SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

87%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is an unusual but coherent desktop combination: an embedded-lineage, efficiency-focused eight-core Raptor Lake Refresh processor sitting in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, driving a 16 GB RDNA 3 graphics card that lands in the 51st percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 69 reflects a build whose processing side is meaningfully stronger than its rendering side. One important caveat applies throughout: no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded gameplay results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-14901E uses Intel Socket 1700, which means the platform supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus depending on the motherboard chosen — a genuine flexibility point, since a builder can reuse existing DDR4 kit or move to DDR5 on the same socket generation. PCIe support is listed as Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, so the primary graphics slot has headroom beyond the RX 7800 XT's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The card will simply run at its own 4.0 speed with no practical penalty given the bandwidth available.

Power is where this build is easy to plan. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP — unusually low for a Core i9 badge — and the GPU draws a 263 W TDP fed by two 8-pin connectors. AMD's suggested PSU for the card alone is 600 W, and with a 65 W processor that 600 W figure leaves comfortable headroom for the whole system. A dual-slot card keeps case compatibility simple.

The sensible next upgrade is on the graphics side. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile versus all CPUs while the GPU sits at the 51st percentile, so the processor can feed a substantially faster card without becoming the limiter. Swapping in a higher-tier GPU later would raise the combined percentile more effectively than any CPU change on this socket. The processor's multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not part of the upgrade path — platform headroom comes from the GPU slot and memory choice, not tuning.

ECC memory support is a notable platform feature: for a workstation build, pairing this CPU with ECC-capable memory on a supporting board gives error-checked operation that most consumer desktop parts skip. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also means the system has display output even without the discrete card, useful for troubleshooting or for a backup configuration.

GPU Analysis

The RX 7800 XT is a Navi 32 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, carrying 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² die at a density of 81.2 million transistors per mm². It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm long and 111 mm tall, so it fits standard mid-tower layouts.

The specification sheet is balanced rather than extreme. There are 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s. Raw FP32 compute lands at 37.32 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same 1:1 rate. Clocks start at a 1295 MHz base, hold a 2124 MHz game clock, and boost to 2430 MHz. The memory subsystem is the strong point: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory running at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective). That 16 GB capacity matters for modern texture-heavy titles and for content work, where VRAM exhaustion is a harder wall than shader throughput.

Ray tracing is handled by 60 RT cores; there are no dedicated tensor cores, so AI-assisted workloads run on general shader hardware. API support is current: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, with display output through one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connectors.

In benchmark terms, the card scores 4157 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 24176 in PassMark G3D, 18290 in Geekbench OpenCL, 54228 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 13473 in PassMark GPU Compute. The Vulkan figure being roughly three times the OpenCL figure is typical of AMD's shading architecture and indicates strong driver throughput for engines that lean on Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 11627 puts it 0.5 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, 0.9 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, 1.3 percent ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla K20c, and 1.8 percent behind the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT on that blended average — though the average mixes compute and graphics tests, so game-oriented numbers like the G3D and Steel Nomad scores are the better guides for rendering performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's numbers tell a consistent story: strong per-core output with competitive multi-core throughput for an eight-core part. In Cinebench R23 it scores 25753 multi-core and 3635 single-core; in R20, 10816 and 1526; in R15, 2595 and 366. PassMark puts the multithread score at 30298 with a single-thread score of 4354, physics at 3041, integer math at 112736, floating point math at 81089, data compression at 288777, encryption at 18571, extended instructions at 17249, prime finding at 189, and string sorting at 39138.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 37911 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals on average score are remarkably close: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 sits at 37904 (a 0 percent delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943 (the i9-14901E is 0.1 percent behind), the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 (0.2 percent behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 (0.3 percent behind). In other words, this processor benchmarks in dead heat with modern mainstream eight-core desktop silicon from both camps — an excellent result for a 65 W embedded-segment part.

The combined percentile of 69 quantifies the asymmetry: the pairing performs better than roughly seven in ten systems in the database, dragged toward the middle by the GPU's 51st percentile standing rather than held back by the CPU. For gaming, the practical reading is that the graphics card sets the ceiling; for compute and productivity, the processor carries the build.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits three user groups well. First, high-refresh 1440p gamers: the GPU's Steel Nomad and G3D results, combined with the CPU's 86th-percentile standing and 4354 PassMark single-thread score, point to strong frame delivery at 1440p where the card's 16 GB of VRAM and 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth are well matched to the render load. Second, content creators and developers: the eight cores and sixteen threads with a 3635 R23 single-core score handle timeline scrubbing, code compilation, and simulation-heavy development loops, and the 16 GB of VRAM is generous for GPU-accelerated viewport work in creative applications. Third, small-business and student workstation builders: ECC support, the locked multiplier, the 65 W CPU TDP, and the presence of integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback make this a stable, low-risk platform for office, engineering, and academic software. What it is not ideal for is a buyer chasing absolute GPU leadership — the 51st percentile GPU ranking makes clear this is a mid-tier rendering configuration, not a flagship one.

CPU Analysis

The i9-14901E is an eight-core, sixteen-thread Raptor Lake-R processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. It runs a 2.80 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.60 GHz — a high peak frequency that explains the single-core results. Cache is generous per core: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus a 36 MB shared L3. That per-core L2 allocation helps latency-sensitive workloads like the single-thread PassMark run, and the shared L3 supports sustained all-core throughput.

The benchmark picture splits cleanly. Single-core scores — 366 in R15, 1526 in R20, 3635 in R23, and 4354 in PassMark single-thread — are top-tier and directly benefit the 5.60 GHz boost. Multi-core scores of 2595, 10816, and 25753 across the Cinebench generations are strong for eight cores but sit below what higher-core-count chips achieve; that is the trade-off of the embedded-segment 65 W envelope. The specialized PassMark subtests reinforce this: 112736 in integer math and 81089 in floating point show healthy arithmetic throughput, while 288777 in data compression and 18571 in encryption indicate strong memory-subsystem-assisted throughput for everyday file and security workloads. The 3041 physics score is the gaming-relevant number, confirming the CPU can drive physics-heavy scenes without dropping frames.

For real workloads, that translates to snappy application responsiveness, quick compile and export passes on eight-thread-friendly software, and fast lightly-threaded performance — with the caveat that heavily parallelized render farms or heavy virtualization would prefer more cores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With a 51st-percentile GPU and an 86th-percentile CPU, the pairing is balanced for 1440p high-refresh play. The GPU's 4157 Steel Nomad score and 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 shading, backed by 624.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth, should hold high frame rates at that resolution; the CPU's single-thread strength keeps frame times tight. At 4K the card becomes the clear limiter.

Streaming: Streaming adds encoding load alongside gameplay. The i9-14901E's 30298 PassMark multithread score and sixteen threads provide overhead for concurrent encode and capture while the GPU renders, though the GPU's absence of dedicated tensor/AI encode acceleration hardware is worth noting; the CPU carries that burden.

Video editing: The 16 GB of VRAM handles high-resolution timeline previews and GPU effects comfortably, and the CPU's 25753 R23 multi-core score drives export rendering. Eight cores is competent rather than class-leading for exports, but the 3635 single-core score keeps the editing interface responsive.

3D rendering: Viewport work is GPU-bound and well served by the RX 7800 XT's texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s and 16 GB VRAM. Final CPU-based renders scale with the 25753 R23 multi-core score — solid mid-range throughput. Ray-traced previews leverage the 60 RT cores.

Software development: Compilation, container workloads, and IDE responsiveness align with the CPU's profile: 3041 in physics, 39138 in string sorting, and 112736 in integer math are directly relevant to code-processing tasks. ECC support adds correctness assurance for long-running builds and test suites.

Student and office work: This is overkill for documents and browsing, but the low 65 W CPU TDP, integrated graphics fallback, and ECC option make it dependable for engineering coursework, statistical software, and shared workstation duty. The UHD Graphics 770 keeps the machine usable even if the discrete card is removed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database — this should be stated plainly, and every frame-rate statement here is therefore an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than recorded results.

Working from those scores: the RX 7800 XT's 4157 in 3DMark Steel Nomad and 24176 in PassMark G3D place it as a capable 1440p-class performer, and the estimates follow from that position. At 1440p ultra settings, expect high-refresh results in well-optimized titles, with demanding AAA releases landing in a playable-to-high band rather than at extreme frame rates. At 1080p, the GPU should push very high frame rates in most games, though the closer the frame rate climbs toward the CPU's delivery ceiling, the more the processor's 3041 physics score becomes the governing number — and at the 86th percentile, that ceiling is high. At 4K ultra, estimates point to playable but not high-refresh performance, since the card's 51st percentile standing reflects a mid-tier position against the full GPU field. Ray-traced settings will pull estimates down further given the 60 RT cores, making selective RT or resolution scaling the practical approach. Treat all of these as score-derived estimates until measured rows are added to the database.

FAQ

Q: How does the i9-14901E compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: On blended benchmark averages they are effectively tied — the i9-14901E's 37911 average sits just 0.1 percent behind the Ryzen 7 9700X's 37943. The practical difference is platform: Socket 1700 with DDR4/DDR5 flexibility and ECC support versus AMD's platform.

Q: Is 16 GB of VRAM enough for this build's target use?

A: Yes for 1440p gaming and most creative work. The RX 7800 XT pairs its 16 GB of GDDR6 with 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth on a 256-bit bus, which is well matched to high-texture 1440p ultra play and GPU-accelerated editing workloads.

Q: What PSU does this build need?

A: AMD suggests a 600 W unit for the RX 7800 XT, and with the CPU at a 65 W TDP that recommendation comfortably covers the whole system. The card requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Can this CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so performance tuning is limited to memory and platform settings. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is the ceiling.

Q: Will the CPU bottleneck the GPU in games?

A: Not meaningfully. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU in the 51st, so the graphics card reaches its performance ceiling first in nearly all gaming scenarios. GPU upgrades remain viable on this processor.

Q: Does the system work without the graphics card installed?

A: Yes. The i9-14901E includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, providing display output for troubleshooting or a low-power fallback configuration.

Q: Are the frame-rate figures on this page measured?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance question answers itself from the percentiles: CPU at 86, GPU at 51, combined at 69. The processor is the stronger component, and in almost every workload the graphics card is the limiter.

In gaming, that means GPU-bound behavior at 1440p and 4K — frame rates scale with the RX 7800 XT's scores, and dropping resolution or settings raises estimates proportionally because the CPU has delivery headroom to spare (single-thread at 4354 in PassMark, physics at 3041, R23 single-core at 3635). Only at low resolutions with very high frame targets would the CPU begin to set the ceiling, and its 86th-percentile standing makes that ceiling high.

In rendering and compute, the picture inverts. GPU compute tasks are governed by the card's 13473 PassMark GPU Compute score and its 18290 Geekbench OpenCL result, while CPU renders scale with the 25753 R23 multi-core figure. Because the CPU is 0 to 0.3 percent away from parts like the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X on blended averages, the processing side of this build keeps pace with mainstream desktop configurations — the upgrade path runs through the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, not the socket. A builder prioritizing gaming gains should plan the next spend for the graphics card; a builder prioritizing compute already has the stronger half of this pair in the CPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds