SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-14901E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti presents a clear asymmetry in processing capability. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 59th percentile among all graphics cards. This 27-percentage-point gap indicates that the processor is substantially more powerful relative to its peer group than the graphics card is relative to its own peer group. In practical terms, the RTX 3060 Ti will be the limiting component in most gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads, while the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck except in highly threaded, compute-heavy tasks that leverage all 16 threads.

The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30,298, combined with a single-thread score of 4,354, shows a processor that excels in both parallel and serial workloads. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20,349, however, places it in a lower tier relative to its competition. When the two are combined, the system's overall percentile drops to 73, reflecting that the GPU holds the pairing back from reaching the CPU's ceiling. For workloads like 3D rendering where both components are exercised, the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB GDDR6 memory will cap performance well before the CPU's 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score becomes a constraint.

FPS scaling data is not available for this exact combination, as no measured frame rate rows exist in the database. However, benchmark scores indicate that at lower resolutions where CPU-bound scenarios dominate, the i9-14901E's 5.60 GHz boost clock and strong single-core performance (3,635 in Cinebench R23 single-core) will keep frame times consistent. At higher resolutions, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4864 shading units become the determining factor, and the pairing will show GPU-bound behavior earlier than a more balanced GPU would.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 37,911 across all tested workloads. This places it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing that puts it just ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37,904, 0% delta) and marginally behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37,943, -0.1% delta). The Intel Core 5 211E trails by 0.2% with a score of 37,829, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 lags 0.3% behind at 37,804. The near-identical scores among these four rivals indicate that the i9-14901E sits in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences produce negligible overall deltas.

In Cinebench testing, the CPU scores 25,753 in R23 multi-core, 10,816 in R20 multi-core, and 2,595 in R15 multi-core. Single-core results are equally consistent: 3,635 in R23, 1,526 in R20, and 366 in R15. These numbers suggest a processor that maintains its performance scaling across different benchmark generations, with the multi-core scores showing roughly 7.1 times the single-core throughput in R23, indicating efficient thread utilization across all 8 cores and 16 threads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,129, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060, scores 16,014 (0.7% ahead of the RTX 3060 Ti), while the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT both score 16,351 (1.4% behind the RTX 3060 Ti). The AMD Radeon R9 370X trails at 15,862, which is 1.7% behind. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,626, and in Geekbench OpenCL it reaches 78,927, while Vulkan performance comes in at 47,784.

The combined picture shows a system where CPU performance is near the top of its class, but GPU performance is merely mid-range. The 73rd overall percentile reflects this imbalance. In tasks that are purely CPU-bound, like data compression (288,777 in PassMark) or integer math (112,736), the system will perform at a high level. In graphics-bound tasks, the GPU's scores will anchor overall results to a lower tier.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.80 GHz, which boosts up to 5.60 GHz under load. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides a total of 16 MB L2 across all cores, which is substantial for feeding the high boost clocks.

The PassMark single-thread score of 4,354 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,635 indicate excellent per-core performance, which is critical for lightly threaded applications like legacy games, spreadsheet calculations, and script execution. The multi-thread score of 30,298 in PassMark and 25,753 in Cinebench R23 demonstrate strong parallel throughput. The floating-point math score of 81,089 and integer math score of 112,736 in PassMark show balanced compute capabilities across different instruction types.

Data encryption performance is notable at 18,571 in PassMark, and extended instruction handling scores 17,249. The physics score of 3,041 and prime number finding score of 189 are less impressive but still within expected ranges for this architecture. The random string sorting score of 39,138 indicates solid memory access patterns and cache efficiency. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, though this will be secondary to the discrete GPU in most builds.

The 65 W TDP is low for a Core i9-class processor, suggesting efficient power delivery despite the high boost clock. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It was released on June 30, 2024, and remains in active production. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported through standard multiplier adjustment.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14901E compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with the i9-14901E at 37,911 and the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37,904, a 0% delta. This means performance parity in aggregate benchmarks, though individual workload characteristics may differ.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti sits at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 59% of graphics cards in the database. This places it in the mid-range tier, well below the top-tier cards but above entry-level options.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E has ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation builds where error correction is important for data integrity.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, which reflects the aggregate performance of both components relative to all other pairings. The CPU's high percentile (86) is dragged down by the GPU's lower percentile (59).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores of each component.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i9-14901E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives builders flexibility in choosing between older, more affordable memory or newer, faster modules.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 399 USD, stated here as the initial retail price at release.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and compute tasks but are satisfied with mid-range graphics capability. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find the RTX 3060 Ti adequate for most titles at high settings, though the CPU's 86th percentile performance means the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in frame delivery. At 4K resolution, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will become the constraint, and the CPU's extra headroom will go unused.

Content creators working with CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D scene preparation, or software compilation will benefit from the i9-14901E's 16 threads and 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The 288,777 data compression score and 112,736 integer math score indicate strong performance for file archiving, data manipulation, and build automation. However, GPU-accelerated rendering tasks will be limited by the RTX 3060 Ti's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB memory capacity.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the high single-thread score of 4,354, while the 18,571 data encryption score supports secure communication workloads. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the system capable for coursework, though GPU compute projects requiring more than 8 GB of VRAM will hit memory limits. Small business workstations running office productivity, database management, and light CAD work will perform admirably, with the ECC memory support adding reliability for long-running processes.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. Base clock is 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz.

The GPU contains 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It includes 38 ray tracing cores and 152 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 16.20 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio between the two.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,626. Geekbench OpenCL shows 78,927, and Vulkan scores 47,784. PassMark G3D results show 20,349, with GPU compute at 10,006. DirectX 12 performance in PassMark is 78, DirectX 11 is 163, DirectX 10 is 132, and DirectX 9 is 234. The G2D score of 989 reflects 2D graphics performance.

The 59th percentile ranking puts the RTX 3060 Ti slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% delta) and behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and RX 5700 XT (both 1.4% delta). The nearest rival below is the AMD Radeon R9 370X, which trails by 1.7%. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU's strong single-core performance (4,354 PassMark, 3,635 Cinebench R23) suggests it can feed frames quickly in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU's 20,349 PassMark G3D score indicates mid-range rasterization capability.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the RTX 3060 Ti should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may cause texture streaming issues in newer games with high-resolution assets. At 1440p, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will become a limiting factor, and users should expect to adjust settings from ultra to high or medium for consistent performance. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, and the CPU's performance advantage will be largely irrelevant.

For esports titles and older games, the i9-14901E's 5.60 GHz boost clock will enable very high frame rates, potentially exceeding the refresh rate of most monitors. For AAA releases with ray tracing enabled, the 38 RT cores will provide some acceleration, but the 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit ray-traced performance to lower resolutions or reduced ray counts. DLSS support through the 152 tensor cores can help recover performance, but this depends on game implementation.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-14901E, a Raptor Lake Refresh processor on Socket 1700, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, an Ampere-architecture GPU based on the GA104 chip. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking combine to place the overall system at the 73rd percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings. This means the system outperforms 73% of combinations in the database, but it is not a top-tier configuration.

The CPU is a high-performance desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, boosting to 5.60 GHz, while the GPU is a mid-range card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The CPU was released in June 2024 and remains active, while the GPU was released in November 2020 and is now end-of-life. This generation gap contributes to the performance imbalance, as the CPU is current-generation hardware while the GPU is two generations old.

The system's 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP make it power-efficient for its performance class. The GPU suggests a 550 W power supply, which is modest for a system with this level of processing capability. The pairing is suitable for a workstation that prioritizes CPU compute over graphics, or a gaming system where the user is willing to play at 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is shared across Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. This provides a mature platform with widespread motherboard availability. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the primary graphics slot, ensuring the RTX 3060 Ti's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully supported with bandwidth to spare.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 200 W TDP combine to require a 550 W power supply, as suggested for the GPU. This leaves headroom for additional components like storage drives, fans, and peripherals, but does not accommodate a significantly more powerful GPU without a PSU upgrade. The CPU's locked multiplier prevents overclocking, so performance gains must come from other components.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the RTX 3060 Ti with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom to support higher-tier graphics cards. The 86th percentile CPU could drive a GPU in the 80th percentile or above without becoming the bottleneck in most workloads. However, the 550 W PSU suggestion would need to be revisited for higher-power GPUs, and the 8 GB VRAM of the current GPU is likely the first limitation encountered in modern games at higher resolutions. Alternatively, adding more system memory or faster DDR5 modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads like data compression and random string sorting, given the CPU's strong scores in those areas.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds