SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-14901E and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE form a desktop pairing where the CPU’s benchmark percentile (86th among all CPUs) sits just above the GPU’s percentile (83rd among all GPUs). This near-parity in relative standing suggests a balanced system where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in typical workloads. However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the task.

For multi-threaded CPU workloads, the i9-14901E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753, placing it in the upper tier of desktop processors. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 indicates strong rasterization capability, but in CPU-bound scenarios such as physics simulation or data compression, the processor will be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 3041 and data compression score of 288777 highlight that the CPU handles these tasks with considerable headroom, meaning the GPU waits on the CPU only in lightly threaded, physics-heavy game engines.

Conversely, at higher resolutions where pixel throughput dominates, the RX 7650 GRE becomes the constraint. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU will saturate before the CPU in 4K gaming scenarios. The i9-14901E’s 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 5.60 GHz boost clock provide ample single-thread performance—evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635—to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps frame rates in pixel-heavy workloads.

FPS scaling data is absent for this exact combination, but benchmark scores indicate the CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 83rd percentile creates a system where the GPU is the primary limiter in graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU leads in compute-heavy professional workloads. The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 170 W TDP of the GPU further emphasizes that the graphics card demands more power headroom, making the PSU sizing (450 W suggested) a critical factor for sustained gaming loads.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37911, with a percentile ranking of 86th among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37904 with a deltaPct of 0, placing the two in a statistical dead heat. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943 with a -0.1 deltaPct, meaning the i9-14901E trails by a mere 0.1%. The Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 shows a 0.2 deltaPct (the i9 leads), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 shows a 0.3 deltaPct (the i9 leads by 0.3%). These margins are negligible, indicating the i9-14901E sits in a tightly contested performance band.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 demonstrates strong parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 3635 confirms excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30298 and single-thread score of 4354 reinforce this dual strength. Data-heavy workloads show the CPU excels: integer math scores 112736, floating-point math scores 81089, and data compression scores 288777. Encryption throughput is 18571, extended instructions score 17249, and random string sorting hits 39138. The prime number finding score of 189 is notably lower, suggesting a relative weakness in that specific algorithm.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 42723, ranking 83rd among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, scores 43223 with a -1.2 deltaPct, meaning the RX 7650 GRE trails by 1.2%. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262 (-1.2 deltaPct), the RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268 (-1.3 deltaPct), and the Quadro M6000 scores 43301 (-1.3 deltaPct). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2336, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 83109. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85th, indicating a high-tier desktop configuration overall.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed across a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM.

The shader configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. Ray tracing is supported via 32 dedicated RT cores; tensor cores are not specified, indicating a reliance on standard compute for AI workloads. The pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 22.08 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for this performance class.

In rendering contexts, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 places the GPU 1.2% behind the RTX 4070 SUPER (43223 vs 42723 average scores), a marginal gap that translates to near-identical rasterization performance in practice. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 indicates strong compute throughput for GPGPU tasks. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, may become a constraint in 4K textures or large scene rendering. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest but appropriate for the 128-bit bus width. The dual-slot cooler and single 8-pin power connector (170 W TDP) make it a practical fit for mid-range builds, with a suggested PSU of 450 W.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets desktop users who need balanced performance across gaming and productivity. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile indicate a system suitable for gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, where the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS and the CPU’s 3635 single-core Cinebench R23 score combine for high-refresh-rate experiences. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 83109 for accelerated effects and rendering.

Software developers will find the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 112736 and data compression score of 288777 valuable for compilation and data processing tasks. The 16 threads and 36 MB L3 cache handle parallel build systems efficiently. Students and small business workstations can rely on the 65 W CPU TDP for energy efficiency, paired with the GPU’s 170 W TDP for occasional graphics acceleration. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for data-sensitive workloads, a feature not commonly found in consumer processors.

The combined 85th percentile ranking places this build in the upper tier of desktop systems, but not at the extreme high end. Users seeking top-tier 4K gaming or heavy 3D rendering may find the 8 GB VRAM limiting; however, for mainstream gaming, office productivity, and moderate content creation, this pairing delivers a well-rounded experience without a dominant bottleneck.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate support frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, while the CPU’s 3635 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures minimal frame pacing issues. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so these are estimates from benchmark scores.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 25753 multi-core Cinebench R23 score handle encoding overhead, while the GPU’s 2048 shading units manage rendering simultaneously. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for game capture plus streaming software at 1080p.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 81089 accelerates timeline scrubbing and effects, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 83109 supports GPU-accelerated exports. The 36 MB L3 cache aids in large file manipulation.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering benefits from the 25753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while GPU-based rendering (via OpenCL) uses the 83109 score. The 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth helps texture streaming.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 112736 and data encryption score of 18571 speed up compilation and secure coding tasks. The 86th CPU percentile ensures responsive builds for moderate-sized projects.

Student and office work: The 65 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP keep power demands reasonable. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is idle, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support offers flexibility.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the LGA 1700 socket (Intel Socket 1700), which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth storage and future GPU upgrades. However, the multiplier is locked, limiting overclocking potential; the 5.60 GHz boost clock is fixed.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM (the current 8 GB is a potential bottleneck) or higher compute throughput, leveraging the CPU’s headroom—its 0% deltaPct versus the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 shows it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios.

The TDP disparity (65 W CPU, 170 W GPU) suggests the 450 W suggested PSU has adequate headroom for the current configuration. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would necessitate a PSU reevaluation, but the CPU’s modest power draw leaves room. Memory upgrades are straightforward with DDR4 or DDR5 support, though the exact bandwidth is not specified. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a unique feature for workstation-class reliability.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a Raptor Lake-R architecture processor (codename Raptor Lake) from the Core 14th Gen series, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, making it power-efficient for a high-core-count desktop CPU. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs reflects strong overall performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 demonstrates that the 8-core/16-thread configuration handles parallel workloads effectively, though it trails higher-core-count rivals. The single-core score of 3635 is exceptional, indicating excellent per-thread performance from the 5.60 GHz boost clock. PassMark results show versatility: multithread score of 30298, integer math at 112736, and floating-point math at 81089.

The architecture’s strength lies in balanced performance. Data compression at 288777 and random string sorting at 39138 highlight efficiency in data manipulation tasks. The extended instructions score of 17249 and encryption score of 18571 indicate robust support for modern instruction sets. The relatively low prime number score (189) is an outlier, suggesting a specific algorithmic weakness that does not impact general workloads. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, ECC memory, and includes UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output. The 2024 release date and active production status ensure ongoing availability.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14901E compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?

A: The two are statistically identical. The i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, resulting in a deltaPct of 0.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723, which is 1.2% lower than the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 43223 (deltaPct -1.2).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, alongside DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85th, indicating a high-tier desktop configuration.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for the Intel Core i9-14901E and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and an effective speed of 18 Gbps.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a TDP of 65 W.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured; treat the following as projections.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest high frame rates in esports titles, likely exceeding 144 FPS in competitive shooters. For AAA games, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 (1.2% behind the RTX 4070 SUPER) indicates 60-100 FPS depending on title optimization. The CPU’s 3635 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures no bottleneck at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM become more significant. Frame rates would drop by 20-30% from 1080p, with the GPU becoming the primary limiter. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking means it maintains frame pacing, but the GPU’s 83rd percentile caps maximum FPS. Expect 50-80 FPS in demanding titles, and 100+ FPS in lighter games.

At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are clear constraints. The GPU would struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most AAA titles, likely delivering 30-50 FPS. The CPU would remain underutilized, as the GPU saturates first. The 2048 shading units are insufficient for 4K ultra settings in modern games; lowering to high or medium presets would be necessary for playable frame rates.

The estimate nature of these figures stems from the lack of measured FPS data. Benchmark scores provide a reliable relative comparison—the GPU’s 1.2% deficit to the RTX 4070 SUPER suggests it performs near that card’s level—but exact frame rates vary by game engine and driver optimization.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i9-14901E with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The CPU, a Raptor Lake-R 8-core/16-thread processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP, ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, a RDNA 3.0 Navi 33 chip with 8 GB GDDR6, 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, and a 170 W TDP, ranks in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 85th, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations.

The pairing is characterized by near-parity in relative performance—the CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 83rd percentile—meaning neither component is a clear bottleneck for the other in most workloads. The CPU’s strength in single-threaded tasks (Cinebench R23 single-core 3635) and multi-threaded tasks (Cinebench R23 multi-core 25753) complements the GPU’s rasterization capability (3DMark Steel Nomad 2336) and compute throughput (Geekbench OpenCL 83109). The 65 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP, with a 450 W suggested PSU, indicate a power-efficient build suitable for mainstream gaming and productivity. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest a capable 1080p and 1440p system with limitations at 4K due to the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds