SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-14901E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB presents a distinctly lopsided configuration. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at exactly the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This 36-percentile gap is the defining characteristic of this build. The processor is capable of far more than the graphics card can feed, which means that in graphically intensive workloads, the RTX 3050 will be the limiting factor. In CPU-bound tasks — such as data compression, encryption, or physics simulation — the i9-14901E will dominate, but the GPU will hold back frame rates in gaming scenarios.

Benchmark data shows the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and single-core score of 3,635, both of which are strong figures for a 65-watt desktop part. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,354 reinforces that the CPU has excellent per-core performance. However, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 9.098 TFLOPS, while respectable for an entry-level card, is not in the same league as the CPU's processing capability. The data suggests that this is a system where the CPU will frequently wait on the GPU in gaming workloads, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the primary constraint.

The FPS scaling picture cannot be measured directly, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. All frame-rate discussion must therefore be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. Based on the GPU's 50th percentile standing and the CPU's 86th percentile, the bottleneck pattern is clear: the GPU is the constraining component in almost every gaming scenario, while CPU-bound productivity tasks will run at near-full potential.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This configuration is not well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming at maximum settings. The RTX 3050's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by current standards, and its 50th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to push frame rates beyond mid-range expectations. The CPU, with its 5.60 GHz boost clock and 16 threads, is more than capable of feeding high frame rates, but the GPU will likely cap performance well below what the processor could theoretically support. At 1080p with competitive settings (lowering graphical fidelity), the system could approach playable triple-digit frame rates in less demanding titles, but this is an estimate based on the GPU's compute capabilities rather than measured data.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The i9-14901E can handle x264 encoding at a quality level that would offload work from the GPU. However, the RTX 3050 also includes 80 tensor cores and 20 RT cores, meaning NVIDIA's NVENC encoder is available for hardware encoding. The Passmark data compression score of 288,777 indicates strong throughput for streaming-related tasks. This scenario is one of the better fits for this pairing, as the CPU can handle the encoding load while the GPU focuses on rendering.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 30,298 and floating-point math score of 81,089 suggest solid performance in video editing workflows that rely on CPU-based effects and encoding. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large media files. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing timelines with moderate effects, though 4K timelines with heavy color grading may run into memory limitations. The GPU's 9.098 TFLOPS FP32 performance will accelerate preview rendering and export in GPU-accelerated applications, but the 128-bit memory bus will constrain performance in memory-bandwidth-heavy operations.

3D rendering: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,816 indicates strong CPU-based rendering performance in applications like Blender's Cycles engine when using the CPU backend. However, GPU-based rendering with the RTX 3050 will be limited by its 2,560 shading units and 9.098 TFLOPS compute throughput. The 20 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the GPU's 50th percentile standing suggests it will perform at roughly the median for graphics cards — functional for occasional renders, but not a professional-grade rendering workhorse.

Software development: The CPU excels here. The Passmark integer math score of 112,736 and extended instructions score of 17,249 indicate strong performance in compilation tasks, code analysis, and test execution. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with working sets. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development workflows, making this pairing a good fit for a developer who also games occasionally. The ECC memory support is a notable advantage for development work where data integrity matters.

Student and office work: This is massively over-specified for typical student and office workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking is far beyond what word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing require. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,354 ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 65-watt TDP keeps power draw reasonable for a dorm room or small office. This pairing would be wasted on such tasks, but it would handle them without breaking a sweat.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. This is a desktop-class processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Despite carrying the i9 designation, this is not a high-core-count part — it relies on 8 fast cores rather than a larger core count. The 65-watt TDP is notably low for an i9-branded processor, suggesting this is an efficiency-focused SKU designed for constrained thermal environments.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 cache size is substantial and helps with workloads that exhibit locality across threads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. This is a rare feature for a consumer-oriented desktop chip and positions it for workstation-adjacent use cases where data integrity is paramount. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and single-core score of 3,635 indicate that this CPU is competitive with other mid-range and upper-mid-range desktop processors. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (average score 37,904, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (average score 37,943, deltaPct -0.1), and the Intel Core 5 211E (average score 37,829, deltaPct 0.2). These are all within 0.3% of each other, meaning the i9-14901E is essentially tied with these alternatives in aggregate benchmark performance.

The Passmark suite shows specific strengths: data compression at 288,777, integer math at 112,736, and floating-point math at 81,089. The extended instructions score of 17,249 indicates good SIMD throughput for AVX-class workloads. The find prime numbers score of 189 is low in absolute terms but is a measure of a specific workload pattern. The average benchmark score of 37,911 places this CPU in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The RTX 3050 8 GB is a modest GPU by current standards. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it sits right at the median — half of all graphics cards are faster, half are slower. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with high textures in most titles, but 1440p and 4K gaming will strain both the memory capacity and the memory bandwidth. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, delivered over a 128-bit bus, is a known limitation for this card.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this system should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends well above 100 FPS, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's adequate rasterization throughput. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, frame rates will likely fall in the 50-70 FPS range for older titles and 30-50 FPS for more demanding recent releases — these are estimates based on the GPU's compute capabilities. Enabling ray tracing will significantly reduce performance, as the 20 RT cores are first-generation Ampere parts that are not particularly fast at ray-traced workloads.

At 1440p, the RTX 3050 will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most AAA titles at high settings. The 128-bit memory bus becomes a bottleneck at higher resolutions, and the 9.098 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is not enough to drive modern engines at this resolution with high fidelity. Competitive settings (low-to-medium) may yield playable frame rates in less demanding games. At 4K, this GPU is not viable for modern gaming at acceptable settings, and even older titles will require significant compromises.

The CPU's contribution to gaming is strong — the 5.60 GHz boost clock and 3,635 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensure that the processor will never be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,354 confirms excellent per-core performance. If a future GPU upgrade is made, the CPU will not hold back the new graphics card in most gaming scenarios.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a specific user: someone who needs substantial CPU horsepower for productivity or development work but has modest gaming requirements. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for software developers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or perform data processing. The integer math score of 112,736 and multi-thread score of 30,298 support these workloads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation-adjacent tasks where a memory error could corrupt hours of work.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older AAA games will find this system adequate, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it delivers average performance — nothing more. Enthusiast gamers would be better served by pairing this CPU with a more powerful GPU, while the RTX 3050 could be paired with a weaker CPU for a more balanced budget build.

Small business workstations that need fast CPU performance for data processing, accounting software, or database operations will benefit from this build. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 288,777 and encryption score of 18,571 indicate strong throughput for these workloads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails, which is a practical reliability consideration.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or encoding will find this system capable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and the floating-point math score of 81,089 support video encoding and 3D rendering workloads. However, creators who rely heavily on GPU acceleration should consider a stronger graphics card, as the RTX 3050's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will limit performance in GPU-accelerated effects and renders.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is an Ampere-architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process, with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The chip is designated GA106 and features 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU includes 20 RT cores for ray tracing and 80 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads like DLSS. The base clock is 1,552 MHz with a boost clock of 1,777 MHz.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This is a modest memory subsystem — the 128-bit bus is the primary bottleneck for this GPU, limiting performance at higher resolutions and in memory-bandwidth-intensive workloads. The pixel rate is 56.86 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 142.2 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 9.098 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 9.098 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The card is dual-slot, 242 mm long, and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a 300 W suggested PSU. The TDP is 130 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for this performance class.

The RTX 3050's 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, with no nearest rivals provided, indicating insufficient benchmark data for comparison. The GPU is end-of-life, having been released on January 3, 2022, and its successor is the GeForce 40 series. The launch MSRP was 249 USD.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 3050 provides functional but not exceptional performance. The 9.098 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is adequate for entry-level GPU rendering, and the 8 GB VRAM can handle moderate scene sizes. The 20 RT cores enable ray-traced rendering, but performance will be limited compared to higher-tier Ampere or newer Ada Lovelace cards. The tensor cores support DLSS, which can help gaming performance in supported titles.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37,904, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37,943, deltaPct -0.1), the Intel Core 5 211E (37,829, deltaPct 0.2), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37,804, deltaPct 0.3). These deltas are all within 0.3%, meaning the i9-14901E is statistically tied with these processors in aggregate performance. The CPU's Cinebench scores are: R15 multi-core 2,595 and single-core 366; R20 multi-core 10,816 and single-core 1,526; R23 multi-core 25,753 and single-core 3,635.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking is 50. No nearest rivals are listed. The GPU has no benchmark entries in the FACT PACK. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, meaning this system outperforms 68% of all recorded builds in the database. The pair rank by FPS is null, and dataIsMeasured is false, confirming that no empirical frame-rate testing has been performed for this exact combination.

The combined picture is one of significant CPU strength paired with mid-tier GPU performance. The CPU's 86th percentile puts it in the top 14% of all processors, while the GPU's 50th percentile places it exactly at the median. The system's 68th combined percentile reflects the GPU dragging down the overall position. In CPU-heavy workloads, this system will perform like a top-tier machine; in GPU-heavy workloads, it will perform like an average one.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB. The CPU is a Raptor Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.60 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 128-bit bus, and 9.098 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The combined 68th percentile ranking indicates this system is above average overall, but the distribution of performance is highly uneven.

The CPU is the clear centerpiece of this build. Its 86th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded and single-threaded benchmark scores make it suitable for demanding productivity workloads. The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is a serviceable entry-level card that will handle 1080p gaming at moderate settings but will not excel. This is a build that prioritizes CPU performance over gaming fidelity — a sensible choice for developers, data analysts, or content creators who game occasionally.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP mean this system has a reasonable total power draw, though the GPU's suggested PSU of 300 W should be respected. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in motherboard and memory selection. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU is future-proof, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, meaning this system outperforms 68% of all recorded builds in the database. This reflects the strong CPU performance (86th percentile) tempered by the mid-tier GPU (50th percentile).

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14901E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37,911, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37,904, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37,943, deltaPct -0.1), and the Intel Core 5 211E (37,829, deltaPct 0.2). All are within 0.3% of each other.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3050 8 GB has 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth delivered over a 128-bit bus. This is a modest figure that will limit performance at higher resolutions and in memory-bandwidth-intensive workloads, as the 128-bit bus is a known constraint of this card.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory. This is a notable feature for workstation-adjacent use cases where data integrity is critical, such as scientific computing or financial modeling.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB had a launch MSRP of 249 USD. The launch MSRP of the CPU is not listed in the data.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. All frame-rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 25,753 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,635 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores indicate strong performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds