SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

77%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

1,577 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It presents an interesting configuration: 8 cores and 16 threads, which is a departure from the higher-core-count i9 parts in the same generation, opting instead for a lower TDP of 65 W. The base clock sits at 2.80 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.60 GHz, indicating a design that prioritizes single-thread responsiveness and power efficiency over raw multi-thread throughput.

Benchmark results confirm this focus. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25,753 in multi-core and 3,635 in single-core. The single-core figure is particularly strong, placing it among the top performers for lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-core score, while respectable, is not class-leading given the 8-core limitation. Cinebench R20 shows a similar pattern: 10,816 multi-core and 1,526 single-core. Older Cinebench R15 results are 2,595 multi-core and 366 single-core, maintaining the same relative performance profile.

PassMark results add further nuance. The multi-thread score is 30,298, while single-thread is 4,354. Integer math performance is robust at 112,736, and floating-point math reaches 81,089. Data compression scores 288,777, which is a strong result for archiving and file-handling workloads. Data encryption is 18,571, extended instructions score 17,249, and random string sorting hits 39,138. The find prime numbers test is notably low at 189, suggesting the architecture is less optimized for certain integer-heavy algorithms. Physics simulation scores 3,041.

The average benchmark score is 37,911, placing the CPU in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943, which is 0.1% higher. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829, a 0.2% deficit, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804, a 0.3% deficit. This indicates that the i9-14901E performs essentially identically to several modern mid-range and high-end processors, despite its i9 branding. The differences are within measurement noise, so real-world performance will be indistinguishable for most users.

For real workloads, the high single-thread score translates to snappy application launches and responsive UI in everyday use. The multi-thread score, while not extreme, is more than adequate for compilation, rendering, and parallel processing tasks. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data, reducing memory latency. The 80 KB per-core L1 cache is typical for this architecture. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, making it viable for workstation and server-adjacent use cases where data integrity is paramount. It also includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, providing a fallback display output and hardware encoding capabilities without a discrete GPU.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB creates a system where the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor in most scenarios. The CPU's 86th percentile standing contrasts sharply with the GPU's 10th percentile, a massive imbalance. The combined percentile is 48, reflecting a system that is dragged down by the graphics card.

The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,354 and multi-thread score of 30,298 indicate a processor capable of feeding any modern GPU. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,577 is low, placing it in the bottom tier of graphics cards. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations or data compression, the CPU will not bottleneck. The PassMark physics score of 3,041 and data compression score of 288,777 show strong performance. However, in GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the RTX 3060 8 GB will saturate well before the CPU reaches its limits.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. However, the percentile gap suggests that the GPU will be the primary constraint in frame rate generation. The CPU's high boost clock of 5.60 GHz ensures that it can keep up with even the most demanding game logic, but the GPU's low throughput will cap the output. This is a classic case of a high-end CPU being paired with a low-end GPU, resulting in a system that is poorly balanced for gaming. For non-graphical workloads, the CPU will dominate, and the GPU will sit idle or underutilized. For graphical workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck, and the CPU will have significant headroom.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,577 is indicative of a very low-performing graphics card. In modern games, this translates to difficulty maintaining playable frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score will not compensate for the GPU's lack of rasterization power. At 1080p with ultra presets, most AAA titles will likely run at 30-45 FPS, with esports titles maybe reaching 60 FPS on lower settings. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle further, with many titles dropping below 30 FPS. At 4K, the system is not viable for gaming, as the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and low compute throughput will cause severe performance degradation.

The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 240.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures. Many modern games exceed 8 GB at high settings, causing texture pop-in and stuttering. The 3,584 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 48 ROPs provide low fill rates and texture throughput. The pixel rate of 85.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 199.0 GTexel/s are modest figures. The FP32 performance of 12.74 TFLOPS is low for contemporary gaming. The RT cores and tensor cores are present but underpowered, so ray tracing and DLSS will not provide meaningful performance boosts. The GPU's 10th percentile ranking confirms that this is a budget or entry-level part.

# Who Should Build It

This system is not for gamers seeking high-refresh or high-resolution experiences. The GPU's low percentile makes it unsuitable for modern gaming at anything beyond low-to-medium settings at 1080p, and even then, frame rates will be inconsistent. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles might find it acceptable, but AAA single-player games will be a struggle.

The target user is one who prioritizes CPU performance for productivity and light GPU acceleration. Content creators who work with video encoding or photo editing will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times and responsiveness. The CPU's ECC memory support makes it suitable for small business workstations where data integrity is critical. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for document creation, web browsing, and spreadsheets, with the integrated GPU providing a backup.

The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and hardware-accelerated video playback, but it is not a compute powerhouse. For users who occasionally play older or less demanding games, the system will suffice. The primary use case is a CPU-centric workstation where the GPU is an afterthought, handling light tasks like video decode or basic 2D acceleration. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 170 W TDP of the GPU mean the system is relatively power-efficient, suitable for environments where heat and noise are concerns.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, indicating the processor outperforms the vast majority of installed CPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (+0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (+0.3% delta). These deltas are negligible, meaning the i9-14901E performs on par with these alternatives.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 1,577, placing it in the 10th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low standing. The nearest rivals are equally low-performing: the Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,586 (-0.6% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 scores 1,588 (-0.7% delta), the AMD FirePro V3900 scores 1,565 (+0.8% delta), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650A scores 1,589 (-0.8% delta). The GPU is essentially on par with integrated graphics from several generations ago, which is a damning comparison.

The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a bottom-tier GPU. The combined percentile is 48, reflecting a mid-pack overall performance that is severely hindered by the graphics component. For CPU-intensive workloads, the system is excellent. For GPU-intensive workloads, it is inadequate. The data shows a stark contrast between the two components, with the CPU providing 86th percentile performance and the GPU providing 10th percentile performance.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is based on the Ampere architecture, using the GA106 chip manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process node. The die size is 276 mm² with 12,000 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1320 MHz and a boost clock of 1777 MHz. The memory clock is 1875 MHz, with 15 Gbps effective data rate.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 240.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant limitation for modern games and rendering workloads, as the narrow bus and moderate capacity will cause bottlenecks with large textures and datasets. The GPU has 3,584 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The pixel rate is 85.30 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 199.0 GTexel/s.

The FP32 performance is 12.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1). This is a low compute throughput for a discrete GPU. The GPU includes 28 RT cores and 112 tensor cores, but these are underpowered for meaningful ray tracing or AI acceleration. The APIs supported include DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,577 confirms the GPU's low performance. The 10th percentile ranking indicates it is among the weakest GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals are integrated graphics and ancient discrete cards, which underscores its weakness. For rendering tasks, the GPU will struggle with complex scenes and high-resolution outputs. The low bandwidth and compute will cause long render times and potential memory swapping. The 170 W TDP and suggested 450 W PSU indicate modest power requirements, but the performance does not justify the power draw relative to newer parts.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory type and pricing. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, which is future-proof for high-bandwidth storage and expansion cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is low for a high-performance part. This means a modest air cooler is sufficient, and the system can be built in compact cases. The GPU's TDP is 170 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This is a low power requirement, allowing for a wide range of power supply options.

The most sensible upgrade path is to replace the GPU. The CPU is powerful enough to handle any modern GPU, so upgrading to a higher-end graphics card would dramatically improve gaming and rendering performance. The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 10th percentile create a massive imbalance that an upgrade would rectify. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a new GPU will not be bandwidth-limited. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so memory can be upgraded without changing the motherboard, though the maximum performance will depend on which memory type is chosen. The CPU's ECC support is a feature that remains relevant for workstation use. Overall, the platform is solid, with the GPU being the obvious weak point that an upgrade would address.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,911.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943, which is 0.1% higher than the i9-14901E. This is a negligible difference.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB scores 1,577 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 10th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 240.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the system?

A: The combined percentile is 48, reflecting a mid-pack overall performance.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the CPU includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which provides a display output and basic graphical capabilities.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not supported by the data. The GPU's 10th percentile ranking and low 3DMark score indicate it cannot sustain high frame rates at any resolution. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will bottleneck all gaming workloads.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-thread score of 30,298 in PassMark can handle encoding, but the GPU's low performance makes game capture and rendering impractical. The GPU's NVENC is not mentioned in the data, so its quality is unknown.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and a single-core score of 3,635, providing fast timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU will accelerate effects, but its low compute will slow down heavy processing.

3D rendering: The CPU's performance is adequate for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU's 12.74 TFLOPS FP32 is low for GPU-accelerated renders. This scenario will be slow, with the GPU limiting output quality and speed.

Software development: The CPU is ideal, with high single-thread performance for compilation and a multi-thread score of 30,298 for parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload, making it a sensible choice for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU provides fast, responsive performance for productivity tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle display output, and the discrete GPU is unnecessary for this use case, though it adds no harm.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the Intel Core i9-14901E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB. The CPU is a high-end desktop part with an 86th percentile ranking, indicating strong performance. The GPU is a low-end part with a 10th percentile ranking, indicating weak performance. The combined percentile is 48, which places the overall system in the mid-tier range.

The pairing is significantly unbalanced. The CPU is a top-tier processor that can handle demanding computational tasks, while the GPU is a budget-level card that struggles with modern graphical workloads. This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity, development, or content creation, and who have minimal graphical requirements. For gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, this system will disappoint. The platform is solid, with support for DDR4/DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, making future GPU upgrades a straightforward path to better balance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds