SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: A Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's Core 14th Gen Raptor Lake architecture with NVIDIA's Ampere-based GeForce 30-series GPU in a desktop configuration. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards, producing a combined percentile of 74. The Intel Core i9-14901E delivers 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 features the GA104 chip on Samsung's 8 nm node with 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² die. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination; all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture (specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh). This is not a high-core-count workstation part; instead, it pairs a moderate core count with very high clock speeds. The base clock of 2.80 GHz is conservative, but the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, which drives exceptional single-threaded performance. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support included.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large shared L3 cache benefits workloads with shared data sets, such as databases or certain scientific computing tasks, by reducing memory latency. The CPU integrates UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output capability without a discrete GPU, though this build includes the RTX 3070.

Benchmark data shows the i9-14901E scoring 2,595 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 366 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 10,816 multi-core and 1,526 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results are 25,753 multi-core and 3,635 single-core. These Cinebench scores indicate strong rendering performance in both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The single-core scores are particularly notable—the R23 single-core score of 3,635 reflects the 5.60 GHz boost clock and Raptor Lake's efficient architecture, making this CPU highly responsive for lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software.

In PassMark tests, the CPU demonstrates strengths in specific areas. Integer math scores 112,736, while floating-point math scores 81,089. Data compression scores 288,777, which is exceptionally high and suggests strong performance in file archiving, compression tools, and database operations. Data encryption scores 18,571, and extended instructions score 17,249. The multithread score is 30,298, and the single-thread score is 4,354. Physics simulation scores 3,041, and random string sorting scores 39,138. The prime number finding score of 189 is comparatively modest, indicating that this workload—which often benefits from specific instruction optimizations—is not a standout area for this chip.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,911, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (0.3% delta). This places the i9-14901E within a hair's breadth of several modern competitors, meaning real-world performance differences across these CPUs would be negligible in most applications. The 86th percentile overall rank indicates this is a high-end part, but not a flagship—there is a meaningful gap between this CPU and the top-tier parts in the benchmark database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the socket associated with Alder Lake and Raptor Lake desktop processors. This socket supports a wide range of CPUs from the 12th, 13th, and 14th generations, offering a flexible upgrade path. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, which provides ample bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage devices. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, meaning builders can choose to reuse older DDR4 memory or invest in newer DDR5 modules, depending on their motherboard selection and budget.

The CPU's TDP is rated at 65 watts, which is notably modest for a Core i9-class part. This low TDP means that a standard air cooler is sufficient for this processor, and it also reduces the power delivery requirements on the motherboard. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 220 watts, and the suggested PSU for the system is 550 watts. This suggests a system with reasonable power headroom—the combination of a 65W CPU and 220W GPU leaves room for other components like drives, fans, and RGB lighting within the 550W suggested PSU envelope.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests several paths. On the CPU side, staying on Socket 1700 allows swapping to a higher-core-count 14th Gen part (though none are specified in the fact pack, the socket supports the full range). On the GPU side, the RTX 3070's successor, the GeForce 40 series, is listed as its successor, indicating a direct upgrade path within the NVIDIA lineup. However, the 550W suggested PSU may need revisiting for a more powerful GPU, as higher-end cards typically demand more power. The platform's DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 support mean that memory and storage upgrades are also viable without changing the motherboard.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 places it in a strong position for multi-threaded productivity tasks. This score, combined with the single-core score of 3,635, shows a balanced processor that handles both highly parallel and latency-sensitive workloads effectively. The PassMark multithread score of 30,298 and single-thread score of 4,354 reinforce this picture. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37,911 sits at the 86th percentile, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, trails by only 0.1%, meaning the two are effectively tied in overall performance.

The GPU's benchmark results tell a different story. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 3070 scores 3,162. Geekbench OpenCL scores 112,821, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 21,022. PassMark G3D scores 22,214, while PassMark GPU Compute scores 11,195. The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,208, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT at 17,083 (0.7% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 at 17,037 (1% delta), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17,019 (1.1% delta), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c at 17,468 (-1.5% delta). The RTX 3070 is essentially tied with these competitors, though some of them (GTX 690, HD 7970M) are much older parts, which speaks to the RTX 3070's aging but still relevant performance.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile. This imbalance is central to understanding the system's behavior in different workloads, as discussed in later sections. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this gap, indicating a system that is more capable in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound ones.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and does it support DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37,911, while the Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943, a delta of -0.1%. This places the two CPUs within 0.1% of each other, indicating effectively identical overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3070 includes 46 RT cores. It also features 184 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads such as DLSS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the system's combined performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 74. The CPU alone is at the 86th percentile, and the GPU is at the 61st percentile.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked. The CPU is not designed for overclocking in the traditional sense, though it does feature a 5.60 GHz boost clock out of the box.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 watts. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 220 watts, leaving headroom for other components.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance but only moderate GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find the RTX 3070 adequate, but the CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it will not be the limiting factor in most games. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores—Cinebench R23 multi-core of 25,753 and PassMark multithread of 30,298—while the GPU's 61st percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated rendering will be adequate but not exceptional.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread of 4,354) for compilation tasks that are often single-threaded, as well as the data compression score of 288,777 for handling large codebases and build artifacts. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet workloads will find the system more than capable, though the discrete GPU is overkill for such tasks. The CPU's 65-watt TDP also makes it suitable for builds where power efficiency is a consideration, such as small form factor systems or always-on workstations.

The 86th percentile CPU ranking and 61st percentile GPU ranking suggest this is a system for users who prioritize CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data analysis, and content creation over GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or machine learning training. For those users, the RTX 3070 provides a solid baseline for display output and GPU acceleration, while the i9-14901E handles the heavy computational lifting.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 3070's PassMark G3D score of 22,214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 indicate a GPU that is roughly average among its peers, sitting at the 61st percentile. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong, which is critical for gaming, but the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates in most modern titles.

At 1080p, the RTX 3070 with 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth should handle most games at high or ultra settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation in the most demanding titles with high-resolution textures. At 1440p, the GPU's 61st percentile ranking suggests frame rates will be playable but not consistently high in demanding games, especially with ray tracing enabled. The 46 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the GPU's overall compute performance (20.31 TFLOPS FP32) is modest by current standards, so heavy ray tracing workloads will significantly impact frame rates.

At 4K, the RTX 3070 is likely to struggle in most games, with the 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus proving insufficient for high-detail 4K gaming. The CPU's high clock speeds will not compensate for the GPU's limitations at this resolution. The 220-watt TDP of the GPU and the 550-watt suggested PSU indicate a system that is not designed for extreme gaming loads. Estimated frame rates should be considered rough approximations; actual performance will vary by game, settings, and driver optimization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this system. The CPU is at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile. This 25-percentile-point gap means that in most workloads, the GPU will reach its maximum capacity before the CPU does. In gaming, this manifests as the GPU being the bottleneck: frame rates will be constrained by the RTX 3070's capabilities, not the i9-14901E's processing power.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and PassMark multithread score of 30,298 are strong enough to feed even a more powerful GPU than the RTX 3070 in most scenarios. Conversely, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 and PassMark G3D score of 22,214 are modest, indicating that the GPU is the first component to saturate in graphically intensive tasks. The FPS scaling from the GPU's benchmark scores suggests that increasing resolution or graphical settings will result in frame rate drops, as the GPU's compute and memory resources are exhausted.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (288,777), integer math (112,736), and floating-point math (81,089), the CPU is the star performer, and the GPU's role is minimal. In these tasks, the system's performance is determined almost entirely by the i9-14901E. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or gaming, the RTX 3070's 61st percentile ranking means the system will perform at a mid-range level, regardless of the CPU's high-end status. This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw—it depends on the user's workload priorities—but it is a defining characteristic of this build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The build class is desktop, confirming it is a fixed, non-portable system. The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of all builds in the benchmark database. The CPU is a high-end part (86th percentile) with 8 cores, 16 threads, and a 5.60 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a mid-range part (61st percentile) with 8 GB of VRAM and 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

The system's overall tier is defined more by the CPU than the GPU. The i9-14901E's performance in Cinebench R23 (25,753 multi-core, 3,635 single-core) and PassMark (30,298 multithread, 4,354 single-thread) makes it a top-tier processor for productivity tasks. The RTX 3070's performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad (3,162) and PassMark G3D (22,214) makes it a competent but not exceptional GPU. The combination produces a system that excels in CPU-intensive workloads and handles GPU-intensive workloads adequately. The 65W CPU TDP and 220W GPU TDP, with a 550W suggested PSU, indicate a system with moderate power requirements and thermal output, suitable for a standard desktop tower with a capable air cooler.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. The die contains 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² area, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It features 46 RT cores for ray tracing and 184 tensor cores for AI acceleration, making it a fully featured DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) part with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support.

Clock speeds are a base of 1500 MHz and a boost of 1725 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU's compute capabilities are rated at 20.31 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 165.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 317.4 GTexel/s. The card has a TDP of 220 watts, is dual-slot width, and uses a single 12-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 550 watts. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a ports. The card is 242 mm (9.5 inches) long and 112 mm (4.4 inches) high. It is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor.

Benchmark performance shows a GPU at the 61st percentile with an average score of 17,208. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3,162. Geekbench OpenCL scores 112,821, and Vulkan scores 21,022. PassMark G3D scores 22,214, while GPU Compute scores 11,195. For rendering workloads, the 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 184 tensor cores provide solid performance for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. The 46 RT cores enable ray-traced rendering, but the GPU's mid-range standing means ray tracing performance will be moderate, especially at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 3070's 61st percentile ranking suggests it can drive high frame rates in competitive titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may cap texture settings in newer games. At 1440p, frame rates will be lower, and ray tracing will significantly impact performance. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,354 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the tensor cores and GeForce 30-series architecture) can handle video encoding, while the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 30,298 suggests the CPU can handle streaming software alongside games without significant frame rate drops.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and PassMark data compression score of 288,777 indicate strong performance in video editing workflows, particularly for timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and CUDA support (implied by the architecture) accelerate effects and rendering, but the 61st percentile GPU ranking means 4K editing may require proxies or reduced effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R20 multi-core at 10,816 and R23 multi-core at 25,753. The GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 46 RT cores provide acceleration in GPU-based renderers, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene sizes. For production-scale rendering, this system is more suited to CPU rendering with GPU assistance.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,354 and integer math score of 112,736 are strong indicators of fast compilation times. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the data compression score of 288,777 speeds up build artifact handling. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development tasks, meaning the CPU's 86th percentile ranking is the primary asset.

Student and office work: For document editing, web browsing, spreadsheet analysis, and presentation creation, this system is overkill. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled. The 65W CPU TDP means low power draw during light workloads, and the system's overall performance will be more than sufficient for any office or academic task.