SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing represents a desktop configuration with a distinct performance asymmetry. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile of all processors, while the GPU occupies only the 57th percentile. The combined system percentile is 72, indicating that the processor dominates the platform’s compute potential. The i9-14901E is a Raptor Lake-R architecture part on a 10 nm Intel process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 2.80 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 pool. This configuration delivers strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and a single-core score of 3635. For context, the average benchmark score for this CPU is 37911, placing it statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (deltaPct 0) and marginally ahead of the Intel Core 5 211E (deltaPct 0.2).

CPU Analysis

The i9-14901E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, a refinement of the hybrid design philosophy, though this specific SKU presents as a monolithic 8-core, 16-thread part. The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size house a substantial amount of logic, but the efficiency metrics are dictated by the 65 W TDP, which is notably modest for a Core i9-class chip. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz is the headline feature; this is a high frequency that directly translates into strong single-threaded responsiveness. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1526 and the Passmark single-thread score of 4354 confirm that this processor excels in lightly-threaded tasks such as application launching, web browsing, and legacy software execution.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration delivers impressive results relative to its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors, rivaling parts with higher core counts due to the high boost clocks. The Passmark multithread score of 30298 and the integer math score of 112736 indicate strong throughput for compilation tasks, financial modeling, and scientific simulations that scale with core count. The floating-point math score of 81089 further underscores its capability in scientific computing. The data encryption score of 18571 and data compression score of 288777 suggest that the CPU handles AES-NI and compression algorithms efficiently, which benefits database workloads and file archiving. The extended instructions score of 17249 points to robust AVX-512 or similar vector processing capabilities, useful in engineering software. However, the find prime numbers score of 189 is a weak point, suggesting that the CPU’s integer latency in specific algorithmic patterns is not its forte.

Real-world interpretation: this CPU is not a workstation monster with 24 cores, but it is a high-frequency octa-core that outperforms many higher-core-count rivals in single-threaded and lightly-threaded tasks. The data shows that it sits statistically neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (deltaPct -0.1) and slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (deltaPct 0.3). For video editing, the Passmark physics score of 3041 and multi-thread scores indicate smooth timeline scrubbing and faster-than-real-time exports for 1080p and 1440p content. For software development, the high integer math and compression scores reduce build times. The 65 W TDP is the critical caveat; it suggests that this CPU is designed for constrained thermal environments where a high-core-count part would throttle, yet it still delivers near-flagship performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-14901E is socketed in Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the FACT PACK only specifies dual-channel memory support without a bandwidth figure. The platform’s flexibility is its main advantage: builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself, which is the primary interface for a discrete GPU. This is a forward-looking feature, though the RTX 3050 OEM only uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so there is no bottleneck from the bus interface. The chip also includes UHD Graphics 770, which serves as a fallback display output or for quick-sync video encoding when the discrete GPU is idle.

The platform’s upgrade path is defined by the LGA 1700 socket’s lifecycle. The i9-14901E is a high-end part on this socket, meaning a CPU upgrade would only make sense to a model with more cores, but the FACT PACK does not specify those options. The memory upgrade path is clearer: if the system currently runs DDR4, moving to DDR5 could improve memory-bound workloads, though the CPU’s benchmark scores do not isolate memory scaling. The PCIe Gen 5 support means that a future GPU upgrade to a modern card using PCIe 5.0 will not be bottlenecked by the interface. The integrated graphics also provide a diagnostic tool for troubleshooting GPU issues.

The PSU headroom is defined by the GPU’s suggested PSU of 300 W and the CPU’s 65 W TDP. This is a modest total system power draw, indicating that a 300 W power supply is the minimum recommendation, but a higher-wattage unit would be needed for future upgrades. The RTX 3050 OEM requires a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card. The CPU’s power delivery is not specified, but the 65 W TDP suggests that a standard mid-range motherboard with adequate VRM cooling is sufficient. The most sensible next upgrade is a GPU replacement, as the CPU is already at the top of its class. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes will accommodate a future high-end GPU, and the DDR5 support allows for memory bandwidth improvements. The ECC memory support is a professional feature, making this platform viable for entry-level workstations where data integrity is critical.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its closest rival?

A: The i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911, which is statistically identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904, deltaPct 0) and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37943, deltaPct -0.1). It is marginally ahead of the Intel Core 5 211E by 0.2%.

Q: What is the GPU’s standing among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM is in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199. It is nearly tied with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (deltaPct 0.2) and the AMD Radeon 680M (deltaPct -0.5).

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the i9-14901E supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation processors. This makes the platform suitable for applications where data corruption is unacceptable.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 130 W TDP. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 300 W, indicating a total system draw well under that threshold.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are intended for the primary GPU. The RTX 3050 OEM uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). Overclocking is not supported, so performance must be taken as stock.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is imbalanced. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4354 in Passmark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 are exceptional, ensuring that the processor will never be the limiting factor in frame generation. However, the GPU’s 57th percentile ranking suggests that it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K in demanding titles. At 1080p, the RTX 3050 OEM can likely push medium-to-high settings in esports titles, but the high-refresh experience is constrained by the GPU.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s high multi-thread score of 30298 in Passmark and 25753 in Cinebench R23 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also supports Intel Quick Sync, which can offload encoding tasks. The GPU lacks a dedicated NVENC encoder specification in the FACT PACK, so the CPU is the primary encoding engine, and it is more than capable.

Video editing is a strong suit for this CPU. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10816 and the Passmark floating-point score of 81089 indicate fast rendering times in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p timelines with effects, but 4K edits will rely heavily on the CPU’s compute power.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya favors the GPU’s compute capabilities. The RTX 3050 OEM scores 5779 in Passmark GPU compute and 60740 in Geekbench OpenCL. This is sufficient for preview renders and light final renders, but heavy production workloads would benefit from a stronger GPU. The CPU’s multi-thread scores will assist in scene preparation.

Software development sees significant benefits from the CPU’s integer math score of 112736 and data compression score of 288777. Compilation tasks are parallelized, and the high single-thread speed reduces link times. The GPU is adequate for UI rendering and basic graphical debugging.

Student and office work is overkill. The CPU’s single-thread performance and the GPU’s capability are far beyond what is needed for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP makes the system efficient for all-day operation, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running research computations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a pronounced imbalance. The CPU is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 57th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The combined percentile of 72 is a weighted average that reflects this asymmetry. In gaming, the CPU can feed frames at a rate that the GPU cannot match, especially at higher resolutions. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11857 is low enough that it will saturate before the CPU’s potential is reached.

The bottleneck reverses in compute-heavy tasks. The GPU's Passmark GPU compute score of 5779 is only a fraction of the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 30298. For workloads like physics simulation (CPU: 3041) or encryption (CPU: 18571), the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU sits idle. The CPU’s data compression score of 288777 is an order of magnitude higher than the GPU’s compute score, making the CPU the clear leader in file archiving and database operations.

The memory bandwidth of the GPU (224.0 GB/s) is a limiting factor for texture-heavy workloads. The CPU’s memory bandwidth is not specified, but the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support likely provides lower bandwidth than the GPU’s dedicated VRAM. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is half the bandwidth of a standard x16 slot, but this is unlikely to be a bottleneck given the GPU’s modest compute power. The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP create a thermal balance where the CPU runs cool, potentially leaving headroom for the GPU in a shared thermal solution, but the GPU is likely to be the thermal constraint in sustained loads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11857 and DirectX 12 score of 58 suggest that it is a 1080p-class card. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the GPU will deliver low-to-medium settings at 1080p in modern AAA titles. At 1440p, the GPU is likely to fall below 60 FPS in demanding games, while esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant may reach high frame rates due to their low graphical demands. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures, but 1440p high-texture packs may exceed it. The DirectX 9 score of 137 is notably high, suggesting strong performance in older titles. The Vulkan score of 57103 in Geekbench indicates that modern Vulkan-based games will perform better than DirectX 12 titles, but the overall frame rates will still be limited by the GPU’s raw compute (8.087 TFLOPS FP32).

Who Should Build It

This system is for a user who prioritizes CPU-intensive workloads over GPU-intensive ones. The target audience includes software developers who need fast compilation times and can accept moderate GPU performance for UI rendering. The CPU’s integer math score of 112736 and data compression score of 288777 make it ideal for continuous integration servers or data processing tasks. Students in engineering or computer science will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread scores, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for research simulations. Small business workstations handling financial modeling or database queries will see excellent performance from the CPU’s encryption and float-point scores.

For gamers, this build is aimed at 1080p esports players who require high frame rates in less demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4354 ensures that the system is future-proof for CPU-heavy game engines, but the GPU will need an upgrade for 1440p gaming. Content creators focusing on video editing will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 25753 excellent for export times, but 3D artists will be limited by the GPU’s compute score of 5779. The system is not suitable for high-end 3D rendering or 4K gaming, but it is a robust workstation for CPU-bound tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a high-end 8-core/16-thread processor on the LGA 1700 platform, representing the top of the Raptor Lake-R lineup for its power class. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture part with 8 GB of VRAM, positioned in the mid-range of the GeForce 30-series. The system’s combined percentile is 72, placing it above average but not in the enthusiast tier. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking is the defining characteristic, while the GPU’s 57th percentile holds the system back from higher tiers. This is a balanced office/workstation machine with gaming capability at 1080p, not a gaming-first or rendering-first build.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37904 with a 0% delta, meaning the i9-14901E is statistically equivalent. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943, a -0.1% delta, also equivalent. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, a 0.2% delta, placing the i9 slightly ahead. The CPU’s best scores are in the Passmark integer math (112736) and data compression (288777) tests. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, scores 15171 with a 0.2% delta, making them equivalent. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, a -0.5% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 scores 15283, also -0.5%. The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms 86% of all processors, but the GPU only outperforms 57% of all GPUs. The CPU is the clear performance driver, with the GPU acting as a secondary component that will need upgrading for graphics-intensive workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA106 chip manufactured on an 8 nm Samsung process. The chip contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The GPU has 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS respectively. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

The benchmark scores show a mixed profile. The Passmark G3D score of 11857 places it in the 57th percentile, which is mid-range. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 is respectable, indicating strong compute performance for its class. The Vulkan score of 57103 suggests good API utilization. The DirectX 11 score of 86 is the highest among the DirectX tests, while DirectX 12 scores 58 and DirectX 10 scores 61. The DirectX 9 score of 137 is the highest of all, indicating excellent legacy compatibility. The Passmark GPU compute score of 5779 is notably lower than the G3D score, suggesting that the GPU is optimized for graphics rendering rather than general-purpose compute. This is a capable 1080p gaming GPU and a light rendering accelerator, but its 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture-heavy workloads. The 130 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU make it an efficient card for a system with a 65 W CPU, keeping the total power draw modest. The dual-slot design and 1x 8-pin connector are standard, and the display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors. The card is end-of-life, so availability may be limited, but its performance is well-understood.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds