures and large game worlds do not cause memory-related stuttering.

For e-sports titles that rely on single-thread performance, the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4354 should allow very high frame rates at 1080p. For AAA games with ray tracing, the 84 RT cores will handle the workload, though the data does not specify exact performance levels. The 450 W TDP of the GPU means adequate power delivery is essential for sustained gaming performance. Overall, the benchmark scores indicate a system capable of high-refresh gaming at 1440p and smooth 4K gaming, but these are estimates — not measured FPS.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets enthusiasts and professionals who need both high-end CPU and GPU performance. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and 24 GB VRAM, which supports ultra-quality textures. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will appreciate the GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, alongside the CPU’s 16 threads for multitasking.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU’s single-thread performance useful, while the ECC memory support adds stability. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the GPU’s compute power for simulations and machine learning projects. Small business workstations performing CAD, financial modeling, or database operations will benefit from the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and the GPU’s compute capabilities.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU makes it energy-efficient for office environments, while the 450 W GPU requires robust power delivery — meaning this build is best suited for those with a suitable PSU and case. The end-of-life status of the GPU (released 2022-01-26) suggests that buyers should consider future upgrade paths, but the current performance remains high.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides bandwidth for future storage devices, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, leaving headroom in most power supplies. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 450 W and a suggested PSU of 850 W, which will be the primary constraint on system upgrades.

The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not a viable upgrade path. However, the high boost clock of 5.60 GHz already delivers strong performance. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation GPU, as the RTX 3090 Ti is end-of-life with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward-compatible with PCIe 5.0 slots, so a newer GPU would work in the same motherboard.

Memory upgrades are possible, as the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Users on DDR4 could upgrade to DDR5 for additional bandwidth, though the data does not specify performance deltas. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core mean the CPU is well-equipped for memory-sensitive workloads. The ECC memory support is a unique feature that may appeal to workstation users, but it requires compatible memory modules.

The 850 W suggested PSU for the GPU provides headroom for a future GPU upgrade, though a higher-wattage unit may be needed for top-tier next-generation cards. The triple-slot GPU footprint means case compatibility is a consideration for any upgrade. The platform’s Intel Socket 1700 is mature, so users should verify motherboard BIOS compatibility for any future CPU upgrades within the same socket.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 Ti have?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 91, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti has a TDP of 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS discussions are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti has 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. The CPU, part of the Core 14th Gen series on the Raptor Lake architecture, delivers 8 cores and 16 threads with a 5.60 GHz boost clock. The GPU, from the GeForce 30-series based on Ampere, offers 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The combined percentile of 91 places this system in the upper tier of desktop builds, with the GPU slightly stronger relative to its market than the CPU. The build targets high-end gaming, content creation, and professional workloads, with the CPU’s 65 W TDP contrasting sharply with the GPU’s 450 W TDP. The data shows a well-matched pairing for most tasks, with the GPU leading in graphics-intensive workloads and the CPU holding its own in single-threaded applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds