SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh generation. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock sits at 2.80 GHz, while the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, a substantial 2.8 GHz increase that allows the chip to deliver strong single-threaded performance when workloads demand it. The processor carries a 65 W TDP, which is notably modest for a Core i9-class part, suggesting that the chip is engineered for efficiency-conscious desktop builds rather than extreme overclocking scenarios — the multiplier is locked, confirming that positioning.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: each core gets 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, while a shared 36 MB L3 pool provides a large high-speed staging area for frequently accessed data. This cache configuration is well-suited for workloads that exhibit data locality, such as compiling code, running database queries, or rendering scenes where repeated geometry access is common. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance trade-offs. ECC memory support is included, which is a meaningful feature for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is paramount. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 points is a strong result for an 8-core part, while the single-core score of 3,635 points reflects the high 5.60 GHz boost clock in action. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 10,816 and single-core score of 1,526 follow the same pattern, confirming consistent scaling across Cinebench versions. PassMark results reinforce this picture: multi-thread performance scores 30,298, while single-thread performance hits 4,354. The integer math score of 112,736 and floating-point math score of 81,089 indicate that the CPU handles both integer-heavy and FP-heavy workloads competently, though integer throughput is noticeably higher, which is typical for this architecture.

The nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 on average, essentially identical to the i9-14901E's 37,911 average benchmark score, a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943, just 0.1% higher. The Intel Core 5 211E trails marginally at 37,829, 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 comes in at 37,804, 0.3% behind. This clustering suggests the i9-14901E sits right at a performance inflection point where several competing parts from both AMD and Intel are effectively tied, making platform features and pricing — not raw CPU performance — the differentiators.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing shows a system that ranks in the 73rd percentile overall, indicating it comfortably outperforms the majority of desktop configurations in the database. The CPU's 86th percentile placement is the stronger component of the pair, while the GPU's 59th percentile is more modest, creating an interesting asymmetry that shapes the system's overall character.

The GPU delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322, a DirectX 12 benchmark result that reflects modern game rendering workloads. Geekbench scores — 88,183 for OpenCL and 39,476 for Vulkan — indicate that the GPU's compute performance via these APIs is respectable, though the OpenCL score is more than double the Vulkan score, which may reflect driver optimization or benchmark characteristics. PassMark G3D scoring comes in at 17,631, while the GPU compute score is 9,919. The DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 PassMark scores are 280, 104, 182, and 44 respectively, showing that legacy DirectX 9 workloads perform best relative to the other API tests, while DirectX 12 shows the lowest score in this set. The G2D score of 1,002 indicates solid 2D desktop acceleration.

The GPU's nearest rivals frame its position. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129 on average, 0.7% higher than the RX 9060's 16,014 average — a negligible gap. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15,862, 1% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15,852, also 1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails at 15,679, 2.1% behind. This places the RX 9060 in a competitive cluster where the performance differences are within noise margins, meaning real-world game selection and driver maturity will determine actual experience more than raw silicon capability.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is clearly the stronger performer relative to its peers, while the GPU holds a middle-tier position. For CPU-bound workloads like compilation, encoding, or scientific computing, this system will punch well above its overall percentile. For GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the system will land more squarely in the mid-range. The data shows a pairing that is CPU-premium and GPU-mid, which has specific implications for workload suitability that the following sections will explore.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the 86th-percentile CPU and 59th-percentile GPU creates a clear bottleneck profile. In gaming workloads, where the GPU typically becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and detail settings, the RX 9060 will be the component that determines frame rates. The CPU's substantial headroom means it will rarely constrain the GPU in most gaming scenarios, which is generally a favorable situation — the system will not suffer from CPU stalls that cause frame hitches or stutter.

In CPU-bound workloads, the opposite dynamic appears. Multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation will leverage the i9-14901E's 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 30,298 PassMark multi-thread score, while the GPU contributes less to these tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 288,777 and data encryption score of 18,571 further illustrate the CPU's strength in data-processing tasks that are purely compute-bound.

The FPS scaling picture is limited by the absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination. No measured FPS rows exist in the database for this pairing — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's high single-thread performance of 4,354 in PassMark and 3,635 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggests that frame pacing in CPU-limited scenarios will be consistent, while the GPU's 59th-percentile standing indicates that frame rates at high settings will be determined by the GPU's rendering throughput.

The 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth of the GPU are modest figures that could constrain performance at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth demands increase. The CPU's dual-channel memory support, meanwhile, provides adequate bandwidth for its core count. The system's overall balance is best described as GPU-limited for graphics workloads and CPU-saturated for compute workloads, with the CPU holding enough reserve headroom that most users will experience the GPU as the primary performance ceiling in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the database contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i9-14901E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than verified measurements.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 and its 59th-percentile standing, the RX 9060 is positioned to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with high detail settings in most titles. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures, though 1440p with maximum texture quality may approach the memory capacity limit in some modern titles. The 1,792 shading units and 64 ROPs provide a solid baseline for rasterization throughput, while the 28 RT cores offer ray tracing capability that is present but likely modest in absolute performance given the card's mid-tier percentile.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance will ensure that the GPU receives a steady stream of draw calls and physics updates without becoming a bottleneck in most games. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is particularly beneficial for games that are sensitive to single-thread performance, such as esports titles and older game engines that do not scale well across many cores. The 36 MB L3 cache also helps with game asset streaming and reducing memory latency penalties.

For competitive gaming at high refresh rates, the CPU's single-thread capabilities combined with the GPU's mid-tier throughput should support frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p in most titles, with the CPU rarely being the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU will become more of a constraint, and frame rates will depend more heavily on the specific game's GPU demands. At 4K, the GPU's 8 GB memory and mid-tier compute resources will likely limit performance to lower detail settings or reduced resolutions for acceptable frame rates. These are estimates grounded in the benchmark scores, not measured results, and actual game performance will vary by title, driver version, and system configuration.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 4,354 PassMark single-thread score and 3,635 Cinebench R23 single-core score provide ample processing power to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound game scenes. The GPU's mid-tier standing will support 1080p high-refresh gaming, with the CPU ensuring minimal frame time spikes. The pairing is suited for 144 Hz-class monitors at 1080p, though the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 65 W TDP leaves thermal and power headroom for concurrent streaming workloads. The CPU's 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates it can handle game encoding overhead while maintaining playable frame rates, though the GPU lacks dedicated hardware encoders as advanced as some competitors, meaning software encoding via the CPU may be preferred, which the 16 threads can accommodate.

Video editing: Multi-threaded rendering tasks will benefit from the CPU's 30,298 PassMark multi-thread score and 112,736 integer math score. The GPU's OpenCL score of 88,183 can accelerate effects and preview rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p timelines, though heavy 4K work with many layers may require proxy workflows. ECC memory support on the CPU platform adds stability for long render sessions.

3D rendering: The CPU's 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 81,089 floating-point math score are strong for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides acceleration for GPU-based renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The combination is workable for small-to-medium scenes, while large productions would benefit from a higher-tier GPU.

Software development: The 36 MB L3 cache and 5.60 GHz boost clock accelerate compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark data compression score of 288,777 indicates fast archive handling for large codebases. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking makes this a capable developer workstation.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption moderate, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. Office workloads will be well-served by the CPU's strong single-thread performance, and the platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allows cost-effective memory configurations. The system is overkill for basic office tasks but provides headroom for future workload demands.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 29,700 million transistors across a 199 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 149.2 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, providing a compute configuration that is positioned for mainstream gaming rather than enthusiast-class performance.

Clock speeds are set at 1,700 MHz base, 2,400 MHz game clock, and 2,990 MHz boost, with the boost clock representing the maximum achievable frequency under ideal thermal conditions. The memory subsystem uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, but the relatively narrow bus width and modest 8 GB capacity will limit performance in memory-intensive scenarios like high-resolution textures or GPU compute workloads with large datasets.

Ray tracing is handled by 28 dedicated RT cores, while the FP32 compute throughput is rated at 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 21.43 TFLOPS in 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s indicate that the GPU can deliver solid fill rates for rasterization-heavy workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 places the GPU in the 59th percentile, meaning it outperforms most GPUs but sits below the upper echelons of the performance hierarchy.

The nearest rival comparison shows the RX 9060 is effectively tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 0.7% higher on average. This is notable because the RTX 3060 Ti is a well-established GPU from a previous generation, suggesting the RX 9060 offers comparable performance in a newer architecture with RDNA 4.0 features like DirectX 12 Ultimate support, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The power delivery requires a single 8-pin connector with a 132 W TDP and a 300 W suggested PSU, keeping the power demands moderate for a mainstream desktop build. The dual-slot cooler design and PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface ensure compatibility with modern motherboards, while display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a provide modern connectivity options.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is someone who prioritizes CPU performance and needs a capable GPU for mainstream gaming and productivity work. The 86th-percentile CPU makes this an excellent choice for developers, content creators, and professionals who run CPU-intensive workloads like compilation, data processing, and 3D rendering. The 73rd-percentile overall standing means the system will handle most tasks with ease, though it will not be the top performer in GPU-bound scenarios.

Gamers at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors will find the pairing well-matched, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures consistent frame delivery while the GPU provides solid 1080p throughput. Gamers at 1440p will still have a good experience, but the GPU will be the limiting factor, and those seeking maximum settings at 1440p or 4K gaming should look at a higher-tier GPU. The 8 GB VRAM is a consideration for texture-heavy titles at higher resolutions.

Students and office workers will benefit from the CPU's efficiency — the 65 W TDP keeps power costs down and cooling requirements modest. Small business workstations that run database applications, spreadsheet analysis, or light video conferencing will be well-served by the 16 threads and ECC memory support. Content creators editing 1080p or moderate 1440p video will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded strength, while the GPU accelerates effects and rendering tasks.

Developers compiling large codebases will see significant gains from the 36 MB L3 cache and high boost clock. The system is also suitable for researchers running simulations or data analysis in Python or similar languages, where the CPU's integer and floating-point throughput are both strong. The pairing is not ideal for those seeking maximum GPU compute performance, as the 59th-percentile GPU will be the constraint in CUDA-like workloads, but for general-purpose and CPU-centric tasks, this is a well-balanced system.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14901E, an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, a mainstream desktop GPU from the Radeon RX 9000 series. The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary, full-size system rather than a laptop or compact form factor. The combined percentile of 73 places this system comfortably above the majority of desktop configurations in the database, though it is not in the top tier of performance.

The CPU is the standout component, ranking in the 86th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 37,911. This puts it in a performance class with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, and Intel Core 5 211E, all of which score within 0.3% of each other. The GPU, ranking in the 59th percentile with an average score of 16,014, is more modest, performing on par with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 7700.

The system represents a CPU-first design philosophy, where the processor is given priority in budget allocation and performance focus. This makes sense for users whose workloads are primarily CPU-bound, but it means the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, suitable for serious productivity work and mainstream gaming, but not for enthusiasts seeking maximum GPU performance or 4K gaming at high detail settings.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 37,911 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37,904, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37,943, -0.1% delta), and the Intel Core 5 211E (37,829, 0.2% delta).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the GPU performance compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16,014 is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's 16,129, making the two effectively equal in performance.

Q: Does the system have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what platform does it use?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 28 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, providing ray tracing functionality, though the 59th-percentile performance indicates mid-tier RT throughput.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types with dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with modern GPUs and high-speed NVMe storage. ECC memory support is included, which is beneficial for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, with a 132 W TDP and a single 8-pin power connector. The system's power consumption is moderate, with the CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 132 W TDP combining for a reasonable total draw. Builders should ensure their PSU provides sufficient headroom for the entire system, including drives, fans, and other components.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary candidate for replacement. The CPU's 86th-percentile performance leaves significant headroom, and upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would improve gaming performance and GPU-accelerated workloads without the CPU becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The 8 GB VRAM of the current GPU is the most likely limitation for future games at higher resolutions, so a GPU with more memory would be a future-proofing improvement.

The CPU's locked multiplier limits overclocking, so performance gains from CPU tuning are not available. However, the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing builders to choose memory based on budget and performance needs. The 36 MB L3 cache and high boost clock provide strong out-of-the-box performance, and the 65 W TDP means that even modest air cooling solutions will suffice. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that storage upgrades to Gen 5 NVMe drives are possible, though the performance benefits are primarily in sequential workloads. The platform is mature, given the Raptor Lake refresh generation, so BIOS stability and driver support are well-established.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds