SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

32,456 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-14901E pairs with AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE in a desktop build that lands at the 82nd combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU, part of the Core 14th Gen series with Raptor Lake architecture, uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is produced on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The GPU, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip, is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process with 57,700 million transistors and a die size of 529 mm². No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not direct gameplay capture.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E presents an 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. This Raptor Lake-R design, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, features a 10 nm process node and a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The processor integrates UHD Graphics 770, though this pairing relies on the discrete GPU for visual output.

Benchmark results place the i9-14901E at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37911. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25753 in multi-core and 3635 in single-core tests. The single-core score of 3635 indicates strong per-thread performance, which translates to responsive everyday tasks and well-optimized applications. The multi-core score of 25753, while respectable for an 8-core part, reflects the thread count limitation compared to higher-core-count alternatives. PassMark results reinforce this profile: single-thread score of 4354, multithread score of 30298, and integer math at 112736. Floating-point math reaches 81089, while data compression hits 288777 and data encryption scores 18571.

The nearest rivals show the i9-14901E sits within a tight cluster. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904 with a 0% delta, AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943 with a -0.1% delta, Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829 with a 0.2% delta, and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804 with a 0.3% delta. This indicates the i9-14901E delivers performance essentially identical to these alternatives, with differences under 0.3% in either direction. The 8-core design means multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering will be competitive with these peers, but the CPU does not extend beyond 16 threads, limiting scaling in heavily parallel tasks.

For real workloads, the 5.60 GHz boost clock is a defining characteristic. Single-threaded performance at this frequency, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635, makes the CPU strong for applications that rely on few fast cores, such as spreadsheet calculations, web browsing, and legacy software. The 36 MB shared L3 cache aids in reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a Core i9 designation, which suggests thermal headroom is generous under typical loads, though the locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) prevents overclocking adjustments.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform anchors this build. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards. Memory options include DDR4 and DDR5, both in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older and newer memory standards. ECC memory support is present, which benefits workstation scenarios where data integrity is critical.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, so no bandwidth bottleneck arises from the interface mismatch. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 600 W, while the CPU draws 65 W TDP and the GPU draws 260 W TDP. The combined power draw of approximately 325 W leaves ample headroom within a 600 W power supply, even accounting for other system components. This makes the pairing well-suited for a single-GPU desktop with modest power delivery requirements.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve increasing CPU core count if multi-threaded performance becomes the primary bottleneck, since the 8-core design caps scaling in heavily parallel workloads. Alternatively, adding more system memory or moving to faster DDR5 modules could improve memory-bound tasks, but the CPU’s locked multiplier means no tuning through overclocking. The GPU, with its 16 GB memory and 260 W TDP, could be replaced with a higher-tier card if gaming resolution increases or ray tracing demands grow, but the current pairing is balanced for the 82nd combined percentile. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage upgrades, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface does not utilize the full bandwidth available.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i9-14901E combined with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing. As a result, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 and PassMark single-thread score of 4354 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 27089 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4814 suggest the graphics card is capable of handling modern titles at high settings. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 45.98 TFLOPS and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide substantial raw compute and memory bandwidth for 1440p and 4K gaming.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU’s single-thread strength should prevent most frame rate drops in esports titles, where high refresh rates are achievable. The GPU’s 5120 shading units and 160 ROPs support high pixel throughput, as indicated by the 359.2 GPixel/s pixel rate. At 1440p, the balance shifts more toward the GPU, and the 7900 GRE’s 45.98 TFLOPS should deliver smooth performance in demanding AAA games, though ray tracing workloads may reduce frame rates given the 80 RT cores are not the primary strength of this RDNA 3.0 architecture. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with the 16 GB memory capacity being sufficient for most titles, but the raw compute may struggle to maintain high frame rates in the most graphically intensive scenes.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 77th percentile among all GPUs. This 9-point gap indicates the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative standing, suggesting the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in balanced workloads. The combined percentile of 82 aligns between the two component percentiles, confirming that neither component dramatically overshadows the other.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or data compression, the i9-14901E’s PassMark physics score of 3041 and data compression score of 288777 demonstrate strong throughput. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 15016 indicates it can offload some parallel compute, but the CPU remains the primary engine for single-threaded logic. In gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 3635) should keep frame rates high in most titles, but the GPU’s 77th percentile position means that as resolution increases, the GPU will become the limiting factor first. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4814, which is a synthetic DX12 benchmark, suggests the card handles modern graphics APIs well, but its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro S10000 (avgScore 32388, deltaPct 0.2%) and AMD Radeon RX 590 GME (avgScore 32601, deltaPct -0.4%), which are older or less powerful cards, indicating the 7900 GRE’s position is mid-range among all GPUs.

Evidence from FPS scaling would show that at 1080p, the CPU’s 86th percentile position allows the GPU to reach higher utilization, while at 4K, the GPU’s 77th percentile position becomes the hard limit. Since no measured FPS data exists, this analysis is based on the percentile differential and the components’ respective benchmark scores, which point to a system where the GPU is the primary constraint in graphics-heavy scenarios, while the CPU excels in compute-heavy and lightly threaded tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, part of the Radeon RX 7000 series, uses the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Plum Bonito codename. Fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, the GPU contains 57,700 million transistors across a 529 mm² die, with a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. Core clocks are 1287 MHz base, 1880 MHz game, and 2245 MHz boost.

The GPU’s compute resources include 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 160 ROPs. It features 80 RT cores for ray tracing, though no tensor cores are listed, indicating a focus on rasterization and compute rather than AI acceleration. FP32 performance is 45.98 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 91.96 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 359.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 718.4 GTexel/s. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores show the GPU at the 77th percentile with an average score of 32456. PassMark G3D scores 27089, while PassMark GPU compute scores 15016. Geekbench OpenCL scores 175758, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 99850. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 4814. PassMark DirectX 11 scores 300, DirectX 12 scores 107, DirectX 10 scores 139, and DirectX 9 scores 310. PassMark G2D scores 1180. The nearest rivals include AMD FirePro S10000 (avgScore 32388, deltaPct 0.2%), AMD FirePro S9300 X2 (avgScore 32540, deltaPct -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 590 GME (avgScore 32601, deltaPct -0.4%), and AMD Radeon Pro 570X (avgScore 32176, deltaPct 0.9%). These rivals are all within 0.9% of the 7900 GRE’s score, placing the card in a competitive but not dominant position.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB memory capacity is ample for large textures and complex scenes, but the 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance is mid-range. The 80 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the card’s strength lies in traditional rasterization, as evidenced by high DirectX 11 scores relative to DirectX 12, suggesting the architecture is optimized for legacy and current raster pipelines. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and compute tasks, but the 256-bit bus limits bandwidth compared to wider-bus competitors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 and PassMark single-thread score of 4354 support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 45.98 TFLOPS and 359.2 GPixel/s pixel rate enable high settings at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s 77th percentile position may limit 4K high-refresh gaming, but 1440p is the sweet spot.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 65 W TDP, leave thermal and power headroom for encoding workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 30298 indicates sufficient parallel capacity for software encoding, while the GPU’s 16 GB memory and compute capability can handle hardware encoding, though no dedicated encoder details are listed.

Video editing: The CPU’s 25753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 81089 PassMark floating-point math score support timeline scrubbing and rendering, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading. The GPU’s 77th percentile position means it is adequate but not top-tier for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 8 cores limit multi-threaded rendering performance compared to higher-core-count CPUs, but the 5.60 GHz boost clock helps with single-threaded tasks. The GPU’s 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 and 91.96 TFLOPS FP16 provide solid compute for GPU rendering, with the 16 GB memory handling complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3635 and PassMark integer math score of 112736 support compilation and code analysis. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces latency for repetitive builds, and ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running processes.

Student and office work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4354 and data compression score of 288777 handle document processing and spreadsheet calculations with ease. The 65 W TDP means low power draw for sustained office workloads, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets desktop users who need balanced performance across CPU-heavy and GPU-heavy tasks. Gamers at 1440p resolution will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-core performance and the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 45.98 TFLOPS compute, which handle modern titles at high settings. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration and the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth useful, though those needing more than 16 threads for rendering should consider higher-core-count CPUs.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s high boost clock and ECC memory support, which provide reliable performance for compilation and data-heavy applications. Students and small business workstations benefit from the low 65 W CPU TDP and the GPU’s 260 W TDP, which together keep power requirements modest with a 600 W suggested PSU. The GPU’s 77th percentile position means it is not a top-tier card for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, but it excels in rasterized gaming and compute workloads. The CPU’s 86th percentile position ensures the system is not CPU-limited in most scenarios, making this build suitable for users who prioritize a balanced system over extreme performance in any single workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 82, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 77th percentile.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the GPU in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The nearest rivals to the RX 7900 GRE include the AMD FirePro S10000 with a 0.2% delta, AMD FirePro S9300 X2 with a -0.3% delta, AMD Radeon RX 590 GME with a -0.4% delta, and AMD Radeon Pro 570X with a 0.9% delta.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is 600 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 260 W and the CPU’s TDP is 65 W.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate estimates are derived from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14901E achieves an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25753 and single-core at 3635, Cinebench R20 multi-core at 10816 and single-core at 1526, and Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2595 and single-core at 366. PassMark results show single-thread at 4354, multithread at 30298, integer math at 112736, floating-point math at 81089, data compression at 288777, and data encryption at 18571. The CPU’s nearest rivals are AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (avgScore 37904, deltaPct 0%), AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (avgScore 37943, deltaPct -0.1%), Intel Core 5 211E (avgScore 37829, deltaPct 0.2%), and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (avgScore 37804, deltaPct 0.3%).

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 32456, placing it at the 77th percentile among all GPUs. Key GPU scores include PassMark G3D at 27089, PassMark GPU compute at 15016, Geekbench OpenCL at 175758, Geekbench Vulkan at 99850, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 4814. PassMark DirectX 11 scores 300, DirectX 12 scores 107, DirectX 10 scores 139, and DirectX 9 scores 310. The GPU’s nearest rivals are AMD FirePro S10000 (avgScore 32388, deltaPct 0.2%), AMD FirePro S9300 X2 (avgScore 32540, deltaPct -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 590 GME (avgScore 32601, deltaPct -0.4%), and AMD Radeon Pro 570X (avgScore 32176, deltaPct 0.9%).

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative percentile ranking by 9 points. The CPU’s 86th percentile position indicates strong performance among all processors, while the GPU’s 77th percentile position is more mid-range. The combined percentile of 82 reflects a balanced system where the CPU provides a solid foundation and the GPU delivers adequate graphics performance, but neither component reaches the top tier. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3% in average score, indicating the i9-14901E is competitively positioned, while the GPU’s rivals are within 0.9%, showing a similar level of competition in its class.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-14901E with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, creating a system that operates at the 82nd combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU, from the Core 14th Gen series with Raptor Lake architecture, is a desktop-class processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 65 W TDP, and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The GPU, from the Radeon RX 7000 series with RDNA 3.0 architecture, is a desktop-class graphics card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 260 W TDP, and a 600 W suggested PSU.

The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 82, places this build in the upper-middle range of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 77th percentile indicate that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is adequate but not exceptional. The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary system designed for performance rather than portability. The pairing is well-balanced for a range of tasks, from gaming at 1440p to content creation and software development, with the CPU’s high boost clock and the GPU’s substantial memory capacity being the defining features. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated from synthetic benchmarks, which suggest the system is capable of handling modern titles but may not excel in the most demanding 4K or ray-traced scenarios.